Scribd
Upload
15 views2 pages

Asphalt Usage Under Placing

The document provides an analysis of actual asphalt usage versus expected usage for the Shire Airfield Upgrading Project, detailing various materials and their respective percentages and weights. It outlines the total asphalt consumption, excess usage, and associated costs due to the excess. Additionally, it includes information on specific activities related to the asphalt placement and the dimensions of the work completed.

Uploaded by

zeyineredwan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views2 pages

Asphalt Usage Under Placing

The document provides an analysis of actual asphalt usage versus expected usage for the Shire Airfield Upgrading Project, detailing various materials and their respective percentages and weights. It outlines the total asphalt consumption, excess usage, and associated costs due to the excess. Additionally, it includes information on specific activities related to the asphalt placement and the dimensions of the work completed.

Uploaded by

zeyineredwan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ETHIOPAN ROAD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Shire Airfield Upgrading Project


Analysis on Actual Asphalt usage with Expected
Date: 31/10/2016 G -- Volume for 1 batch (m3) 0.85

H -- Weight for 1 batch (Kg) 1263


M--Req. Volume covering
0.07
1m2 (m3)
Actual
Expected Actual Area To be Additional
Reading on Actual Consumpti Expected
Item Material Percentage Percentag covered Cost due to
Code Asphalt Plant Volume on for Consumption Excess Usage Remark
No. Type by Weight e by with Excess Excess Usage
machine (Kg) (m3) Asphalt for Coverd Area
(%) Weight (%) Volume (Birr)
(m3)
C= (B/sub F=(S/total-
A B D=(B*G)/H E=D K=E-F L=K/M
total) B)*0.07

1 A1 3/4 Retain 20% 223,465 20.0% 150.392

2 A2 3/8 Retain 18% 201,025 18.0% 135.290


790.905 559.86 231.05 3,300.64 ###
3 A3 No. 4 Retain 10% 111,265 10.0% 74.881

4 A4 No. 4 Pass 46% 514,250 46.0% 346.091

5 Filler No. 4 Pass 6% 67,133 6.0% 45.181


Sub-total--A ( Aggregate
1,117,138 751.835
)
4.9 %
of Sub-
7 Bitumen total 58,054 5.20% 39.070

Total ( Aggregate +
1,175,192 790.905
Bitumen)

Working Station Dimensioning Average


Actual Actual
Item
Activity Description Length Accomplished Placing Remark
No Start End Width (m) Offset
(m) Qty (m2) thickness (t)
(cm)
J=Volume/
Area

Placing AC R.H.S
2+920 2+970 49.82 4.0 11m - 15m 199.30
1 Binding Course
(07001 Pvr) R.H.S
1+990 2+970 979.82 4.0 15m - 19m 3919.30
9.89
Placing AC R.H.S
1+990 2+970 979.82 3.5 19m - 22.5m 3429.40
2 Binding Course
R.H.S
(07000 Pvr)
2+910 2+970 59.82 7.5 22.5m - 30m 450.00
ETHIOPAN ROAD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Shire Airfield Upgrading Project
Analysis on Actual Asphalt usage with Expected
Date: 31/10/2016 G -- Volume for 1 batch (m3) 0.85

H -- Weight for 1 batch (Kg) 1263


M--Req. Volume covering
0.07
1m2 (m3)
Actual
Expected Actual Area To be Additional
Reading on Actual Consumpti Expected
Item Material Percentage Percentag covered Cost due to
Code Asphalt Plant Volume on for Consumption Excess Usage Remark
No. Type by Weight e by with Excess Excess Usage
machine (Kg) (m3) Asphalt for Coverd Area
(%) Weight (%) Volume (Birr)
(m3)
Sub-Total--B (Area Covered)
7998.00

You might also like