Module 4 Part 1
Module 4 Part 1
Highway Engineering
3
References
4
Aggregates
• Types of aggregates
• Production and storage of aggregates
• Sampling of aggregates
• Desirable properties of aggregates
• Aggregate testing
5
Why do we Need Aggregates ??
• Resist wear due to abrasive action of traffic
• Resist deterioration due to weathering
• Resist highest magnitude of wheel load stresses
6
Types of Aggregates
Natural aggregate Crushed rock,
Mineral sources sands and gravel
Recycled aggregate
Reclaimed asphalt
Used in construction
7
Production of Aggregates
• Processed in stone quarries
o Boulder broken into smaller parts
Earth moving equipment
Explosion
o Further broken into smaller pieces for achieving suitable gradations
Crushers
• Aggregates
o Screened through different sieves
o Batching
8
Stone Quarry Aggregate Quarry
9
Simple Quarry Set-up
10
Storage of Aggregates
11
Storage of Aggregates
12
Sampling of Aggregates for Testing
1. Loader enters stockpile with bucket 4. Sampling pad – Draw sample portions from each
≈ 150 mm above ground level quadrant
2. Loader gently rolls the material out 3. Loader reaches across the small pile,
of bucket to form a small pile lowers bucker & back-drags small pile
13
Desirable Properties of Aggregates
• Strength » Resistance to crushing
• Hardness » Resistance to abrasion & attrition
• Toughness » Resistance to impact
• Durability » Resistance to action of weather
• Shape » Measure of angularity, flakiness & elongation
• Water absorption » Measure of affinity of aggregates to absorb water
• Cleanliness » Measure of dust coatings on aggregate particles
• Adhesion with Bitumen » Stripping resistance of bitumen from aggregate surface
• Polish Characteristics » Resistance to polishing
14
Specification Limits (MoRTH, 2014)
Property Test
BC DBM WMM GSB
Grain size analysis
Cleanliness (dust) Max 5% Max 5% -- --
(% passing 0.075 mm)
Combined Flakiness and
Particle shape Max 35% Max 35% Max 35% --
Elongation Index
Los Angeles Abrasion Value Max 30% Max 35% Max 40% --
Strength
or Aggregate Impact Value Max 24% Max 27% Max 30% Max 40
Soundness
Durability Sodium Sulphate Max 12% Max 12% -- --
Magnesium Sulphate Max 18% Max 18%
Polishing Polished Stone Value min. 55 -- -- --
Water Absorption Water Absorption Max 2% Max 2% Max 2% Max 2%
Stripping of Bituminous Mix
Stripping Min. 95% Min. 95% -- --
(% retained coating)
Water Sensitivity Retained Tensile Strength** Min. 80% Min. 80% -- --
Cleanliness – Materials finer than 75 μm
IS 2386-1: Determination of total quantity of material passing 75 μm sieve, i.e., claylike
materials in aggregates.
Procedure
• Place oven-dried aggregates in container
• Add water and agitate
• Pour sample onto 1.18 mm + 75 μm sieve
• Repeat until wash water is clear
Source: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jrbzSDEzHjA/maxresdefault.jpg
16
Particle Shape
(a) Angular crushed stone. (b) Flaky crushed stone. (c) Elongate crushed stone. (d) Round river gravel
17
Flakiness and Elongation Index
18
Angularity Number
IS 2386-1: Angularity is the absence of rounding of the particles of an aggregate.
Angularity number of an aggregate is the amount (to the higher whole number) by
which the percentage of voids in it after compacting in a prescribed manner exceeds 33,
where 33 is the % of volume of voids in a perfectly rounded aggregate.
Procedure
• 10 kg oven dried aggregate of predominant size
• Pour sample in cylinder = 3 layers
Tamping = 100 blows, 5 cm height
• Fill cylinder with water and weigh
𝟏𝟎𝟎 × 𝑾
𝑨𝒏𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 = 𝟔𝟕 −
𝑪×𝑮
19
Strength
20
Durability – Soundness Test
IS 2386-5: Soundness test is used to determine the resistance of aggregates to degradation
when exposed to weathering, i.e., wetting-drying and/or freezing-thawing.
Reagents
21
Durability – Soundness Test
Fine aggregates Coarse aggregates
22
Durability – Soundness Test
Procedure
• Immersion: Sample in solution = 16-18 hrs at 27 ± 1°C
• Drying: Remove from solution ⇒ Oven dry at 105-110°C for 4-18 hrs
• Number of cycles: Repeat immersion and drying (MoRT&H = 5 cycles)
• After final cycle, wash with BaCl2 + water
• Oven dry and sieve to determine loss
23
Polishing – Polished Stone Value
IS 2386-4: Polished-stone value
gives a relative measure of the
extent to which different types
of aggregates in the wearing
surface will polish under traffic
Test conducted in 2 parts
• Accelerated polishing
• Friction test
24
Polishing – Polished Stone Value
Materials
• Hard siliceous sand – 2.5 kg • Air-floated emery powder – 350 g
25
Polishing – Polished Stone Value
Specimen
• Aggregates = 3 kg of 10 to 8 mm
• Mount aggregate in a sand-cement mortar placed on the mold
• Single layer of 40 to 50 particles, area 90.5 × 44.5 mm
26
Polishing – Polished Stone Value
Procedure – Friction test
• Level instrument – Leveling screws
• Zero adjustment – No obstruction, pointer reaches 0
• Slide Length Adjustment – Slider moves over
specimen for 75 mm length
• Testing – Wet surface.
Make 5 swings.
27
Polishing – Polished Stone Value
Calculations
Mean of the two values of the coefficient of friction, expressed as a percentage
𝑊𝑋𝑍
𝜇= × 100
𝑃𝐷𝑝
𝜇 =
Effective coefficient of friction, %
𝑊 =
Weight of the swinging arm, kg
𝑋 =
Distance of effective centre of gravity of the arm from the centre of oscillation, cm
𝑍 =
Vertical distance of the edge of the scale below the zero of the scale, ,which shall be 10 mm
below the horizontal when the arm is released to swing freely from the horizontal
𝑃 = Normal load on the slider, kg
𝐷 = Sliding distance, cm
𝑝 = Length of the pointer, cm
28
Adhesion With Bitumen – Stripping Test
IS 6241: Assessment of the property of adhesion of aggregates with different types of
bituminous binders so that the suitability of aggregates could be ascertained.
29
Adhesion With Bitumen – Stripping Test
Procedure
• 200 g oven-dry aggregate within 20-12.5 mm
• Heat aggregate to 150°C and bitumen to 160°C
• Add 5% bitumen and mix
• Cool for 2 hours
• Immerse in water for 24 hours at 40°C
Source: https://theconstructor.org/practical-guide/stripping-value-test-road-aggregates/8597/
• Remove water
• Examine coating visually
30
Gradation and Size
• Grading: Process of arranging aggregates based on their size
• Aggregate gradation: Particle-size distribution of an aggregate – Sieve analysis
20
200
0.002
4.75
0.425
80
2
0.075
31
Important Terminologies
MoRT&H Asphalt Institute MS-2
Nominal maximum Largest specified sieve size upon One sieve size larger than the first
aggregate size which any of the aggregate sieve size to retain more than 10%
(NMAS) material is retained. of the aggregate gradation
32
Sieve Analysis
Procedure used to assess the particle size distribution
(gradation) of a granular material by allowing the material
to pass through a series of sieves of progressively smaller
mesh size and weighing the amount of material that is
stopped by each sieve as a fraction of the whole mass
Source: www.particletechlabs.com
33
Sieve Analysis – Calculations
Sieve Size, Weight Cumulative
• Sieve according to gradation requirements % retained
mm retained, g % passing
• Calculate % retained 19 0 0.0 100.0
Cumulative % passing
13.2 95.2
9.5 86.4 60
4.75 54.0
40
2.36 29.1
1.18 13.6
20
0.6 6.2
0.3 3.9 0
0.15 3.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0.075 2.0 Sieve size, mm (log scale)
35
Typical Aggregate Gradations
100
Uniformly-graded • Well graded/Dense graded
Cumulative % passing
36
Maximum Density Curves
Fuller’s Curve
𝒏
𝒅𝒊
𝒑𝒊 = 𝒏 = 0.50
𝑫
37
Blending of Aggregates
38
Blending of Aggregates
Trial and error method
𝑷=𝑨×𝒂+𝑩×𝒃+𝑪×𝒄+⋯
𝒂+𝒃+𝒄+⋯=𝟏
39
Blending of Aggregates
Trial and error method Sieve Required gradation Stockpiles
Blended
Size,
• For 0.075 mm sieve mm
Lower Upper Mid Source Source Source gradation
Limit Limit Point A B C
7 = 0 × 𝑎 + 4 × 𝑏 + 21 × 𝑐
⇒ 4𝑏 + 21𝑐 = 7 19 100 100 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
13.2 90 100 95.0 86.0 100.0 100.0 95.0
• For 0.15 mm sieve
9.5 70 88 79.0 43.9 98.0 100.0 79.0
16 = 0 × 𝑎 + 6 × 𝑏 + 52.7 × 𝑐
⇒ 6𝑏 + 52.7𝑐 = 16 4.75 53 71 62.0 16.3 79.4 100.0 62.0
2.36 42 58 50.0 8.7 54.8 100.0 50.0
• Solve both equations
1.18 34 48 41.0 0.0 39.5 100.0 41.0
𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟖 ; 𝒄 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟔
𝑎 + 𝑏 + 𝑐 = 1 ⇒ 𝒂 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟔 0.6 26 38 32.0 0.0 25.0 86.7 32.0
0.3 18 28 23.0 0.0 12.0 71.0 23.0
• Check for other sieves
0.15 12 20 16.0 0.0 6.0 52.7 16.0
Within lower and upper limit;
0.075 4 10 7.0 0.0 4.0 21.0 7.0
Close to mid-point
40
Blending of Aggregates
Using optimization tool SOLVER
• Microsoft Excel add-in program used for WHAT-IF analysis
• Data required
Objective function
Minimize sum of squared error between blended and desired gradation
Variables to be modified
Proportions of stockpile
Constraints
Sum of proportions of all stockpiles = 1
Blended gradation is within desired range of gradation
41
Bitumen
IS 334 (2023)
A class of black or dark colored viscous material having adhesive and
waterproofing properties, derived from crude petroleum by refinery
processes or present in natural asphalt, completely or nearly completely
soluble in toluene
42
How Bitumen Behaves
• Bitumen behavior depends on temperature and time of loading
43
Desirable Properties of Bitumen
• Adequate viscosity during mixing and compaction
• Sufficiently viscous on cooling to resist deformation under traffic
• Form ductile thin film around aggregates
• Not highly temperature susceptible
• Adhesion with aggregates
44
Physical Properties of Bitumen
45
Consistency Tests
• Bitumen – Thermoplastic material
Consistency varies with temperature
Testing – Same temperature and shear loading conditions
Softening Point
Penetration
Consistency tests
Absolute Viscosity
Kinematic Viscosity
46
Softening Point
47
Penetration
48
Absolute Viscosity
IS 1206 (Part II): It is an internal friction, such that if a
tangential force of one dyne (0.00001 N) acting on planes of unit
area separated by unit distance of the liquid produces unit
tangential velocity, in Poise
Cannon-Manning Vacuum
Capillary Viscometer
49
Kinematic Viscosity
IS 1206 (Part III): Quotient of the absolute or dynamic
viscosity divided by the density of the liquid under test; both
at the same temperature, in stoke (dimensions = cm2/sec).
Measurements
• Time required for the leading edge of the
meniscus to pass from timing mark E to F
51
Kinematic Viscosity
ASTM D4402 - Rotational Viscometer: The torque
on the apparatus-measuring geometry, rotating in a
thermostatically controlled sample holder containing
a sample of asphalt, is used to measure the relative
resistance to rotation.
52
Kinematic Viscosity
53
Kinematic Viscosity
Testing Conditions
• Bitumen content = 8-10 g
• Conditioning = 15 min sample chamber
and 10 min bitumen in chamber
• Resisting torque = 10 to 98% of
instrument capacity
Viscometer Digital Displays
Measurements
• Measure either the viscosity or the torque at
1-min intervals for a total of three minutes
54
Durability
Ageing
Increase in stiffness or hardening of bitumen during production and in-service of pavement
Short-term ageing
Loss of volatiles and oxidation of
bitumen during mixing, transportation,
laying and compaction of bituminous
mixture at elevated temperatures
Long-term ageing
Hardening of bitumen throughout
the pavement service life due to its
interaction with the environment
Source: Notani et al. (2021)
55
Durability Tests
Thin Film Oven Test (TFOT)
Short-term aging
Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (RTFOT)
Durability
tests
56
Rolling Thin Film Oven
IS 15799: Indicates approx. change in properties of
asphalt during conventional hot-mixing at about
150°C as indicated by viscosity and rheological
measurements
57
Rolling Thin Film Oven
Testing conditions
• Bitumen content = 35 g • Temperature = 163 ± 1°C for 85 min
• Air flow = 4000 ml/min • Rotation = 15 rev/min
59
Solubility in Trichloroethylene
IS 1216 – Determination of the degree of solubility in
Gooch Crucible trichloroethylene of bitumen having little or no mineral
Rubber Tubing matter. The portion that is soluble in trichloroethylene
Filter Tube
represents the active cementing constituents
60
Spot Test
AASHTO M102 – Spot test is used to
determine if an asphaltic material has
been overheated during processing,
i.e., cracked bitumen
Testing conditions
• Material = 2 g bitumen in 10 ml naphtha
• Temperature = 32°C for 15 min before test
• Timing = One after 1 hr and other after 24 hr
Measurement
Uniformly brown circular stain ⇒ Uncracked bitumen
61
Safety
• Heating of bitumen to elevated temperature
Formation of vapours
Ignite in the presence of a spark or open flame
62
Flash Point
IS 1448-69: Cleveland open cup method. Detect presence
of some volatiles like kerosene in bitumen.
Test conditions
• Heating rate = 14-17°C/min initially ; 5-7°C/min when
temperature is 23°C below expected flash point
• Application of test flame = Every 2°C (final stage)
63
Ductility
64
Specific Gravity
Ratio of the mass of the material at a given temperature to the mass of an
equal volume of water at the same temperature
A B C D
𝐶−𝐴
𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 =
𝐵−𝐴 − 𝐷−𝐶
66
Bitumen Grading System – History
Grading by chewing Viscosity grading
Based on stiffness at 37°C Based on stiffness at 60°C
Chewing in mouth Absolute viscosity test
Late 19th
century
1903 1970s 1993
67
Bitumen Grading System
68
Bitumen Grading – India : IS 73
1950 First Revision 1992 Third Revision 2013
Accommodated IS Grading changed
1201-1220 (1958) from penetration to
Methods for testing viscosity grading
tar and bitumen. system
Paving grades
introduced.
69
Penetration Grading
• H.C. Bowen in 1888 invented penetration machine
• Grading system – Based on penetration test
Greater the penetration ⇒ Softer the bitumen
70
Advantages of Penetration Grading
• Test done at average service temperature
• Easy test, inexpensive equipment
• Special ovens or water baths aren’t required ⇒ Test at room temperature
71
Limitations of Penetration Grading
• Empirical test
• Can’t be used effectively for polymer
modified bitumen
• Similitude at 25°C ⇒ Doesn’t capture
temperature susceptibility
• Doesn’t specifically address aging
• No bitumen viscosity available near
mixing and compaction temperature 25°C
72
Viscosity Grading
• Early 1960s : Development of viscosity grading (based on viscosity at 60°C)
Replacement of empirical test by a fundamental test
60°C – Average max surface temperature in US during hot summers
73
Viscosity Grading
74
Viscosity Grading
Viscosity Grade General Applications
75
Advantages of Viscosity Grading
• Wide range of temperature
25°C – Penetration ⇒ Raveling/fatigue cracking resistance
60°C – Absolute viscosity ⇒ Rutting
135°C – Kinematic viscosity ⇒ Construction, minimize potential of tender mix
• Same viscosity grade ⇒ Similar rutting performance in hot summer
• Min. penetration & kinematic viscosity ⇒ Temperature susceptibility
• Mixing and compaction temperature
76
Limitations of Viscosity Grading
• Grading at 60°C is deceptive to performance at average or low service temperatures
• Test is expensive and time consuming
• TFOT residue viscosity can vary considerably within the same grade
77
Shortcoming – Bitumen Grading System
Bitumen can have different
temperature and performance
within the same grade
Long term aging not considered
Not applicable to modified
binders
Same test temperatures
irrespective of project location
78
Superpave Performance Grading (PG)
• SUPERPAVE = Superior Performing Asphalt Pavement
• Development of performance based grading system for bitumen
Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP)
50 million dollar, 5 year program (1987-1992)
Based on engineering principles to address common pavement distress issues
• Asphalt binder grades are specified primarily with respect to pavement temperatures
PG 64 - 22
Min pavement
Performance temperature
Grade
Average 7-day max
pavement temperature
79
PG Specification Tests
80
Rheological Tests
Construction
Rutting
Fatigue
Low-temperature
cracking
-20 25 60 135
81
Performance Grading – ASTM D6373
82
Purpose of Specification Limits
Specification requirements to control workability during construction
83
Modification of Bitumen
Polymer Modified Bitumen
Bituminous binder whose rheological properties have been modified during manufacture
by the use of one or more organic polymers.
Rubberized Bitumen
Bituminous binder whose rheological properties have been modified during manufacture
by the use of one or more chemical agents. Such chemical agents include crumb rubber,
natural rubber, synthetic polymers, waxes, and sulphur
84
Modification of Bitumen
Why is modification required ??
Increase in rainfall and temperature variations
Increases in axle weight, tyre pressures and freight movement
Tendency to use thinner layers in pavements
Reduce frequency of maintenance
85
Advantages of Modified Bitumen
One or more of the following
• Lower susceptibility to temperature variations
• Higher resistance to deformation at high pavement temperature
• Delay of cracking and reflective cracking
• Better age resistance properties
• Better adhesion between aggregates and binder
• Higher fatigue life of mixes
• Overall improved performance
86
General Requirements of Modifiers
Selected polymers/rubbers or its blend should have the following properties
• Compatible with bitumen
• Resist degradation at mixing temperature
• Capable of being processed by conventional mixing and laying machinery
• Produce coating viscosity at application temperature
• Maintain premium properties during storage, application and in service
• Capable of providing homogeneous blend with bitumen
87
Classification of Polymer Modified Bitumen
Polymer modified bitumen (PMB) shall be classified into five grades
• Grade PMB 64-10
• Grade PMB 70-10
Based on average maximum pavement temperature
• Grade PMB 76-10
and minimum pavement temperature
• Grade PMB 82-10
• Grade PMB 76-22
88
Testing of PMB
• Traditional bitumen tests
• Special tests
Storage stability for phase separation
Elastic recovery
Multiple stress and creep recovery
89
Specification
Limits
90
Specification
Limits
91
Specification Limits
92
What is an Emulsion ?
Emulsions are MIXTURES
of two immiscible liquids,
such as oil and water,
STABILIZED by an
EMULSIFIER
93
Bitumen Emulsion
A liquid product in which a substantial amount of bitumen is dispersed in a finely divided
droplets in an aqueous medium containing an emulsifier and a stabilizer (IS 334, 2002)
Components
• Bitumen – Dispersed phase
• Water – Continuous phase
• Emulsifier – Surfactant
• Acid/Base
• Additives
94
Composition of Bitumen Emulsion
Emulsifier
Additives
95
Why Use Bitumen Emulsion ?
• Ease of handling and storage
• Safety
• Low fumes, low volatiles (VOC)
• Save energy
• Low cost in-place/on-site techniques
• Easily mixed with latex or cement
Composite binders
• Water dilutable
Accurate dosing
• Deferred set
96
Classification of Bitumen Emulsion
Based on sign of the charge on the droplets and reactivity
Emulsion type Property
Cationic (C) Positively charged droplets
Anionic Negatively charged droplets
Rapid Setting (RS) Set quickly in contact with clean aggregates of low-surface area
Medium Setting (MS) Set sufficiently less quickly; Can be mixed with aggregates of low surface area
Slow Setting (SS) Mix with reactive aggregates of high surface area
Quick Setting (QS) Intermediate in reactivity between MS and SS
97
Classification of Bitumen Emulsion
Based on viscosity and residue properties
Emulsion type Property
Number Emulsion viscosity (1 – low viscosity)
Text Residue properties (h – hard asphalt residue)
98
Classification of Bitumen Emulsion
99
Bitumen Emulsion Testing
Sampling Marking
• From Drums or Barrels • Indication of the source of
Roll container – To and fro : 2-3 min manufacture
• Drawing emulsion sample • Month and year of manufacture
Within 24 h after delivery • Type/Grade
Testing within 7 days from the date • Batch Number
of drawing. • Date of expiry
100
Tests on Bitumen Emulsion
Tests on Bitumen Emulsion Tests on Bitumen Emulsion Residue
• Residue by evaporation or distillation • Penetration 25°C/100g/5 sec
• Residue on 600 micron IS Sieve • Ductility 27°C/cm
• Viscosity by Saybolt Furol Viscometer • Solubility in trichloroethylene
• Coagulation of emulsion at low
temperature
Coagulation at low temperature: Applicable
• Storage stability, after 24 hours/5 days when ambient temperature < 15°C
• Particle charge Solubility: Determined on distillation residue
• Coating ability and water resistance at 360°C
• Stability to mixing with cement
101
Cationic Emulsion – IS 8887, 2018
S. Grade of Emulsion
Characteristics
No. RS-1 RS-2 MS SS-1 SS-2
1. Residue on 600 micron sieve, % by mass, max. 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
2. Viscosity by Saybolt Furol Viscometer, seconds
a) at 25°C --- --- --- 20-100 30-150
b) at 50°C 20-100 100-300 50-300 --- ---
3. Coagulation of emulsion at low temperature Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
4. Storage stability after 24 h, %, max. 2 1 1 2 2
5. Particle charge Positive Positive Positive --- Positive
6. Coating ability and water resistance
a) Coating, dry aggregate --- --- Good --- ---
b) Coating, after spraying --- --- Fair --- ---
c) Coating, wet aggregate --- --- Fair --- ---
d) Coating, after spraying --- --- Fair --- ---
7. Stability to mixing with cement, % coagulation, max. --- --- --- --- 2
(contd.)
102
Cationic Emulsion – IS 8887, 2018
S. Grade of Emulsion
Characteristics
No. RS-1 RS-2 MS SS-1 SS-2
8. Miscibility with water No No No No
Immiscible
coagulation coagulation coagulation coagulation
9. Residue by evaporation, %, min. 60 67 65 --- 60
10. Tests on residue
a) Penetration 25°C/100g/5 sec 80-150 80-150 60-150 --- 60-120
b) Ductility 27°C/cm, min. 50 50 50 --- 50
c) Solubility in trichloroethylene, % by mass, min. 98 98 98 98 98
11. Distillation, % volume of distillate recovered at 360°C at
a) 190°C --- --- --- 20-55 ---
b) 225°C --- --- --- 30-75 ---
c) 260°C --- --- --- 40-90 ---
d) 316°C --- --- --- 60-100 ---
e) Residue at 360°C, %, min. --- --- --- 50 ---
12. Water content, % by mass, max. --- --- --- 20 ---
103
Anionic Emulsion – IS 3117, 2004
S. Grade of Emulsion
Characteristics
No. RS MS SS
1. Viscosity at 25°C by Saybolt Furol Viscometer, seconds 20-100 20-100 20-100
2. Residue by evaporation, % by mass, min. 65 65 57
3. Storage stability after 5 days, %, max. 3 3 3
4. Demulsibility, 35 ml of 0.02 N CaCl, %, min. 60 --- ---
5. Miscibility in water, coagulation in 2 hour --- Nil ---
6. Modified miscibility with water (difference of bitumen content), max. --- --- 4.5
7. Stability to mixing with cement, %, max. --- --- 2.0
8. Coating ability and water resistance
a) Coating, dry aggregate --- Good ---
b) Coating, after spraying --- Fair ---
c) Coating, wet aggregate --- Fair ---
d) Coating, after spraying --- Fair ---
9. Sieve test, % by mass, max. 0.10 0.10 0.5
10. Particle charge Negative Negative Negative
104
Cutback Bitumen
Petroleum bitumen whose viscosity is
reduced by the addition of a cutback solvent
derived from petroleum
Curing process
Solvent from the bituminous material will
evaporate and the bitumen will bind the
aggregate
105
Classification of Cutback Bitumen
Rapid Curing (RC) Used with aggregates
RC-70 ; RC-250 ;
Blend of bitumen with a having nothing passing
2.36 mm sieve RC-800 ; RC-3000
naphtha type distillate
106
Composition of Cutback Bitumen
107
Specification Limits – IS 217
108
Specification Limits – IS 217
109
Specification Limits – IS 217
110