Chapter 2 (TP&M)
Chapter 2 (TP&M)
Transportation Planning
2024/25
2nd semester
Department of Civil Engineering
CHAPTER 2
Transportation Planning
Problems addressed can range from broad issues of policy at the federal or state level to
specific programs and projects at a local level. Besides problems of congestion and travel
growth, these could include the following:
- Travel demand alternatives for congestion reduction
- Land use/transportation coordination
- Fuel reduction measures
- Air quality measures
- Safety measures
- Economic development/redevelopment activity
The transportation planning process is direct application of problem solving via system
analysis. It provides a framework for the identification of transportation problems and the
development of alternative potential solutions. In its simplest form, it can be depicted by
figure 2.1.
process may iterate in defining alternatives and then estimating and assessing the
associated performance. The results might be that new alternatives must be found, or
perhaps the problem needs to be re-defined. Note that the planning process continues both
during and after project construction to assess the effectiveness of the selected alternative
in addressing the identified problems.
The transportation planning process comprises seven basic elements, which are inter-
related and not necessarily carried out sequentially. The information acquired in one phase
of the process may be helpful in some earlier or later phase, so there is a continuity of effort
that finally results in a decision. The elements in the process are:
i) Facility inventory
An important starting point for transport planning inventory of the existing transport
facilities are their condition and performance.
The major purposes facility inventory is to describe the current state of the system and to
procure input to the estimation and validation of models.
The type of data collection depends on the specific problem, for example – For a highway
planning the inventory may involve:
• Function classification
- Major arterials
- Minor arterials
- Local /access roads
- Collector roads
• Physical features of the road
- No. of lane
- Pavement & approach width
- Street and highway capacity
- Traffic control devices
- Traffic signals
• Traffic volume delay
• Travel time along the route
ii) Socio –economic and land-use
Transport planning process involves all of the activities required to understand the
situation that give rise to the perceived need for a transportation improvement. In this
regard, socio-economic and land-use factor should be considered which relates trip making
to the type of activities that occur in a region and also to the characteristics of the trip
maker that will influence the way this trips are made.
This is done by categorizing land-use that can then be used in transport planning to
estimate how many trips are attracted to each type of land use.
• Level of income
• Number of members in house hold
• Number of vehicles in house hold
• Age composition of house hold
• Education level
• Employment etc
Example of land uses shopping center, industrial areas, residential areas, Offices etc …
Such and other socio economic characteristics have been shown how trips are made. The
socio economic characteristics and land use are projected and used to forecast the travel
demand in the plan year.
An objective is a statement of a desired end state. However, that statement can range from
very general such as successful urban economy or higher standard quality life to a very
specific such as avoiding pollution levels above a specific threshold. Both are helpful, the
first in providing the context of strategy and a direction to it, the second in providing a
basic for assessing where the objective is being met.
To identify objectives and related problems there are two types of approaches
Identification of goals and objectives is critical in that they define the evaluation criteria
that will be used letter in planning process to assess the relative impact of alternative
projects and strategies. These criteria are often called measure of effectiveness.
1. Economic efficiency
2. Environmental protection
3. Safety
4. Accessibility
5. Sustainability
6. Economic regeneration
Transport planning identifies and prioritizes these elements of transport systems where
problems exist today or where problems exist in further given growth in travel. Also
transport planning can also identify areas where significant problem do not exist this time,
but system can provide opportunities for enhanced efficiency of operation.
This phase include preliminary feasibility studies, data gathering field testing and cost
estimating may be necessary at this stage to determine the practicability and financial
feasibility of the alternatives being proposed.
• New construction
• Adding new lanes
• Improving traffic controls through signals, signs etc
• Improving traffic flow through canalization.
vi) Evaluate alternatives
The purpose of evaluation phases it to determine how well each alternative achieve the
objectives of the project as defined by the criteria.
Evaluation involves methods for comparing an analytic way relative value of the
alternatives. One of the most used approaches is the benefit cost ratio, which compares the
alternatives on the bases of benefits and costs.
The benefit cost ration is the means of identifying the most economical efficient alternative
by defining benefits and costs in monitory terms. Many measures of effectiveness however
can’t be defined in monitory terms and this effective evaluation must include many
different means of preventing relevant information for decision.
Once the transport project has been selected, a detail design phase begins, in which each of
the components of the facility is specified. For transportation facility, this involves physical
location, geometric dimension, and structural configuration. Design plans are produced
that can be used to estimate the cost of building the project. When the construction firm is
selected these plans will be the bases on which the project will be built.
Sometimes the number of project that is recommended exceeds the amount of funding that
is available. In such cases properties will be privatized for implementation.
It is the task of politicians, and of the skilled professionals who advise them, to identify the
most appropriate solutions to today's and tomorrow's transport problems. These solutions
form the basis of a transport policy, which can be designed for a nation, a city, a town or a
rural area. But it is essential that professionals are clear on the reasons for such solutions:
that is, that the objectives which are to be achieved should be specified.
An objective is a statement of a desired end-state. However, that statement can range from
the very general, such as a successful urban economy or a high standard quality of life, to
the very specific, such as avoiding pollution levels above a specified threshold. Both are
helpful, the first in providing the context for the strategy, and a direction to it; the second in
providing a basis for assessing whether the objective is being met. Objectives in transport
policy can be categorized into four classes:
• Statements of Vision: Broad indications of the type of area which politicians or the
public wish to see. These serve to identify long-term goals to which more detailed
transport policy objectives can contribute. These broad statements often say
nothing about transport itself: instead they raise the question:”how best can
transport help to realize this vision?’.
• Higher level objectives: These higher level objectives, sometimes referred to as
aims or goals, identify attributes of transport system, or its side effects, which can be
improved as a means of realizing the vision. Typical among are to reduce
congestions, protect the environment, avoid accidents and improve accessibility.
These broad objectives indicate the directions in which strategies should be
developed.
• Quantified objectives: Quantified objectives may indicate a requirement, for
example, to avoid residents without cars being more than 30 minutes from the
nearest bus station. They provide a clear basis for assessing performance of the
strategy, but they do require careful definition if the specified thresholds are to be
realistic. Once this is done, quantified objectives provide a direct basis for
identifying problems, for current or future conditions, on the basis that a problem
occurs wherever the quantified objective is not met.
• Solution-specific ‘objectives’: It is important to avoid specifying solutions within the
objectives, since this constrains the search for solutions, and may lead to an overall
strategy which is less appropriate to the area’s needs. Where politicians, or interest
groups, wish to introduce general objectives such as to impose physical restrictions
on car use, it is preferable to ask why this solution is being proposed and what it is
designed to achieve. Answer to such questions should lead to clearer specification of
the true underlying objectives.
There are in practice two different types of policy formulation approaches: objective-led
and problem oriented approaches.
1. Objective-led strategy formulation: broad (or more detailed) objectives are first
specified. These are then used to identify problems by assessing the extent to which
current, or predicted future conditions in the absence of new policy measures, fail to
meet the objectives. Possible solutions are then identified as ways of overcoming the
problems which have been identified. The potential solutions are then compared,
often by means of predictive model of transport systems, by appraising them against
the objectives which they are designed to meet. As the measures are implemented,
their impact is assessed, through before and after studies, again in terms of
achievement against objectives. On regular basis, too, conditions are monitored and
the current conditions and problems are reassessed, in terms of overall objectives.
Figure 2.2 presents a structure for strategy formulation in which objectives are the
starting point.
This process may seem somewhat idealized and remote from standard practice, but
it has several virtues. First, it offers a logical basis for proposing solutions, and also
for assessing any proposals offered by others. Second, it ensures that the appraisal
of alternatives is conducted in a logical, consistent, and comprehensive way against
the full set of objectives. Third, assessing the performance of the implemented
measures improves the ability to judge the potential of similar measures elsewhere,
and to predict their impact. Fourth, regular monitoring provides a means of
checking not just on the scale of current problems, but also, through attitude
surveys, on the perception of those problems.
The main draw back with this approach is that many elected officials and the public
are less familiar with the abstract concept of objectives (such as improving
accessibility) than they are with concrete problems (such as the nearest job centre
being 50 minutes away).
described above can be achieved, and problems overcome. These instruments can be
categorized in several ways:
1. Infrastructures
Provision for cars
➢New road construction
Construction new roads are one of infrastructure measures since it has the following
advantages;
- It induces additional traffic so it will increase travel time savings and negatively impact the
environment such as increase noise level and CO2 emission
- It makes more sustainable modes of transport (public transport, cycling and walking)
relatively less attractive.
And finally it is more expensive measure.
Advantages;
➢ Light rail
It has similar impact to conventional rail. Its main difference with conventional) rail
The key objectives behind the development of park and ride services have been to reduce:
1) congestion within city centers and along the approach roads to city centers since it
increases public transport use; and
2) The environmental externalities that have accompanied increasing traffic levels. It is
commonly used at big events such as formula 1, football matches and concerts.
➢ Terminals & interchange
➢ Cycle routes
These provide dedicated infrastructure for cyclists, and hence extend the range of cycle
priorities. As well a making cycling safer, they have been designed to attract more people to
cycle in preference to driving, hence achieving the benefits of reduced car use. It appears
that cycle routes can achieve travel time benefits for cyclists, but they will not attract more
people to cycle in the absence of other measures.
➢ Pedestrian areas
These provide a dramatic improvement in the environment for pedestrians. This will help
in achieving environmental and safety benefits. They may also have positive impacts on the
urban economy and land use policy. However, they present some accessibility problems for
car and bus users and, particularly, for goods deliveries and for disabled people.
➢ Transshipment facilities
These aim to provide a means of transferring goods from the larger vehicles needed for
efficient line haul to smaller, less environmentally intrusive vehicles for distribution in
town centers.
2. Management measures
➢ Parking control
Parking controls are applied to on and off street parking (multistory, ground level and
underground), although the style of control will vary with the type of parking space. The
ability to apply controls will also depend on local legislation. Controls can be applied to
bicycle and motorcycle parking, coach parking and lorry parking as well as car parking.
Parking controls can take a number of forms, including duration, cost, time of day, supply,
location of spaces, permits and parking bans. Parking charges will be considered separately
from the other controls considered here. The application of controls to existing private
spaces can be very difficult for local authorities, as they generally do not have any
jurisdiction over parking that is not for public use. Private non-residential parking is most
easily controlled through the planning process and is considered in more detail under
Parking Standards for New Developments. Additionally, legislation may be required to
apply other controls, such as restricting on street areas to residents only parking.
Parking controls are introduced to reduce the negative impacts of excess demand for
parking, and to allocate scares space according to priority needs.
Effective bus priority measures reduce operating costs for bus operators and increase
patronage, both of which impact positively on the financial cost of bus operations. The
impacts can be beneficial across a range of objectives including the environment, the
economy and social inclusion. Some measures such as bus lanes are often faced with great
opposition from traders and residents because of concerns over loss of access and parking.
A further difficulty arises in a deregulated environment because the local authority will
have difficulty ensuring that a high quality and regular service is maintained on the newly
constructed measures. This causes political difficulties with the bus priority measures
appearing unjustifiable.
No comprehensive post implementation studies were found, but the general evidence
suggests that the measures are justifiable on the grounds of benefits to bus users and
operators without having a significant detrimental effect on car journey times.
Bus priority measures are particularly effective wherever bus journey times and reliability
are affected by traffic congestion.
An HOV lane can be created by converting an existing multi-user road lane into an HOV
lane (for all or part of the day), by adding an extra inside or outside lane to an existing road
or by converting an existing bus way or bus lane into an HOV lane.
HOV lanes can be a part of motorway (as is common in the USA) or of a major arterial road
(as in Leeds, UK). They can be ‘tidal’ to help the traffic in the busiest direction (usually
inbound towards city canters during the morning peak, outbound during evening peak).
They can be permanent and separated by a physical barrier from the general purpose lanes
or may be defined by purely nonphysical means such as lane markings and special traffic
signs. The hours and days of HOV lane operation can vary depending on the congested
hours and function of the road stretch to which they are applied; for example during
morning peak hours only, on weekdays or at all times.
Conclusions on the effects of HOV lanes vary from one study to other. They have been
reported to reduce vehicle trips on HOV corridors by between 4 per cent and 30 per cent. It
has also been reported that willingness to share cars and to use buses increases after the
opening of an HOV lane. There is evidence that HOV lanes are more effective in these terms
in cases where delays to general traffic due to congestion are greatest. There is, however,
also a view that HOV lanes may be less effective in some cases than general purpose lanes.
3. Information provision
Provision for cars
➢ Conventional signs and markings
Conventional signs and markings are visual means of providing information, guidance and
instruction to travelers during their journey. Their objective is to promote the safe and
efficient use of the transport system. Both signs and markings impart information but also
have a role in the management of traffic. In many cases, signs and markings are used in
conjunction with each other.
Signs and markings include:
• Upright signs - various types of upright signs with textual or graphical images, for
information, regulation or warning
• Road markings – provided to channel traffic and to convey warnings, regulatory
requirements or basic information
• Miscellaneous signs – including traffic signals, temporary signs and lamps to identify
refuges or provide additional warning in cases of dangerous obstructions.
Common standards for signs and markings exist to help ensure that travelers can easily
understand signs wherever they might be travelling.
Conventional direction signing can provide benefits to car users, and other traffic, by
reducing journey lengths and travel times; direction signing can also be used to divert
traffic away from environmentally sensitive routes.
Signs and markings are also important in road safety by providing information necessary to
make safe decisions while travelling.
A typical PGI system consists of monitoring equipment to establish the flow into and out of
the car park, a central computer to process the counts and control the dissemination of
information to the public via VMS or other media such as radio or a web site. VMS displays
should be located at suitable decision points on the network, so that a driver’s journey time
to a vacant space is minimized.
The aim of PGI systems is to manage the available parking spaces in highly populated urban
areas more efficiently. Studies have shown that PGI systems can influence drivers’ choice of
car park and reduce the time spent looking for a parking space. This affects traffic flows
and queuing outside the most popular car parks. The overall effect is a reduction in
congestion and air pollution which will lead to enhancement of urban areas.
4. Pricing
Provision for cars
➢ Vehicle ownership taxation
Vehicle ownership taxation (an indirect tax) has two key purposes. Firstly, as a general
revenue generator - income is rarely hypothecated. Secondly, to regulate the number of
vehicles owned and potentially the age of the vehicle stock to meet environmental
objectives.
➢ Private parking charges
Private parking charges are, in the main, levied by local authorities on existing or future
non-residential developments, e.g. office buildings. They are designed to help suppress the
demand for car parking and thus traffic levels, particularly in urban centers where
commuting to work makes up a large percentage of the traffic. Much less common are
instances of private parking charges being introduced by individual companies as part of a
conscious effort to either implement travel plans that reduces car use amongst their work
force or to reduce land take costs associated with car parking.
➢ Fuel taxes
Fuel taxes are levied on the purchase of fuel in most countries. Levying a tax on fuel
consumption not only raises revenues, it is also a relatively unselective means of charging
for road use. However, there is some differentiation by fuel type and mode. Fuels that are
considered to be the most polluting are often taxed at a higher level. Fuel tax escalators
have also been applied to raise fuel tax on an annual basis regardless of need to generate
income. This differentiation and annual incrementation are both designed to influence
purchasing decisions in favor of more environmentally friendly choices. Some consumers,
e.g. bus operators, are offered rebates or tax-free purchase, constituting a subsidy. Fuel tax
income is rarely hypothecated.
Development densities and the mix of those developments have a key role to play in
affecting both the level of travel and overall travel patterns. Higher densities of
development may encourage shorter journeys and, thus, the use of walking and cycling.
They may also help to make public transport more viable. In a similar manner, a better mix
of developments can improve accessibility and hence reduce the need to travel.
In practical terms there are two specific, inter-related ways in which land use planning can
encourage the use of public transport:
1. By locating trip origins and destinations near public transport routes:
2. By ensuring trip densities are sufficiently intense to establish an efficient service.
With both, the general principle is thus to ensure that trip origins and destinations are
arranged in nodal or linear patterns which are compatible with the demand patterns
needed to ensure that public transport services, both bus and rail, are viable and efficient.
In addition major activities, employment nodes and higher density residential areas should
be encouraged near stations, significant stops and interchanges along public transport
routes.
Parking standards
Parking standards are the controls applied to private non-residential (PNR) parking
through the planning system. Parking standards are set by local authorities to specify the
minimum and maximum number of spaces permitted for particular types of new
development. The number of spaces permitted in new developments varies between land
uses and local authorities. Office developments and retail developments are the two most
common building projects requiring PNR parking.
As with parking controls and pricing, parking standards are applied to meet demand and
regulate supply to influence demand. Additionally, parking spaces take up land, so reducing
parking capacity may reduce land take. There are a number of approaches to the setting of
parking standards.
(For more detail and exhaustive explanation of transport policy and strategies, please refer to
O’Flaherty 1997, Chapters 3 and 6)
References
C.A. O’Flaherty et.al, Transport Planning and Traffic Engineering, Elsevier, 1997
C. J. Khisty and B.K. Lall, Transportation Engineering: An Introduction, 3rd Edition, Prentice
Hall of India, 2006
J.D. Ortuzar & L.G. Willumsen, Modeling Transport, 3rd edition, Wiley, 2001
P.H.L Bovy, M.C.J Blemier & R. van Nes, Transportation Modeling: CT4801 Course Notes,
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, 2006