Scribd
Upload
24 views6 pages

An Advance Nature Based Algorithm With Hybridization ALO With SA

The document presents a hybrid algorithm combining the Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) and Simulated Annealing (SA) to enhance optimization results. The proposed method was tested against 23 benchmark functions, yielding improved outcomes in 12 cases compared to the original ALO. The study highlights the effectiveness of hybridization techniques in optimizing algorithm performance.

Uploaded by

IJMSRT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views6 pages

An Advance Nature Based Algorithm With Hybridization ALO With SA

The document presents a hybrid algorithm combining the Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) and Simulated Annealing (SA) to enhance optimization results. The proposed method was tested against 23 benchmark functions, yielding improved outcomes in 12 cases compared to the original ALO. The study highlights the effectiveness of hybridization techniques in optimizing algorithm performance.

Uploaded by

IJMSRT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology

ISSN No- 2584-2706

An Advance Nature Based Algorithm with


Hybridization : ALO with SA
Vidhi Mehta; Ritika Parate
Prerna Motey; Vrukshani Gathibandhe
Department of Master in Computer Applications, GHRCEM, India

Abstract:
The proposed algorithm is an advance nature The main inspiration of the Ant Lion
based algorithm with hybridization of Ant Optimizer (ALO) originates from different
Lion Optimizer algorithm (ALO) with behaviors.
Simulated Annealing (SA). The algorithm will The Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) mimics the
be tested by using hybridization technique hunting mechanism of ant lions in nature. Five
with Ant Lion Optimizer algorithm main steps of hunting prey such as the random
(ALO)andSimulated Annealing (SA), targets walk of ants, building traps, entrapment of ants
to enhance best solution. Here, the 23 standard in traps, catching preys, and re-building traps
functions will be applied and tested to are implemented. The purpose of choosing this
compare the hybridized algorithm. After (ALO) algorithm was its results were very
testing, better results will be found by using impressive. To overcome the problems in the
functions. original ALO algorithm, the hybridization of
Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) with the Simulated
Keywords: Annealing (SA) focused to enhance best
Algorithm, Functions, Optimization, values. The nature inspired algorithms were of
Hybridization, ALO-SA. four main categories which includes Physics-
based, Human-behavior based, Evolution-
1. Introduction based and Swarm based. These algorithms used
The Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) mimics the Physics-based techniques, Human-related
hunting mechanism of ant lions in nature. Five techniques, Evolutionary techniques and
main steps of hunting prey such as the random Swarm intelligence techniques respectively.
walk of ants, building traps, entrapment of ants
in traps, catching preys, and re-building traps 2.1 Classification of Algorithms
are implemented.[6]
The proposed algorithm targeted to improve
these results. The algorithm was tested by
using hybridization of Ant Lion
Optimizer (ALO) with the Simulated
Annealing (SA), focused to enhance best
values. Here, among many techniques of
improving the ALO algorithm’s outcomes, the
hybridization technique was used for obtaining
better solutions. Here, the 23 benchmark
functions were applied and compared the
results with existing Algorithm. After testing,
better results were found using functions. The
hybridization technique proved the most
promising.
Fig 1. Classification of Nature-inspired
2. Proposed Optimization Algorithm algorithms [6]

IJMSRT25MAY056 www.ijmsrt.com 126


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458293
Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN No- 2584-2706

Sr. Algorithm Author


Year
No. Name Name
Ant Colony Marco
1. 1992
Optimization Dorigo
Firefly Xin-She
2. 2008
Algorithm Yang
Ingo
Evolution
3. Rechenberg 1960
Strategy
et al
Genetic
4. John R. Koza 1992
Programming
Human Learning Xianbing
5. 2014
Optimization Meng et al
Brain Storm
6. Yuhui Shi 2011
Optimization
Water Cycle Eskandar et
7. 2012
Algorithm al
Gravitational
Esmat
8. Search 2009
Rashedi et al
Algorithm

2.2 Algorithms & Authors


Table 1: Algorithms and Authors [6]
2.3 Steps
1. Original algorithm (ALO) used with 23
benchmark functions.
2. Iterations were carried out for each
function.
3. Obtained optimal values for ALO using
23 benchmark functions.
4. Hybridized (ALO) algorithm with (SA) Table 2: Standard UM Benchmark functions [6]
algorithm for obtaining best optimal
solution using 23 benchmark functions. 4. Result & Discussion
5. Results were found best in 12 benchmark  Function 1:
functions.

3. Functions & Equations

The best optimal value of the objective


function F-1 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as7.6832e-09.
 Function 2:

IJMSRT25MAY056 www.ijmsrt.com 127


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458293
Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN No- 2584-2706
The best optimal value ofthe objective
function F-2after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as4.1762e-05.

 Function 3:
The best optimal value of the objective
function F-7 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as0.012528.
 Function 8:
The best optimal value ofthe objective
function F-3 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as0.035858.

 Function 4:
The best optimal value of the objective
function F-8 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as-3617.3413.
 Function 9:

The best optimal value ofthe objective


function F-4 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as0.00013128.

 Function 5: The best optimal value of the objective


function F-9 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as27.8588.
 Function 10:

The best optimal value of the objective The best optimal value of the objective
function F-5 after hybridization of ALO with function F-10 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as5.0457. SA was found as1.1551.
 Function 6:  Function 11:

The best optimal value of the objective The best optimal value of the objective
function F-6 after hybridization of ALO with function F-11 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as3.2805e-09. SA was found as0.11311.
 Function 7:  Function 12:

IJMSRT25MAY056 www.ijmsrt.com 128


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458293
Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN No- 2584-2706

The best optimal value of the objective The best optimal value of the objective
function F-12 after hybridization of ALO with function F-17 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as0.2056. SA was found as0.39789.
 Function 13:  Function 18:

The best optimal value of the objective The best optimal value of the objective
function F-13 after hybridization of ALO with function F-18 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as2.2729e-08. SA was found as3.
 Function 14:  Function 19:

The best optimal value of the objective The best optimal value of the objective
function F-14 after hybridization of ALO with function F-19 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as0.998. SA was found as-3.8628.
 Function 15:  Function 20:

The best optimal value of the objective


The best optimal value of the objective function F-20 after hybridization of ALO with
function F-15 after hybridization of ALO with SA was found as-3.322.
SA was found as0.00075301.  Function 21:
 Function 16:

The best optimal value of the objective


The best optimal value of the objective function F-21 after hybridization of ALO with
function F-16 after hybridization of ALO with SA was found as-10.1532.
SA was found as-1.0316.  Function 22:
 Function 17:

IJMSRT25MAY056 www.ijmsrt.com 129


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458293
Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN No- 2584-2706
exploration of ALO with exploitation and
genetic features of SA.The hybridized
algorithm of ALO with SA was tested with 23
benchmark functions and in 12 functions best
values were found and considered as great
The best optimal value of the objective results.
function F-22 after hybridization of ALO with
SA was found as-5.1288. 6. Reference
 Function 23: [1] W. Y. Lin, “A novel 3D fruit fly
optimization algorithm and its applications
in economics,” Neural Comput. Appl.,
2016, doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-1942-8.
The best optimal value of the objective [2] M. Mafarja et al., “Evolutionary
function F-23 after hybridization of ALO with Population Dynamics and Grasshopper
SA was found as-10.5364. Optimization approaches for feature
selection problems,” Knowledge-Based
Table 3: Results & Discussion Syst., vol. 145, pp. 25–45, 2018, doi:
Benchmark (ALO) (ALO-SA) 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.037.
Functions Algorithm Algorithm
Values Values [3] E.-S. M. El-Kenawy, M. M. Eid, M.
F1 3.17E-09 7.6832e-09 Saber, and A. Ibrahim, “MbGWO-SFS:
F2 7.73E-05 4.1762e-05 Modified Binary Grey Wolf Optimizer
F3 1.91E-05 0.035858 Based on Stochastic Fractal Search for
F4 8.60E-05 0.00013128 Feature Selection,” IEEE Access, 2020,
doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3001151.
F5 8.75E+02 5.0457
F6 1.46E-08 3.2805e-09
[4] Y. Cheng, S. Zhao, B. Cheng, S. Hou, Y.
F7 1.60E-02 0.012528
Shi, and J. Chen, “Modeling and
F8 -2.04E+03 -3617.3413 optimization for collaborative business
F9 2.09E+01 27.8588 process towards IoT applications,” Mob.
F10 1.16E+00 1.1551 Inf. Syst., 2018, doi:
F11 5.95E-01 0.11311 10.1155/2018/9174568.
F12 8.58E-09 0.2056
F13 9.62E-09 2.2729e-08 [5] I. E. Grossmann, Global Optimization in
F14 9.98E-01 0.998 Engineering Design (Nonconvex
F15 7.24E-04 0.00075301 Optimization and Its Applications), vol. 9.
F16 -1.03E+00 -1.0316 1996.
F17 3.98E-01 0.39789
F18 3.00E+00 3 [6] R. V. Rao and G. G. Waghmare, “A new
F19 -3.86E+00 -3.8628 optimization algorithm for solving
F20 -3.20E+00 -3.322 complex constrained design optimization
F21 -5.06E+00 -10.1532 problems,” vol. 0273, no. April, 2016, doi:
F22 -3.72E+00 -5.0877 10.1080/0305215X.2016.1164855.
F23 -2.42E+00 -10.5364
[7] X. Wang, T. M. Choi, H. Liu, and X. Yue,
5. Conclusion “A novel hybrid ant colony optimization
The hybridization of the Ant Lion Optimizer algorithm for emergency transportation
(ALO) with the Simulated Annealing (SA) problems during post-disaster scenarios,”
successfully combined the strong capability of

IJMSRT25MAY056 www.ijmsrt.com 130


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458293
Volume-3, Issue-5, May 2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN No- 2584-2706
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Syst., AIMS Energy, 2017, doi:
2018, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2606440. 10.3934/energy.2017.5.798.

[8] M. Nouiri, A. Bekrar, A. Jemai, S. Niar, [12] R. Al-Hajj, A. Assi, and F. Batch, “An
and A. C. Ammari, “An effective and evolutionary computing approach for
distributed particle swarm optimization estimating global solar radiation,” in 2016
algorithm for flexible job-shop scheduling IEEE International Conference on
problem,” J. Intell. Manuf., 2018, doi: Renewable Energy Research and
10.1007/s10845-015-1039-3. Applications, ICRERA 2016, 2017. doi:
10.1109/ICRERA.2016.7884553.
[9] Y. Li, J. Wang, D. Zhao, G. Li, and C.
Chen, “A two-stage approach for [13] R.A. Meyers, “Classical and Nonclassical
combined heat and power economic Optimization Methods Classical and
emission dispatch: Combining multi- Nonclassical Optimization Methods 1
objective optimization with integrated Introduction 1 1.1 Local and Global
decision making,” Energy, 2018, doi: Optimality 2 1.2 Problem Types 2 1.3
10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.200. Example Problem: Fitting Laser-induced
Fluorescence Spectra 3 1.4 Criteria for
[10] D. Yousri, T. S. Babu, and A. Fathy, Optimization 4 1.5 Multicriteria
“Recent methodology based Harris hawks Optimization 4,” Encycl. Anal. Chem., pp.
optimizer for designing load frequency 9678–9689, 2000, [Online].
control incorporated in multi-
interconnected renewable energy plants,” [14] N. Steffan and G. T. Heydt, “Quadratic
Sustain. Energy, Grids Networks, 2020, programming and related techniques for
doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2020.100352. the calculation of locational marginal
prices in distribution systems,” in 2012
[11] R. Al-Hajj and A. Assi, “Estimating solar North American Power Symposium
irradiance using genetic programming (NAPS), 2012, pp. 1–6. doi:
technique and meteorological records,” 10.1109/NAPS.2012.6336310.

IJMSRT25MAY056 www.ijmsrt.com 131


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458293

You might also like