Notes On Introduction To Research
Notes On Introduction To Research
Research Methodology
Introduction to Research
Teacher In-Charge: Anubhuti Singh
Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific.
Sometimes this is informally called a “top-down” approach. We might begin
with thinking up a theory about our topic of interest. We then narrow that
down into more specific hypotheses that we can test. We narrow down even
further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses. This ultimately
leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data – a confirmation (or
not) of our original theories.
Inductive reasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to
broader generalizations and theories. Informally, we sometimes call this a
“bottom up” approach (please note that it’s “bottom up” and not “bottoms up”
which is the kind of thing the bartender says to customers when he’s trying to
close for the night!). In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations
and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some
tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some
general conclusions or theories.
These two methods of reasoning have a very different “feel” to them when
you’re conducting research. Inductive reasoning, by its very nature, is more
open-ended and exploratory, especially at the beginning. Deductive reasoning
is more narrow in nature and is concerned with testing or confirming
hypotheses. Even though a particular study may look like it’s purely deductive
(e.g., an experiment designed to test the hypothesized effects of some treatment
on some outcome), most social research involves both inductive and deductive
reasoning processes at some time in the project. In fact, it doesn’t take a rocket
scientist to see that we could assemble the two graphs above into a single
circular one that continually cycles from theories down to observations and
back up again to theories. Even in the most constrained experiment, the
researchers may observe patterns in the data that lead them to develop new
theories.
(Refer- https://conjointly.com/kb/deduction-and-
induction/#:~:text=In%20logic%2C%20we%20often%20refer,general%20to%20
the%20more%20specific.&text=Inductive%20reasoning%20works%20the%20ot
her,to%20broader%20generalizations%20and%20theories.)
Characteristics of Research
1. Empirical.
Research is based on direct experience or observation by the researcher.
2. Logical.
Research is based on valid procedures and principles.
3. Cyclical.
Research is a cyclical process because it starts with a problem and ends with a
problem.
4. Analytical.
Research utilizes proven analytical procedures in gathering the data, whether
historical, descriptive, experimental and case study.
5. Critical.
Research exhibits careful and precise judgment.
6. Methodical.
Research is conducted in a methodical manner without bias using systematic
method and procedures.
7. Replicability.
The research design and procedures are replicated or repeated to enable the
researcher to arrive at valid and conclusive results.
Basic research
Applied Research
Descriptive research
Causal research
Causal research can be defined as a research method that is used to determine
the cause and effect relationship between two variables. This research is used
mainly to identify the cause of the given behavior. Using causal research, we
decide what variations take place in an independent variable with the change
in the dependent variable. The meaning of causal research is to determine the
relationship between a cause and effect. It is also known as explanatory
research. A variation in an independent variable is observed, which is assumed
to be causing changes in the dependent variable. The changes in the
independent variable are measured due to the variation taking place in the
dependent variable.
Ex-post-facto Research
The ex-post facto research is a kind of research in which the researcher
predicts the possible causes behind an event that has already occurred. For
example, if a child is delinquent (that is, one who indulges in criminal
activities), then in order to find the basic reason behind such delinquency, the
researcher would try to find out the various events that have occurred and the
many possibilities that could have contributed to the concerned delinquent
behaviour. The expected possibilities may be lack of discipline at school/ family
history/ peer effect/ neighbourhood or socialisation. It is an interesting point
to note that, the researcher predicts a cause on the basis of a controlled effect
(since no variation can be done on the effect which has already taken place on
the basis of the independent variable or the cause). Thus, an ex-post facto
research can be defined as an empirically based investigation which does not
involve the researchers’ direct control over the independent variables because
they have already led to effects.
Types of research for Qualitative approach
1. Ethnography
For example, one way of uncovering the unmet needs of customers is to “follow
them home” and observe them as they interact with the product. You don’t
come armed with any hypotheses to necessarily test; rather, you’re looking to
find out how a product is used.
2. Narrative
The narrative approach weaves together a sequence of events, usually from just
one or two individuals to form a cohesive story. You conduct in-depth
interviews, read documents, and look for themes; in other words, how does an
individual story illustrate the larger life influences that created it. Often
interviews are conducted over weeks, months, or even years, but the final
narrative doesn’t need to be in chronological order. Rather it can be presented
as a story (or narrative) with themes, and can reconcile conflicting stories and
highlight tensions and challenges which can be opportunities for innovation.
3. Phenomenological
When you want to describe an event, activity, or phenomenon, the aptly named
phenomenological study is an appropriate qualitative method. In a
phenomenological study, you use a combination of methods, such as
conducting interviews, reading documents, watching videos, or visiting places
and events, to understand the meaning participants place on whatever’s being
examined. You rely on the participants’ own perspectives to provide insight into
their motivations.
Like other qualitative methods, you don’t start with a well-formed hypothesis.
In a phenomenological study, you often conduct a lot of interviews, usually
between 5 and 25 for common themes, to build a sufficient dataset to look for
emerging themes and to use other participants to validate your findings.
4. Grounded Theory
5. Case Study