Scribd
Upload
9 views5 pages

Tugas

The document presents statistical analysis comparing pre-test and post-test scores across different teaching methods, revealing a significant decrease in scores from pre-test (mean 86.20) to post-test (mean 72.53) with a p-value < .001. Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the teaching method 'Demonstrasi' on project-based learning outcomes, which showed no significant effect (p = .558). Overall, the findings suggest a strong effect of the teaching method on test scores but not on project-based learning outcomes.

Uploaded by

Tia Fa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views5 pages

Tugas

The document presents statistical analysis comparing pre-test and post-test scores across different teaching methods, revealing a significant decrease in scores from pre-test (mean 86.20) to post-test (mean 72.53) with a p-value < .001. Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the teaching method 'Demonstrasi' on project-based learning outcomes, which showed no significant effect (p = .558). Overall, the findings suggest a strong effect of the teaching method on test scores but not on project-based learning outcomes.

Uploaded by

Tia Fa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

No.

Kelompok Kelompok
Diskusi Ceramah
1 85 75
2 80 72
3 88 76
4 90 74
5 84 70
6 86 73
7 87 71
8 82 69
9 89 68
10 83 72
11 91 75
12 84 70
13 88 74
14 86 73
15 90 76

Paired Samples Statistics


Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Pair 1 Pre Test 86.20 15 3.212 .829
Post Test 72.53 15 2.532 .654

Paired Samples Correlations


Significance
N Correlation One-Sided p Two-Sided p
Pair 1 Pre Test & Post Test 15 .469 .039 .078

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences
Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 95%
Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Pair 1 Pre Test - Post Test 13.667 3.016 .779 11.997

Paired Samples Test


Paired
Differences
Significance
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Upper t df One-Sided p Two-Sided p
Pair 1 Pre Test - Post Test 15.337 17.551 14 <.001 <.001

Paired Samples Effect Sizes


95% Confidence
Interval
Standardizera Point Estimate Lower Upper
Pair 1 Pre Test - Post Test Cohen's d 3.016 4.532 2.790 6.259
Hedges' correction 3.190 4.284 2.638 5.917
a. The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes.
Cohen's d uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference.
Hedges' correction uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference, plus a correction
No Pembelajaran Pembelajaran
Demonstrasi Berbasis
Proyek
1 70 80
2 65 75
3 60 85
4 80 75
5 75 80
6 60 70
7 75 85
8 55 70
9 60 90
10 80 70
11 65 80
12 60 70
13 70 90
14 60 75
15 50 90
16 55 75
17 60 90
18 75 80
19 70 85
20 85 70
21 65 90
22 60 80
23 80 85
24 70 75
25 65 90

Variables Entered/Removeda

Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
b
1 Demonstrasi . Enter
a. Dependent Variable: Proyek
b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
a
1 .123 .015 -.028 7.529
a. Predictors: (Constant), Demonstrasi
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 20.078 1 20.078 .354 .558b
Residual 1303.922 23 56.692
Total 1324.000 24
a. Dependent Variable: Proyek
b. Predictors: (Constant), Demonstrasi

Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 86.765 11.800 7.353 <.001
Demonstrasi -.105 .176 -.123 -.595 .558
a. Dependent Variable: Proyek

You might also like