Define Final
Define Final
DEFINE
This section presents the aim, objectives, statement of the problem, and a review of related
literature supporting the most prevalent problems identified in the initial findings.
The study aims to investigate and address the challenges faced by first-year Bachelor of
Secondary Education Major in English (BSED-English) students at Northern Bukidnon State College
in writing academic texts with clarity, coherence, and proper structure. While elements such as
grammar, vocabulary, and spelling are fundamental, this research places greater emphasis on the
structural aspect of writing specifically, structuring a text implies separating it into an introduction,
main body, and conclusion and visualizing this division through paragraphs. In terms of coherence,
linking ideas seems to be central (Taye and Mengesha, 2024). Incorporating text structure
knowledge into reading and writing instruction can significantly improve educational outcomes, as
Initial findings were based on writing samples and interviews conducted with fifteen first-year
BSED-English students. These revealed a common struggle among students to organize their ideas
effectively. Their writings were often marked by mixed-up thoughts, missing transitions, and
paragraphs that lacked singular focus. Many respondents admitted confusion about how to begin or
end a paragraph, often including too many unrelated ideas in one section or shifting topics abruptly
without clear linkage. As one student stated during the interview: “Usahay, kabalo ko nga naa jud
dapat paragraphs, pero diko sure unsaon nga mag connect sila ug sakto para akong mga idea mag
sunod na ang flow” (Sometimes, I know there should be paragraphs, but I'm not really sure how to
connect them properly so my ideas flow). Many students struggle with recognizing and applying
cohesive devices and structural elements in their writing, which can lead to disorganized narratives
and unclear arguments (Nurhayati, 2024). Another similar sentiment: “Kana ganing ang idea kay
naa ra sa akong ulo, pero kung isulat na nako bita kay feeling nako nag sagol-sagol” (It’s like I have
the ideas in my head, but when I try to write them down, it just feels disorganized). Text structure
2
serves as a framework for organizing ideas, which is crucial for effective writing. Studies show that
students' writing composition skills and reduces anxiety associated with writing tasks (Algaragere &
Al-Khawaldeh, 2023).
According to Sulaiman et al., (2023), despite these challenges, some students may perceive
their difficulties differently, often underestimating the impact of structural issues compared to
grammar or vocabulary problems. Many students struggle with arranging their ideas logically,
leading to illogical sequences in their writing. These accounts reflect a deeper issue of translating
mental concepts into a structured and coherent form of writing. Poor Organization: Many students
struggle with structuring their essays logically, leading to illogical sequences of ideas (Thao &
Quyên, 2020). This disorganization can confuse readers and detract from the clarity of the argument.
Based on initial observations and student engagement during the Empathize stage, it was
found that many first-year BSED-English students struggle significantly with organizing their written
ideas. Their outputs often reflect mixed-up thoughts, missing transitions, and unfocused paragraphs.
Common problems include difficulty in beginning or ending a paragraph, placing too many ideas
within one paragraph, or shifting topics abruptly. These struggles point to a lack of awareness and
skills in structuring academic texts, which negatively affects the coherence and clarity of their writing.
Guided by these initial observations, the study sought to answer two central research
questions:
1. Is there a need to improve the text structure and coherence in the academic writing of first-
year BSED-English students enrolled at the Institute for Teacher Education, Northern
2. Which specific aspects of text structure and coherence were least mastered by the first-year
BSED-English students enrolled in the Institute for Teacher Education at Northern Bukidnon
State College?
3
The initial findings of the analysis reveal significant structural weaknesses in students’ writing,
particularly in their ability to craft effective introductions and conclusions. Most students struggled to
present a clear and engaging opening statement that establishes the context and purpose of the
essay. This lack of a strong introduction suggests a limited understanding of how to effectively frame
the topic and guide the reader into the discussion. Additionally, some essays lacked a coherent
concluding sentence that summarizes or ties back to the main ideas, further reflecting challenges in
structuring their written work. The introduction emerged as the weakest area, underscoring the need
for targeted instruction in this aspect of essay writing. A poorly developed introduction weakens the
entire essay by failing to establish direction and relevance (Hyland, 2003). These problems suggest
that students require more instruction and modeling in how to construct purposeful introductions and
In terms of coherence, the output of the respondents was rated as generally good. However,
based on the data, the respondents can improve on formulating clear thesis statements to guide
their essays and develop arguments with sufficient explanations, examples, and logical reasoning.
Writing instruction that incorporates text structure knowledge can enhance students' ability to
produce coherent and well-organized written work (Bonnie J.F et al., 2023). Nevertheless, their
current knowledge and skill on coherence poses little to no issue. This lack of a focused thesis
weakens the coherence of the entire text, as it becomes unclear what position the student is arguing
for (Tribble, 1996). This lack of elaboration compromises the persuasiveness and clarity of the
writing (Van Eemeren et al., 2002). A weak or unclear thesis statement undermines the entire
essay's focus and coherence (Tribble, 1996). A common challenge is formulating a clear thesis
statement and effective topic sentences, which are crucial for guiding the reader through the text
logical reasoning, directly impacts the persuasiveness and clarity of the writing (Van Eemeren et al.,
2002). These issues indicate a need for focused instruction on writing strong, debatable thesis
4
statements and developing arguments through logical reasoning and supporting details to enhance
The analysis of students’ written outputs highlights that while there is some evidence of
foundational writing skills, the overall quality of text structure remains barely acceptable. Significant
weaknesses were observed in key structural elements, particularly in the formulation of introductions
and conclusions. Many students struggled to create engaging and purposeful opening statements,
often failing to establish a clear context and direction for their essays. Conclusions were similarly
problematic, with a number of students either omitting them or failing to effectively summarize or tie
back to the main points, resulting in essays that feel incomplete and unfocused.
Though coherence was generally rated as good, further analysis reveals that this strength is
somewhat superficial. Students often lacked a clear and focused thesis statement to guide their
arguments, and their body paragraphs frequently contained underdeveloped ideas, lacking sufficient
explanations or examples. This undermines both the persuasiveness and the logical flow of their
writing.
The implications of these findings suggest that students require targeted instruction in text
structure specifically in crafting strong thesis statements, organizing supporting ideas logically, and
composing purposeful introductions and conclusions. Without these skills, the overall effectiveness
and clarity of their writing remain limited. As it stands, the current level of proficiency in text structure