CS636
CS636
Answer:
The modeling scenario violates two key constraints: consistency and type correctness.
Ensuring model consistency and type accuracy through regular peer reviews, tool-based
validation, and adherence to formal modeling guidelines can prevent such issues and improve
the reliability of concurrent systems.
Answer:
Group B’s structured methodology is more suitable for developing a health management
system, considering the system’s complexity, sensitivity of patient data, and future scalability.
By using DFDs and ERDs, Group B ensures clarity in data flow, accurate entity relationships, and
minimizes errors during implementation. This approach enhances data integrity, consistency,
and makes the system easier to maintain and scale over time.
Group A’s ad hoc method may seem faster in the short term but can lead to data redundancy,
design flaws, and difficulty in scaling or modifying the system later. However, in small-scale or
temporary projects with low complexity and strict time constraints, an ad hoc approach might
be preferable to deliver a quick, basic solution—only if future growth is not expected.
In conclusion, for a critical and long-term system like HealthSync, structured design (Group B)
is essential to ensure quality, accuracy, and long-term success.
In the given scenario, two main constraints are violated: consistency and type correctness. The
contradiction in soda inventory updates across diagrams reflects a consistency issue, which can
cause confusion and faulty system behavior. This should be avoided by ensuring all diagrams
align logically and are cross-checked. The use of an integer as a Boolean guard represents a
type constraint violation, leading to logical errors. This can be prevented by enforcing strict
type usage and validating expressions during modeling. Proper reviews and modeling standards
help maintain accuracy in concurrent systems.