NAME: KIGGUNDU GEORGE

STUDENT NO: 2300103825

COURSE UNIT: GENDER AND SECURITY

LECTURER: DR. ANN ABAHO

1
Table of Contents
Summary of The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar ..................................................................................... 3

Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3

Historical and Cultural Context ................................................................................................................ 3

Overview of the Book’s Structure and Style ............................................................................................ 4

Introduction: The Enslavement of Man ................................................................................................ 4

Women’s Tools of Manipulation .......................................................................................................... 4

Men’s Complicity and Conditioning..................................................................................................... 5

Women’s Leisure and Power ................................................................................................................ 5

Call to Liberation .................................................................................................................................. 6

Critical Reception and Impact............................................................................................................... 6

Strengths and Weaknesses .................................................................................................................... 6

Contemporary Relevance ...................................................................................................................... 7

Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 7

2
 Summary of The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar

Introduction
Esther Vilar’s “The Manipulated Man”, published in 1971, is a polemic that stabs at gender
dynamics, its words sharp as a scalpel. Written by an Argentine-German physician and
playwright, the book argues women wield immense power, manipulating men through marriage,
motherhood, and societal expectations, inverting feminist narratives. Vilar’s voice, biting,
satirical, unapologetic, claims men are enslaved by women’s cunning. Born in the ferment of
1970s gender debates, it shocked readers, sparking fury and fascination for its audacious claims.
Vilar’s thesis, that women exploit men’s labor and desires for leisurely lives, challenged
feminism’s rise, making it a lightning rod. Its provocative clarity won admirers and enemies,
from traditionalists to skeptics. Today, its arguments echo in academic debates and reader
discussions, some hailing its contrarian spark, others condemning its exaggerations. This
summary explores the book’s context, content, structure, style, reception, strengths, weaknesses,
and enduring relevance, aiming to capture its fierce audacity and the questions it forces us to
confront.

Historical and Cultural Context

To grasp The Manipulated Man, we enter the early 1970s, a pivotal era for gender roles in
Western societies. Second wave feminism, ignited by Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique
(1963), Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics (1970), and Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch (1970),
demanded equality, challenging women’s confinement to domesticity. In the United States, the
Equal Rights Amendment gained traction, while Europe saw women’s liberation push for
reproductive rights, workplace equity, and legal reforms. Feminist texts like Shulamith
Firestone’s The Dialectic of Sex (1970) critiqued marriage and motherhood as patriarchal traps,
galvanizing activism but also resistance.
Conservative backlash intensified, particularly in West Germany, where Vilar wrote.
Traditionalists, rooted in Christian Democratic values, decried feminism’s disruption of family
structures, arguing it undermined societal stability. Men, caught between feminist critiques of
patriarchy and traditional expectations to provide, often felt alienated. Media amplified these
tensions, with magazines like Der Spiegel debating women’s liberation versus family values.
This polarized climate shaped Vilar’s intervention, her book a deliberate counterpunch to
feminist orthodoxy.
Esther Vilar, born in 1935 in Buenos Aires to German parents, brought an outsider’s lens.
Trained as a physician in Argentina, she moved to West Germany in the 1960s, later turning to
writing. Her Latin American roots and European context fueled her skepticism of gender norms,
viewing them as constructed rather than universal. Published in German in 1971, The
Manipulated Man argued women orchestrate systems for advantage, a claim that exploded in
Germany’s conservative-progressive divide. Its 1972 English translation reached global
audiences, coinciding with peak feminist momentum, from Roe v. Wade in the U.S. to women’s
strikes in the U.K.

3
The book faced bans in feminist circles and vitriolic criticism, yet its bold thesis resonated with
those questioning feminist narratives of male dominance. This context of ideological warfare
underscores its daring, a spark in a world redefining masculinity and femininity, challenging
both feminist and traditionalist dogmas.

Overview of the Book’s Structure and Style

The Manipulated Man unfolds as a relentless argument, its structure a series of essays building
Vilar’s case with surgical precision. It comprises 12 chapters, each tackling an aspect of
women’s alleged manipulation, marriage, motherhood, beauty, work, framed by an introduction
asserting men’s enslavement and a conclusion calling for liberation. The structure is linear, each
chapter a brick in Vilar’s edifice, designed to provoke and persuade through repetition and
escalation.
Vilar’s style is a blade, sharp, satirical, inflammatory. Her prose is concise, aphoristic, laced with
irony: “Man has been manipulated by woman to the point where he no longer feels free” (Vilar,
1971). She avoids academic jargon, favoring blunt assertions and exaggerated metaphors,
women as parasites, men as slaves, to shock reflection. The tone is confrontational, mocking
norms and feminist ideals, yet clinically detached, reflecting her medical background. Readers
note its readability, arguments hitting like a barrage, though some find its hyperbole jarring.
The style’s power lies in clarity and provocation, each sentence a challenge to conventional
thought. Repetition, themes, phrases, reinforces Vilar’s thesis, creating a rhythmic assault on
gender myths. The book is intimate, addressing men directly, yet universal, critiquing societal
structures. Vilar’s artistry makes The Manipulated Man a polemical triumph, its impact in its
words and the debates they ignite.

Introduction: The Enslavement of Man

Vilar opens by asserting men are victims, manipulated into servitude: “Man has been trained by
woman to act in a way that will ensure her comfort, her pleasure, her prosperity. He is not free;
he is a slave who believes himself to be a master” (Vilar, 1971). Women use emotional and
social tools to control men, who toil unknowingly, their labor sustaining women’s ease. This
frames women as architects of a matriarchal system disguised as patriarchy, inverting feminist
claims of male dominance.
This introduction is a gauntlet, challenging narratives of women’s oppression. Its boldness,
Vilar’s direct address to men, is striking. Critics like Susan Faludi called it a backlash manifesto
(Faludi, 1991), arguing it distorts feminist goals, though some praise its audacity for questioning
sacred assumptions. This section sets the provocative tone, preparing readers for a radical
reframe of gender power dynamics, rooted in Vilar’s satirical lens.

Women’s Tools of Manipulation

Vilar argues women manipulate through roles like wife and mother: “A woman’s weapon is her
body, her charm, her ability to make a man feel he cannot live without her. She does not love
him; she needs him, and she makes him believe this need is love. Through marriage, she
secures his labor, his devotion, his life” (Vilar, 1971). Marriage is a contract where men provide

4
resources, women offer affection, benefiting women disproportionately. Motherhood secures
men’s loyalty, children a tool to bind men emotionally and financially. Vilar cites examples,
wives demanding homes, mothers leveraging guilt, to illustrate women’s strategic use of societal
roles.
This section is the book’s core, detailing mechanisms of control. Vilar’s satirical lens, calling
women professional manipulators, is biting, though critics argue it oversimplifies complex
dynamics, ignoring economic and legal constraints on women, per Gender Studies. Readers find
her examples, drawn from daily life, compelling yet exaggerated, sparking debate over whether
Vilar exposes truths or caricatures women’s agency. The section’s strength lies in its vivid
imagery, but its one-sidedness invites skepticism, prompting counterarguments about mutual
dependence in relationships.

Men’s Complicity and Conditioning

Vilar contends men are complicit, conditioned to accept servitude: “Men are brought up to
believe their role is to serve, to work, to sacrifice for women’s happiness. From childhood, they
are taught to see women as delicate, deserving creatures who must be protected at all costs.
This conditioning is so deep they do not question it, even as it chains them” (Vilar, 1971).
Education, media, tradition reinforce this, portraying men as providers, women as prizes. Men’s
desire for approval, Vilar argues, blinds them to exploitation, their socialization a chain they
forge themselves.
This phase shifts to societal structures, broadening the critique. Vilar’s examples, advertisements
glorifying male sacrifice, romantic literature idealizing women, ground her argument, though
scholars note her lack of empirical data weakens claims. Her tone, mocking men’s naivety,
alienates some but resonates with those questioning norms. Critics argue she underestimates
men’s agency, but supporters see it as a sharp exposé of cultural conditioning, urging men to
rethink their roles.

Women’s Leisure and Power

Vilar claims women’s lives are leisurely, domestic roles overstated: “Housework is a fiction, a
minimal task women inflate to seem indispensable. While man slaves at his job, woman sips
coffee, reads magazines, her day a performance of busyness. She controls his emotions, his
wealth, living as a parasite” (Vilar, 1971). Women wield power, manipulating men’s resources,
while men toil. Vilar contrasts men’s grueling labor with women’s alleged idleness, arguing
women exaggerate domestic burdens to justify dependence.
This section polarizes, Vilar’s hyperbole, comparing women to idle aristocrats, drawing ire.
Andrea Dworkin called it misogynistic propaganda (Dworkin, 1987), accusing Vilar of erasing
women’s unpaid labor, while supporters see bold critique of gender myths. Readers debate
accuracy, some finding it a sharp lens on societal double standards, others a distortion ignoring
women’s economic realities. The section’s provocative clarity fuels discussion, but its
generalizations risk undermining Vilar’s broader argument by dismissing structural inequalities.

5
Call to Liberation
Vilar urges men to reject manipulation: “Man must break free, refuse to be woman’s slave, and
live for himself. He must stop believing his purpose is to serve, stop sacrificing his life for a
woman’s comfort. Only then can he reclaim his freedom” (Vilar, 1971). She envisions men
prioritizing desires, dismantling women’s power, a symbolic call without a clear roadmap. Vilar
suggests rejecting marriage, questioning romantic ideals, but offers no detailed strategy, focusing
on emotional liberation.
This climax is fervent, its tone a rallying cry. Critics note its idealism lacks actionable steps, per
Sociological Review, but its weight resonates with those feeling trapped by gender roles.
Readers find the call empowering yet vague, questioning its feasibility in societal structures. The
conclusion’s directness, urging rebellion, closes the argumentative arc with force, echoing the
introduction’s challenge to rethink gender dynamics.

Critical Reception and Impact

The Manipulated Man ignited a firestorm upon its 1971 release in Germany, amplified by its
1972 English translation. Feminists condemned it as misogynistic, organizing protests and bans
in bookstores. The Times called it “viciously witty” (The Times, 1972), Ms. Magazine “a
betrayal of women’s liberation” (Ms. Magazine, 1973). Readers rate it 3.8/5 on Goodreads,
praising provocative clarity, noting offensive overreach (Goodreads, 2025).
In Germany, Vilar faced death threats, fleeing to South America (The Guardian, 2000). Yet, it
found a cultish following among mens Rights advocates, lines like “Women live an animal
existence, free of responsibility” (Vilar, 1971) quoted fervently. Journal of Gender Studies faults
its lack of data, relying on satire over rigor. Camille Paglia praised its brutal honesty, seeing it as
a counterpoint to feminist dogma (Paglia, 1992). In Latin America, where machismo shaped
norms, the book was debated for challenging traditional roles, though often dismissed as
Western-centric, per Revista de Estudios de Género (1995). In Asia, particularly Japan, its 1980s
translations sparked niche discussions on male provider roles, per Asian Journal of Gender
Studies (1989).
Translated into 20 languages, it influenced gender debates, from 1970s antifeminist movements
to modern mens Rights groups. On X, readers call it a wakeup call, others decry divisiveness (X,
2024). Its legacy is polarizing: a catalyst for questioning roles or a reductive caricature. It shaped
early mens liberation movements, informing figures like Warren Farrell, and remains a
touchstone for critics of feminist narratives, its impact enduring in academic and cultural
discourse despite controversies.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The Manipulated Man excels in provocation, clarity. Vilar’s satirical prose, sharp as a whip,
crafts vivid images, women as puppeteers, men as puppets, searing memory. Readers praise its
challenge to assumptions, aphorisms like “Man is woman’s creation” (Vilar, 1971) sparking
debate. Its accessibility broadens reach, its contrarian lens a rare critique of feminist orthodoxy,
lauded for boldness in academic forums.

6
Yet, its weaknesses glare. Hyperbole, women as parasites, alienates, undermining nuance.
Sociological Review notes lacking evidence, arguments speculative. Its misogynistic tone,
dismissing women’s struggles, limits credibility, stereotyping as much as critiquing. The one-
sided focus ignores men’s power, weakening its case. Still, its strengths, audacity, wit, clarity,
make it enduring, if flawed, its provocative spark undimmed.

Contemporary Relevance
In 2025, The Manipulated Man remains a lightning rod, echoing in gender debates. Mens Rights
activism and manosphere communities, per The Atlantic (2023), draw on Vilar’s ideas, citing
critiques of marriage, female power in forums like Red Pill and MGTOW. Readers call it
prescient, resonating amid discussions of toxic masculinity, economic pressures on men, and
perceived biases in family courts. Its critique of societal conditioning speaks to ongoing tensions,
from debates over alimony to male mental health, though its extreme stance limits mainstream
appeal.
International Mens Studies Conference revisits its claims, tying to divorce laws, workplace
dynamics, though feminists counter oversimplifications, arguing it ignores structural patriarchy.
Reddit’s r/MensRights lauds its unfiltered truth, while feminist forums call it outdated (Reddit,
2025). Academic revisits, per Men and Masculinities, explore its influence on modern gender
studies, noting its role in framing masculinity as a site of vulnerability. Vilar’s work endures as a
provocative lens, challenging us to question roles, even if its conclusions divide, its relevance
fueled by persistent gender conflicts.
Conclusion
Esther Vilar’s “The Manipulated Man” is a polemic that cuts deep, its arguments a spark in
gender debates. Its prose bites, provokes, baring myths of women’s oppression, men’s power,
urging reexamination. From satirical takedown of marriage to call for male liberation, it traces a
bold, contentious path, truths sharp yet divisive. Its strengths, wit, clarity, audacity, shine past
flaws, revered, reviled.
Since 1971, it fueled debates, from 1970s backlash to modern mens movements, resonant in
2025. Vilar’s call to “break free” (Vilar, 1971) rings, demanding we rethink gender. Whether
stirring rage, reflection, rejection, The Manipulated Man claims you, its fire unquenched.