Ecn 410 Topic 2
Ecn 410 Topic 2
According to Jhingan (2011), economic development is measured in four ways, these are:
1. Gross National Product (GNP) – This is the total monetary value of goods and services
produced in a country including net incomes from abroad in a year. One of the methods to
measure economics development is in terms of an increase in the economy’s real national
income over a long period of time. The phrase “over a long period of time” implies a
sustained increase in real income. A short period rise in national income which occurs during
the upswing of the business cycles does not constitute economic development. However, this
is not a satisfactory definition due to the following reasons.
i. Nominal national income instead of the real national income which refers to the
country’s total output of final goods and services in real terms rather than in money
terms. Thus, price changes will have to be ruled out while calculating real national
income. But this is unrealistic because variations in prices are inevitable.
ii. This measure fails to take into consideration changes in the growth of population. If
a rise in real national income is accompanied by a faster growth in population, there
will be no economic growth but retardation.
iii. The GNP figure also does not reveal the costs to society of environment pollution
due to urbanization and industrialization.
iv. This measure tells us nothing about the distribution of income in the economy.
v. Moreover, there are certain conceptual difficulties in the measurement of GNP
which are discussed as under.
2. GNP per Capita – The second measure relates to an increase in the per capital real income
of the economy over the long period. In the opinion of Meier, economic development is seen
as the process whereby the real per capita income of a country increase over a long period of
time, subject to the stipulations that the number of people below an absolute poverty line does
not increase and that distribution of income does not become more unequal. This indicator of
economic growth purports to emphasize that for economic development the rate of increase
in real per capita income should be higher than the growth rate of population. However, this
measure is also fraught with some difficulties.
i. An increase in per capita income may not raise the real standard of living of the
masses. It is possible that while per capita real income is increasing, per capita
consumption might be failing. People might be increasing the rate of saving or the
government might itself be using up the increased income for military or other
purposes.
ii. There is another possibility of the masses remaining poor despite an increase in the
real GNP per capita if the increased income goes to the few rich instead of going to
the many poor.
iii. Such a measure does not consider the structure of the society, the size and
composition of its population, its institutions and culture, the resource patterns and
even distribution of output among the society members
iv. The real per capita income estimates fail to measure changes in output due to
changes in the price level as it makes use of index numbers which are simply rough
approximations.
v. International comparisons of the real GNP per capita are inaccurate due to
exchange rate conversion of different currencies into a common currency, i.e. US
dollars, through the use of official exchange rates. These nominal exchange rates do
not reflect the relative purchasing power of different currencies. Thus, the
comparisons of GNP per capita of different countries are erroneous.
Despite these limitations, however, the real GNP per capita is the most widely used measure
of economic development.
3. Welfare – This is another measure of economic development from the point of view of
economic welfare. Economic development is regarded as process whereby there is an
increase in people’s welfare as a result of the increase in the consumption of goods and
services. According to Okun and Richardson, economic development is a sustained, secular
improvement in material well- being, which we may consider to be reflected in an increasing
flow of goods and services.
This indicator is also not free from limitations. Some of these limitations includes:
i. The first limitation arises with regard to the weights to be attached to the
consumption of individuals as consumption of goods and services depends on the
tastes and preferences of individuals.
ii. In measuring economic welfare caution has to be exercised with regard to the
composition of the total output that is giving rise to an increase in per capita
consumption, and how this output is being valued. The increased total output may be
composed of capital goods which may be at the cost of a reduced output of consumer
goods.
iii. The output may be valued at market prices whereas economic welfare is measured
by an increase in real national output of income.
iv. The expansion of real national output might have raised the real costs (pain and
sacrifice) and social costs in the economy. For instance, the increased output might
have resulted from long hours and in the deterioration of the working conditions of
the labour force.
v. It is possible that with the increase in real national income/ per capita income, the
rich might have become richer and the poor poorer due to high level of income
inequality. Thus, mere increase in economic welfare does not lead to economic
development till the distribution of national income is equitable or justifiable.
4. Social Indicators – Dissatisfied with GNP and GNP per capita as the measure of economic
development, certain economists have tried to measure it in terms of social indicators. This is
done by including a wide variety of items in social indicators. Some are inputs such as
nutritional standards or number of hospital beds or doctors per head of population, while
others may be output corresponding to these inputs such as improvements in health in terms
of infant mortality rates, sickness rates, etc. The merit of social indicators is that they are
concerned with ends, the ends being human development. Economic development is a means
to these ends. Social indicators tell us how different countries prefer to allocate the GNP
among alternative uses. Some may prefer to spend more on education and less on hospitals.
Moreover, they give an idea about the presence, absence or deficiency of certain basic needs.
Simply put, underdevelopment is a situation whereby the resources are not fully utilized to
their socio-economic potential, with the result that local or regional development is slower
than it should be in most cases. Furthermore, it results from the complex interplay of internal
and external factors that allow less developed countries only a lop-sided development
progression. According to the United Nations, an underdeveloped country is one in which per
capita real income is low when compared with the per capita real income of the United States
of America, Canada, Australia and Western Europe. By this definition an important feature of
underdevelopment is poverty. Also, a country is be underdeveloped when the resources both
human and natural which may be used for production to raise per capita income and
standards of living of the people are unutilized or underutilized. Furthermore,
underdeveloped countries are characterized by a wide disparity between their rich and poor
populations, and an unhealthy balance of trade.
Other features of underdevelopment include;
Lack of access to job opportunities, health care, drinkable water, food, education and
housing. It is usually believed that economic development takes place in a series of capitalist
stages and that today’s underdeveloped countries are still in a stage of history through which
the now developed countries passed long ago. However, the developed countries of this
world have never been underdeveloped in the first place, though they might have been
undeveloped. All economies of the world have been classified into developed economies and
underdeveloped economies. However, some are more developed and advanced than others.
According to Professor Viner, an underdeveloped country is one which has good potential
prospect for using more capital or more labour or more available natural resources, or all of
these to support its present population on a higher level of living or if its per capita income
level is already fairly high to support a larger population on a lower level of living. Thus, the
emphasis is that for a country to be called underdeveloped there must be possibilities and
potentialities for its development.
It can therefore be concluded that undeveloped country is one which is poor but which has
the future possibility and prospect of removing poverty and raising the levels of living of its
people by utilizing the idle and underutilized resources for production. Since there exists
potential prospects for development in almost all poor countries, therefore all poor countries
are generally described as underdeveloped. These days the underdeveloped countries of
which Nigeria is part of are usually called developing or less developed countries (LDCs) or
the Third World countries
There are many obstacles to economic growth and development in developing countries. Let
us look at a few of them.
i) Leadership problem and bad governance. Leadership is very important to driving
economic development as its coordinates and determines how resources are to be
utilized. Governance among others is defined as a system of values, policies, and
institutions by which a society manages its economic, social, and political affairs
through interactions within the state, civil society and private sector. Thus,
governance comprises the mechanisms and processes for citizens and groups to
articulate their interests, to work together and mediate their differences, and exercise
their legal rights and obligations with rules, institutions, and practices that set limits
and provide incentives for individuals, organizations and firms. Good governance
promotes people centered development and ensures equality of opportunity, social
and economic justice for all citizens.
ii) Corruption: Most underdeveloped countries and Nigeria in particular appear to suffer
the most from corruption because the leaders are ‘fantastically’ corrupt. Everyone
appears to believe that the nation has a culture of corruption. Over the years, Nigeria
has earned huge sum of money from crude oil, which has gone down the sinkhole
created by corruption. Top public servants are very rich as they engage in corrupt
practices.
iii) Lack of commitment and sincerity on the part of public officers: This greatly hampers
development in the sense that certain policies which are supposed to be executed by
public officer’s, if not sincerely overseen will lead to backwardness and jeopardy on
the part of the country‘s economic development.
iv) Infrastructural and Institutional challenges: One of the major challenges being faced
by Nigeria is poor social infrastructure and institutions; bad roads, erratic power
supply, limited access to potable water and basic healthcare, ineffective regulatory
agencies, and much more.
v) Market challenges: Lack of genuine competition is another major challenge facing
underdeveloped economy. Real capitalistic economies are controlled by market forces
or what is called the invisible hand of the market. Although every economy -
developed, developing or underdeveloped needs some form of government
intervention, the self-regulating nature of the market determines the effective and
efficient allocation of resources.
vi) Cultural issues: It has been argued that some countries lack the right culture for
economic development. Their people might not want to take risks in order to start new
businesses. Their people might feel that traditional cultural duties are more important
than showing up to work every day. These sorts of cultural issues can slow down a
country’s growth.
vii) Foreign debt: Most underdeveloped countries are repressed by heavy debt, the serving
and the repayment of which constitute a major burden on the economy. Resources that
would have been used for infrastructural development and for other investment
purposes are used to service loan. Lack of adequate human resources: This may not be
a major problem in Nigeria but most underdeveloped countries suffer from this. Many
developing countries lack the educational infrastructure needed to develop a
workforce that could support a more modern economy.
viii) Foreign competition: Developing countries have to compete against companies from
the developed world. This can be very difficult. It can force developing countries to
stay with making low value-added products using cheap labor instead of becoming
more modernized
Summary of topic 2
In this topic, we have learnt the following:
1. The meaning of economic development and economic growth was discussed with
clear distinction made about them. It was shown that economy can only be said to
grow and develop when there is an improvement in people’s standard of living, life
expectancy, and literacy level.
2. Different measurements of economic development as well as their shortcomings were
also considered.
3. We discussed the meaning of underdevelopment, highlighted the visible criteria or
indicators of underdeveloped countries, and understand the obstacles to economic
development.
4. For a country to be referred to as being underdeveloped, there must be unutilized or
underutilized natural resources which may be used for production to raise per capita
income and standards of living of the people.
5. Sustainable development encourages us to conserve our resource base, by gradually
changing the ways in which we develop and use technologies.