Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002. 31:99119 doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.032702.131011 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews.

All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on May 10, 2002

THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF FOOD AND EATING

Sidney W. Mintz1 and Christine M. Du Bois2
1

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

Anthropology Department, Emeritus, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218; email: [email protected] 2 Department of International Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; email: [email protected]

Key Words commensality, meals, cooking, cuisine, food insecurity s Abstract The study of food and eating has a long history in anthropology, beginning in the nineteenth century with Garrick Mallery and William Robertson Smith. This review notes landmark studies prior to the 1980s, sketching the history of the subeld. We concentrate primarily, however, on works published after 1984. We contend that the study of food and eating is important both for its own sake since food is utterly essential to human existence (and often insufciently available) and because the subeld has proved valuable for debating and advancing anthropological theory and research methods. Food studies have illuminated broad societal processes such as political-economic value-creation, symbolic value-creation, and the social construction of memory. Such studies have also proved an important arena for debating the relative merits of cultural and historical materialism vs. structuralist or symbolic explanations for human behavior, and for rening our understanding of variation in informants responses to ethnographic questions. Seven subsections examine classic food ethnographies: single commodities and substances; food and social change; food insecurity; eating and ritual; eating and identities; and instructional materials. The richest, most extensive anthropological work among these subtopics has focused on food insecurity, eating and ritual, and eating and identities. For topics whose anthropological coverage has not been extensive (e.g., book-length studies of single commodities, or works on the industrialization of food systems), useful publications from sister disciplinesprimarily sociology and historyare discussed.

INTRODUCTION
Writing more than twenty years ago, Professor Joseph Epstein tells us: [T]en years ago I should have said that any fuss about food was too great, but I grow older and food has become more important to me. . . . [J]udging from the space given to it in the media, the great number of cookbooks and restaurant guides published annually, the conversations of friendsit is very nearly topic number one. Restaurants today are talked about with the kind of excitement that ten years ago was expended on movies. Kitchen technologyblenders,
0084-6570/02/1021-0099$14.00

99

100

MINTZ

DU BOIS

grinders, vegetable steamers, microwave ovens, and the restarouses something akin to the interest once reserved for cars. . . . The time may be exactly right to hit the best-seller lists with a killer who disposes of his victims in a Cuisinart (Aristides 1978, pp. 15758). But what Professor Epstein was witnessing turned out to be only the rst swallow, so to speak. Since then, food has become even more important to everybody, anthropologists included. Of course anthropologists have been interested in food for a long time. Garrick Mallerys paper, Manners and meals (1888), appeared in Volume 1, No. 3, of the American Anthropologist. William Robertson Smiths Lectures on the Religion of the Semites (1889) contains an important chapter on food. Frank Hamilton Cushings little monograph on Zu i breadstuffs (1920) and Franz Boass exhaustive n treatment of Kwakiutl salmon recipes (1921) are other examples of early work. (Though these last two seemed like mere fact collecting to some, Helen Coderes paper on Boass salmon recipes (1957) showed just how much could be learned about social organization and hierarchy by carefully reading about how to cook a salmon.) In a more recent era, Claude L vi-Strauss (e.g., 1965) and, in his wake, Mary e Douglas (1966) made important contributions to a structuralist vision of food and eating. But Jack Goodys book Cooking, Cuisine, and Class: A Study in Comparative Sociology (1982) seemed to mark a turning point. Since then, as the world that anthropologists chose to study became different, so has their work on food and eating. The anthropological study of food today has matured enough to serve as a vehicle for examining large and varied problems of theory and research methods. In theory building, food systems have been used to illuminate broad societal processes such as political-economic value-creation (Mintz 1985), symbolic valuecreation (Munn 1986), and the social construction of memory (Sutton 2001). Food studies have been a vital arena in which to debate the relative merits of cultural materialism vs. structuralist or symbolic explanations for human behavior (M. Harris 1998 [1985]; Simoons 1994, 1998; Gade 1999). In addition, food avoidance research has continued to rene theories about the relationship between cultural and biological evolution (Aunger 1994b). Examinations of the relationships between food supplies and seasonal rituals of conict (Dirks 1988), food supplies and the frequency of war (Ember & Ember 1994), and food resource periodicity and cooperativeness (Poggie 1995)while by no means devoid of methodological problemssuggest the utility of the Human Relations Area Files for comparative cross-cultural research. The reasons for intracultural variation in informants responses, and their implications for data interpretation, have been examined with reference both to hot-cold classications of foods (Boster & Weller 1990) and to food avoidances (Aunger 1994a). Food systems have also been used to examine tensions between elicited taxonomies and the categories people use in everyday life (Nichter 1986, Wassmann 1993). Our work here had to take into account nearly two decades of research since Messers ARA review (1984). Serious coverage of the whole eld was impractical.

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING

101

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

We decided to use just seven headings to dene our scope. This coverage omits many worthy sources, even within those headings: classic food ethnographies; single commodities and substances; food and social change; food insecurity; eating and ritual; eating and identities; and instructional materials. We had to neglect closely related topics, such as food in prehistory; biological aspects of eating (nutritional anthropology and food in medical anthropology); infant feeding and weaning (see Van Esterik in this volume); cannibalism (on kuru, see Lindenbaum 2001); and substances causing major psychoactive changes. Except in our food insecurity section, we set aside works dealing only with food production and not with its consumption. On the one hand, the literature on agriculture in developing countries is extensive and requires separate review; on the other, the social science of food production in industrialized contexts is scant (Murcott 1999a). Our focus on works that postdate Messers review of similar themes heavily favors anthropology, but unity of theme mattered more in some instances than did disciplinary boundaries. In addition to the specic sources discussed below, scholars benet from general reference works including theoretical analyses of social scientic approaches to eating (Murcott 1988, Wood 1995), literature reviews (Messer 1984), compilations of syllabi and bibliographies (Lieberman & Sorensen 1997; Dirks 2002), encyclopedias of food (Davidson 1999, Katz 2002, Kiple & Ornelas 2000), and general histories of food habits (e.g., Toussaint-Samat 1992, Flandrin & Montanari 1999; for surveys of the historical literature on specic European countries, see Teuteberg 1992). Journals oriented to the social life of food include: Gastronomica, Petits Propos Culinaires, Food & Foodways, and Digest: An Interdisciplinary Study of Food and Foodways; they are complemented by numerous journals in the subeld of nutritional anthropology (see Messer 1984, p. 207 for a partial listing). Internet sources on agriculture and food (e.g., Agricultural Network Information Center 2000, U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization 2001, U.S. Department of Agriculture 2001), which often yield far more information than rst meets the eye, offer statistical data, details of policies and programs, bibliographies, and links to other websites. Among relevant conferences, the Oxford Symposia publish useful proceedings (see R. Harris 1996).

CLASSIC ETHNOGRAPHIES
Comprehensive, anthropological monographs on food systems are lamentably rare. Audrey Richardss (1939) Land, Labour and Diet in Northern Rhodesia still remains the model for the eld; she and an interdisciplinary team examined food production, preparation, exchange, preferences, symbolism, consumption, and nutritional consequences. Moore & Vaughan have restudied food systems in the region where Richards worked (1994), combining history with ethnography in an analysis that is both broad and richly detaileda worthy successor to Richardss work. Taken as a pair, Ikpes history of food systems in Nigeria (1994) and Anigbos ethnography of commensality among the Igbo (1987) provide similar breadth.

102

MINTZ

DU BOIS

Trankells culinary ethnography of the Thai Yong of Thailand (1995) lacks historical depth, yet still combines examination of food production, local categorization, preparation, gender dynamics, consumption patterns, and rituals. More specically focused ethnographies include: Weismantels examination of gender and political economy as expressed through food in the Ecuadorian Andes (1988); Kahns analysis of food, gender identities, and social values in Papua New Guinea (1986); Whiteheads study of gender hierarchy and food sharing rules, also in Papua New Guinea (2000); Mahiass work on culinary beliefs and practices among the Jains of Delhi (1985); Kanafanis nely textured study of the visual, olfactory, and gustatory aesthetics of food preparation and consumption in the United Arab Emirates (1983); and Suttons extended meditation on how culinary memories help dene the identities and social lives of Greeks living on the island of Kalymnos (2001). These monographs are complemented by several collections of essays dealing with foodways in specic regions: Peru (Weston 1992), the United States (Brown & Mussell 1984, Humphrey & Humphrey 1988), Africa (Devisch et al. 1995; Froment et al. 1996), the Middle East (Zubaida & Tapper 1994), Britain (Murcott 1983, 1998), South Asia (Khare & Rao 1986), Oceania and Southeast Asia (Manderson 1986), and Oceania alone (Kahn & Sexton 1988, N. Pollock 1992). All except Pollocks book on Oceania are anthologies; all cover multiple topics, including food in regional history; food preparation, taboos, and preferences; food and identities; and culinary symbolism. Scattered among a wide variety of social-scientic journals and anthologies dealing primarily with issues other than food are many valuable ethnographic essays on food systems; we cannot begin to mention them all. We should note, however, the debates among those who study hunter-gatherers over optimal foraging theory, a behavioral-ecological model which posits that people adopt food strategies maximizing their caloric intake per unit of time, with the caloric costs of those food strategies taken into account. The theory itself has been propounded (Kaplan & Hill 1985) and contested (Thomas 1992), as have its implications for the study of hunters motivations for food-sharing (Hawkes 1991, Bliege Bird & Bird 1997, Wood & Hill 2000). In-depth studies of food systems remind us of the pervasive role of food in human life. Next to breathing, eating is perhaps the most essential of all human activities, and one with which much of social life is entwined. It is hoped that more anthropologists will accord food the central place in their ethnographies that it occupies in human existence.

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

SINGLE COMMODITIES AND SUBSTANCES

Anthropologists have been writing papers about single substancesfood sources, plants, animals, and foods made from themfor a long time. Probably the rst substantial work in English devoted to a single such theme was R. N. Salamans History and Social Inuence of the Potato (1949). His book dealt with the potatos

FOOD AND EATING

103

origins, domestication, worldwide diffusion, and political fate in European life. Since that time many other such books have appearedon drugs hard and soft, sugar, rhubarb, salt, codsh, capsicums, etc. Many are histories, general or botanical, others economic; it is striking that so few are by anthropologists. Such works generally incline toward treating the subject mostly in terms of itself; using it to illuminate broader processes; or developing the theme in specic relation to cuisine. Smith on the tomato (1994), Willard on saffron (2001), Jenkins on bananas (2000), and Kurlansky on salt (2002) focus principally on their subject; all make use of history. Anthropologists such as Warman on maize (1988), Ohnuki-Tierney on rice (1993), and Mintz on sucrose (1985) are historical in orientation but try to relate each subject to wider elds of explanation. Two books by anthropologists on a food animal, the guinea pig (Morales 1995, Archetti 1997 [1992]), are quite similar in content. Though perhaps less detailed ethnographically, Archettis is theoretically richer. Both authors take globalization and the world market into account; both note the spread of the cuy as a food source outside the Andes; both treat the guinea pig as a device through which to discuss cultural and social change. Long-Solss (1986) study of capsicum in Mexico comes early in the succession of such studies. Rare enough to merit mention is Malag ns o edited volume on marzipan (1990), which includes anthropological contributions. S. Coe & M. Coes study of chocolate (1996) successfully combines archaeology and ethnography. The Quincentenary stimulated much interest in foods that travel. Viola & Margolis (1991), Foster & Cordell (1992), and Long (1996), among many others, produced rich collections on food and diffusion that included work by many anthropologists. The late Sophie Coes ne book on New World cuisine (1994) also stands out. Though not linked to 1492, the volume edited by Plotnicov & Scaglion (1999) contains, among others, papers on New World capsicums, cassava, the potato and tomato, and sweet potatoes, as well as sugar and coffee, and it stresses plant diffusion. Fiddess (1991) approach to meat reopened a subject that had previously held the attention of Sahlins (1976), Ross (1980), and M. Harris (1998 [1985]), among others. Orlove (1997) eloquently addresses the issue of universal vs. contingent meanings for meat by looking at a food riot. Anthropological articles on single substances are so copious that only a few can be noted here. Messers nuanced study of potato use in Europe (1997) considers obstacles to and benets of the spread and assimilation of new food items. Gade, a geographer, raises useful questions with his study of broad beans in Quebec (1994) about how foods gain a foothold in specic settings. Y. Lockwood & W. Lockwood (2000a) consider Finnish-American dairy foods in an Oxford food symposium dedicated entirely to milk; Bestor (1999, 2001) reveals the links of Tokyos wholesale tuna market to the world outside. Murcott (1999b) argues for a redenition of the social construction of food by looking at the history of milk and poultry regulation/denition in the United Kingdom. Gades examination (1999) of the absence of milking in the Andes

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

104

MINTZ

DU BOIS

recalls Simoonss treatment of the fava bean and favism (1998)cases of foods people eat sparingly, with unease, or not at all. Somewhat different is McIntosh (2000), who links a temporary decline in U.S. egg consumption to a food scare. Taking a longer historical view, Brandes (1992) looks at maize avoidance and fear of pellagra in Europe, while Leach (2001) explains how a good herb can acquire a bad reputation. Neither taboo nor prohibition covers these papers; each is a different view of the perception of food.

FOOD AND SOCIAL CHANGE

The effects of broad societal changes on eating patterns, and vice versa, are of growing interest to ethnographers. In-depth food ethnographies that include discussion of social change are covered in our Classic Ethnographies section above. In addition, the relevant literature includes both general collections of essays (Harris & Ross 1987, Pelto & Vargas 1992, Macbeth 1997, Lentz 1999, Wu & Tan 2001, Cwiertka & Walraven 2002) and other research exploring the culinary effects of the Soviet collapse; other changes in intergroup relations within societies; mass production of foods; biotechnology; movements of peoples; increasing globalization of foods themselves; and war. These themes are dealt with in turn. Ethnographic literature on post-Soviet dietary patterns is limited but promising. Caglar addresses changes in the marketing of Turkish fast-food in Germany after the fall of the Berlin Wall (Caglar 1999), whereas Ziker discusses food sharing and the moral code of aboriginal peoples in post-Soviet Siberia (Ziker 1998). Chatwin explores extensively the transformation of foodways in the Republic of Georgia, detailing the social, political, and economic context (Chatwin 1997). Other food shifts are associated with a variety of economic and political changes, such as male out-migration, interclass rivalry and imitation, and market integration. Lentzs edited collection of essays explores several such themes (Lentz 1999). Mayer similarly delineates how changing caste relations are reected in Indian village foodways (Mayer 1996). Jings edited volume explores how government policies and social transformations in China have affected dietary habits, particularly of children (2000). Historians, too, have examined how broad social processes have led to culinary change (Mennell 1985, Levenstein 1993), and conversely, how food processing problems, such as massive, natural food poisonings (Matossian 1989), may have fostered social change. Anthropological work on how the industrialization of food production and distribution has affected dietary patterns is scant. Mintz pioneered in this area with a historical study of sugar production and consumption (Mintz 1985). Anthropologists have also explored the interplay between the requirements of capitalists and consumers in Trinidads sweet drink industry (D. Miller 1997) and the reaction to industrialized consumption patterns among adherents of Italys slow food movement (Leitch 2000). Historians, rural sociologists, and communications theorists have also taken up the challenge of studying dietary patterns under industrialized capitalism, examining the relationship between food industries and the U.S.
Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING

105

counterculture (Belasco 1989), contestation in the organic foods movement (Campbell & Liepins 2001), food industries and the incorporation of ethnic cuisines (Belasco 1987), the renement of packaging to entice consumption (Hine 1995), the role of modern advertising and marketing in dietary change (Cwiertka 2000), and the mad cow crisis (Ratzan 1998; for an anthropological review of literature on this crisis, see Lindenbaum 2001). The interactions among the technologies of food production and processing, the physical characteristics of new foods, and consumer responses to new foods are critical determinants of dietary change, as Leach illustrates with historical examples (Leach 1999). In the contemporary period, capitalized agriculture has produced genetically engineered foods, provoking consumer reactionsparticularly in Europethat sorely merit further social-scientic examination (Murcott 1999a, 2001). For histories of agricultural biotechnologys social contexts, see Kloppenburg 1988 and Purdue 2000; for contrasting perspectives on the globalization of such technology, see Levidow 2001 and Buctuanon 2001. Anthropologists have more commonly recognized peoples on the move migrants, refugees, and colonizersas agents of dietary change. Thus, Lockwood & Lockwood explore changes in the foodways of Detroits Arab community, where not only the foods of the larger society, but also the cuisines of different ethnic groups within the community have inspired dietary shifts (Lockwood & Lockwood 2000b). By contrast, Goodys examination of Chinese migrant food focuses not on their diets, but rather on their inuences on diets in the countries to which they move (Goody 1998; see also Caglar 1999). Wilk examines the complex culinary reactions of Belizeans to colonialism, class differentiation, and modernity (Wilk 1999). Tackling colonialism from a different angle, Dennett & Connell and their commentators have stirred up debate over the effects of acculturation on the diets of aboriginal peoples (Dennett & Connell 1988). Not only do peoples move across the globe, so also do foods (see D. Miller 1997, Long 1996, and our section Single Commodities and Substances above). Sobal provides a useful review of the globalization of food production and transport, drawing on the work of sociologists, political economists, demographers, and other theorists (Sobal 1999; see also McMichael 1995). Focusing by contrast on consumption, Tam explains how the eclectic, international eating style of the residents of Hong Kong helps them construct their paradoxically local identities (Tam 2001). Also studying Asia, Watson has produced a ne edited volume about the varied reactions to McDonalds of consumers in ve different societies (Watson 1997). Finally, the role of war in dietary change must not be overlooked. The following section notes the relationship between war and food insecurity. War as an agent of dietary change has also been researched by anthropologists Vargas (with physician Casillas) (1992), Mintz (1996), and Du Bois (2001), and by food historians Cwiertka (2002), Bentley (1998), Tanner (1999), and Ikpe (1994), among others. In general, however, we argue that the role of warand the roles of many kinds of social changeshas been relatively neglected in food studies. These are areas ripe for research.

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

106

MINTZ

DU BOIS

FOOD INSECURITY
Johan Pottier argues that anthropology is threatened not by a crisis of representation, but by a problem of relevance (1999, p. 7; emphasis in original). Anthropologists can move beyond sometimes sterile metatheoretical debates either by contributing cultural understanding to nutritional interventions (e.g., Cortes et al. 2001) or by addressing the aching, urgent problem of food insecurity (or both). Those interested in world hunger will nd area-studies journals useful, along with the IDS Bulletin, World Development, Development and Change, the Journal of Peasant Studies, Food Policy, and Disasters, among many others. Pottier has written a masterful, extended review of anthropological work on the problem of food insecurity (1999). He focuses on the social backgrounds behind food insecurity and the projects meant to alleviate it, richly exploring such varied topics as intrahousehold allocation of resources, gender inequality, peasants risk management, effects of the Green Revolution, rural class polarization, local agricultural knowledge and meanings, constraints on small food marketers, loss of genetic diversity, and effective famine intervention. Pottier repeatedly questions conventional wisdom, suggesting avenues for detailed research in specic locales: Are intrahousehold allocations actually skewed? Is gender-separated farming always in the best interests of women? To what extent have capitalistic relations of agriculture evolved? Has the introduction of modern, scientic crops actually reduced genetic diversity? When should local famine-relief initiatives be prioritized over state initiatives? And so on. Pottiers book is complemented by development analyst Stephen Devereuxs Theories of Famine (1993), which explores both the weaknesses and contributions of several major theories about the causes of famine (see also de Waal 1989, which offers an ethnographic critique of standard Western denitions of famine). Studies dealing with malnutrition among older children and adults (for young childrens nutritional issues, see Van Esterik in this volume) identify a variety of reasons for food insecurity. Scheper-Hughess wrenching ethnography of hunger in northeast Brazil lays the blame squarely on political-economic inequality (1992). Other sources explore powerful links between hunger and war, or ethnic conict (e.g., Macrae & Zwi 1994, Chatwin 1997, Messer et al. 1998, Ogden 2000, Ikpe 1994), noting that at the close of the 20th century, greatly enhanced capacity to anticipate and address natural disasters means that serious [acute, mass] food emergencies are almost always due to violent conict and other human actions (Pinstrup-Anderson, quoted in Messer et al. 1998, p. v). Still other studies nd that infectious epidemics can lead to food insecurity because the most economically active individuals fall ill and networks of social exchange break down (Mtika 2001)or the converse, that severe food shortages can lead to overcrowding and unsanitary conditions, exposing vast numbers to death from infectious diseases (de Waal 1989). Many anthropological works on food insecurity focus on Africa. Shipton provides a valuable review for the pre-1990 literature (Shipton 1990). Notable studies

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING

107

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

have examined the difculties in feeding African cities (Guyer 1987), African food systems in times of crisis (ecological and land tenure problems, coping mechanisms, and strategies for increasing food securityHuss-Ashmore & Katz 1989/1990), the effects of economic structural adjustment programs on African women farmers (Gladwin 1991; see also Ikpe 1994), and the value of symbolic analyses in understanding the dynamics of food insecurity (Devisch et al. 1995). Studies examining food insecurity and disease in Africa have already been noted (de Waal 1989, Mtika 2001). More general collections of essays, covering not only Africa but also other regions, likewise address numerous topics, including food policy and development strategies (McMillan & Harlow 1991), indigenous responses to uctuations in food supplies (including case studies in Afghanistande Garine & Harrison 1988), and the relationships of women farmers to agricultural commercialization (Spring 2000). Nutritional anthropologists have undertaken research on food insecurity in the United States (see Himmelgreen et al. 2000). Literature on the hotly debated issue of whether and when food is unequally distributed within households in South Asia (to the detriment of females) is ably reviewed by B. Miller (1997).

EATING AND RITUAL

Ethnographers have found multiple entry points for the study of how humans connect food to rituals, symbols, and belief systems. Food is used to comment on the sacred and to reenact venerated stories (e.g., see the francophone research on Islamic ritual sacriceBrisebarre 1998, Bonte et al. 1999, Kanafani-Zahar 1999). In consecrated contexts, food binds people to their faiths through powerful links between food and memory (Feeley-Harnik 1995; see Sutton 2001). Sometimes the food itself is sacred through its association with supernatural beings and processes (Bloch 1985, Feeley-Harnik 1994); the research on Hinduism is particularly rich in this regard (Singer 1984, Khare 1992, Toomey 1994). Not only do ritual meals connect participants to invisible beings (e.g., Brown 1995), but they also perform critical social functions. Eating in ritual contexts can reafrm or transform relationships with visible others (Munn 1986, Murphy 1986, Buitelaar 1993, Feeley-Harnik 1994, Brown 1995)even when participants in a ritual meal bring very different religious understandings to the event (Beatty 1999). Rituals and beliefs surrounding food can also powerfully reinforce religious and ethnic boundaries (see, e.g., Mahias 1985, Bahloul 1989, Fabre-Vassas 1997). Among the fundamental questions scholars can ask in this area are how human beliefs and rituals delineate what counts as food, and conversely, how humans use food in delineating what counts as ritual or proper belief. Addressing the rst question, geographer Frederick Simoons has produced extensive studies of food taboos (1994, 1998). Simoons argues (against cultural materialist interpretations, such as M. Harris 1987, Katz 1987) that belief systems and their attendant rituals are the causal factors behind food taboos. For example, he contests the view of Katz (1987) and others that the ban against fava bean consumption among the ancient

108

MINTZ

DU BOIS

followers of Pythagoras can appropriately be invoked to support a biocultural evolutionary theory (Katz 1987, p. 134) of food choice. Rather than evolving as a response to any medical dangers of fava bean consumption, according to Simoons the ban on fava beans sprang from powerful magico-religious motives (1998, p. 215). In a related vein, Vialless structuralist ethnography of French slaughterhouses (1994) examines how ritual and beliefs work to transform taboo items (carcasses) into food (meat) (see also Whitehead 2000 for a cogent socialrelations interpretation of taboos). The second questionhow people use the act of eating as a vehicle for ritual includes the study of food etiquette (Cooper 1986) and how such etiquette is implemented to express and create spirituality. J. Andersons study of the religious dimensions of the Japanese tea ceremony (1991), and Currans study of bodily discipline in the food rituals of American nuns (1989) exemplify this approach. The invocation of deeply held values and beliefs through ritual foods has been analyzed in a variety of settings. Feeley-Harnik details the profoundand in its era, shockingtransformation of biblical symbolism among early Israelite Christians, particularly in the celebration of the Eucharist (1994). Brandes examines the relationship between sugar and Mexican rituals for the Day of the Dead, questioning the extent of these rituals historical continuities with Aztec practices (1997). By contrast, Weismantel argues that Andean Indian practices of eating and drinking during religious estas do have indigenous roots, reecting Inca beliefs about feasting as a way of nourishing the dead (1991; on food continuities and their transformations, see also Bahloul 1989, Khan 1994). Ironically, the relationship between eating and the sacred also provides fodder for carnivalesque, ritualized anti-ritual. Kugelmasss essay on an ethnically Jewish restaurant in Manhattan that intentionally subverts the Jewish dietary laws, to comic effect, offers a fascinating example of such a process (1990). The humor in the restaurant Kugelmass describes depends on a rich symbolic context even as it pokes fun at it. But one can argue that sometimes food rituals are not laden with symbolic meaning. Charsley contends that to his British informants, wedding cakes symbolize little more than weddings themselves (1992). He adds that what little evolution there has been in the meaning of the cake has been driven by technical changes in the cakes materiality. Less extreme materialists have posited that primary functions of food rituals are material, even as symbolism surrounding them abounds. Following in the footsteps of Rappaport, more recent works have examined ritual as a mechanism for maintaining ecological balance in local environments and/or for redistributing food (M. Harris 1987, Voss 1987). Similarly, many scholars point out that food rituals and taboos that practitioners understand at least partly in symbolic terms often serve either to reinforce (Tapper & Tapper 1986, M. Harris 1987, Aunger 1994b, Fabre-Vassas 1997, Whitehead 2000) or to question (Lindenbaum 1986) hierarchical power relations or access to material goods. Rituals and taboos can also create divisions of labor and economic nichessometimes even to the benet of groups despised because of their contamination with polluted foodstuffs (M. Harris 1987). In all such analyses, symbolism surrounding food is evaluated as

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING

109

fundamentally in the service of ecological, nutritive, or political-economic ends. Such approaches can contrast with the view that meaning is a powerful human need in and of itself (Giobellina Brumana 1988)an importance it shares with food, with which it is constantly intertwined.

EATING AND IDENTITIES

Like all culturally dened material substances used in the creation and maintenance of social relationships, food serves both to solidify group membership and to set groups apart. The works noted here deal with how food functions in social allocation, in terms of ethnicity, race, nationality, class, and (less precisely) individuality and gender. Caplan (1997, pp. 131) offers a useful introduction to this broad theme. Ethnicity is born of acknowledged difference and works through contrast. Hence an ethnic cuisine is associated with a geographically and/or historically dened eating community (e.g., Lockwood & Lockwood 2000a). But ethnicity, like nationhood, is also imagined (Murcott 1996)and associated cuisines may be imagined, too. Once imagined, such cuisines provide added concreteness to the idea of national or ethnic identity. Talking and writing about ethnic or national food can then add to a cuisines conceptual solidity and coherence. Thus, Ferguson (1998) uses Bourdieus cultural eld to claim that discourse really dened French cuisine. This argument ts well, as does Cwiertkas metacuisine (1999), with Trubeks study (2000) of how French cuisine was created, and it brings to mind Appadurais classic paper (1988) on how to create a national cuisine; Pilcher (1998) provides a ne example of how it happens. Gender does not differ from these other devices of social allocation: its relationship to food and eating is at least as real as foods relationship to the construction of nationhood, ethnicity, and race. Complicating these other distinctions is the part played by class or social position. Weismantel (1989) provides an excellent case in which nationality, ethnicity, class, and gender all intermesh in food habits. James (1994) counterposes local identity to globalization, suggesting how the global may actually reestablish the local, rather than supplant it. Tuchman & Levine (1993) analyze the urban U.S. Jewish love affair with Chinese food, throwing light on both groups. Two rare little volumes on Vietnamese food and identity (Poulain 1997, Vol. I & II) provide a brief overview of that national cuisine. Kwon & Lee (1995) do a bit of the same for Korea. Finally, Noguchi (1994), Allison (1991), and Fieldhouse (1995, pp. 21533) together provide a nice example of how lunchand lunch boxescan become part of national identity. So swiftly has the literature on food and gender grown that it could properly merit an article of its own. Relevant work published since 1984 touches on intrafamilial food allocation, familial division of labor, obesity, ethnicity, fasting, sexual identity, and many other subjects. The Counihan-Kaplan anthology (1998) provides an introduction to gender as a basis of social allocation in foodways. Kahn (1986) made a valuable early contribution to our understanding of institutionalized gender differences and their connections to food (see also Munn 1986, Whitehead

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

110

MINTZ

DU BOIS

2000); Counihans collected papers (1999) are also useful. Juliers view that food and gender is a subject tackled primarily by female authors (Julier 1999) is convincing. Van Esterik (1999) discusses gender and the right to food; McIntosh & Zey (1989) discuss womans role as gatekeeper. D. Pollock (1985), Jansen (1997), and Flynn (1999) provide three contrastive cases of the relation of food to sexual identity.

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
The torrent of new courses on the anthropology of food has been accompanied by a ood of books, syllabi, and lms about food. We can document only some of those resources, beginning with works dealing with the foods of one (very populous) society that has been better researched than most others. When the late K.C. Chang edited the volume Food in China (1977), it was a trend-setting achievement in two ways: a serious analytical and historical collection on Chinese cuisine by scholars, the rst of its kind in English; and a joint effort, which helped to establish a precedent in food studies. Soon more Chinese food books, as opposed to cook books, appeared, by anthropologist Eugene Anderson (1988) and geographer Frederick Simoons (1991). Additional recent collections relevant to the study of Asian cuisine include: Jun Jings Feeding Chinas Little Emperors (2000), David Wu & Tan Chee-bengs Changing Chinese Foodways in Asia (2001), and Katarzyna Cwiertka & Boudewijn Walravens Asian Food: The Global and the Local (2002). A course on Chinese cuisine could make good use of these sources. The multiplication of food anthologies without a regional focus is striking. Included are sociologist Anne Murcotts The Sociology of Food and Eating (1983); Barbara Harriss-White & Sir Raymond Hoffenbergs Food (1994); and Arien Macks Food: Nature and Culture (1998). Volumes by anthropologists include Carola Lentzs Changing Food Habits (1999); Harris & Rosss (1987) rich anthology24 contributions on food and evolution; Carole Counihan & Steven Kaplans Food and Gender (1998); Leonard Plotnicov & Richard Scaglions Consequences of Cultivar Diffusion (1999); and Marie-Claire Bataille-Benguigui & Fran oise Cousins Cuisines: reet des soci t s (1996). Helen Macbeths Food c ee Preferences and Taste (1997) and Martin Schaffners Brot, brei und was dazugeh rt o (1992) are two other nonanthropological anthologies, the rst mostly sociological, the second mostly historical; both contain some contributions by anthropologists. The same is true of Wiessner & Schiefenh vels Food and the Status Quest (1996) o and Hladik et al.s Tropical Forests, People and Food (1993); both contain socially, culturally, and biologically oriented essays. We asked a student of anthropology to examine the place of food in anthropology textbooks from the 1920s to the 1990s. Her ndings suggest that food had become a much more concrete and important subject by the late 1950s. In post-1955 texts, one or more chapters might be devoted to food, especially food production, often in connection with subsistence levels, and some slant toward an evolutionary
Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING

111

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

treatment of society. By the 1980s, however, textbooks on the anthropology of food as such begin to appear (Farb & Armelagos 1980, MacClancy 1992). The textbook by Bryant et al. (1985) links nutrition and anthropology closely, as does the anthology edited by Sharman et al. (1991). The readers by Counihan & van Esterik (1997) and by Goodman et al. (2000) are entitled Food and Culture, and Nutritional Anthropology; their contents overlap. Lieberman & Sorensen (1997) have edited an invaluable collection of syllabi for courses in nutritional anthropology, including a list of useful lms, now available in PDF format from the Council on Nutritional Anthropology of the American Anthropological Association. The welter of food-related materials provides prospective course planners with ample material, but the courses themselves appear to be more clearly organized within nutritional anthropology than otherwise. It appears, though, that sociologists have done even more than anthropologists. Among the many textbooks on the sociology of food, we should mention Mennell et al. (1992), Fieldhouse (1995), Whit (1995), McIntosh (1996), Fine et al. (1996), and Beardsworth & Keil (1997). It seems likely that there will be more textbooks and readers yet to come.

CONCLUDING REMARKS
The staggering increase in the scale of food literatureinside and outside anthropologymakes bibliographic coverage challenging, a challenge compounded by the close intertwining of food and eating with so many other subjects. We posit that three major trends this last quarter century or so have inuenced this growth: globalization; the general afuence of Western societies and their growing cosmopolitanism; and the inclusivist tendencies of U.S. society, which spurs even disciplines (and professions, such as journalism and business) without anthropologys strong inclusivist ethic to consider cross-cultural variations in foodways. A vast literature on food and globalization has appeared. Philosophers ponder whether they are exploiting the Third World by eating its foods. Culinary competence in the West declines at almost the same rate as discrimination in taste rises. Social scientists have examined the eating habits of Westerners in terms of ethnic group, region, religion, and much elsethough relatively little, it seems, in terms of class (but see Roseberry 1996). Much remains to be done in exploring foodways in other areas of the world. In this setting, anthropologists are in a good position to make useful contributions to the development of policy in regard to health and nutrition, food inspection, the relation of food to specic cultures, world hunger, and other subjects. By and large, though, they have not taken full advantage of this opportunity. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although we are quite appreciative, we are unable to thank here all the colleagues who sent us suggestions, vitas, syllabi, and copies of their work. We do wish, however, to thank two students: Amy Delamaide and Jomo Smith.

112

MINTZ

DU BOIS

The Annual Review of Anthropology is online at http://anthro.annualreviews.org

LITERATURE CITED
Agric. Netw. Inf. Cent. 2000. http://www.agnic. org Allison A. 1991. Japanese mothers and obentos: the lunch-box as ideological state apparatus. Anthropol. Q. 64(4):195208 Anderson EN. 1988. The Food of China. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press Anderson J. 1991. An Introduction to Japanese Tea Ritual. Albany: State Univ. N.Y. Press Anigbo OA. 1987. Commensality and Human Relationship Among the Igbo. Nsukka: Univ. Nigeria Press Appadurai A. 1988. How to make a national cuisine: cookbooks in contemporary India. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 30(1):324 Archetti E. 1997 (1992). Guinea-Pigs: Food, Symbol, and Conict of Knowledge in Ecuador. Oxford: Berg Aristides [Epstein J]. 1978. Foodstuff and nonsense. Am. Scholar 47(2):15763 Aunger R. 1994a. Sources of variation in ethnographic interview data: food avoidances in the Ituri Forest, Zaire. Ethnology 33(1):65 99 Aunger R. 1994b. Are food avoidances maladaptive in the Ituri Forest of Zaire? J. Anthropol. Res. 50:277310 Bahloul J. 1989. From a Muslim banquet to a Jewish seder: foodways and ethnicity among North African Jews. In Jews Among Arabs: Contacts and Boundaries, ed. MR Cohen, AL Udovitch, pp. 8596. Princeton, NJ: Darwin Bataille Benguigui M, Cousin F, eds. 1996. Cuisines: Reets des Soci t s. Paris: Ed. ee S pia, Mus e de lHomme e e Beardsworth A, Keil T. 1997. Sociology on the Menu: an Invitation to the Study of Food and Society. London: Routledge Beatty A. 1999. Varieties of Javanese Religion: an Anthropological Account. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Belasco WJ. 1987. Ethnic fast foods: the corporate melting pot. Food Foodways 2:130 Belasco WJ. 1989. Appetite for Change: How the Counterculture Took on the Food Industry, 19661988. New York: Pantheon Bentley A. 1998. Eating for Victory: Food Rationing and the Politics of Domesticity. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press Bestor TC. 1999. Wholesale sushi: culture and commodity in Tokyos tuna market. In Theorizing the City, ed. S Low, pp. 20142. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press Bestor TC. 2001. Supply-side sushi: commodity, market, and the global city. Am. Anthropol. 103(1):7695 Bliege Bird R, Bird D. 1997. Delayed reciprocity and tolerated theft. Curr. Anthropol. 38 (1):4978 Bloch M. 1985. Almost eating the ancestors. Man (n.s.) 20:63146 Boas F. 1921. Ethnology of the Kwakiutl. 35th Annu. Rep. Bur. Am. Ethnol. Washington, DC: US GPO Bonte P, Brisebarre A, Gokalp A, eds. 1999. Sacrices en Islam: Espaces et Temps dun Rituel. Paris: Ed. CNRS Boster JS, Weller SC. 1990. Cognitive and contextual variation in hot-cold classication. Am. Anthropol. 92:17179 Brandes S. 1992. Maize as a culinary mystery. Ethnology 31:33136 Brandes S. 1997. Sugar, colonialism, and death: on the origins of Mexicos Day of the Dead. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 39(2):27099 Brisebarre A, ed. 1998. La F te du Mouton: Un e Sacrice Musulman dans lEspace Urbain. Paris: Ed. CNRS Brown KM. 1995. Serving the spirits: the ritual economy of Haitian Vodou. In Sacred Arts of Haitian Vodou, ed. DJ Cosentino, pp. 205 23. Los Angeles: UCLA Fowler Mus. Cult. Hist. Brown LK, Mussell K, eds. 1984. Ethnic and Regional Foodways in the United States: the Performance of Group Identity. Knoxville: Univ. Tenn. Press

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING Bryant CA, Courtney A, Markesbery BA, DeWalt KM. 1985. The Cultural Feast: an Introduction to Food and Society. St. Paul, MN: West Buctuanon EM. 2001. Globalization of biotechnology: the agglomeration of dispersed knowledge and information and its implications for the political economy of technology in developing countries. New Genet. Soc. 20(1):2641 Buitelaar M. 1993. Fasting and Feasting in Morocco: Womens Participation in Ramadan. Oxford: Berg Caglar AS. 1999. McD ner: d ner kebap and o o the social positioning struggle of German Turks. See Lentz 1999, pp. 20930 Campbell H, Liepins R. 2001. Naming organics: understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive eld. Sociol. Rural. 41(1):2139 Caplan P. 1997. Approaches to the study of food, health and identity. In Food, Health and Identity, ed. P Caplan, pp. 131. London/ New York: Routledge Chang KC. 1977. Food in China. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press Charsley SR. 1992. Wedding Cakes and Cultural History. New York: Routledge Chatwin ME. 1997. Socio-Cultural Transformation and Foodways in the Republic of Georgia. Commack, NY: Nova Sci. Codere H. 1957. Kwakiutl society: rank and class. Am. Anthropol. 59(3):47386 Coe SD. 1994. Americas First Cuisines. Austin: Univ. Tex. Press Coe SD, Coe MD. 1996. The True History of Chocolate. London: Thames & Hudson Cooper E. 1986. Chinese table manners: you are how you eat. Hum. Organ. 45(2):17984 Cortes LM, Gittelsohn J, Alfred J, Palafox NA. 2001. Formative research to inform intervention development for diabetes prevention in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Health Educ. Behav. 28(6):696715 Counihan CM. 1999. The Anthropology of Food and Body: Gender, Meaning, and Power. New York: Routledge Counihan CM, Kaplan SL, eds. 1998. Food

113

and Gender: Identity and Power. Amsterdam, The Neth.: Harwood Acad. Counihan CM, Van Esterik P, eds. 1997. Food and Culture: a Reader. New York/London: Routledge Curran P. 1989. Grace Before Meals: Food Ritual and Body Discipline in Convent Culture. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press Cushing FH. 1920. Zu i breadstuffs. Indian n Notes and Monographs, 8. New York: Mus. Am. Indian, Heye Found. Cwiertka KJ. 1999. The making of modern culinary tradition in Japan. PhD thesis. Univ. Leiden Cwiertka KJ. 2000. From Yokohama to Amsterdam: Meidi-Ya and dietary change in modern Japan. Japanstudien 12:4563 Cwiertka KJ. 2002. Popularising a military diet in wartime and postwar Japan. Asian Anthropol. 1(1). In press Cwiertka KJ, Walraven B, eds. 2002. Asian Food: the Global and the Local. Surrey, UK: Curzon Davidson A, ed. 1999. The Oxford Companion to Food. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press de Garine I, Harrison GA, eds. 1988. Coping with Uncertainty in Food Supply. Oxford: Clarendon Dennett G, Connell J. 1988. Acculturation and health in the highlands of Papua New Guinea: dissent on diversity, diets, and development. Curr. Anthropol. 29(2):27399 Devereux S. 1993. Theories of Famine. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf Devisch R, de Boeck F, Jonckers D, eds. 1995. Alimentations, Traditions, et D veloppee ments en Afrique Intertropicale. Paris: Ed. LHarmattan de Waal A. 1989. Famine that Kills: Darfur, Sudan, 19841985. Oxford: Clarendon Dirks R. 1988. Annual rituals of conict. Am. Anthropol. 90:85670 Dirks R. 2002. Resources for the anthropological study of food habits. http://lilt.ilstu. edu/rtdirks Douglas M. 1966. Purity and Danger. New York: Praeger Du Bois CM. 2001. A specic legume case:

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

114

MINTZ

DU BOIS Gade DW. 1999. Nature and Culture in the Andes. Madison: Univ. Wis. Press Giobellina Brumana F. 1988. La comida de santo en el candomble. Am. Indgena 48(3): 60517 Gladwin CH, ed. 1991. Structural Adjustment and African Women Farmers. Gainesville: Univ. Fla. Press Goodman AH, Dufour DL, Pelto GH, eds. 2000. Nutritional Anthropology: Biocultural Perspectives on Food and Nutrition. Mountain View, CA: Mayeld Goody J. 1982. Cooking, Cuisine and Class: a Study in Comparative Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Goody J. 1998. The globalisation of Chinese food. In Food and Love: a Cultural History of East and West, pp. 16171. London: Verso Guyer J, ed. 1987. Feeding African Cities: Studies in Regional Social History. Bloomington: Ind. Univ. Press Harris M. 1987. Foodways: historical overview and theoretical prolegomenon. See Harris & Ross 1987, pp. 5790 Harris M. 1998 [1985]. Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland. 2nd ed. Harris M, Ross EB, eds. 1987. Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Human Food Habits. Phila.: Temple Univ. Press Harris R. 1996. An Index to the Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery, 19811994. Devon, UK: Prospect Harriss-White B, Hoffenberg R, eds. 1994. Food: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell Hawkes K. 1991. Showing off: tests of an hypothesis about mens foraging goals. Ethol. Sociobiol. 2:2954 Himmelgreen DA, P rez-Escamilla R, Segurae Mill n S, Peng YK, Gonzalez A, et al. a 2000. Food insecurity among low-income Hispanics in Hartford, Connecticut: implications for public health policy. Hum. Organ. 59(3):33442 Hine T. 1995. The Total Package: the Secret History and Hidden Meanings of Boxes,

history of soy and soy protein products in the USA. http://www.jhsph.edu/environment/ CLF conferences/Dietary DuBois.html Ember M, Ember CR. 1994. Prescriptions for peace: policy implications of cross-cultural research on war and interpersonal violence. Cross-Cult. Res. 28(4):34350 Fabre-Vassas C. 1997. The Singular Beast: Jews, Christians, and the Pig. New York: Columbia Univ. Press Farb P, Armelagos G. 1980. Consuming Passions: the Anthropology of Eating. Boston: Houghton-Mifin Feeley-Harnik G. 1994. The Lords Table: the Meaning of Food in Early Judaism and Christianity. Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. 2nd ed. Feeley-Harnik G. 1995. Religion and food: an anthropological perspective. J. Am. Acad. Relig. 63(3):56582 Ferguson PP. 1998. A cultural eld in the making: gastronomy in 19th- century France. Am. J. Sociol. 104(3):597641 Fiddes N. 1991. Meat: a Natural Symbol. London: Routledge Fieldhouse P. 1995. Food and Nutrition: Customs and Culture. London: Chapman & Hall. 2nd ed. Fine B, Heasman M, Wright J. 1996. Consumption in the Age of Afuence: the World of Food. London: Routledge Flandrin JL, Montanari M, eds. 1999. Food: a Culinary History from Antiquity to the Present. New York: Columbia Univ. Press Flynn KC. 1999. Food, gender and survival among street adults in Mwanza, Tanzania. Food Foodways 8(3):175201 Foster N, Cordell LS, eds. 1992. Chilies to Chocolate: Food the Americas Gave the World. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press Froment A, de Garine I, Binam Bikoi C, Loung JF, eds. 1996. Bien Manger et Bien Vivre: Anthropologie Alimentaire et D veloppement e en Afrique Intertropicale: Du Biologique au Social. Paris: LHarmattan Orstom Gade DW. 1994. Environment, culture and diffusion: the broad bean in Quebec. Cah. G ogr. Qu bec 38(104):13750 e e

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING Bottles, Cans, and Other Persuasive Containers. Boston: Back Bay Hladik CM, Hladik A, Linares OF, Pagezy H, Semply A, Hadley M. 1993. Tropical Forests, People and Food. Paris: UNESCO Humphrey TC, Humphrey LT, eds. 1988. We Gather Together: Food and Festival in American Life. Ann Arbor: UMI Res. Huss-Ashmore R, Katz SH, eds. 1989/1990. African Food Systems in Crisis, Vols. I, II. New York: Gordon & Breach Ikpe EB. 1994. Food and Society in Nigeria: a History of Food Customs, Food Economy and Cultural Change, 19001989. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag James A. 1994. Cuisiner les livres: identit s e globales ou locales dans les cultures. Anthropol. Soc. 18(3):3956 Jansen W. 1997. Gender identity and the rituals of food in a Jordanian community. Food Foodways 7(2):87117 Jenkins VS. 2000. Bananas: an American History. Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Jing J, ed. 2000. Feeding Chinas Little Emperors: Food, Children, and Social Change. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press Julier AP. 1999. Hiding gender and race in the discourse of commercial food consumption. Presented at Annu. Meet. Assoc. Stud. Food Soc., Toronto Kahn M. 1986. Always Hungry, Never Greedy: Food and the Expression of Gender in a Melanesian Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Kahn M, Sexton L, eds. 1988. Continuity and Change in Pacic Foodways, special issue Food Foodways 3(12) Kanafani A. 1983. Aesthetics and Ritual in the United Arab Emirates. Lebanon: Am. Univ. Beirut Kanafani-Zahar A. 1999. Le Mouton et le M rier: Rituel du Sacrice dans la Montagne u Libanaise. Paris: Presses Univ. France Kaplan H, Hill K. 1985. Food sharing among Ache foragers: tests of explanatory hypotheses. Curr. Anthropol. 26:223 46 Katz SH. 1987. Fava bean consumption: a case

115

for the co-evolution of genes and culture. See Harris & Ross 1987, pp. 13359 Katz SH, ed. 2002. The Scribner Encyclopedia of Food. New York: Scribners Khan A. 1994. Juthaa in Trinidad: food, pollution, and hierarchy in a Caribbean diaspora community. Am. Ethnol. 21(2):245 69 Khare RS, ed. 1992. The Eternal Food: Gastronomic Ideas and Experiences of Hindus and Buddhists. Albany: State Univ. N.Y. Press Khare RS, Rao MSA, eds. 1986. Aspects in South Asia Food Systems: Food, Society and Culture. Durham: Carolina Acad. Kiple K, Ornelas K, eds. 2000. The Cambridge World History of Food. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Kloppenburg JR. 1988. First the Seed: the Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492 2000. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Kugelmass J. 1990. Green bagels: an essay on food, nostalgia, and the carnivalesque. YIVO Annu. 19:5780 Kurlansky M. 2002. Salt: a World History. New York: Walker Kwon SSY, Lee CH, eds. 1995. The wisdom of Korean food. Korean Am. Stud. Bull. 6 Leach HM. 1999. Food processing technology: its role in inhibiting or promoting change in staple foods. In The Prehistory of Food, ed. C Gosden, J Hather, pp. 12938. London: Routledge Leach HM. 2001. Rehabilitating the stinkinge herbe: a case study of culinary prejudice. Gastronomica 1(2):1015 Leitch A. 2000. The social life of lardo: slow food in fast times. Asia Pac. J. Anthropol. 1: 10318 Lentz C, ed. 1999. Changing Food Habits: Case Studies from Africa, South America, and Europe. Amsterdam: Harwood Acad. Levenstein H. 1993. Paradox of Plenty: a Social History of Eating in Modern America. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press Levidow L. 2001. Utilitarian bioethics?: market fetishism in the GM crops debate. New Genet. Soc. 20(1):7584

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

116

MINTZ

DU BOIS nia and Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press Matossian MK. 1989. Poisons of the Past: Molds, Epidemics, and History. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press Mayer A. 1996. Caste in an Indian village: change and continuity 19541992. In Caste Today, ed. CJ Fuller, pp. 3264. Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press McIntosh WA. 1996. Sociologies of Food and Nutrition. London: Plenum McIntosh WA. 2000. The symbolization of eggs in American culture: a sociologic analysis. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 19(5):S53239 McIntosh WA, Zey M. 1989. Women as gatekeepers of food consumption: a sociological critique. Food Foodways 3(4):31732 McMichael P, ed. 1995. Food and Agrarian Orders in the World-Economy. Westport, CT: Greenwood McMillan DE, Harlow J, eds. 1991. Anthropology and Food Policy: Human Dimensions of Food Policy in Africa and Latin America. Athens: Univ. Ga. Press Mennell S. 1985. All Manners of Food: Eating and Taste in England and France from the Middle Ages to the Present. Oxford: Blackwell Mennell S, Murcott A, van Otterloo AH. 1992. The Sociology of Food: Eating, Diet and Culture. London: Sage Messer E. 1984. Anthropological perspectives on diet. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 13:20549 Messer E. 1997. Three centuries of changing European taste for the potato. See Macbeth 1997, pp. 10114 Messer E, Cohen MJ, DCosta J. 1998. Food From Peace: Breaking the Links Between Conict and Hunger. Washington, DC: Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Miller BD. 1997. Social class, gender, and intrahousehold food allocations to children in South Asia. Soc. Sci. Med. 44(11):168595 Miller D. 1997. Capitalism: an Ethnographic Approach. New York: Berg Mintz SW. 1985. Sweetness and Power: the Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Penguin

L vi-Strauss C. 1965. Le triangle culinaire. e LArc 26:1929 Lieberman LS, Sorensen MV, eds. 1997. SNAC II: Syllabi for Courses in Nutritional Anthropology. 2nd ed. http://www.aaanet. org/cna/index.htm Lindenbaum S. 1986. Rice and wheat: the meaning of food in Bangladesh. See Khare & Rao 1986, pp. 25376 Lindenbaum S. 2001. Kuru, prions, and human affairs: thinking about epidemics. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 30:36385 Lockwood WG, Lockwood YR. 2000a. Finnish American milk products in the northwoods. In Milk: Beyond Dairy, ed. H Walker. Proc. Oxford Symp. Food Cookery 1999, pp. 232 39 Lockwood WG, Lockwood YR. 2000b. Continuity and adaptation in Arab American foodways. In Arab Detroit: From Margin to Mainstream, ed. N Abraham, A Shryock, pp. 515 59. Detroit: Wayne State Univ. Press Long J, ed. 1996. Conquista y Comida: Consecuencias del Encuentro de Dos Mundos. Mexico City: Univ. Nacional Aut noma o M xico e Long-Sols J. 1986. Capsicum y Cultura: La Historia del Chilli. M xico: Fondo Cultura e Econ. Macbeth H, ed. 1997. Food Preferences and Taste: Continuity and Change. Providence, RI: Berghahn MacClancy J. 1992. Consuming Culture. New York: Holt & Co Mack A, ed. 1998. Food: nature and culture. Soc. Res. 66(1):3428 (Special issue) Macrae J, Zwi A, eds. 1994. War & Hunger: Rethinking International Responses to Complex Emergencies. London: Zed Mahias MC. 1985. D livrance et Convivialit : e e le Syst` me Culinaire des Jaina. Paris: Ed. e Maison Sci. lHomme Malag n J. 1990. Historia y Leyenda del Mazao p n. M xico: San Angel Ed. a e Mallery G. 1888. Manners and meals. Am. Anthropol. 1(3):193207 Manderson L, ed. 1986. Shared Wealth and Symbol: Food, Culture, and Society in Ocea-

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING Mintz SW. 1996. Tasting Food, Tasting Freedom. Boston: Beacon Moore H, Vaughan M. 1994. Cutting Down Trees: Gender, Nutrition, and Agricultural Change in the Northern Province of Zambia, 18901990. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Morales E. 1995. The Guinea Pig: Healing, Food, and Ritual in the Andes. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press Mtika MM. 2001. The AIDS epidemic in Malawi and its threat to household food security. Hum. Organ. 60(2):17888 Munn ND. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: a Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Murcott A, ed. 1983. The Sociology of Food and Eating. Aldershot, Hants, UK: Gower Murcott A. 1988. Sociological and social anthropological approaches to food and eating. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 55:140 Murcott A. 1996. Food as an expression of identity. In The Future of the National State: Essays on Cultural Pluralism and Political Integration, ed. S Gustafsson, L Lewin, pp. 49 77. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santerus Murcott A, ed. 1998. The Nations Diet: the Social Science of Food Choice. London: Longman Murcott A. 1999a. Not science but PR: GM food and the makings of a considered sociology. Soc. Res. Online 4(3) Murcott A. 1999b. Scarcity in abundance: food and non-food. Soc. Res. 66(1):30539 Murcott A. 2001. Public beliefs about GM foods: more on the makings of a considered sociology. Med. Anthropol. Q. 15(1):111 Murphy CPH. 1986. Piety and honor: the meaning of Muslim feasts in Old Delhi. See Khare & Rao 1986, pp. 85120 Nichter M. 1986. Modes of food classication and the diet-health contingency: a South Indian case study. See Khare & Rao 1986, pp. 185222 Noguchi P. 1994. Savor slowly: EKIBENthe fast food of high-speed Japan. Ethnology 33(4):31730 Ogden K. 2000. Coping strategies developed

117

as a result of social structure and conict: Kosovo in the 1990s. Disasters 24(2):117 32 Ohnuki-Tierney E. 1993. Rice as Self: Japanese Identities Through Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press Orlove BS. 1997. Meat and strength: the moral economy of a food riot. Cult. Anthropol. 12(2):23468 Pelto GH, Vargas LA, eds. 1992. Perspectives on Dietary Change: Studies in Nutrition and SocietyEcol. Food Nutr. 27(34):1335 (Special issue) Pilcher JM. 1998. Que Vivan los Tamales! Albuquerque: Univ. N.M. Press Pillsbury R. 1998. No Foreign Food: the American Diet in Time and Place. Boulder, CO: Westview Plotnicov L, Scaglion R, eds. 1999. Consequences of Cultivar Diffusion. Ethnol. Monogr. 17. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press Poggie JJ. 1995. Food resource periodicity and cooperation values: a cross-cultural consideration. Cross-Cult. Res. 29(3):27696 Pollock DK. 1985. Food and sexual identity among the Culina. Food Foodways 1(1):25 42 Pollock N. 1992. These Roots Remain: Food Habits in Islands of the Central and Eastern Pacic. Laie, Hawaii: Inst. Polyn. Stud. Pottier J. 1999. Anthropology of Food: the Social Dynamics of Food Security. Malden, MA: Blackwell Poulain JP, ed. 1997. Eating And Drinking Habits And Cultural Identity (I) and (II). Vietnam. Stud. (n.s.) 55(3):5190, 55(4):5 251 Purdue DA. 2000. Anti-GenetiX: the Emergence of the Anti-GM Movement. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Ratzan SC, ed. 1998. The Mad Cow Crisis: Health and the Public Good. New York: N.Y. Univ. Press Richards AI. 1939. Land, Labour, and Diet in Northern Rhodesia: an Economic Study of the Bemba Tribe. London: Oxford Univ. Press Roseberry W. 1996. The rise of yuppie coffees

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

118

MINTZ

DU BOIS Sutton D. 2001. Remembrance of Repasts: an Anthropology of Food and Memory. Oxford: Berg Tam SM. 2001. Lost and found?: reconstructing Hong Kong identity in the idiosyncrasy and syncretism of yumcha. See Wu & Tan 2001, pp. 4970 Tanner J. 1999. The rationing system, food policy, and nutritional science during the Second World War: a comparative view of Switzerland. See Lentz 1999, pp. 211 42 Tapper R, Tapper N. 1986. Eat this, itll do you a power of good: food and commensality among Durrani Pashtuns. Am. Ethnol. 13(1):6279 Teuteberg HJ, ed. 1992. European Food History: a Research Review. New York: Leicester Univ. Press Thomas B. 1992. The Utah school of evolutionary ecology: a cost-benet and materialistfunctional veneer of superstructure. Dialect. Anthropol. 17:41328 Toomey P. 1994. Food from the Mouth of Krishna: Feasts and Festivities in a North Indian Pilgrimage Centre. Delhi: Hindustan Toussaint-Samat M. 1992. A History of Food. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Trankell IB. 1995. Cooking, Care, and Domestication: a Culinary Ethnography of the Tai Yong, Northern Thailand. Sweden: Uppsala Univ. Press Trubek AB. 2000. Haute Cuisine: How the French Invented the Culinary Profession. Phila.: Univ. Penn. Press Tuchman G, Levine HG. 1993. New York Jews and Chinese food: the social construction of an ethnic pattern. J. Contemp. Ethnog. 22(3):362407 UN Food Agric. Organ. 2001. http://www.fao. org US Dep. Agric. 2001. http://www.usda.gov, http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu Van Esterik P. 1999. Right to food; right to feed; right to be fed: the intersection of womens rights and the right to food. Agric. Hum. Values 16:22532 Vargas LA, Casillas LE. 1992. Diet and

and the reimagination of class in the United States. Am. Anthropol. 98(4):76275 Ross EB. 1980. Patterns of diet and forces of production: an economic and ecological history of the ascendancy of beef in the United States. In Beyond the Myths of Culture: Essays in Cultural Materialism, ed. E Ross, pp. 181225. San Francisco: Academic Sahlins M. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press Salaman RN. 1949. History and Social Inuence of the Potato. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Schaffner M, ed. 1992. Brot, Brei und Was Dazugeh rt. Z rich: Chronos Verlag o u Scheper-Hughes N. 1992. Death Without Weeping: the Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press Sharman A, Theophano J, Curtis K, Messer E, eds. 1991. Diet and Domestic Life in Society. Phila.: Temple Univ. Press Shipton P. 1990. African famines and food security: anthropological perspectives. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:35394 Simoons FJ. 1991. Food in China: a Cultural and Historical Inquiry. Boston: CRC Simoons FJ. 1994. Eat Not This Flesh: Food Avoidances from Prehistory to the Present. Madison: Univ. Wis. Press. 2nd ed. Simoons FJ. 1998. Plants of Life, Plants of Death. Madison: Univ. Wis. Press Singer EA. 1984. Conversion through foodways enculturation: the meaning of eating in an American Hindu sect. See Brown & Mussell 1984, pp. 195214 Smith AF. 1994. The Tomato in America: Early History, Culture and Cookery. Columbia: Univ. S. Carolina Press Smith WR. 1889. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites. New York: Appleton Sobal J. 1999. Food system globalization, eating transformations, and nutrition transitions. In Food in Global History, ed. R Grew, pp. 171-93. Boulder, CO: Westview Spring A, ed. 2000. Women Farmers and Commercial Ventures: Increasing Food Security in Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Rienner

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

FOOD AND EATING foodways in Mexico City. See Pelto & Vargas 1992, pp. 23547 Vialles N. 1994. Animal to Edible. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Viola HJ, Margolis C, eds. 1991. Seeds of Change: Five Hundred Years Since Columbus. Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Voss J. 1987. The politics of pork and the rituals of rice: redistributive feasting and commodity circulation in northern Luzon, Philippines. In Beyond the New Economic Anthropology, ed. J Clammer, pp. 12141. New York: Macmillan Warman A. 1988. La Historia de un Bastardo: Maz y Capitalismo. Mexico City: Fondo Cultura Econ. Wassmann J. 1993. When actions speak louder than words: the classication of food among the Yupno of Papua New Guinea. Q. Newslett. Lab. Comp. Hum. Cogn. 15(1):3040 Watson JL, ed. 1997. Golden Arches East: McDonalds in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press Weismantel MJ. 1988. Food, Gender, and Poverty in the Ecuadorian Andes. Phila.: Univ. Penn. Press Weismantel MJ. 1989. The children cry for bread: hegemony and the transformation of consumption. In The Social Economy of Consumption, ed. HJ Rutz, BS Orlove, pp. 85 100. Lanham, MD: Univ. Press Am. Weismantel MJ. 1991. Maize beer and An-

119

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

dean social transformations: drunken Indians, bread babies, and chosen women. MLN 106(4):86179 Weston RO, ed. 1992. Cultura, Identidad, y Cocina en el Per . Peru: Univ. San Martn u de Porres Whit WC. 1995. Food and Society: a Sociological Approach. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall Whitehead H. 2000. Food Rules: Hunting, Sharing, and Tabooing Game in Papua New Guinea. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press Wiessner P, Schiefenh vel W, eds. 1996. Food o and the Status Quest: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Providence, RI: Berghahn Wilk RR. 1999. Real Belizean food: building local identity in the transnational Caribbean. Am. Anthropol. 101(2):24455 Willard P. 2001. Saffron. Boston: Beacon Wood B, Hill K. 2000. A test of the showingoff hypothesis with Ache hunters. Curr. Anthropol. 41(1):12425 Wood RC. 1995. The Sociology of the Meal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press Wu DYH, Tan CB, eds. 2001. Changing Chinese Foodways in Asia. Hong Kong: Chinese Univ. Press Ziker JP. 1998. Kinship and exchange among the Dolgan and Nganasan of Northern Siberia. Res. Econ. Anthropol. 19:191238 Zubaida S, Tapper R, eds. 1994. Culinary Cultures of the Middle East. London: Tauris

Annual Review of Anthropology Volume 31, 2002

CONTENTS
FrontispieceClifford Geertz
Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

xxii

OVERVIEW
An Inconstant Profession: The Anthropological Life in Interesting Times, Clifford Geertz 1 189 279 363 21 45 211

ARCHAEOLOGY
The Politics of Archaeology in Africa, Nick Shepherd The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology, Lynn Meskell The Upper Paleolithic Revolution, Ofer Bar-Yosef

BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
The Form and Function of Reconciliation in Primates, Joan B. Silk Current Topics in Primate Socioendocrinology, Fred B. Bercovitch and Toni E. Ziegler Variation in Human Body Size and Shape, Christopher Ruff The Human Y Chromosome Haplogroup Tree: Nomenclature and Phylogeography of Its Major Divisions, Michael F. Hammer and Stephen L. Zegura Energetics and the Evolution of the Genus Homo, Leslie C. Aiello and Jonathan C. K. Wells

303 323

LINGUISTICS AND COMMUNICATIVE PRACTICES

Signs of Their Times: Deaf Communities and the Culture of Language, Richard J. Senghas and Leila Monaghan Discourse Forms and Processes in Indigenous Lowland South America: An Areal-Typological Perspective, Christine Beier, Lev Michael, and Joel Sherzer Language Socialization: Reproduction and Continuity, Transformation and Change, Paul B. Garrett and Patricia Baquedano-L pez o 69

121 339

xv

xvi

CONTENTS

REGIONAL STUDIES
Religion in South Asia, Peter van der Veer African Presence in Former Soviet Spaces, Kesha Fikes and Alaina Lemon 173 497

SOCIOCULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
The Anthropology of Food and Eating, Sidney W. Mintz and Christine M. Du Bois Street Children, Human Rights, and Public Health: A Critique and Future Directions, Catherine Panter-Brick Weber and Anthropology, Charles F. Keyes Contemporary Trends in Infant Feeding Research, Penny Van Esterik Laboring in the Factories and in the Fields, Sutti Ortiz Migrant Illegality and Deportability in Everyday Life, Nicholas P. De Genova The Anthropology of Online Communities, Samuel M. Wilson and Leighton C. Peterson Toward an Anthropology of Democracy, Julia Paley Youth and Cultural Practice, Mary Bucholtz 99 147 233 257 395 419 449 469 525

Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.

THEME I: CHILDHOOD
Street Children, Human Rights, and Public Health: A Critique and Future Directions, Catherine Panter-Brick Contemporary Trends in Infant Feeding Research, Penny Van Esterik Youth and Cultural Practice, Mary Bucholtz 147 257 525 21 99 257 395 419 449

THEME II: THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF EVERYDAY LIFE

The Form and Function of Reconciliation in Primates, Joan B. Silk The Anthropology of Food and Eating, Sidney W. Mintz and Christine M. Du Bois Contemporary Trends in Infant Feeding Research, Penny Van Esterik Laboring in the Factories and in the Fields, Sutti Ortiz Migrant Illegality and Deportability in Everyday Life, Nicholas P. De Genova The Anthropology of Online Communities, Samuel M. Wilson and Leighton C. Peterson

CONTENTS

xvii

INDEXES
Subject Index Cumulative Index of Contributing Authors, Volumes 2331 Cumulative Index of Chapter Titles, Volumes 2331 553 563 566

ERRATA
An online log of corrections to Annual Review of Anthropology chapters (if any, 1997 to the present) may be found at http://anthro.annualreviews.org/errata.shtml
Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002.31:99-119. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Berry College on 11/19/11. For personal use only.