Engineering Catalysis 2nd Edition Dmitry Yu Murzin Download
Engineering Catalysis 2nd Edition Dmitry Yu Murzin Download
Murzin download
https://ebookbell.com/product/engineering-catalysis-2nd-edition-
dmitry-yu-murzin-48779108
https://ebookbell.com/product/engineering-catalysis-dmitry-yu-
murzin-50339624
https://ebookbell.com/product/engineering-catalysis-dmitry-
murzin-50620814
https://ebookbell.com/product/green-catalysis-and-reaction-
engineering-an-integrated-approach-with-industrial-case-studies-bala-
subramaniam-46209950
https://ebookbell.com/product/heterogeneous-catalysis-fundamentals-
engineering-and-characterizations-book-2022-giovanni-
palmisano-38474960
Green Chemical Engineering An Introduction To Catalysis Kinetics And
Chemical Processes Sundaramoorthy
https://ebookbell.com/product/green-chemical-engineering-an-
introduction-to-catalysis-kinetics-and-chemical-processes-
sundaramoorthy-5066572
https://ebookbell.com/product/past-and-present-in-denox-catalysis-
from-molecular-modelling-to-chemical-engineering-pascal-
granger-1132338
https://ebookbell.com/product/enzyme-engineering-selective-catalysts-
for-applications-in-biotechnology-organic-chemistry-and-life-
science-1st-edition-manfred-t-reetz-48946064
https://ebookbell.com/product/calcination-engineering-of-urchinlike-
coo-x-cn-catalysts-to-enhance-photothermocatalytic-oxidation-of-
toluene-via-photothermo-coupling-effect-meng-zhang-59163510
https://ebookbell.com/product/sizecontrolled-engineering-of-cobalt-
metal-catalysts-through-a-coordination-effect-for-oxygen-
electrocatalysis-huihui-jin-59161856
Dmitry Yu. Murzin
Engineering Catalysis
Also of interest
Chemical Product Technology
Murzin,
ISBN ----, e-ISBN ----
Engineering
Catalysis
2nd Edition
Authors
Prof. Dmitry Yu. Murzin
Åbo Akademi University
Process Chemistry Centre
Biskopsgatan 8
20500 Turku/Åbo
Finland
[email protected]
ISBN 978-3-11-061442-8
e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-061443-5
e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-061469-5
www.degruyter.com
To the memory of Elena Murzina
Preface to the first edition
If you do not stay the road will lead you
Andrei Platonov
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614435-202
Preface to the second edition
Apparently, this book devoted to the engineering aspects of heterogeneous catalysis
found its readership, as the publisher suggested to prepare the second edition. One
of the reasons was that the author, with experience in both industry and academia,
tried to combine both perspectives on catalysis, which are sometimes antagonistic
as illustrated in a somewhat provocative slide
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614435-203
Contents
Preface to the first edition VII
1 The basics 1
1.1 Catalytic concepts 1
1.1.1 Definitions 1
1.1.2 Length and time scales in catalysis 5
1.1.3 Catalytic trinity: activity, selectivity, stability 7
1.1.4 Composition of catalysts 13
1.2 Reactivity of solids 16
1.2.1 Physisorption and chemisorption 17
1.2.2 Basics of chemisorption theory 20
1.2.3 Surface crystallography 21
1.2.4 Mechanisms of some catalytic reactions 24
1.3 Catalysis in industry and for environmental protection 30
1.4 Fuel cells and electrocatalysis 45
References 47
2 Engineering catalysts 49
2.1 Catalyst design 49
2.1.1 Being in shape 50
2.1.2 Catalysis informatics and high-throughput experimentation 57
2.2 Toolbox in catalysis 59
2.2.1 General overview of the characterization methods 59
2.2.2 Adsorption methods 62
2.2.3 Physisorption methods 63
2.2.4 Chemisorption 74
2.2.5 Temperature-programmed methods 77
2.2.6 Calorimetry 82
2.2.7 X-ray diffraction 83
2.2.8 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence 84
2.2.9 Infrared and Raman spectroscopies 87
2.2.10 Catalyst particle size measurements 93
2.2.11 Electron paramagnetic/spin resonance 94
2.2.12 Mössbauer spectroscopy 96
2.2.13 X-ray absorption spectroscopy 98
2.2.14 Nuclear magnetic resonance 99
XIV Contents
Acknowledgments 533
Index 539
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to very many colleagues who shared their ex-
perience on various aspects of catalysis, in particular to the late Prof. M.I. Temkin
and Dr. N.V. Kul’kova, as well as Dr. A.K. Avetisov (all from Karpov Institute of
Physical Chemistry), Dr. R. Touroude (University of Strasbourg), Dr. E. Schwab
(BASF) and Dr. I.L. Simakova (Boreskov Institute of Catalysis). The everyday inter-
actions with colleagues from the Laboratory of Industrial Chemistry and Reaction
Engineering at Åbo Akademi University (Dr. K. Eränen, Dr. N. Kumar, Prof. J.-P.
Mikkola, Dr. P. Mäki-Arvela and Prof. J. Wärnå) and collaboration with numerous
colleagues and PhD students from Åbo Akademi University and other institutions
are gratefully acknowledged. Please, forgive me for not mentioning you all. Very
special thanks go to my colleague, friend and brother-in-science Prof. T. Salmi,
who has influenced me through the decades in very many ways.
The moral support of my family was very important in writing the first and
the second edition of this book. I am especially grateful to E. Murzina for her techni-
cal and spiritual contribution and especially endless patience and tolerance.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614435-005
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614435-204
1 The basics
1.1.1 Definitions
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614435-001
Although formaly catalysts remained unchanged during a reaction, they are in-
volved in chemical bonding with the reactants during the catalytic process in a
cyclic process: the reactants are bound to one form of the catalyst, and the prod-
ucts are released from another, regenerating the initial state (Fig. 1.1).
R (reactant)
Catalyst Catalyst-R
It should be also noted that although it is usually assumed that a catalyst participates
in the process but remains unchanged at the end, there could be major changes in its
structure and composition.
Potential energy diagrams for the catalytic and non-catalytic reactions presented
in Fig. 1.2 indicate that in both cases the reactions should overcome a certain barrier,
which is lower in the presence of a catalyst.
G x‡
Uncatalyzed
Catalyzed
A+B
A+B C+D
C+D
Reaction coordinate
Fig. 1.2: Potential energy diagram for catalytic and non-catalytic reactions. Changes of Gibbs
energy along the reaction coordinate.
As follows from Fig. 1.2, the change in the Gibbs free energy between the reactants
and the products ΔG is the same, independent of the presence or absence of a cata-
lyst, but providing, however, an alternative reaction path.
A lower value of activation energy implies higher reaction rates, which could
be expressed through the rate constant k dependence on temperature:
− Ea
k = AT m e RT (1:1)
where A is the pre-exponential factor, Ea is the activation energy related to the po-
tential energy barrier and m is a constant. Equation (1.1) was proposed by Kooij and
van’t Hoff [4] to explain the temperature dependence of reaction rates and could be
derived from the transition state theory of Eyring and Polanyi [5]. Arrhenius [6] ap-
plied a slightly simplified form:
− Ea
k = ko e RT (1:2)
∂ ln r ∂ ln r
Eact, apparent = −R = RT 2 (1:3)
∂1=T ∂T
Figure 1.3 also shows that if a catalyst is active in enhancing the rate of the forward
reaction it will do the same with a reverse reaction. As mentioned above, the catalyst
Gas-phase reaction
Ea
Energy
ΔH
Adsorption
E‡a
Product
Reaction Desorption
Reaction coordinate
affects only the rate of the reaction, but not the thermodynamics (for example,
the Gibbs energy of the reaction is the same), the approach to equilibrium or
the equilibrium composition. Thus, in the case of a thermodynamically unfa-
vorable process, there is no hope of finding an active catalyst that will beat
thermodynamics.
Instead, as a first step the reaction conditions (temperature, pressure and re-
actant composition) must be optimized to maximize the equilibrium concentration
of the desired product. Once suitable reaction conditions are identified the cata-
lyst screening is performed with the aim of finding a suitably active and selective
material.
The statement – that thermodynamics frequently limits the concentration of
a desired product and that a catalyst search will not help – sounds very straight-
forward and obvious. The author knows, however, a case where modern methods
of high throughput experimentation were used in industry to find an active cata-
lyst for a reaction with a maximum conversion allowed by thermodynamics of
only 1%.
Several years ago I started to be involved in a project related to the synthesis of dimethyl car-
bonate from methanol and CO2. The literature was full of papers describing various catalytic
systems and the mechanisms behind their catalytic action. Unfortunately, explicit data on
conversions and thermodynamics were absent from the literature. The PhD student doing the
experiments was initially very frustrated when, after a couple of months of catalyst screening,
very low conversions in the range of 0.1% were obtained. After repeated advises finally ther-
modynamics was calculated and it became clear that the reaction is heavily thermodynami-
cally limited. This switched the strategy from catalyst screening to finding a means of shifting
reaction equilibrium, in that case by in situ water removal.
Figure 1.2 represents a simplified situation, not taking into account the binding of
the reactant to the catalyst (called adsorption in heterogeneous catalysis), which is
illustrated in Fig. 1.3. The energy barrier between the catalyst-substrate and the
transition state should be lower than between the substrate and the transition state
in an uncatalyzed reaction (Fig. 1.3).
If the energy is lowered too much when the substrate is bound to the reactant
during adsorption, and the activation energy in the catalytic reaction is still rather
high compared to non-catalytic reactions, then the reaction rate is slow and catalysis
is not effective. In addition, if the binding of the products is too strong they will not
be desorbed (released) from the catalyst. At another extreme, if the binding is too
weak then the catalytic cycle could not proceed as effectively. It is thus intuitively
clear that bonding between a catalyst and a reactant should not be too strong. This
principle was first put forward by Sabatier [7], who proposed that a catalytic reaction
has an optimum (maximum) rate as a function of the heat of adsorption, and then
further developed by Balandin [8], who introduced volcano plots, relating catalytic
activity with adsorption energy (Fig. 1.4).
1,000 450 °C
100 bar
100 3:1 H2/N2
3
NH
%
10
01
0.
1 Ru
3
NH
Os
TOF (s–1)
1%
0.1
0.
0.01 Fe
3
NH
Co
1%
0.001
0.0001
3
NH
0.00001 Mo Ni
%
10
0.000001
–150 –100 –50 0 50 100
Relative nitrogen binding energy (kJ/mol)
Fig. 1.4: Activity (turnover frequency) in ammonia synthesis with different catalysts as a function of the
relative nitrogen binding energy, 450 °C, 100 bar, H2/N2 =3. (Reproduced with permission from [9]).
400 C
CO2 + 4H2 ! CH4 + 2H2 O
Pressure
This reaction is witnessing now a renaissance associated with a strong desire to di-
minish CO2 emissions. This reaction has also a special application, as it can be ap-
plied to produce water from exhaled CO2 in confined spaces (e.g., submarines or
the International Space Station). An important issue related to the latter applica-
tions is efficient and rather small-scale generation of hydrogen.
1–2 m
H2 (g)
10–20 m
Attractive interaction H2 (adsorbed on Pt)
2H (adsorbed
on Pt)
Re-face adsorption
(A) (B)
Fig. 1.5: Length scales in catalysis ranging from (A) an active site to (B) a reactor.
1 cm
(A) (B) (C)
Fig. 1.6: Different levels in catalysis. (A) active site level (subnanometer scale), (B) catalyst particle
powder (μm) level), (C) shaped catalyst (mm) level. Photos courtesy of Dr. E. Toukoniitty.
Catalysts in the form of powders can be used in industrial processes only in limited
cases. Shaped catalysts, in the form of extrudates, pellets and tablets on a mm scale
(Fig. 1.6C), are introduced into industrial reactors. Engineering of such materials
The main requirements of a catalyst for an industrial process depend on the trinity
of catalysis: activity, selectivity and stability. Activity refers to the ability to conduct
a process within a reasonable contact time, which influences the reactor dimensions
and process capacity. Insufficient activity in principle could be compensated by
higher catalyst amounts or some other means, such as higher temperature. Catalyst
selectivity is probably the most important characteristics of a catalyst, which should
be also sufficiently stable under operation conditions.
The reaction rate is calculated as the converted amount of the substance with
time relative to the amount of catalyst (mass or volume), specific surface area or to
the amount of active sites. In cases when the rate is defined per catalyst mass, the
unit of measurement is mol g–1 h–1.
The rate per amount of sites available for the reaction (exposed sites) is denoted
in heterogeneous catalysis as the turnover frequency (TOF) [or turnover number
(TON)], which is defined as the number of molecules reacted per site per unit time:
Even if the TOF concept is widely applied, its application is not straightforward,
because TOF depends on kinetics, i.e., the concentration of reagents and temper-
ature, and thus strictly speaking should be referred to particular conditions.
Typical values of TOF for industrially relevant reactions are in the range 10–2 ÷
102 s–1.
Exercise 1.1: Fig. E1.1 displays a fixed-bed reactor where there is a certain molar flow in the reac-
tor n_ Ain and out of the reactor n_ Aout . In such reactors, during catalyst screening conversions at
constant space velocity [volume flow rate (m3 s–1) relative to catalyst (kg)] are compared.
mcat
n•A n•A
in out
• •
n = cA V
Calculate:
for a continuous reaction of benzene hydrogenation over 5 cm3 5 wt% Pd on a support with the
catalyst density of 0.9 g cm−3 and the catalyst surface area of 250 m3 g−1 (5% of which is cov-
ered by Pd) when the molar flow of benzene in the reactor is 4 mol h−1 and the outlet flow is
3.7 mol g−1.
The number of mols of Pd should be calculated using the following strategy. From the overall sur-
face, the surface of Pd atoms could be computed. This in turn gives the number of atoms of Pd if
the surface density is known. Finally the number of moles of the metal can be easily calculated.
Exercise 1.2: Lilja et al. [10] investigated esterification of propanoic acid with methanol over a hetero-
geneous fiber catalyst. The temperature dependence is presented in Fig. E1.2.
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
c/c0
0.6
55 °C
0.5
60 °C
0.4
63 °C
0.3
0 50 100 150
Time (min)
Fig. E1.2: Esterification kinetics of propanoic acid with methanol (the initial molar ratio 1:1) as a
function of temperature.
Calculate:
1. The activation energy, based on initial rates (10 min).
2. Gibbs energy of the reaction at 60 °C based on experimentally recorded equilibrium data.
3. Reaction enthalpy at 60 °C, assuming that the entropy change during the reaction is negligible.
Hints:
– Initial rates (ΔC/dt) should be calculated from the slopes for the initial period when the rates
are not changing with time.
– Composition at equilibrium defines equilibrium constant (Keq = Cproducts/Creactants) and subse-
quently Gibbs energy (ΔG = –RTlnK).
– Enthalpy of the reaction is defined through Gibbs energy: ΔG = ΔH – TΔS.
Exercise 1.3: Steam reforming of heptane was performed over a 6 wt% cobalt catalyst supported on
γ-alumina. The amount of catalyst was 15 cm3. Knowing conversion and specific activity calculates
the molar feed rate, the rate per catalyst volume and catalyst weight, and apparent activation
energy.
o
C Conversion of heptane (%) Specific catalytic activity (mol/(mol(Co) s))
.
.
.
The turnover number is a useful concept, but is limited by the difficulty of determin-
ing the true number of active sites. The situation is somewhat easier for metals, as
chemisorption, which will be discussed further (Chapter 2, Section 2.2.4), could be
used to measure the exposed surface area.
For some reactions (structure insensitive) the rate is independent on size, shape
and other physical characteristics, while for structure-sensitive reactions the rate de-
pends on the detailed surface structure.
In order to increase turnover number it is obvious that the number of exposed
sites should be increased, which is possible with small sizes of active particles pro-
viding high surface area per unit volume (Fig. 1.7). This can be achieved with the
catalyst particles in the nanoscale range, thus placing catalysts in the domain of
nanomaterials.
1.0
NS/NT
0
1 1,000 Fig. 1.7: Ratio of surface (NS) to total (NT) atoms as a
dcluster (Å)
function of cluster size dcluster.
It should be noted that many granting agencies are somewhat reluctant to con-
sider heterogeneous catalysis as a part of nanoscience and nanotechnology, espe-
cially in comparison with some emerging applications. This is probably because
catalysis is a more established concept, with many dozens of decades of experi-
ence in synthesis of such materials as supported metals and zeolites.
Small particles of the active catalyst alone cannot provide thermostable highly
active catalysts because of sintering of them at conditions of catalyst preparation
and catalysis. Moreover, the separation of reaction products from nanosized cata-
lysts is far from being trivial, in many cases even impossible. Therefore an active
phase (responsible for activity and selectivity) is usually deposited on a thermosta-
ble support (Fig. 1.8), which also provides the required shape, mechanical strength
and pore structure.
Expensive active compounds (such as precious metals) are typically prepared
with the objective of maximizing the active surface area per unit weight of the ac-
tive compound, which is achieved at low loadings and rather small metal clusters.
Without support
With support,
no sintering
Fig. 1.8: Supported active phase. (Reproduced with permission from [11]).
For the less expensive active phase (supported base metal catalysts) the target is
maximum active surface area per unit volume, thus allowing higher loading of the
support with the active phase.
Fig. 1.8 depicts a simplified view on the catalyst nanocluster. In fact, the cluster
can contain different types of sites (Fig. 1.9A), with different binding to neighbor
atoms and thus differences in the ability to bind (adsorb) reacting molecules. As a
consequence, we can observe notable differences between the reactivity of different
surface atoms and active sites (edges, corners and faces as shown on Fig. 1.9B).
Adatom
Adatom
Corner
atom Edge
Corner
Edge
atom Corner
atom
Face
Corner Face
atom atom
Adatom Edge
(A) atom (B)
By controlling the amount of different surface sites (atom) we can, in principle, con-
trol catalyst reactivity and selectivity. There are however practical challenges in the
preparation of a cluster with a desired size and a narrow cluster size distribution.
III 6
TOF (s–1)
TOF
I 4
II
Diameter 2 4 6 8
(A) (B) Cluster size (nm)
Fig. 1.10: (A) I, II correspond respectively to structure sensitivity, while III represents a structure
insensitive reaction and (B) ethene hydrogenation on Pd/TiO2 (data from [12]).
poisons, loss of volatile agents and changes of crystalline structure, which cause a
loss of mechanical strength. There are industrial examples, discussed in Chapter 4,
that show successful industrial implementation of catalytic reactors in combination
with continuous regeneration, when the catalyst life is merely few seconds.
Because of the extreme importance of catalyst deactivation, the kinetic aspects of
this phenomenon will be treated in a separate section (Section 3.4.5).
In summary, it can be concluded that the target priorities in catalyst develop-
ment and applications are typically: selectivity > stability > activity.
The catalytic properties of activity, selectivity and stability are closely related to the
composition of the catalyst. Typical catalytic materials are shown in Fig. 1.11. Most
catalysts are multicomponent and have a complex composition. Components of the
catalyst include the active agent itself and may also include a support, a promoter,
and an inhibitor.
For example, metal catalysts are not in their bulk form but they are generally dis-
persed on a high surface area insulator (support) such as Al2O3 or SiO2. Many het-
erogeneous catalysts need supports, which, from an economic viewpoint, are a
means of spreading expensive materials and providing the necessary mechanical
strength, heat sink/source, help in optimization of bulk density and in dilution
of an overactive phase. The supports also provide geometric functions (an
20 mm 12 mm 10 mm 9 mm 6 mm
rings daisy rings daisy cylinder
Fig. 1.12: Vanadium-based catalysts supported on silica for sulfur dioxide oxidation.
Although there were catalyst formulations using silica synthesized from water glass
(sodium silicate), the catalyst manufacturers predominantly use kieselguhr. More
details of the manufacturing are provided in Section 2.3.5.4. This diatomaceous
earth (diatomite) is a form of silica composed of the siliceous shells of unicellular
aquatic plants of microscopic size. Kieselguhr is heat resistant and, in addition to
catalytic applications, has been used as an insulator, a component in toothpaste
and an abrasive in metal polishes. The specific features of the diatomaceous earth
(surface area 20–40 m2) are related to small amounts of alumina and iron as part
of the skeletal structure and a broad range of pore sizes. The main components of
the sulfur dioxide oxidation catalyst include SiO2 as a support, vanadium, potas-
sium and/or caesium and various other additives. The reaction actually occurs
within a molten salt consisting of potassium/caesium sulfates and vanadium sul-
fates, coated on the solid silica support. Vanadium is present as a complex sulfated
salt mixture and not as vanadium pentoxide (V2O5).
to C2H4O. It was found that the addition of halogen compounds to the catalyst in-
hibits this complete oxidation and results in satisfactory selectivity [13].
Metal oxides usually consist of bulk oxides. As semi-conductors, metal oxides
catalyze the same type of reactions as metals but are used in processes that require
higher temperatures. Often a multicomponent mixture of various oxides is used to
increase the catalytic activity.
For example: transition metals such as MoO3 and Cr2O3 are good catalysts for
the polymerization of olefins; a mixture of copper on chromium oxides, called cop-
per chromite, is used for hydrogenation; and a mixture of iron and molybdenum
oxide, called iron molybdate, is used for formaldehyde formation from methanol.
A* A* B*
(A) (B)
Fig. 1.13: (A) the Eley-Rideal and (B) the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanisms of catalytic reactions.
Adsorption in heterogeneous catalysis takes place before surface reactions and thus
deserves special consideration.
In the case of chemisorption of a molecule (adsorbate), a chemical bond is
formed between the molecule and the surface (adsorbent). For chemisorption, the
adsorption energy is comparable to the energy of a chemical bond. The molecule
may chemisorb intact or it may dissociate with breaking chemical bonds. The chem-
isorption energy is 30–70 kJ mol–1 for molecules and 100–400 kJ mol–1 for atoms.
In physisorption, the bond is a van der Waals interaction and the adsorption
energy is typically 5–10 kJ mol–1, which is much weaker than a typical chemical
bond. As a consequence the chemical bonds in the adsorbing molecules remain in-
tact. As the van der Waals interactions between the adsorbed molecules are similar
to the van der Waals interaction between the molecules and the surface, many
layers of adsorbed molecules may be formed. Some other features of physisorption
and chemisorptions are presented in Tab. 1.1.
E (d)
Physisorption
d (nm)
Chemisorption
After rearranging its electronic configuration and interacting with the electron
clouds of the metal, the molecule, however, may become chemisorbed.
The equilibrium position of this new chemisorbed state is at a shorter distance
than for physisorption, Moreover, for chemisorption the potential energy curve is
dominated by a much deeper chemisorption minimum. The chemisorption curve in-
tersects with the physical adsorption curve at a value close to zero in the energy
axes. For a clean surface this barrier between physisorption and chemisorption is
below zero, thus chemisorption on clear surfaces is usually fast and non-activated.
Dissociative chemisorption can occur for a diatomic molecule.
The structure of solid surfaces is fairly complicated (Fig. 1.15) as they are usu-
ally complex and rough, and consisting of high Miller index (to be discussed later)
planes with different energetics.
Moreover, adsorbed species can form different types of complexes on the surfaces
(some examples are given in Fig. 1.16), which might interact with each other (lat-
eral interactions).
As a result, the heat of adsorption might decrease with coverage, with the mini-
mum of adsorption energy decreasing in magnitude. This leads to a situation when
such a decrease of the adsorption heat will lead to an activation energy of adsorp-
tion (Fig. 1.17).
Physisorption at low temperatures is a standard method for determination of
the surface area of a catalyst, pore size and volume, and pore size distributions;
this will be discussed in detail in Chapter 2 along with the application of chemi-
sorption measurements for active surface area, surface site energetics and deter-
mination of catalytic sites.
O
C C C C C C
H C C
M M M M M M M M M M M M
C O
M M
M C C
C C C M M M M H
M M M M M M M M M M
C C M
C C O O M
M
C C M M M
M M M
Fig. 1.16: Examples of the complexes that could be formed on the solid surfaces. M, metal site.
E (d)
d (nm)
Evac Evac
Antibonding Antibonding
EF EF
d-Band d-Band
Bonding Bonding
s-Band s-Band No bonding
Fig. 1.18: Chemisorption of an atom. (A) strong chemisorption, (B) no bonding. (From [15]).
In the case when a molecule is chemisorbed, chemisorption orbitals are formed from
both bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals of a molecule (Fig. 1.19).
Filling of the orbital of the molecule, which was originally antibonding, makes
interactions with the surface stronger, while at the same time weakening the intra-
molecular bond of the adsorbed molecule and facilitating, for example, dissociation
of a molecule.
Filling of the bonding orbital is called donation, favoring “on-top” adsorption
(discussed in Section 1.2.3). Filling of the antibonding orbital, which binds a mole-
cule additionally to the surface, is called “back donation”.
The crystallographic structure of the metals that are most important for catalysis is
presented in Fig. 1.20(A).
σ-Orbitals σ*-Orbitals
Evac Antibonding
σ*
Antibonding
EF 1s 1s
Bonding
Bonding
d-Metal
Adsorbed molecule Free molecule
Fig. 1.20B shows three most important metal crystal structures: face-centered
cubic (fcc), hexagonally close-packed (hcp) and body-centered cubic (bcc). Other
structures can exist for more complex materials such as oxides, the bulk structures
of which can be represented by positive metal ions (cations) and negative O ions
(anions).
For catalysis, which is a surface phenomenon, it is not the bulk structure that is
important, but the exposed surface. As energy is required to cleave the surface, the
total energy is higher and the surface free energy is always positive.
Reactivity of the surface depends on the number of surrounding atoms, or in
other words, on packing. Dense regular packing (Fig. 1.21) has lower energy.
In order to discuss surface crystallography – the two-dimensional analogue of
bulk crystallography – the nomenclature of various metal planes (Fig. 1.20) should
be explained. The assignment of indices is done using the following approach. A
particular surface plane of a crystal is considered and is shown in Fig. 1.22.
Firstly the intercepts on the x-, y- and z-axes are identified. In Fig. 1.22 the inter-
cept on the x-axis is at x = a [at (a,0,0)], corresponding to the unit cell distance. The
surface is parallel to the y- and z-axes, thus there are no intercepts on these two axes
and they are considered to be at infinity (∞). The intercept coordinates on the x-, y-
and z-axes (a, ∞,∞) are converted to fractional coordinates by dividing by the respec-
tive cell-dimension (a) to give the fractional intercepts: (1, ∞,∞). The reciprocal values
of the fractional intercepts are 1, 0 and 0, yielding the Miller indices (100), which is
specified without being separated by any commas or other symbols (Fig. 1.23).
The surfaces in Fig. 1.23 are different in terms of their coordination or number of
neighbors. The most stable solid surfaces are those with a high surface atom density
(A)
(B)
Fig. 1.20: (A) Crystallographic structure of some catalytically active metals. (B) Metal crystal
structures.
that contains surface atoms with a high coordination number. For face-centered
cubic structures (representative of Ni, Cu, Pt, Pd, Ir, Au, Ag, etc.) the following order
of stability is valid: fcc (111) > fcc (100) > fcc (110). The most stable surface is then the
most closely packed. At the same time, the more open the surface is the more reactive
it is. It should be mentioned that surfaces of real catalysts are usually rough and con-
sist of high Miller index planes.
Figure 1.24 shows the most common adsorption sites: on-top, bridge (long or
short) and hollow (three-fold or four-fold).
From the discussion above it is apparently clear that the classical treatment of
adsorption and kinetics, which assumes the same adsorption strength for all sites, is
an oversimplification. In addition to different energetics of adsorption an adsorbed
molecule can bind to several metal sites and there could be interactions between
Energy
Typical neighbor
bond length
r
Typical neighbor
bond energy
(A)
Energy
Typical neighbor
bond length
r
Typical neighbor
bond energy
(B)
Fig. 1.21: (A) Dense, regular packing. (B) Non-dense, random packing.
(x,0,0)
x Fig. 1.22: Assignment of indices.
adsorbed species. This complicates the mathematical treatment of adsorption and ki-
netics, which will be addressed in detail in Chapter 3.
There are countless heterogeneous catalytic reactions with very many different
types of catalysts. It is thus impossible in a textbook focused on engineering rather
than on mechanisms of catalysis to describe even a small fraction of these, there-
fore only a few generic examples for some typical reactions will be mentioned here.
1 2 1 2 1 2
6
5
4
3 4
Threefold Threefold
4 Fourfold hollow 5 6
hollow FCC hollow BCC
1.2.4.1 Oxidations
In industry, typical oxidation reactions over heterogeneous catalysts are usually
partial or selective oxidations, such as:
– ethylene epoxidation
Ag2O
C C C C
O
O
C C C C
Bi2O3–MoO3
C C C C
V2O5–MoO3 [cat.]
O + CO2 + H2O + 3.5 O2 O + 4 H2O
+ O2 400 °C
O O
In terms of carbon use, butane oxidation is much more efficient than benzene oxi-
dation, as according to stoichiometry in benzene oxidation two moles of CO2 are
formed per one mole of reacting substrate.
In the selective oxidation reactions, CO2, CO and even water are undesirable
products.
Partial oxidation reactions (and selective catalytic reduction, Fig. 1.25) are typi-
cally carried out using such oxides as, for example, V2O5, MoO3, or molybdates. They
proceed through changes in oxidation states following the Mars-van Krevelen redox
mechanism.
Reduction
Oxidation
O
|
CO C CO2
|
O
M O M O M M M O M M M O M Interface
O2
M M O M M O M O M Interface
Oxide Oxide
(B)
Fig. 1.26: The Mars-van Krevelen redox mechanism. (A) oxide reduction and (B) re-oxidation.
O
|
CO O2 C
— O— O CO2
| | |
Interface
Alternatively one reactant is adsorbed and the other reacts from the fluid phase.
1.2.4.2 Hydrogenation
From the fundamental as well as an industrial viewpoint, hydrogenations can be con-
sidered to be the most advanced field of catalysis. Various hydrogenation reactions
are employed in industry, such as hydrogenation of double, triple and aromatic
bonds, and C=O bonds to name a few. Different mechanisms were proposed for the
hydrogenation of olefinic double bonds [16]. The Horiuti-Polanyi mechanism as-
sumes that both the alkene and hydrogen must be activated by being adsorbed on
the surface (see Fig. 1.28).
1. H2 + 2 * 2H
*
2. C C + 2* C C
* *
3. C C + H C C + 2*
* * * * H
4. C C + H C C + 2*
* H * H H
H
CO2CH3 CO2CH3
H2, Pt
CO2CH3 CO2CH3
H
(100%)
The mechanism, which addresses stereo selectivity and is consistent with liquid-phase
hydrogenation kinetics, assumes the addition of hydrogen to the adsorbed organic
molecule, followed by isomerization in the adsorbed state of the formed olefin-
hydrogen complex (Fig. 1.30). The adsorbed product is displaced from the surface by
the incoming substrate. See [17] for a detailed discussion on the mechanism.
B
H2
ZA
ZB ZAH2
H2 C = CH − CH2 − CH3 + H + !
H3 C − C H − CH2 − CH3
¯
H3C–CH–CH2–CH3 H3C–CH2–CH–CH3
+ +
H3 C − CH2 − C H − CH3 !
H3 C − CH = CH − CH3 + H
+
¯
Skeletal isomerization of olefins also proceeds with the addition of proton and fur-
ther rearrangement of carbenium ions because of their different stabilities:
CH3 CH3
H H2 H2 H2
R C C C R' R C C C R'
+ +
H
Thus, tertiary carbenium ions are more stable than secondary ones, with primary
ions the least stable. Because of the different mechanisms of proton addition, the
skeletal isomerization of alkanes is more difficult than that of olefins, requiring
stronger acid sites.
Catalytic cracking of heavy organic compounds is an industrially important re-
action in oil refining that will be covered in detail in Chapter 4. During cracking,
secondary carbenium ions are formed at random followed by cracking at the bond
at the beta position to the charged carbon atom, giving an olefin and a primary car-
benium ion:
The primary ion undergoes a hydride shift to secondary ions, as discussed above. A
detailed account of the mechanism of catalytic cracking is provided in Section 4.3.
Fig. 1.31: Shapes of heterogeneous catalysts. (Reproduced with permission from [18]).
In theory, catalysts are not consumed in a chemical reaction, thus in an ideal sce-
nario for cost calculations only the cost of the initial catalyst should be considered.
In practice many industrial catalysts deactivate, requiring gradual replacement.
Nonetheless, the contribution of catalysts to the overall cost of a product is on aver-
age not very high (~3%) and subsequently a part of catalyst sales in relation to the
gross domestic product (GDP) is marginal (~0.1%). However, the share in GDP of
products made by catalysts could be as high as 25%. The global catalyst market was
estimated to be worth 27.7 billion dollars in 2015 and is projected to increase to
33.5 billion USD in 2019. The main contribution to the global demand for catalysts
is associated with environmental applications (Fig. 1.32), while the second most im-
portant contribution is related to сrude oil refining (Fig. 1.33).
41%
17%
Refining Fine chemicals and intermediates
13% Petrochemicals Environmental
5%
Polymers
Gas
Desulfurization Isomerization
Light
naphtha
Gasoline
Heavy
naphtha
Reforming
Petrol Kerosene
Catalytic cracking
Asphalt
Residues bitumen
Most growth in catalyst demand is outside the Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development and is driven to a substantial extent by environmental air
quality and fuel specifications. The annual growth rate of emission control catalysts
(~12%) is higher than the average for the catalyst manufacturing industry (~8%).
In addition to tightening the regulations for mobile emissions and for fuel
quality, other trends driving future demand for catalysts are: improving process
efficiency by more efficient use of feedstock and higher yields; and increasing en-
ergy efficiency, expanding simultaneously the feedstock base to include coal, nat-
ural gas and biomass.
The contribution of catalysts to improving the environment is not only related
to end-of-pipe technologies (for example, the cleaning of wastes), but also to the
prevention of pollution by avoiding the formation of waste and unwanted by-
products through improving processes and selectivity in the existing ones.
Tab. 1.2 gives some examples of catalytic processes in oil refining for the pro-
duction of gasoline, diesel, kerosene, heating oils, while a photo of catalysts used
in refining as well as in the synthesis of petrochemicals is presented in Fig. 1.34.
G eorge found his herdsman eager for news from the settlement,
as he always was, but he had nothing to tell him that was very
interesting. He could have given him some information that would
have made him open his eyes and put him in fighting humor at
once; but he thought it best to avoid that subject altogether. If he
told Zeke that Uncle John had threatened to take his herd of cattle
away from him, under the plea of reducing expenses, but really as
George believed, for the purpose of turning it over to Ned, the old
man would have been as angry as George was when he first learned
of the fact. But the boy didn’t want to let Zeke know how mean his
uncle was, and so he said nothing about his plans. They never could
be carried out while Zeke was there to protect his stock, and George
could afford to be magnanimous.
George and his herdsman made an early start on the following
morning, and the third night found them at Catfish Falls. They now
felt perfectly safe, for the raiders had never been known to
penetrate so far into the country. Their depredations were principally
confined to the counties bordering on the river, it being their object
to stampede all the stock they could find in one night’s raid, and
drive it across the river into Mexico, before the settlers could gather
in sufficient numbers to pursue them. They tried as hard to avoid a
fight as the ranchemen did to overtake them.
George made the camp and cooked the supper, and when they had
satisfied their appetites, the former laid down on his blanket in front
of the fire with his saddle for a pillow, and listened to Zeke, who
talked and smoked incessantly. Their work for the day was over now.
The cattle were always brought close in to camp at dark, the horses
and mule were staked out, and the campers went to bed at an early
hour. If they awoke during the night, they replenished the fire with
some of the fuel that was always kept close at hand, and walked
around the herd to see if there were any restless ones in it who felt
inclined to stray away. George performed this necessary duty twice
on this particular night making the first round about twelve o’clock.
To his surprise, he found the most of the cattle on their feet, and
saw that some of them were exhibiting unmistakable signs of
uneasiness and alarm. They stood snuffing the air eagerly, carrying
their heads high and their ears thrown forward, and now and then
they would walk a few steps out of the herd, lower their horns and
paw the ground as if challenging the object that had excited them,
whatever it was, to come out and give them battle. The rest of the
cattle were lying down, chewing their cuds contentedly, and
apparently not at all disturbed by the antics of their nervous
companions.
George threw himself flat upon the ground and swept his eyes
around the horizon. In this position, he could distinctly see any
object that might be approaching the camp (provided, of course,
that it was taller than the grass) for it would be clearly outlined
against the sky. But he could see nothing. He arose to his feet again
and listened intently, but could hear nothing calculated to excite his
alarm. The wolves which serenaded them every night were holding a
concert a short distance away, and that made George believe that if
there was any danger approaching, it was yet a long distance off; for
he knew that the wolves would be the first to discover it, and that
they would then bring their concert to a close and take to their
heels.
“There’s something up,” thought George, once more turning his eyes
toward the cattle. Some of the uneasy ones, reassured by his
presence, were walking about among their companions, as if they
were looking for a good place to lie down, while the others remained
in a defiant attitude and snuffed the air as before. “There’s
something up,” repeated George, “and I have been expecting it. I
have felt very nervous and timid for two or three days, and I don’t
know how to account for it. If there is anybody within hearing or
smelling distance who has no business here, I can find it out.”
George walked back to the camp, picked up his rifle, and after
unfastening the lasso with which his horse was confined, he jumped
on the animal’s back without saddle or bridle and rode away in the
darkness, paying no heed to a bray of remonstrance from Bony who
followed as far as the length of his lariat would allow him to go. He
rode out on the prairie for a hundred yards or more, and then
stopped his horse and listened again. The animal stood perfectly
quiet for a few seconds, looking first one way and then another, and
turning his ears toward all points of the compass, and apparently
satisfied with the result of his reconnoissance, he put down his head
and began cropping the grass.
“Hold up, here!” exclaimed George, seizing the horse by the mane
and tapping him gently on the side of his head with the muzzle of
his rifle to make him turn around. “We have nothing to be frightened
at yet—that’s evident. Now, old fellow, I shall leave you loose. Keep
your ears open and wake us up if you hear anything!”
George rode back to camp and sought his blanket feeling a little
more at his ease. He had as much faith in his horse as he had in
Zeke (the latter used to say that he could smell an Indian or a
Greaser at night as far as he could see him in the daytime), and
since the animal could not discover anything suspicious, it was as
good evidence as he wanted that there was nothing to fear. No
doubt some of the wild members of the herd felt as nervous and
uneasy as he did, and took their own way to show it.
Although George brought back to his blanket a most refreshing
feeling of security, he did not sleep as soundly as he usually did. He
went through all sorts of terrible things in his dreams, and started
every time the fire snapped. He was wide awake again at one
o’clock, and set out on his second tour of inspection. The moon, now
nearly half an hour high, had brought up with it a cooling breeze
which gently rustled the long grass of the prairie, and sent the
sparks from the camp-fire circling high in the air. The wolves had
closed their concert and gone off to find a more appreciative
audience, and there was an air of peaceful quiet brooding over the
scene. George forgot all his fears and continued his round with a
light heart. He found the cattle quiet, but some of them had begun
feeding and were straying away from the rest of the herd. While
George was engaged in driving them back, and forcing the
remainder of the herd into a more compact body, a yell, so sudden
and startling that it made the cold chills creep all over him, arose on
the air, and out from a little thicket of willows that grew a short
distance from the belt in which the camp was located, dashed a
party of horsemen who charged toward the herd at the top of their
speed. They were Mexicans; George could see that at a glance. They
had doubtless been hovering about the camp all night, and it was
while they were working their way around to the leeward of the herd
that their presence had been detected by the wakeful cattle.
George stood for an instant as if he were rooted to the ground; and
then with a wild cry of alarm he dashed forward, running diagonally
across the front of the herd, hoping almost against hope that he
might succeed in passing them, and thus avoiding the rush which he
knew would come in a moment more. It was the only way in which
he could escape being trampled to death. He ran as he had never
run before, but he had made scarcely half a dozen steps when a
rumble like that of an avalanche sounded close at his side, telling
him that the cattle were coming. The strongest fence that was ever
built would not have stopped them now, and George, had he
attempted to drive them back or turn them aside, would have been
trampled under their feet like a blade of grass. He saw and fully
realized his danger, but could not escape it. Even Zeke, who was as
light of foot as an antelope, could not have saved himself by his
speed; and George, giving himself up for lost, fell flat upon the
ground, clasped his hands over his head and awaited his fate. By the
merest chance he threw himself into a little excavation in the prairie,
which, in the years gone by, had doubtless served as a wallow for
some old patriarch of a buffalo; but now it was covered with grass,
and there were two or three little willows growing out of the bottom
of it.
This protection, slight as it was, saved the boy’s life. He had barely
time to crowd himself close against the frail stems of the willows
before the frantic cattle were upon him. The roar of their hoofs on
the hard ground was almost deafening. It was louder than the roar
of all the northers he had ever heard crowded into one; but even
while he was wondering why some of the cattle did not jump upon
him the roar subsided, and George, looking up through the willows
which had been bent over his head, saw the moon shining down
upon him. Every steer had jumped the wallow, and George had
escaped with nothing more than a terrible fright. While he was
congratulating himself upon his good fortune, a clatter of hoofs
sounded near, and he ducked his head just as two horsemen, riding
side by side, dashed over the wallow in pursuit of the flying herd.
The boy’s first thought, after he had satisfied himself that he had
escaped without injury, was of Zeke. What had become of him?
There was one thing certain—George knew it now as well as he did
a few minutes later—and that was that the herdsman had made a
fight, and a good one, too. Although the old fellow appeared to be a
sound sleeper, he would jump to his feet the instant he heard any
unusual noise, and he was wide awake the moment he opened his
eyes. More than that, he kept his Winchester close at hand, and
could discharge it with a rapidity and accuracy that George had tried
in vain to imitate. Zeke was probably on his feet before the yell that
frightened the cattle was half uttered, and as soon as he got there
he was ready to begin shooting. Of course George had not heard the
report of his rifle, for the rumble of that multitude of hoofs about his
ears would have drowned the roar of a cannon.
“But I know, all the same, that he did shoot, and that some of those
raiders didn’t get away,” thought George, as he once more raised his
head and looked over the grass in the direction of the camp. “I think
I had better stay here. Zeke will know when the danger is over, and
then he will call to me. I wonder if he is there now? Somebody is
punching up the fire, sure!”
The old buffalo wallow into which George had thrown himself, was
about a hundred yards distant from the willows, and the grass was
so high that he could not see the camp; but he could see the smoke
of the fire as it arose through the tops of the trees that hung over it.
Just now the fire was blazing brightly, and the sparks were rising
from it in volumes. This was what led George to believe that there
was somebody in the camp. It couldn’t be one of the raiders, he told
himself, for they never stopped. They stampeded the cattle and
dashed on after them to get out of reach of the bullets in the
herder’s rifles.
“Of course Zeke is there,” thought George as he arose from his place
of concealment; but he had scarcely placed himself fairly upon his
feet before he dropped back among the willows again. There were
several figures moving about the fire, and there were riderless
horses and mounted men near by. The men were all dressed in
Mexican costume—the wide brims of their sombreros were plainly
visible in the moonlight—and there were at least a dozen of them in
sight. One of them seemed to be poking up the fire for the purpose
of making as bright a light as possible, while the others were going
into the willows with blazing fire-brands in their hands. Some of their
companions had already gone in there armed in the same manner,
for George could see the lights dancing about among the trees.
The boy saw all this during the instant of time he was on his feet,
and when he dropped back into his concealment again, his fear had
given place to a feeling of exultation. The raiders were searching the
woods in the vicinity of the camp, and of course they could be
looking for nobody but Zeke. Probably the old fellow had given them
a very warm reception. No doubt he had tumbled three or four of
them out of their saddles, and the survivors were hunting him up
with the intention of taking vengeance on him if they caught him.
“But they’ll never catch him,” chuckled George, “because he’s too old
a ‘coon. He has fought Indians too long to be beaten by a lot of
lubberly Greasers.”
George drew the tops of the willows closer together, confining them
in that position by twisting their branches, and having thus formed a
screen that was large enough to cover his head, he raised himself
upon his knees, so that he could look over the grass and watch the
motions of the raiders. They were certainly looking for somebody,
and they seemed resolved to find him, too, for they did not grow
discouraged and go away, as George hoped they would. Their failure
only seemed to make them the more determined. First one and then
another seized fire-brands and joined their companions in the
woods, and finally those who were mounted, swung themselves out
of their saddles and went in too, leaving the camp to take care of
itself.
“I wonder what Zeke has done to make them so persistent!” said
George to himself. “Perhaps they’ve got an old grudge against him.
They might as well go away, for they’ll not find him. He’s safe long
before this time, and if I could only make my horse hear me, I’d
soon be safe too.”
George could always find something to feel happy over, no matter
how unpleasant the situation in which he might be placed, and he
found something now. He had lost his fine herd of cattle, but Zeke
was left to him, and so were his horse and pack-mule. The former
had been stampeded with the cattle, but George knew he would not
run far before he would leave them and strike a straight course for
home. The two Mexicans who had followed the herd to head it off
and turn it away from the settlements toward the river, would not
bother their heads about him, for while they had three hundred fat
cattle to look out for, they could not afford to waste time in pursuing
a single horse. Bony was still staked out near the camp, and so was
Zeke’s nag. They both made the most desperate efforts to escape
with the herd, but the lariats with which they were confined were
too strong to be broken, and the picket-pins were driven so firmly
into the ground that they could not be easily pulled up. The
Mexicans, when they were ready to leave the camp, would probably
turn these animals loose, expecting them to follow their own horses,
just as Silk Stocking had followed off the raiders who made the
attack on the rancho; but that was something Bony would not do.
He was very much afraid of strangers, and when left to himself he
would make the best of his way home.
The search for Zeke was continued? until broad daylight, and all this
while George lay in his concealment watching the motions of the
raiders and wondering what his herdsman had done to make the
thieves so anxious to find him. When day began to dawn he
discovered something that seemed to explain it all: there were five
wounded men sitting and lying beside the fire. George knew that
they were wounded, for he could see that they wore bandages, and
that one who limped considerably and used a stick to walk with,
would now and then get up to bring a cup of water from the bayou
to two of his companions who kept their blankets. Probably one of
these men was the leader of the band, and that was the reason why
the others were so determined to find Zeke. But they had to give up
the search and go away without him, as George knew they would.
Shortly after daylight they began to come into camp by twos and
threes, and when they were all assembled George counted eighteen
of them. They talked earnestly together for a few minutes and then
set about preparing a hasty breakfast, helping themselves bountifully
to the contents of the pack-saddle, and using the cooking utensils
which George had provided for his own use and Zeke’s.
George waited with no little impatience to find out what they were
going to do when they made an end of the bacon and coffee, and
was very glad to see that they were preparing for an immediate
departure. When all was ready the wounded members of the band
were assisted into their saddles, Zeke’s horse and George’s pack-
mule were set at liberty, and the raiders moved slowly along the
willows in the direction the cattle had taken when they were
stampeded. It was a wonder that their suspicions were not aroused
by the actions of the mule which, foolish as mules generally are, ran
at once to the buffalo wallow in which George was concealed, and
not content with shying at the sight of it and giving it a wide berth,
as Zeke’s horse did, Bony circled around it two or three times, and
finally stopping, thrust out his neck, threw his long ears forward and
looked suspiciously at the crouching form of his master.
George, who had been in a fever of suspense for long hours, and
who began to breathe more freely when he saw the raiders moving
away, was frightened again; but, as it happened, the thieves paid no
attention to the mule’s actions. Better than that, Zeke’s horse kept
on his way without stopping, and Bony, seeing that he was going to
be left behind, started in pursuit. The danger was over now, but
George was much too wary to run any risks. He saw the raiders
disappear over the nearest swell, but he allowed another hour to
pass before he left his hiding-place. Then he moved very cautiously,
crawling along on his hands and knees, stopping every few feet to
look over the grass and listen, and examining the ground about the
camp very thoroughly before he ventured into the woods.
He found the camp in the greatest confusion. His rifle and revolvers
were gone, so were his blankets and poncho, and also a good
portion of the contents of the pack-saddle; but there was still a little
of the bacon and hard-tack left, and the raiders had forgotten to
take his haversack and frying-pan. He replenished the fire at once,
and while waiting for it to get fairly started, employed himself in
cutting up the bacon with an old rusty hunting-knife which one of
the thieves had probably left in exchange for his own new one.
While he was thus engaged he did not neglect to keep an eye open
for any straggling raiders who might have fallen behind the main
body; but there were none in sight. He placed the bacon in the
frying-pan, and when it was done to his satisfaction he put it into his
haversack, together with the small supply of hard-tack that was left,
extinguished the fire and set out for home.
“I am glad the thieves left me provisions enough to last me until I
can get more,” said George, to himself. “If I have to travel all the
way on foot, it will take me four or five days to reach the nearest
rancho, and I have no fears of getting hungry during that time. What
brought those raiders so far from the river? That’s what I can’t
understand.”
During the two days that followed, while the young cattle-herder
was trudging painfully over the lonely prairie, he had ample leisure
to turn this question over in his mind. He travelled early and late,
but his progress was necessarily slow, for one who spends the most
of his time in the saddle, finds it hard work to go on foot, and soon
grows weary. He kept a bright lookout for Zeke, and stopped on the
top of every swell to scan the prairie before and on both sides of
him, in the hope of discovering his horse or pack-mule; but Zeke was
miles ahead of him, hastening toward the settlement, intent on
alarming the ranchemen in time to cut the raiders off from the river,
while Bony and Ranger were making the best of their way toward
home.
“They are all safe, I know, for they are able to take care of
themselves. So am I; but there’s no fun in looking forward to three
days more of such walking as I have had. I shouldn’t mind it so
much if I hadn’t lost my cattle,” said George, with a long-drawn sigh.
“Those lazy Greasers have robbed me of years of hard work, and
now I must begin all over again, or else go to herding cattle for
Uncle John. Of course I can’t loaf about the house all the time and
do nothing, as Ned does. Hallo!”
While George was talking to himself in this way he came to the top
of a ridge, and found before him a long line of willows which fringed
the banks of a water-course. A solitary horse was feeding near the
willows, and this it was that attracted the boy’s attention and called
forth the exclamation with which he finished his soliloquy. The sight
of the animal alarmed him, for it was not at all likely that a horse,
wearing a saddle and bridle, would be feeding contentedly in that
wilderness, so far from all signs of civilization, unless there was
some one with him. George dropped to the ground, and ran his eyes
along the willows in search of a camp. If there was one in the
neighborhood he could not find it. There was no smoke to be seen,
nor were there any other indications of the presence of human
beings.
“But there’s somebody here all the same,” thought the boy, shifting
his position a little, so that he could obtain a better view of the
willows, “for that horse never came here without a rider. Somebody
has stopped in the willows to rest, and he’s a Mexican, too. I know it
by the silver ornaments on the saddle. I wish I could think up some
way to capture that horse. Shall I try it?”
Not knowing what else to do just then, George lay there in the grass
and considered the matter. Weary and footsore as he was, the
thought of finishing his journey on horseback was a most agreeable
one. The animal was loose—when he raised his head, George could
see that he was not confined by a lariat—but if he attempted to
creep up to him the horse would doubtless take fright and run off;
and that would excite the suspicions of his owner, who might be
tempted to send a bullet from his carbine in that direction. There
was too much danger in it George found when he came to think it
over. He sighed regretfully, thought almost with a shudder, of the
long, weary miles that lay between him and the nearest rancho, and
was about to crawl back down the swell again, when he was
astonished almost beyond measure, to hear his own name
pronounced in a weak and trembling, but still distinct voice.
“George! George Ackerman!” came the hail from the willows.
George jumped to his feet, and looking in the direction from which
the voice sounded, saw a sombrero waved in the air, and could dimly
discern the figure of a man, dressed in Mexican costume, who was
sitting on the ground, with his back against one of the willows.
“George!” repeated the man.
“Hallo!” was the reply.
“Come here, will you? I am badly hurt and in need of help!”
George grew more and more astonished. The man was a Mexican
beyond a doubt, but the voice sounded strangely familiar.
“Don’t be afeared, George!” continued the man, in a pleading tone.
“I couldn’t hurt you if I wanted to! I’ve got something to tell you!”
“Who are you?” asked the boy.
“Why, don’t you know Springer, who used to herd cattle for your
father?”
Yes, George knew him, and he didn’t know anything good of him
either.
“If you are Springer,” he shouted “what are you doing there with
those clothes on?”
“Come here, an’ I’ll tell you all about it!” was the answer. “I’ll tell you
something else, too—something that’ll make you open your eyes. Do
come, George, and give me a drink of water! I’ve got a chunk of
lead through each leg!”
“Aha!” said George, who thought he understood the matter now.
“You were with the raiders, and Zeke got two pulls at you with his
Winchester!”
As he said this he ran down the swell, and in a few minutes more
was standing beside the wounded man. It was Springer, sure
enough, but he was so much changed that George could scarcely
recognise him. His face was very pale and his strong frame was
convulsed with agony. The sash he usually wore around his waist
had been cut in two, and the pieces were bound tightly about his
legs above the knee to stanch the flow of blood from the wounds
made by the herdsman’s rifle. He was a hard-looking fellow, and any
one would have taken him for just what George knew him to be—a
cattle-thief.
Without stopping to ask any more questions George seized the
man’s hat, and hastening to the bayou presently returned with the
crown filled with water. The wounded raider drank eagerly and sank
back against his tree with a sigh of great satisfaction.
CHAPTER XIII.
GEORGE HAS COMPANY.
G eorge knew Springer well. The latter had once been in his
father’s employ; but being of no use as a herdsman or anything
else, he had been discharged, to make room for a more industrious
and pains-taking man. This enraged Springer, who threatened
vengeance, and followed up his threats by attempting to fire the
rancho. He had been detected in the act and almost captured; but
he succeeded in making his escape, and since then George had
never met him until this particular day. He had often heard of him,
however, as a member of a band of cattle-thieves, who now and
then made a raid through the country farther down the river. There
were a good many others just like Springer, on the opposite side of
the Rio Grande—renegade Americans—who, having left their country
for their country’s good, had taken refuge among the Mexicans, and
joined with them in raiding upon the well-stocked farms and ranches
of their Texan neighbors.
George returns Good for Evil.
ebookbell.com