Scribd
Upload
80 views5 pages

Spam Detection Viva Questions Full

The document outlines a spam email detection project that uses machine learning to identify spam emails, enhancing email security and user privacy. It details the project's workflow from data collection and preprocessing to model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of techniques like TfidfVectorizer and the selection of models based on accuracy and precision. Future improvements could involve deep learning models and advanced feature engineering for better performance.

Uploaded by

mvijayauto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
80 views5 pages

Spam Detection Viva Questions Full

The document outlines a spam email detection project that uses machine learning to identify spam emails, enhancing email security and user privacy. It details the project's workflow from data collection and preprocessing to model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of techniques like TfidfVectorizer and the selection of models based on accuracy and precision. Future improvements could involve deep learning models and advanced feature engineering for better performance.

Uploaded by

mvijayauto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Viva Questions and Answers for Spam Email Detection Project

# Viva Questions and Answers for Spam Email Detection Project

### General Understanding

**1. What is the main objective of your project, and why is spam email detection important?**

- **Answer:** The main objective is to detect spam emails efficiently using machine learning models

to enhance email security, protect user privacy, and reduce exposure to phishing and malware

threats. Spam detection improves productivity by reducing unwanted interruptions.

**2. Can you explain the workflow of your project from data collection to model evaluation?**

- **Answer:** The workflow involves:

1. **Data Collection:** Used a Kaggle dataset containing labeled emails (spam/ham).

2. **Data Cleaning:** Removed irrelevant columns and duplicates, renamed columns, and checked

for missing values.

3. **EDA:** Explored the dataset and identified imbalances between spam and ham emails.

4. **Text Preprocessing:** Applied label encoding, text cleaning, stemming, and vectorization.

5. **Model Building:** Trained various machine learning models.

6. **Evaluation:** Compared models using metrics like accuracy and precision.

**3. Why did you choose the specific dataset, and what are its key characteristics?**

- **Answer:** The Kaggle dataset is well-labeled and widely used for spam detection, containing

examples of both spam and ham emails. Its diversity helps train robust models.

**4. How do you define spam and ham emails in the context of this project?**
- **Answer:** Spam emails are unwanted, potentially harmful messages, while ham emails are

legitimate and useful messages.

---

### Data Preprocessing

**5. What was the purpose of cleaning the dataset, and what techniques did you use?**

- **Answer:** Cleaning ensures data quality and consistency. Techniques included removing

irrelevant columns, dropping duplicates, and renaming columns for clarity.

**6. Why did you perform label encoding, and what does it achieve?**

- **Answer:** Label encoding converts categorical labels (ham/spam) into numerical format (0/1),

making them suitable for machine learning models.

**7. What preprocessing steps did you apply to the email text data, and why are they necessary?**

- **Answer:** Steps include lowercasing, tokenization, removing special characters and stopwords,

and stemming. These steps normalize the data and reduce noise for better feature extraction.

**8. What is stemming, and how does it help in text preprocessing?**

- **Answer:** Stemming reduces words to their root form (e.g., "running" to "run"), minimizing

vocabulary size and focusing on core meanings.

**9. How did you handle imbalanced data in the project, and why is it important?**

- **Answer:** Imbalance was observed but not directly addressed. Handling imbalance (e.g., via

SMOTE or oversampling) ensures models do not favor the majority class.


---

### Feature Extraction

**10. Why did you choose TfidfVectorizer over CountVectorizer for feature extraction?**

- **Answer:** TfidfVectorizer assigns importance to terms based on their frequency across

documents, reducing the impact of common but less informative words compared to

CountVectorizer.

**11. What does the `max_features` parameter in TfidfVectorizer do, and how does it improve

performance?**

- **Answer:** The `max_features` parameter limits the number of features, focusing on the most

relevant terms and reducing computational complexity.

---

### Model Selection and Evaluation

**12. Why did you test multiple machine learning models, and how did you select the best one?**

- **Answer:** Testing multiple models helps identify the one best suited for the data. The best model

was selected based on accuracy and precision metrics.

**13. What are the advantages of using Multinomial Naive Bayes for this task?**

- **Answer:** Multinomial Naive Bayes is efficient, works well with textual data, and performs

effectively when features (e.g., word frequencies) follow a multinomial distribution.

**14. Why did you use accuracy and precision as evaluation metrics? Are there any other metrics
you considered?**

- **Answer:** Accuracy measures overall correctness, while precision evaluates the proportion of

correctly identified spam. Recall and F1-score could also be used for a balanced assessment.

**15. What were the challenges in training the models, and how did you address them?**

- **Answer:** Challenges included data imbalance and choosing optimal hyperparameters.

Optimization techniques like limiting features in TfidfVectorizer helped improve performance.

---

### Performance Optimization

**16. How did you optimize the model's performance, and what results did you achieve?**

- **Answer:** Used TfidfVectorizer with `max_features=3000` to reduce dimensionality and enhance

focus on significant terms. This combination with MultinomialNB yielded the best accuracy and

precision.

**17. What are the potential limitations of your current approach, and how could they be

addressed?**

- **Answer:** Limitations include the inability to handle real-time adaptation and reliance on static

data. Incorporating user feedback and advanced models like RNNs could address these.

---

### Future Scope

**18. How can deep learning models like RNNs or LSTMs improve spam detection performance?**
- **Answer:** RNNs and LSTMs capture sequential patterns in text, making them better suited for

understanding context and handling large, complex datasets.

**19. What additional features or techniques could you incorporate to make the detection system

more robust?**

- **Answer:** Advanced feature engineering like semantic analysis, word embeddings, or ensemble

techniques could improve robustness and adaptability.

---

### Domain Knowledge

**20. Can you explain the difference between precision and recall, and why precision is more critical

in spam detection?**

- **Answer:** Precision measures the proportion of correctly identified spam among all predicted

spam, while recall measures the proportion of correctly identified spam among all actual spam.

Precision is more critical in spam detection to minimize false positives and avoid filtering legitimate

emails.

**21. What are the potential real-world applications of your spam detection system?**

- **Answer:** Applications include email security solutions, anti-phishing systems, and tools to

enhance organizational productivity by reducing spam clutter.

You might also like