Chapter 1 Notes
Chapter 1 Notes
“Statutes” = laws
Common law: body of laws and authorities among the judicial branches that was a common heirloom
- Subject to change or modification, parliament had total control, people were reflected through
government
- In the US, the will of the people were reflected through the constitution
Case of first impression: A unique dispute that cannot be resolved based off of previous cases
Constitutional Law
Articles of confederation was the first version - not good
United States Constitution is the seminal legal document in the country (1787)
- Meanings its a highly influential case which has given rise to a long line of cases following the
original holding
1. Article 1: Creates in the legislature (congress) the authority to enact laws. Defines the functions,
powers, and role of congress.
2. Article 2: Executive power: the president has the duty to enforce all federal laws.
3. Article 3: Establishes judicial branch, confers power to interpret laws
4. Article 4: Concerns the relationship between states.
5. Article 5: Lays out the means by which the US constitution may be amended
6. Article 6: Confers supremacy of the US constitution, federal laws, and treaties over all other laws
Constitutional Amendments:
Bills of Rights is the collective name of the first ten amendments to the US constitution, freedom of
speech, religion, right to bear arms, etc.
1. 5 Freedoms : religion, assembly, petition, press, speech
2. Right to bear arms
3. Quartering act
4. Rights of the accused
a. Amendment 4. Unreasonable search and seizure
b. Amendment 5: Establishes due process of law (right to grand jury) Double jeopardy.
Right to remain silent
c. Amendment 6: Speedy and public trial
d. Amendment 8: Cruel and unusual punishment
5. Amendment 7: (civil law) Guarantees trial by jury in civil lawsuit
6. Amendment 9: just cause some rights are written down, does not mean other rights that aren’t
written can be denied
7. Amendment 10: If not in the constitution, then the states can decide
Law vs Equity
Law: To provide stability and certainty
Equity: To promote fairness
Preemption: (allows higher level of government to limit or eliminate the power of a lower level
government to regulate specific issues)
- Article 6, supremacy law, federal law takes precedence over state and local law
- Express Preemption: state law directly opposes a local power
- Field Preemption: a clear showing that congress meant to “occupy the field” and displace states
from regulating the subject matter
- Conflict preemption: when simultaneous compliance with both federal and state regulations is
impossible
Natural Law
Natural law is the idea that certain rights or values are inherent by virtue of human nature and universally
cognizable through human reason. Historically, it suggests there's a set of moral and legal principles
inherent to all humans, regardless of legal systems or beliefs.
Example: The concept of human rights can be seen as derived from natural law. For instance, the right to
life is often cited as a fundamental natural right. This means that regardless of what laws a country might
pass, the right to life is considered universal and should be respected because it's a basic principle that
comes from human nature itself, not from man-made laws.
Positivist School
The positivist school is a theory within the fields of law and criminology that emphasizes the importance
of using empirical evidence and scientific methods to study and understand human behavior, including
criminal behavior.
This approach contrasts with the natural law theory, which relies on moral reasoning and the belief in
inherent rights and wrongs that exist independently of human recognition or construction.
Legal Realism
Legal realism is a school of legal philosophy that emerged in the early 20th century, primarily in the
United States, as a response to the prevailing legal formalism of the time. Legal realists challenge the idea
that judicial decisions can be predicted solely based on abstract legal principles or the formal application
of law to facts. Instead, they argue that the law is not a fixed set of rules but a dynamic and evolving
practice that judges shape through their decisions.
Briefing a case:
1. Select a useful case brief format
2. Use the right caption when naming the brief
a. Plaintiff P x Defendanct D (citation)
3. Identify the case facts
a. Who are the parties
b. What is the conflict
4. Outline the procedural history
a. Where did we start, finish, and along the way
5. State the issues in question
a. Is xyz liable for this?
b. Should be framed to be answered with yes or no
6. State the holding in your words
a. Holding is the answer
b. We therefore find xyz guilty…
7. Describe the court’s rationale for each holding
a. The reason for the court rule that way
8. Explain the final disposition
a. The outcome
9. Include other opinions
Questions
6. Explain the federal powers conferred in Articles I, II, and III. What is the doctrine of separation
of powers?
a. Article I confers legislative powers to Congress, which makes laws.
b. Article II establishes the executive powers vested in the President, who enforces laws.
c. Article III sets up the judicial branch, with the Supreme Court and other federal courts
interpreting laws.
d. The doctrine of separation of powers is a constitutional principle that divides government
responsibilities among these branches to prevent any one group from gaining too much
power and to provide a system of checks and balances. Each branch has distinct and
separate powers and areas of responsibility so that the powers of one branch are not in
conflict with the powers associated with the others.
7. Differentiate between courts of equity and law. Why are each needed?
a. Courts of Law: These courts grant relief in the form of monetary compensation or
specific actions through the application of statutes and legal principles. Their decisions
are based on the rigid application of established laws.
b. Courts of Equity: These courts provide remedies that are non-monetary and based on
principles of fairness and justice. They can issue orders, like injunctions, specific
performances, or decrees, that require a party to act or refrain from acting in a certain
way.
c. The distinction arose because the rigid application of laws in courts of law sometimes
resulted in unfairness or injustice. Courts of equity were therefore established to offer
more flexible, just, and individualized outcomes. Both are needed to ensure a
comprehensive justice system that can adequately address all kinds of legal disputes,
offering both strict legal judgments and more discretionary, equitable resolutions. Today,
most courts have merged these functions, but the principles of law and equity remain
distinct and guide judicial discretion and remedies.
9. What role do administrative agencies play in government? Name a federal agency and a state
agency.
a. Administrative agencies play a crucial role in government by implementing and
enforcing laws, regulating industries, and administering public programs. They have the
authority to create regulations, adjudicate disputes, and issue permits or licenses within
their area of responsibility.
b. Federal Agency Example: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates air and
water quality, and oversees environmental laws to protect human health and the
environment.
c. State Agency Example: The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) manages
vehicle registration, and driver licensing, and promotes road safety within the state of
California.
10. What is the difference between a state constitution and the federal constitution?
a. The federal Constitution sets the framework for the U.S. government and applies
nationwide, while state constitutions govern individual states, often with more detail on
local governance and rights.
12. Explain what a treaty is and when the courts have to follow it.
a. A treaty is a formal agreement between sovereign states or international entities, legally
binding under international law. U.S. courts must follow treaties when they are applicable
to a case, are self-executing, and do not conflict with the Constitution, as treaties are
considered part of the supreme law of the land.
13. What is the difference between statutory law and constitutional law?
a. Statutory law consists of laws passed by legislatures at the federal, state, or local level.
These laws provide specific rules or codes of conduct and can be changed more easily
than constitutional laws.
b. Constitutional law is derived from a country's constitution, serving as the foundational
legal framework that outlines the structure of the government, the distribution of powers,
and the fundamental rights of citizens. It has a higher authority than statutory law,
meaning statutes must align with the Constitution's principles and can be invalidated if
they conflict.
14. What is the difference between public and private law? Give examples/ Give an example of
substantive law. How does the procedural law complement the substantive law?
a. Public Law governs the relationship between individuals and the state, as well as the
structure and operation of the government itself. It includes constitutional law,
administrative law, and criminal law. For example, criminal law involves the state
prosecuting an individual for acts considered harmful to society.
b. Private Law deals with legal disputes between private individuals or entities over
relationships, obligations, and liabilities. It includes contract law, property law,
c. Substantive Law
d. Substantive law refers to the set of laws that governs how members of a society are to
behave. It defines rights and responsibilities in civil law, and crimes and punishments in
criminal law. An example of substantive law is the law prohibiting murder. This law
defines the offense of murder and the penalties that follow a conviction.
e. Procedural Law
f. Procedural law complements substantive law by providing the methods and means by
which substantive laws are applied and enforced. It outlines how the legal process
operates, including how legal actions are initiated, what procedures must be followed,
and how trials are conducted. For instance, procedural law dictates how a lawsuit must be
filed, the process for conducting a criminal trial, or how evidence is to be presented in
court. It ensures fairness and consistency in the legal process, facilitating the enforcement
of substantive laws.
15. Who brings the charges against the accused in a criminal matter?
a. In a criminal matter, the government brings the charges against the accused. This is
typically done through a prosecutor or district attorney, representing the state or the
federal government, depending on the jurisdiction of the offense.
18. What is the difference between civil law and criminal law?
a. Civil law deals with disputes between individuals or organizations, typically involving
private rights and remedies like compensation. Criminal law involves actions considered
harmful to society as a whole, prosecuted by the government, and can result in penalties
like imprisonment or fines.
19. What are the differences between the various schools of jurisprudential thought? Which is more
convincing?
a. The schools of jurisprudential thought include:
i. Natural Law: Laws reflect universal moral principles.
ii. Legal Positivism: Law is based on written rules and government authority.
iii. Legal Realism: Law's impact is determined by how it's applied in real cases.
iv. Critical Legal Studies: Law is seen as influenced by social and political factors.
b. Which is more convincing depends on individual perspectives on law's role and function
in society.