Assignment No 1-Spring 2025-Complex Engineering Problem
Assignment No 1-Spring 2025-Complex Engineering Problem
Note:
i. Student are required to carry out and submit this assignment on individual basis.
ii. Assignment will be evaluated at the end of semester based on the rubrics provided at the
end of this assignment.
iii. Students are expected to come up with alternative designs and use of technologies which
shall be well justified in the report.
iv. Students’ learning will be assessed in a viva/short presentation in the last class.
Question: Assuming that we have five sites of an organization, which are required to be connected
with one another. In each site, we have 1000 employees with a potential to grow working in various
departments (Admin, HR, Finance). The organization provides some essential services to its
employees which include email and web services. Students are required to design and implement
a fully functional internetwork in Cisco Packet Tracer that simulates real-world Internet-like
capabilities. The project should focus on scalability and efficiency while implementing core
networking principles. Following are the requirements of design and implementation.
1
the concept of sub-netting and why it is being used in networks. If sub-netting is being
used, students shall justify its usage. The proposed IP scheme will then be implemented
using DHCP (Refer to S. No. 3 (i).
iii. Requirement: Create multiple Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) on each site for
network segmentation.
Learning Outcome: Students will incorporate and justify the use of VLAs, i.e.,
segmenting the LAN based on the layer-2.
4. Submission Guidelines
i. Packet Tracer File (.pkt) – Fully configured internetwork.
ii. Technical Report (15-20 Pages, .pdf or .docx) including:
a. Introduction & Design Goals
b. Network Diagram in MS Visio)- Outcome: Students will learn the design tool,
MS Visio.
c. Addressing & Sub-netting Plan
d. Routing and Switching Configurations- Outcome: Students will have hands on
experience of the IOS CLI.
2
Evaluation Criteria (Grading Rubric)
Component Marks Description
Network Topology & 20 Logical & hierarchical
Design structure
IP Addressing & Subnetting 20 Efficient addressing scheme
Detailed Rubrics
Logical & Hierarchical Structure (20 Marks)
Criteria Excellent (18- Good (14-17 Satisfactory Needs
20 Marks) Marks) (10-13 Marks) Improvement (0-9
Marks)
Network Design Clearly follows Uses a Partially Poor structure, flat
3-tier hierarchy structured design structured but topology, excessive
(Core, but lacks full lacks scalability. use of single-layer
Distribution, adherence to Some devices connections. No
Access) with hierarchical best directly hierarchy followed.
optimal traffic practices. Some connected to the
flow. Efficient traffic core, creating
segmentation bottlenecks congestion.
and redundancy. exist.
Scalability & Easily Mostly scalable, Limited Not scalable,
Modularity expandable but expansion scalability, inefficient use of
without major may require addressing and VLANs, poor
reconfiguration. reconfiguration VLAN design modularity, difficult
Proper of multiple not future-proof. to expand.
VLAN/Subnet devices.
planning.
Redundancy & Implements Some Minimal No redundancy,
Fault Tolerance STP, redundancy redundancy, single point of
EtherChannel, mechanisms potential single failure present,
HSRP/VRRP for implemented, points of failure. network collapses on
redundancy. but not fully minor failure.
Multiple paths to optimized.
prevent failure.
3
Criteria Excellent (18- Good (14-17 Satisfactory Needs
20 Marks) Marks) (10-13 Marks) Improvement
(0-9 Marks)
public/private
IPs.
Routing & All devices Some devices Inconsistent Poor
Addressing configured with misconfigured addressing, configuration,
Consistency correct but functional, multiple devices network devices
gateways, subnet minor routing misconfigured. unable to
masks, no inconsistencies. communicate
conflicts. properly.
4
Documentation Quality (20 Marks)- Not mapped to the CLO
Criteria Excellent (18- Good (14-17 Satisfactory Needs
20 Marks) Marks) (10-13 Marks) Improvement (0-
9 Marks)
Network Clear, well- Mostly correct Diagram No diagram or
Diagram & labeled but some incomplete, incorrect
Topology topology, missing details missing key representation of
includes IP in diagrams. components. network.
addresses,
VLANs, routing
paths.
Configuration Well- Mostly complete Includes basic Poor
Details documented but missing configuration documentation, no
command explanations for but lacks configuration
outputs, step-by- some justification. details provided.
step explanation. configurations.
Problem Solving Lists challenges, Identifies some Some issues No troubleshooting
& provides issues but lacks mentioned, but or problem
Troubleshooting solutions with depth in no solutions identification
logical solutions. provided. included.
reasoning.
Writing Quality Well-structured, Mostly clear, Somewhat Disorganized, poor
& Formatting clear, technical minor organized, lacks writing quality,
language, free of grammatical clarity, several lacks structure.
major errors. issues. grammar issues.