Scribd
Upload
7 views3 pages

Assignment No 01

The assignment focuses on analyzing various websites to determine their quality as good or bad based on specific criteria. Students are required to evaluate at least five websites, noting their purposes, strengths, weaknesses, and overall evaluations. The case study emphasizes the importance of planning and understanding design principles in web development to create user-friendly and effective websites.

Uploaded by

Pranav Sherekar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views3 pages

Assignment No 01

The assignment focuses on analyzing various websites to determine their quality as good or bad based on specific criteria. Students are required to evaluate at least five websites, noting their purposes, strengths, weaknesses, and overall evaluations. The case study emphasizes the importance of planning and understanding design principles in web development to create user-friendly and effective websites.

Uploaded by

Pranav Sherekar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Assignment No.

01
Title: Case study to analyze website is either good website or bad website.

Date of completion: 25th February 2025

Objective:

• To learn the web based development environment


• To use client side and server side web technologies

Problem Description:
Before coding of the website, planning is important, students should visit different websites
(Min. 5) for the different client projects and note down the evaluation results for these
websites, either good website or bad website in following format

Sr. No. Website Purpose of Things linked in Things Overall


URL Website the website disliked in evaluation of
the website the website
(Good/bad)

From the evaluation, students should learn and conclude different website design issues,
which should be considered while developing a website

Theory:

1. GeeksforGeeks

• Website URL: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/


• Purpose: Provides tutorials, coding practice, and interview preparation for
programming and computer science topics.
• Things linked:
1. Well-structured coding problems and solutions.
2. Rich UI with categorized tutorials and interactive coding sections.
• Things disliked:
1. Ads and pop-ups affect readability.
2. Sometimes overwhelming due to excessive content.
• Overall evaluation: Great for coding and interview prep, but cluttered UI with
excessive content and ads affect readability. Needs better organization.
2. W3Schools

• Website URL: https://www.w3schools.com/


• Purpose: Offers tutorials and interactive coding examples for web development and
programming languages.
• Things linked:
1. Simple, clean, and beginner-friendly UI.
2. Interactive "Try it Yourself" editor for practical learning.
• Things disliked:
1. Limited depth for advanced topics.
2. Some tutorials lack real-world examples.
• Overall evaluation: Beginner-friendly with an interactive UI, but lacks depth for
advanced learning. Simple yet limited in real-world coding examples.

3. TutorialsPoint (TPointTech)

• Website URL: https://www.tpointtech.com/


• Purpose: Provides technical tutorials on programming, databases, networking, and
software development.
• Things linked:
1. Comprehensive theory explanations for various topics.
2. Simple UI with categorized subjects.
• Things disliked:
1. UI feels outdated.
2. Navigation can be confusing with too many links.
• Overall evaluation: Informative with detailed explanations, but outdated UI and
confusing navigation reduce user experience. Needs a modern, structured approach.

4. Khan Academy

• Website URL: https://www.khanacademy.org/


• Purpose: Free educational platform covering math, science, coding, and test
preparation.
• Things linked:
1. High-quality video lectures with interactive exercises.
2. User-friendly and well-organized course structure.
• Things disliked:
1. Limited advanced programming content.
2. Some explanations can be too simplistic for higher education.
• Overall evaluation: Excellent for general learning with interactive videos but lacks in-
depth programming content. Simplistic explanations may not suit advanced learners.
5. NPTEL (National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning)

• Website URL: https://nptel.ac.in/


• Purpose: Provides free online courses in engineering, science, and management from
top Indian institutes.
• Things linked:
1. Video lectures from IIT professors.
2. Certification courses with exams for credibility.
• Things disliked:
1. UI is outdated and less interactive.
2. Some courses lack structured learning paths.
• Overall evaluation: Great for academic courses with IIT lectures, but outdated UI and
weak course structuring reduce engagement. Needs modernization.

Conclusion:

This case study emphasized the significance of thorough planning prior to website
development. By evaluating a minimum of five websites, ranging from well-designed to poorly
designed—students were able to identify critical design elements such as layout structure,
navigation flow, color schemes, responsiveness, and overall user experience. The analysis
provided valuable insights into common design pitfalls and best practices, reinforcing the
importance of user-centric and aesthetically sound design. This exercise highlighted that
evaluating existing websites is a vital preparatory step in the web development process. The
knowledge gained will guide students in creating effective, functional, and user-friendly
websites in future projects.

You might also like