Improper Integral
Improper Integral
aft
Sharad Bhagwanrao Kadam
Assistant Professor
Department of Mathematics
Dr
Shri Shivaji College, Parbhani - 431 401.
The concept of Riemann integrals requires that the range of integration is finite and the integrand
aft
remains bounded in that domain. In case the integrand f becomes infinite in the interval a 6 x 6 b,
i.e., f has points of infinite discontinuity (singular points) in [a, b], or the limits of integration a
Zb
or b (or both) become infinite, the symbol f dx is called an improper (or infinite or generalised)
a
integral. Thus
Z∞ Z∞ Z1 Z∞
dx dx dx dx
, , ,
1 x2 −∞ 1 + x2 0 x (1 − x) −1 x2
are examples of improper integrals.
Dr
The integrals which are not improper are called proper integrals. Thus
integral.
Z1
0
sin x
x
dx is a proper
It is assumed once for all that in a finite interval which encloses no point of infinite discontinuity
(singular point) the integrand is bounded and integrable.
Let a function f be defined in an interval [a, b] everywhere except possibly at a finite number of
points.
i) Convergence at the left-end : Let a be the only point of infinite discontinuity of f , the integral
Zb Zb
aft
f dx exists for every λ, 0 < λ < b − a. The improper integral f dx is defined as the limit
a+λ a+λ
Zb
of f dx when λ → 0+, so that
a+λ
Zb Zb
f dx = lim f dx (1)
a λ→0+ a+λ
Zb
Dr
If this limit exists and is finite, the improper integral
otherwise it is called divergent.
a
f dx is said to exist or converge (at a ),
ii) Convergence at the right-end : Let b be the only point of infinite discontinuity of f , the improper
integral is then defined by the relation
Zb Z b−µ
f dx = lim f dx, 0<µ<b−a (2)
a µ→0+ a
If the limit exists, the improper integral is said to be convergent (at b), otherwise it is called
divergent.
aft
If both the integrals in (3) exist in accordance with the definitions given above, the improper
integral converges, otherwise it is divergent.
The improper integral is also defined as
Zb Z b−µ
f dx = lim f dx (4)
a λ→0+ a+λ
µ→0+
discontinuity of f , we put
Dr
iv) Convergence at interior points : If an interior point c, a < c < b, is the only point of infinite
Zb Zc
a
Zb
f dx = f dx + f dx
a c
Zb
The improper integral f dx is convergent if both the integrals on the R.H.S. exist in accordance
a
with the definitions given above.
aft
[a, b], where
a 6 c1 < c2 < . . . < cm 6 b,
Zb
the improper integral f dx is defined as
a
Zb Z c1 Z c2 Zb
f dx = f dx + f dx + . . . + f dx (5)
a a c1 cm
Dr
and is said to be convergent if all the integrals on the R.H.S. of equation (5) are convergent,
otherwise it is divergent.
Z1 Z1
dx dx
Examine the convergence of 2
, √ .
0 x 0 1−x
Solution : 0 is the only point of infinite discontinuity of the integrand in [0, 1]. Thus,
aft
Z1 Z1
dx dx
= lim , 0<λ<1
0 x2 λ→0+ x2 λ
1
= lim −1 =∞
λ→0+ λ
0
Dr
Z1
√
dx
1−x
= lim
µ→0+
h √
Z 1−µ
√
dx
1−x
0
= lim −2 1 − x
, 0<µ<1
i1−µ
µ→0+ 0
√
= − lim 2 ( µ − 1) = 2
µ→0+
Z2
dx
Examine the convergence of .
aft
0(2 x − x2 )
Solution : Both the end-points 0, 2 are the points of infinite discontinuity of the integrand and are
in fact the only such points in [0, 2]. Thus for any point, say 1, within [0, 2], we put
Z2 Z1 Z 2−µ
dx dx dx
= lim + lim
0 2 x − x2 λ→0+ λ x (2 − x) µ→0+ 1 x (2 − x)
1 2−µ
1 x 1 x
= lim log + lim log
2 λ→0+ 2−x λ 2 µ→0+ 2−x 1
Dr=−
=∞
1
lim log
2 λ→0+
λ
2−λ
+
1
lim log
2 µ→0+
2−µ
µ
Zb
A necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of the improper integral f dx at a,
a
aft
where f is positive in [a, b] is that there exists a positive number M, independent of λ, such that
Zb
f dx < M, 0 < λ < b − a.
a+λ
Zb
Proof : Given f is positive in [a, b]. We know that the improper integral f dx converges at a if for
Zb a
If f and g be two positive functions such that f (x) 6 g(x), for all x in [a, b], then
Zb Zb
(i) f dx converges, if g dx converges, and
a a
aft
Zb Zb
(ii) g dx diverges, if f dx diverges.
a a
Proof : Let f and g be both bounded and integrable in [a + λ, b], 0 < λ < b − a and a is the only
point of infinite discontinuity in [a, b]. Since f and g are positive and
Zb Zb
(i) Let
Zb
Dr ∴
a+λ
f dx 6
a+λ
g dx
a
Zb
g dx < M, for 0 < λ < b − a
a+λ
aft
Zb
f dx < M, for 0 < λ < b − a
a+λ
Zb
Hence f dx converges at a.
a
Zb Zb
(ii) Again, if f dx is divergent at a, then the positive function f dx is not bounded above
a a+λ
Zb Z b+λ
Dr
and therefore from equation (1),
divergent at a.
g dx is also not bounded above. Hence,
a+λ a
g dx is
f (x)
If f and g are two positive functions in [a, b] such that lim = l, where l is a non-zero finite
x→a+ g(x)
Zb Zb
number, then the two integrals f dx and g dx converge and diverge together at a.
aft
a a
Proof : Evidently l > 0.
f (x)
Let ε be a positive number such that l − ε > 0. Since lim = l, therefore there exists a
g(x) x→a+
neighbourhood (a, c), (a < c < b), such that for all x ∈ (a, c), we have
f (x)
−l <
g(x)
or
Now,
Dr (l − ) g(x) < f (x) < (l + ) g(x) (7)
aft
So if f dx i.e., if
f dx diverges at a, then by comparison test, (I + ε) g dx and therefore, g dx
a a
Zb a
Zb a
diverges at a. It may similarly be shown that f dx converges and diverges with g dx.
a a
Hence, the two integrals behave alike.
(ii) if
g
f
g
→ ∞ and
Zb
a
Dr
→ 0 and g dx converges, then f dx also converges, and
Z
g dx diverges, then f dx also diverges.
Zb
dx
The improper integral converges if and only if n < 1.
(x − a)n
a
Proof : It is a proper integral if n 6 0, and improper for other values of n, a is the only point of
infinite discontinuity of the integrand.
aft
Now for n , 1,
Zb Zb
dx dx
n
= lim , 0<λ<b−a
a (x − a) λ→0+ a+λ (x − a)n
1 1 1
= lim n−1
− n−1
λ→0+ 1 − n (b − a) λ
1
, if n < 1
n−1
= (1 − n) (b − a)
Dr
∞, if n > 1
Again, for n = 1
Zb Zb Zb
dx dx dx
= = lim
a (x − a)n a x−a λ→0+ a+λ x−a
= lim {log(b − a) − log λ} = ∞
λ→0+
Zb
dx
Thus, converges only for n < 1.
a (x − a)n
aft
√ .
0 1 − x3
Solution : Let
1 1 1
f (x) = √ =
1 − x3 (1 − x)1/2 (1 + x + x2 )1/2
1
Clearly, 1/2
is a bounded function and let M be its upper bound.
(1 + x + x2 )
M
Also
Z1
dx
(1 − x)1/2
0
is convergent.
Z1
Dr ∴ f (x) 6
(1 − x)1/2
dx
Therefore by comparison test, √ is convergent.
0 1 − x3
aft
0 xp
Solution : For p 6 1, it is a proper integral. For p > 1, it is an improper integral, 0 being the point
of infinite discontinuity. Now
sin x 1 sin x
= p−1 ·
xp x x
sin x sin x
The function is bounded and 6 1.
x x
Also
Z π/2
dx
Dr ∴
sin x
xp
xp−1
0
Z π/2
sin x
Therefore by comparison test, dx converges for p < 2 and diverges for p > 2.
0 xp
aft
converges at a if there exists a positive number n less than 1 and a fixed positive number M
such that
M
f (x) 6
(x − a)n
for all x in (a, b].
Zb
Also, f dx diverges if there exists a number n > 1 and a fixed positive number G such that
a
x in (a, b].
Dr f (x) >
G
(x − a)n
ii) If lim [(x − a)n f (x)] exists and is non-zero finite, then the integral
x→a+
Zb
f dx
a
aft
Find the values of m and n for which the following integral converge:
Z1
e−m x xn dx
0
Thus, e−m x xn dx converges only for n > −1, irrespective of the values of m.
0
aft
0
Z1 Z 1/2 Z1
Solution : Putting (log 1/x)m dx = (log 1/x)m dx + (log 1/x)m dx,
0 0 1/2
0 and 1, respectively are the points of infinite discontinuity of the integrals on the right. Let
Convergence at 0 :
Z 1/2
0
Dr
(log 1/x)m dx is a proper integral if m 6 0, for the integrand tends to a finite limit as x → 0 (1
if m = 0; 0 if m < 0). 0 is the only point of infinite discontinuity if m > 0.
For m > 0, take
1
g(x) = p , 0 < p < 1
x
so that
f (x)
= xp (log 1/x)m → 0 as x → 0
g(x)
aft
(log 1/x)m dx is a proper integral if m > 0, and 1 is the only point of infinite discontinuity if
1/2
m < 0. For m < 0, let
1
g(x) =
(1 − x)−m
so that
log 1/x n
f (x)
= → 1 as x → 1.
g(x) 1−x
1/2
if −m
Dr
f dx and
< 1
Z1
1/2
or
g dx behave alike.
m > −1 therefore
Z1
(log 1/x)m dx also converges if
1/2 (1 − x) 1/2
0>m> Z −1. 1
Hence, (log 1/x)m dx is convergent when 0 > m > −1.
0
Z1
log x
Show that √ dx is convergent.
0 x √
Solution : Since log x/ x is negative in [0, 1], we take
aft
log x log 1/x
f (x) = − √ = √
x x
The integral
Dr
f (x)
g(x)
= x1/4 (log 1/x) → 0 as x → 0+
Z1
g dx =
Z1
dx
0 0 x3/4
is convergent at 0.
Z1 Z1
log 1/x log x
Therefore, √ dx and so √ dx is also convergent.
0 x 0 x
Z2 √
x
Show that dx is divergent.
1 log x
Solution : Here 1 is the only point of infinite discontinuity.
Let
aft
√
x
f (x) =
log x
and
1
g(x) =
x−1
so that √ 3
f (x) (x − 1) x 2 x1/2 − 21 x−1/2
lim = lim = lim =1
The integral
x→1+ Dr
g(x) x→1+ log x
Z2
1
x→1+
dx
x−1
1/x
Z π/2
sinm x
Show that the integral dx exists if and only if n < m + 1.
0 xn
Solution : Let m
sinm x
aft
1 sin x
f (x) = = n−m ·
xn x x
Here as x → 0+, f (x) → 0 if n − m < 0, and f (x) → ∞ if n − m > 0.
Thus, it is a proper integral if n 6 m, and improper if n > m, 0 being the only point of infinite
discontinuity of f .
When n > m, let
1
g(x) = n−m
x
so that
Z π/2 Z π/2
dx
Dr
f (x)
g(x)
=
sin x m
x
→ 1 as x → 0+
aft
1
Taking a number, say , between 0 and 1, we put
2
Z1 Z 1/2 Z1
xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 dx = xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 dx + xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 dx
0 0 1/2
and examine the two integrals on the right for convergence at 0 and 1 respectively.
Convergence at 0 : When m < 1.
Let
Dr
f (x) = xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 =
f (x)
g(x)
(1 − x)n−1
x1−m
and g(x) = 1−m
x
= (1 − x)n−1 → 1 as x → 0
1
Z 1/2 Z 1/2
dx
Also g dx = converges at 0 if and only if 1 − m < 1, i.e., m > 0.
x1−m
Z01/2 0
xm−1
f (x) = xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 = .
(1 − x)1−n
aft
Let
1
g(x) =
(1 − x)1−n
then
f (x)
= xm−1 → 1 as x → 1
g(x)
Z1 Z1
dx
Also g dx = converges at 1, if and only if 1 − n < 1, or n > 0.
(1 − x)1−n
Thus
Hence
1/2
Z1
1/2
Z1
1/2
Dr
xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 dx converges at 1, if and only if n > 0.
aft
−xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 log x dx, i.e. xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 log dx
0 0 x
1
Since 0 and 1 are the possible points of infinite discontinuity, therefore taking a number, say ,
2
between 0 and 1, we examine the integrals
Z 1/2 Z1
1 1
xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 log dx, xm−1 (1 − x)n−1 log dx
0 x 1/2 x
at 0 and 1 respectively.
Convergence at 0 :
Dr
It is a proper integral for m − 1 > 0, and improper for m 6 1, 0 being the only point of infinite
discontinuity, then for m 6 1, let
aft
Convergence at 1 :
log 1/x (1 − x)n
Since lim = lim exists finitely when n > 0, therefore the integral is proper
x→1− (1 − x)1−n x→1 (1 − n)x
for n > 0 and improper for n < 0, 1 being the only singular point. For n < 0, let
1/2
Dr
g dx is convergent if and only if q < 1. Also
f (x)
g(x)
=
xm−1 log 1/x
(1 − x)1−n−q
Z π/2
Show that the integral log sin x dx is convergent and hence evaluate it.
0
Solution : Let f (x) = log sin x. As f is non-positive in [0, π/2], we consider the function (−f ) for
aft
testing convergence of the integral. 0 is the only point of infinite discontinuity of f . Let
1
g(x) = , m < 1,
xm
so that
f (x)
− = −xm log sin x → 0 as x→0
g(x)
Z π/2
dx
Also, we know that
Therefore,
Z π/2
0
0 xm
Dr
is convergent for m < 1.
0
log sin x dx is convergent.
sin 2x = 2 sin x cos x ⇒ log sin 2x = log 2 + log sin x + log cos x
aft
π
= log 2 + I + log cos x dx
2 0
π
Putting 2 x = t in the first and x = − y in the last integral, we get
2
π
I= log 2 + I + I
2
π
Hence
Dr Z π/2
0
∴ I=−
log sin x dx = −
2
log 2
π
2
log 2
aft
f dx < ε, 0 < λ1 , λ2 < δ
a+λ1
Z a+λ2
[Notice that f dx tends to 0 as λ1 , λ2 → 0. ]
a+λ1
Zb Zb
Proof : The improper integral f dx is said to exist when lim f dx exists finitely.
a λ→0+ a+λ
Zb
Let F(λ) = f dx so that F(λ) is a function of λ.
a+λ Dr
According to Cauchy’s criterion for finite limits F(λ) tends to a finite limit as λ → 0 if and only if
for every > 0 there corresponds δ > 0 such that for all positive λ1 , λ2 < δ.
aft
a a
Zb
Proof : Since |f | dx exists, therefore by Cauchy’s test, for ε > 0 there corresponds δ > 0 such
a
that
Z a+λ2
|f | dx < ε, 0 < λ1 , λ2 < δ (8)
a+λ1
a+λ1
f dx 6
Z a+λ2
a+λ1
|f | dx (9)
Z1
sin 1/x
Show that dx, p > 0, converges absolutely for p < 1.
aft
0 xp
Solution : Let
sin 1/x
f (x) = , p>0
xp
0 is the only point of infinite discontinuity, and f does not keep the same sign in any neighbour-
hood of 0. In [0, 1],
sin 1/x | sin 1/x| 1
|f (x)| = = < p
xp xp x
Also
Z1
dx
0 x
Dr
p converges if and only if p < 1.
0
sin 1/x
xp
dx converges and so
Z1
0
sin 1/x
xp
dx converges
absolutely if and only if p < 1.
We shall now consider the convergence of improper integrals of bounded integrable function with
infinite range of integration (a or b or both infinite.)
i) Convergence at ∞ : The symbol
aft
Z∞
f dx, x > a (10)
a
ZX
is defined as the limit of f dx, when X → ∞, so that
a
Z∞ ZX
f dx = lim f dx
Dr a X→∞ a
If the limit exists and is finite, then the improper integral (10) is said to be convergent, otherwise
it is said to be divergent.
Example : Examine for convergence
Z∞ Z∞ Z∞
x 1
2
dx, √ dx, sin x dx
0 1+x 1 x a
aft
is defined by the equation
Zb Zb
f dx = lim f dx
−∞ X→−∞ X
If the limit exists and is finite then the integral (11) converges (or exists). Otherwise it diverges (or
does not exist).
iii) Convergence at both ends :
Z∞
is understood to mean
Dr Zc
−∞
f dx, ∀ x
Z∞
(12)
f dx + f dx (13)
−∞ c
aft
f dx = lim f dx (14)
−∞ X→∞ Y
Y→−∞
In
Dr Za
−∞
f dx +
Zb
a
f dx +
Z∞
b
f dx
Z ∞case all the integrals in (15) exist in accordance with the definitions given above, the integral
(15)
aft
sin x dx = lim sin x dx = lim [− cos x]X
0 = lim (1 − cos X)
0 X→∞ 0 X→∞ X→∞
Thus the improper integral does not exist since cos X has no limit when X → ∞.
Z∞ ZX
dx dx
= lim
−∞ 1 + x2 X→∞ Y 1 + x2
Y→−∞
π π
= lim tan−1 X − tan−1 Y = − − =π
X→∞ 2 2
Z∞
2 x2
x4 − 1
Dr Y→−∞
dx = lim
X→∞
ZX
2 x2
x4 − 1
dx
2 2
1 X−1 1
= limtan−1 X − tan−1 2 + log + log 3
X→∞ 2 X+1 2
π −1 1
= − tan 2 + log 3
2 2
Thus, the integral converges.
Sharad Bhagwanrao Kadam Improper Integrals April 24, 2021 35 / 67
Example
Z∞ Z∞
dx 2
Examine for convergence the integrals , x3 e−x dx.
−∞ (x2 + 1)2 0
Solution : By definition
Z∞ Z0 Z∞
dx dx dx
aft
= +
−∞ (x2 + 1)2 −∞ (x2 + 1)2 (x2 + 1)2
0
Z∞ ZX
dx dx
=2 2 2
= 2 lim
0 (x + 1) X→∞ 0 (x2 + 1)2
X
= 2 lim tan−1 X + by putting x = tan θ
X→∞ 1 + X2
π
=
2
Thus, the integral converges.
Dr
Z∞
0
2
x3 e−x dx = lim
X→∞ 0
ZX
x3 e−x dx
2
1 1 2
= lim − (X2 + 1) e−X
X→∞ 2 2
1
=
2
Thus, the integral converges.
aft
As in the case of unbounded functions with finite limits of integration, there is no loss of generality
in supposing that the integrand f is positive in [a, X], for, if negative it Zcan be replaced by (−f ).
∞
Theorem : A necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of f dx, where f is positive
a
in [a, X] is that there exists a positive number M, independent of X, such that
ZX
f dx < M, for every X > a.
a
a
Dr
f dx is said to be convergent if lim
If f and g be two positive functions such that f (x) 6 g(x), for all x in [a, X], then
Z∞ Z∞
(i) f dx converges, if g dx converges, and
aft
a a
Z∞ Z∞
(ii) g dx diverges, if f dx diverges.
a a
Proof : Let f and g be both bounded and integrable in [a, X], X > a.
Since f and g are positive and
f (x) 6 g(x), ∀ x ∈ [a, X]
ZX ZX
(i) Let
Z∞
a
Dr ∴
a
f dx 6
a
g dx
ZX
g dx < M, for X > a
a
aft
f dx < M, X > a.
a
Z∞
Hence f dx is convergent.
a
Z∞ ZX
(ii) If f dx is divergent then the positive function f dx is not bounded above and therefore
a ZX a
Hence,
Z∞
a
a Dr
g dx diverges.
f (x)
If f and g are positive in [a, X] and lim = l, where l is a non-zero finite number, then the two
x→∞ g(x)
Z∞ Z∞ Z∞
f
integrals f dx and g dx converge or diverge together. Also if → 0 and g dx converges
aft
Z∞ a a Z∞ Z ∞g a
f
then f dx converges, and if → ∞ and g dx diverges then f dx diverges.
a g a a
Proof : Evidently l > 0.
Let be a positive number such that l − > 0.
f (x)
Since lim = l, therefore there exists a number k (> a), however large, such that for all x > k,
x→∞ g(x)
or
Dr f (x)
g(x)
−l <
Now,
(l − ) g(x) < f (x), ∀x > k > a
aft
f
When → 0, we can find k so that
g
f (x)
< , ∀x > k
g(x)
i.e.,
f (x) < g(x), ∀x > k
Z∞ Z∞
So, if
When
a
f
g
g dx converges thenDr a
f dx also converges.
f (x)
> M or f (x) > M g(x), ∀x > k
g(x)
Z∞ Z∞
Hence, if g dx diverges then f dx also diverges.
a a
Z∞
C
Show that the improper integral dx, a > 0, where C is a positive constant, converges if and
xn
aft
a
only if n > 1.
Proof : We have
X
ZX
C log a , n=1
C
dx =
xn
1 1 1
a − n−1 , n,1
1−n X n−1 a
and therefore
Z∞
C
Z∞
a
Dr
C
xn
dx = lim
X→∞
ZX
a
C
xn
dx =
+∞,
C
(n − 1) an−1
,
n61
n>1
Z∞
i) If f is positive in [a, x], then the integral f dx converges, if there exists a positive number n
a
greater than 1 and a fixed positive number M such that
aft
M
f (x) 6
xn
for every x > a.
Also the integral diverges if there exists a positive number M such that
M
f (x) >
xn
for every x > a.
Dr
ii) If lim [xn f (x)] exists and is non-zero finite, then the integral
x→∞
Z∞
f dx
a
Z∞ Z∞
dx x2 dx
Examine the convergence of √ , √ .
1 x x2 + 1 0 x5 + 1
1 1
Solution : Let f (x) = √ , (behaves like x−2 at ∞) and g(x) = 2 ,
aft
x x2 + 1 x
so that
f (x) x2
= lim √
lim = 1 (non-zero finite)
g(x) x→∞x→∞ x x2 + 1
Z∞ Z∞
Hence, the two integrals f dx and g dx behave alike.
Z∞ 1 Z∞ 1
dx dx
As 2
converges, therefore √ also converges.
1 x 1 x x2 + 1
Let f (x) = √
x2
x5 + 1
f (x)
Dr
, ∼ x−1/2 and g(x) = √ .
= √
x5/2
1
= √
x
1
→ 1 as x → ∞
g(x) x5 + 1 1 + x−5
Z∞ Z∞ Z∞
dx x2 dx
As g dx = √ diverges, thus by comparison test, √ also diverges.
0 0 x 0 x5 + 1
aft
2
Let us consider the integral e−x dx.
1
We know
2
ex > x2 , for all real x
2 1
∴ e−x <
x2
Z∞ Z∞ Z∞
1 −x2 2
As 2
dx converges at ∞, the integral e dx and therefore the integral e−x dx con-
1 x 1 0
verges.
Here
Dr log x
x
log x
x3/2 2 = 1/2 → 0 as x → ∞
x
and Z∞
dx
1 x3/2
converges. Z∞ Z∞
dx log x
Hence by comparison with , the integral dx also converges.
1 x3/2 1 x2
aft
dx
x2 xn e−x = → 0 as x → ∞, for all n and converges.
ex 1 x2
Z∞
Hence by comparison test, xn e−x dx converges.
1
Here 0 is not a point of infinite discontinuity, so if we put
Z∞ Z1 Z∞
sin2 x sin2 x sin2 x
dx = dx + dx
0 x2 0 x2 1 x2
Dr
the first integral on the right being proper, we test the second,
Z∞
sin2 x
x2
dx for convergence at ∞.
1
Z∞ Z∞
sin2 x 1 dx sin2 x
Now 6 2 and is convergent, therefore the integral dx is also convergent.
x2 x x2 x2
Z∞ 1 2 1
sin x
Hence, the integral dx is convergent.
0 x2
x tan−1 x tan−1 x 1
(∼ x−1/3 at ∞) and g(x) = 1/3
aft
f (x) = = 1/3
(1 + x4 )1/3 x (1 + x−4 )1/3 x
so that
f (x) tan−1 x π
= → as x → ∞
g(x) (1 + x−4 )1/3 2
Z∞ Z∞
Hence, f dx and g dx behave alike.
Z ∞1 1 Z∞
dx x tan−1 x
Since
1 x
1/3
diverges,
t
Dr
therefore
Z∞
4 1/3
dx
dx also diverges.
=
Z∞
dt
e2 x log log x 2 log t
Z∞
The integral xm−1 e−x dx is convergent if and only if m > 0.
0
Solution : Let
aft
e−x
f (x) = xm−1 e−x = .
x1−m
The integrand f has infinite discontinuity at 0 if m < 1. So we have to examine convergence at 0
and ∞ both.
Putting
Z∞ Z1 Z∞
xm−1 e−x dx = xm−1 e−x dx + xm−1 e−x dx
0 0 1
we test the two integrals on the right for convergence at 0 and ∞ respectively.
Dr
Convergence at 0 : m < 1.
Let
1
g(x) = 1−m
x
so that
f (x)
= e−x → 1 as x → 0
g(x)
aft
Hence xm−1 e−x dx converges if and only if m > 0.
0
Convergence at ∞
Let
1
g(x) =
x2
so that
f (x) xm+1
= x → 0 as x → ∞, for all m
As
Hence
Z∞
1
dx
Zx
∞
2
converges, therefore
Dr
g(x)
Z∞
1
e
aft
Solution : Let
1 1 1
f (x) = − .
x sinh x x
1
Using L’Hospital rule, we find that f (x) → as x → 0. Therefore 0 is not a point of infinite
6
discontinuity of f .
To examine the convergence at ∞, we put
f (x) =
1
x2
Dr
1
x
−
1
sinh x x
at ∞.
1 1
= 2 −
x
2 e−x
x (1 − e−2x )
Z∞ Z∞
dx 1 1 dx
By comparison with the convergent integral 2
we can show that − and
Z∞ 1 x 1 x sinh x x
1 1 dx
therefore − is also convergent.
0 x sinh x x
aft
0 x
1
Solution : Making the substitution log = t or x = e−t , we get
x
Z1 Z∞
1 q
xp log dx = tq e−(p+1) t dt
0 x 0
The integrand of the last integral has a point of infinite discontinuity 0. So, we put
Z∞
0
Dr
tq e−(p+1) t dt =
Z1
0
tq e−(p+1) t dt +
Z∞
and examine the integrals on the right for convergence at 0 and ∞ respectively.
tq e−(p+1) t dt
Convergence at 0 : Let
e−(p+1) t
f (t) = tq e−(p+1) t = .
t−q
aft
converges at 0 if only if −q < 1 or q > −1, for all values of p.
Convergence at ∞ :
Let
tq 1
f (t) = tq e−(p+1) t = (p+1) q and g(t) = 2
e t
so that
f (t) tq+2
= (p+1) t → 0, as t → ∞ for all q and p + 1 > 0.
g(t) e
Z∞ Dr
dt
Also 2
converges.
1Z t
∞
Hence tq e−(p+1) t dt converges for all q and only if p + 1 > 0.
1
Hence Z∞ Z1
1 q
tq e−(p+1) t dt = xp log dx
1 0 x
is convergent for p > −1, q > −1 and divergent for all other values of p and q.
aft
f dx < , for all X1 , X2 > X0
X1
Z X2
[It implies that f dx → 0 as X1 , X2 → ∞]
X1
Z∞ ZX
Proof : The improper integral f dx exists if lim f dx exists finitely.
a X→∞ a
Let ZX
a function of X.
Dr F(X) =
a
f dx,
According to Cauchy’s criterion for finite limits F(X) tends to a finite limit as X → ∞ if and only
if for every > 0 there corresponds X0 such that for all X1 , X2 > X0 ,
i.e.,
Z X1 Z X2 Z X2
f dx − f dx < ⇒ f dx < .
a a X1
aft
sin x sin x sin x
dx = dx + dx
0 x 0 x 1 x
Z∞
sin x
and test dx for convergence at ∞.
0 x
2
For any > 0, let X1 , X2 be two numbers, both greater than .
Now Z X2 Z X2
sin x h cos x iX2 cos x
so that
Dr
Z X2
sin x
dx 6
X1
cos X1
x
−
dx = −
cos X2
x X1
+
Z X2
−
cos x
2
dx
X1 x2
dx
X1 x X1 X2 X1 x
Z X2
1 1 dx
6 + + 2
<2· =
X1 X2 X1 x 2
Z∞ Z∞
sin x sin x
Then by Cauchy’s test dx and consequently dx is convergent.
1 x 0 x
aft
Z∞ Z∞
The improper integral f dx is said to be absolutely convergent if |f | dx is convergent.
a a
The following theorem can be proved with the help of Cauchy’s text.
Z∞ Z∞
Theorem : The improper integral f dx exists, if |f | dx exists.
a a
Dr
The converse, however, is not true. Integrals which are convergent but not absolutely are called
conditionally convergent integrals.
Z∞
sin x
Show that dx converges absolutely if p > 1.
xp
aft
1
Solution : Now
sin x | sin x| 1
= 6 p, ∀x > 1
xp xp x
Also Z∞
dx
converges only if p > 1.
1 xp
Z∞
sin x
Hence
Dr
∴
Z∞
1
sin x
xp
1 xp
dx converges if p > 1.
aft
φ(x) 6 K, ∀x > a (18)
Z∞
Again, since |f | is positive and |f | dx is convergent, a number M exists such that
a
ZX
|f | dx 6 M, for all X > a (19)
a
⇒
Dr ZX
|f φ| 6 K |f |, ∀ x > a
|f φ| dx 6 K
ZX
|f | dx 6 K M, for all X > a
a a
ZX
which implies that the positive function |f φ| dx is bounded above by K M, for X > a. Hence
Z∞ Z∞ a
aft
Discuss the convergence of the integral
Z∞
1
2, x is a rational number
x
f (x) dx, where f (x) =
1 − 1 , x is an irrational number
x2
Solution : Since Z∞ Z∞
1
Dr 1
|f (x)| dx =
1 x2
dx
is convergent, and every absolutely convergent integral is convergent. Therefore the given integral
is convergent.
Dr
Sharad Bhagwanrao Kadam Improper Integrals April 24, 2021 60 / 67
Abel’s Test
Z∞ Z∞
If φ is bounded and monotonic in [a, ∞), and f dx is convergent at ∞, then f φ dx is
a a
convergent at ∞.
aft
or
An infinite integral which converges (not necessarily absolutely) will remain convergent after the
insertion of a factor which is bounded and monotonic.
Proof : Since φ is monotonic in [a, ∞), it is integrable in [a, X], for all X > a. Also, since f is
integrable in [a, X], we have by Second Mean Value Theorem
Z X2 Zξ Z X2
f φ dx = φ (X1 ) f dx + φ (X2 ) f dx for a < X1 6 ξ 6 X2 (20)
X1 X1 ξ
Dr
Let > 0 be arbitrary. Since φ is bounded in [a, ∞), a positive number K exists such that
|φ(x)| 6 K, ∀x > a
In particular,
Z X2
f dx < , for all X1 , X2 > X0 (22)
X1 2K
aft
Let the numbers X1 , X2 in (20) be > X0 so that the number ξ which lies between X1 and X2 is also
> X0 .
Hence from (22)
Z X2 Zξ Z X2
f φ dx = φ (X1 ) f dx + φ (X2 ) f dx
X1 X1 ξ
Zξ Z X2
6 |φ(X1 )| · f dx + |φ(X2 )| · f dx
f φ dx
a
is convergent at ∞.
ZX
If φ is bounded and monotonic in [a, ∞) and tends to 0 as x → ∞, and f dx is bounded for
Z∞ a
f φ dx is convergent at ∞.
aft
X > a, then
a
or
An infinite integral which oscillates finitely becomes convergent after the insertion of a bounded
monotonic factor which tends to zero as a limit.
Proof : Since φ is monotonic, it is integrable in [a, X] for all X > a.
Also, since f is integrable in [a, X]. Therefore by Second Mean Value Theorem,
Z X2 Zξ Z X2
f φ dx = φ (X1 ) f dx + φ (X2 ) f dx for a < X1 6 ξ 6 X2 (23)
Again, since
X1
ZX
a
Dr X1 ξ
ZX
f dx 6 K, ∀x > a
a
6 K + K = 2 K, for X1 , ξ > a
Similarly
Z X2
f dx 6 2 K, for X2 , ξ > a
aft
ξ
X1
Dr
f φ dx = φ (X1 ) f dx + φ (X2 )
6 |φ (X1 )| ·
X1
Zξ
X1
f dx
ξ
f dx + |φ (X2 )| ·
Z X2
ξ
f dx
< · 2K + · 2K =
4K 4K
Hence, by Cauchy’s test, Z∞
f φ dx
a
is convergent at ∞.
Sharad Bhagwanrao Kadam Improper Integrals April 24, 2021 64 / 67
Example
Z∞
sin x
The integral dx is convergent for p > 0.
1 xp
Solution : Let
f (x) = sin x
aft
and
1
φ(x) = .
xp
Here
ZX ZX
f dx = sin x dx = |cos 1 − cos X|
1 1
6 |cos 1| + |cos X|
1
Dr 6 2, for 1 6 X < ∞.
aft
Thus we conclude that Z∞
sin x
dx
1 xp
converges absolutely for p > 1, but only conditionally for 0 < p 6 1.
The integral Z∞
sin x log x
dx
1 x
is convergent.
Let
Z∞
Drf (x) = sin x, φ(x) =
log x
x
.