Debating Template

Topic 1: That children should have a say in family decisions

1st Proposition 1st Opposition

Esteemed judges and audiences. We, the prop, Esteemed judges and audiences. We, the opp,
argue for the notion that __________ argue against the notion that __________

Our argument is that __________ Our argument is that __________

This is true because [reasons] This is true because __________

For example, __________for your reasons.

According to ______, __________for your
reasons. In short, say __________ again with brief
reasons.
In short, say ____________________________
again with brief reasons. I rest my case.

I rest my case.

2nd Proposition 2nd Opposition

As the 2nd speaker of Proposition team, I As the 2nd speaker of Opposition team, I
disagree with this argument came from 1st disagree with this argument came from 2nd
speak of Opposition team that says __________ speaker of Proposition team that says
__________
This is not true because __________
This is not true because [trình bày vì sao
Indeed, __________ không đồng ý với proposition’s 2nd claim]

Our first speaker has stated that __________ Indeed, __________

Our first speaker has stated that __________

There’s another reason why judges should
believe in our argument __________ There’s another reason why judges should
believe in our argument __________

In short, say __________ again with brief __________

reasons.
In short, say __________ again with brief
I rest my case. reasons.

I rest my case.
 3rd Proposition 3rd Opposition

As this debate comes to an end, I have noticed 2 As this debate comes to an end, I have noticed 2
main issues: main issues:

The 1st issue is __________ The 1st issue is __________

Opposition team has won this because
Proposition team has won this because Proposition team said __________, but we’ve
Opposition team said __________, but we’ve done better because we’ve stated that
done better because we’ve stated that __________
__________
The 2nd issue is [opposition’s 2nd claim]
The 2nd issue is __________ Opposition team has won this because
Proposition team said __________,but we’ve
Proposition team has won this because done better because we’ve stated that
Opposition team said __________,but we’ve __________
done better because we’ve stated that
__________ All above, please vote for Opposition team

All above, please vote for Proposition team

Debating Template
Topic 2 : That we should prioritize making friends with those
who agree with us over those who disagree with us

1st Proposition 1st Opposition

Team proposition wants to prove that uniforms Team opposition disagrees with proposition’s
are not important and schools should argument that [confidence and success
abandon them . contribute to children’s future when they get
used to sharing ideas at home].
Our argument is that [rely on agreement foster
a supportive and understanding Our argument is that [children’s perspectives
environment] are valuable, but the ultimate decision
making should rest with parents]
This is true because [
This is true because [parents -> life experience
and wisdom]
[children are willing to share their ideas,
leading to confidence value contributing to For example, [children can’t make decisions
critical thinking further and successful for their surgery or drug usage because they
leadership skills] are too young to take the consequences] for
your reasons.
According to ______, [60% of successful
businessmen stated that they used to In short, say [ensuring well-being/ health
participate in family sharings when they were should be prioritized which sometimes means
at secondary school] for your reasons. making uncommon decisions] again with brief
reasons.
In short, say [children involved in family
decisions lead to confidence and success] I rest my case.
again with brief reasons.

I rest my case.

2nd Proposition 2nd Opposition

As the 2nd speaker of Proposition team, I As the 2nd speaker of Opposition team, I
disagree with this argument came from 1st disagree with this argument came from 2nd
speak of Opposition team that says speaker of Proposition team that says [2nd
[opposition’s claim] proposition’s claim]

This is not true because [trình bày vì sao This is not true because[trình bày vì sao không
không đồng ý với opposition’s claim] đồng ý với proposition’s 2nd claim]

Indeed, [fact example] Indeed, [fact example]

Our first speaker has stated that [1st Our first speaker has stated that [1st
proposition’s claim] opposition’s claim]

There’s another reason why judges should There’s another reason why judges should
believe in our argument [your 2nd claim] believe in our argument [your 2nd claim]

[Fact example with “You”] [Fact example with “You”]

In short, say [your claim] again with brief In short, say [your claim] again with brief
reasons. reasons.

I rest my case. I rest my case.

3rd Proposition 3rd Opposition

As this debate comes to an end, I have noticed 2 As this debate comes to an end, I have noticed 2
main issues: main issues:
The 1st issue is [rely on agreement foster a The 1st issue is [opposition’s 1st claim]
supportive and understanding environment] Opposition team has won this because
Proposition team has won this because Proposition team said [proposition’s 1st claim]
Opposition team said [opposition’s 1st claim] + + [proposition’s 1st brief reasons], but we’ve
[opposition’s 1st brief reasons], but we’ve done better because we’ve stated that [trình bày
done better because we’ve stated that [trình bày vì sao không đồng ý với proposition’s claim]
vì sao không đồng ý với opposition’s claim] *Opp 2 có trình bày*
*Prop 2 có trình bày*
The 2nd issue is [opposition’s 2nd claim]
The 2nd issue is [proposition’s 2nd claim] Opposition team has won this because
Proposition team has won this because Proposition team said [Proposition’s 2nd
Opposition team said [opposition’s 2nd claim] claim] + [Proposition’s 2nd brief reasons], but
+ [opposition’s 2nd brief reasons], but we’ve we’ve done better because we’ve stated that
done better because we’ve stated that [trình bày [trình bày vì sao không đồng ý với
vì sao không đồng ý với opposition’s 2nd proposition’s 2nd claim] *phần này Opp 3 tự
claim] *phần này Prop 3 tự nói* nói*

All above, please vote for Opposition team

All above, please vote for Proposition team

Debating Template
Topic 3 : That schools should abandon uniform

1st Proposition 1st Opposition

Team proposition wants to prove that uniforms Team opposition disagrees with proposition’s
are not important and that schools should argument that [confidence and success
abandon them . contribute to children’s future when they get
used to sharing ideas at home].
Our argument is that [rely on agreement foster
a supportive and understanding Our argument is that [children’s perspectives
environment] are valuable, but the ultimate decision
making should rest with parents]
This is true because [
This is true because [parents -> life experience
and wisdom]
[children are willing to share their ideas,
leading to confidence value contributing to For example, [children can’t make decisions
critical thinking further and successful for their surgery or drug usage because they
leadership skills] are too young to take the consequences] for
your reasons.
According to ______, [60% of successful
businessmen stated that they used to In short, say [ensuring well-being/ health
participate in family sharings when they were should be prioritized which sometimes means
at secondary school] for your reasons. making uncommon decisions] again with brief
reasons.
In short, say [children involved in family
decisions lead to confidence and success] I rest my case.
again with brief reasons.

I rest my case.

2nd Proposition 2nd Opposition

As the 2nd speaker of Proposition team, I As the 2nd speaker of Opposition team, I
disagree with this argument came from 1st disagree with this argument came from 2nd
speak of Opposition team that says speaker of Proposition team that says [2nd
[opposition’s claim] proposition’s claim]

This is not true because [trình bày vì sao This is not true because [trình bày vì sao
không đồng ý với opposition’s claim] không đồng ý với proposition’s 2nd claim]

Indeed, [fact example] Indeed, [fact example]

Our first speaker has stated that [1st Our first speaker has stated that [1st
proposition’s claim] opposition’s claim]

There’s another reason why judges should There’s another reason why judges should
believe in our argument [your 2nd claim] believe in our argument [your 2nd claim]

[Fact example with “You”] [Fact example with “You”]

In short, say [your claim] again with brief In short, say [your claim] again with brief
reasons. reasons.

I rest my case. I rest my case.

3rd Proposition 3rd Opposition

As this debate comes to an end, I have noticed 2 As this debate comes to an end, I have noticed 2
main issues: main issues:

The 1st issue is [proposition’s 1st claim] The 1st issue is [opposition’s 1st claim]
Proposition team has won this because Opposition team has won this because
Opposition team said [opposition’s 1st claim] + Proposition team said [proposition’s 1st claim]
[opposition’s 1st brief reasons], but we’ve + [proposition’s 1st brief reasons], but we’ve
done better because we’ve stated that [trình bày done better because we’ve stated that [trình bày
vì sao không đồng ý với opposition’s claim] vì sao không đồng ý với proposition’s claim]
*Prop 2 có trình bày* *Opp 2 có trình bày*

The 2nd issue is [proposition’s 2nd claim] The 2nd issue is [opposition’s 2nd claim]
Proposition team has won this because Opposition team has won this because
Opposition team said [opposition’s 2nd claim] Proposition team said [Proposition’s 2nd
+ [opposition’s 2nd brief reasons], but we’ve claim] + [Proposition’s 2nd brief reasons], but
done better because we’ve stated that [trình bày we’ve done better because we’ve stated that
vì sao không đồng ý với opposition’s 2nd [trình bày vì sao không đồng ý với
claim] *phần này Prop 3 tự nói* proposition’s 2nd claim] *phần này Opp 3 tự
nói*

All above, please vote for Proposition team All above, please vote for Opposition team