0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views16 pages

Physical Activity and Cognitive Functioning

Uploaded by

Bojan Klapčić
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views16 pages

Physical Activity and Cognitive Functioning

Uploaded by

Bojan Klapčić
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

medicina

Review
Physical Activity and Cognitive Functioning
Francesca Latino 1, * and Francesco Tafuri 2

1 Department of Human Science, Educational and Sport, Pegaso University, 80143 Naples, Italy
2 Heracle Lab Research in Educational Neuroscience, Niccolò Cusano University, 00166 Rome, Italy;
[email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract: Neuroscience applied to motor activity is a growing area that aims to understand the effects
of motor activity on the structures and functions of the Central Nervous System. Attention has been
paid to this multidisciplinary field of investigation by the scientific community both because it is of
great importance in the treatment of many chronic diseases and because of its potential applications in
the Movement Sciences. Motor activity during a developmental age is, in fact, an indispensable tool
for the physical and mental growth of children, both able-bodied and disabled. Through movement,
individuals can improve their physical efficiency and promote their own better health, establish
relationships with the environment and others, express themselves and their emotions, form their
identity and develop cognitive processes. This literature review aims, therefore, to highlight how
an adequate practice of motor activity offers extraordinary possibilities for everyone in relation to
learning, from the perspective of an integral development of the person, and, consequently, can
raise the awareness of those involved in the training and growth, especially the youngest, towards
the educational value of motor and sports activities. According to this review, and in line with the
modern neuroscientific approach toward the relationships between motor activities and cognitive
functions, it is possible to claim that hypokinesia tends to inhibit learning. Therefore, it now seems
more topical than ever to draw attention to the need to introduce working proposals that integrate
brain-based motor activity programs into the school curriculum.

Keywords: neuroscience; able-bodied; disabled children; learning; physical activity; cognitive


function

Citation: Latino, F.; Tafuri, F. Physical


Activity and Cognitive Functioning. 1. Introduction
Medicina 2024, 60, 216. https:// Motor and sporting activity is always recognized for its many benefits for everyone.
doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020216 The positive effects on the psycho-physical well-being of the individual have led to the
Academic Editor: Jan Bilski
proposal of motor activity as a true therapy, often an alternative to medication. Over
the past few decades, numerous studies have shown that it can also induce significant
Received: 9 January 2024 cognitive and neuroprotective benefits, especially on processes involving learning abilities
Revised: 18 January 2024 and memory [1–3].
Accepted: 25 January 2024 According to a conceptualization model proposed by many authors [4–6], this inter-
Published: 26 January 2024
dependence is mainly related to the changes that occur in brain function and structure
as a consequence of motor activity. In recent years, research in this field has evolved
considerably through studies born out of the need to better understand the multifaceted
relationship between motor activity and cognitive health. Advances in neuroscience and
Copyright: © 2024 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
neuroimaging techniques have enabled researchers to better understand the effects of
This article is an open access article
motor activity on cognitive functions by investigating its physiological and molecular
distributed under the terms and mechanisms [7]. Research conducted in the different areas of interest concerning motor
conditions of the Creative Commons activity has helped us to define this line of investigation and to identify some preliminary
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// underlying mechanisms. A deeper understanding of the components that are related to
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ cognitive function and that may be amenable to intervention has thus been obtained [8].
4.0/). Investigations into the influence of motor activity on cognitive functioning have proposed

Medicina 2024, 60, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020216 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/medicina


Medicina 2024, 60, 216 2 of 16

several mechanisms that could explain this relationship [9]. Numerous studies published
in recent years on this subject have mainly concluded that motor activity is able to bring
about a series of biological and structural modifications and adaptations that allow brain
cells to create new connections in different cortical areas. Motor activity, in fact, is able to
trigger a cascade of neurochemical growth factors capable of changing the entire brain’s
structure. This reflects the brain’s ability to adapt to the various cognitive challenges that
it faces [10]. Studies using imaging techniques have thus demonstrated that movement
can stimulate angiogenesis, i.e., the development of new blood vessels from existing ones,
neurogenesis, i.e., the presence of undifferentiated neuronal cells capable of self-renewal
and differentiation into different neuronal lines, and improve synaptic plasticity, i.e., the
nervous system’s ability to modify the efficiency of the functioning of connections between
neurons, to eliminate some and establish new ones [11,12]. Motor and sporting activity
conducted on a constant and regular basis is, therefore, capable of favorably influencing
cognitive processes as:
1. It facilitates neural development;
2. It increases the concentration of synapses between neurons;
3. It promotes vascular circulation in the cerebral cortex;
4. It promotes the synthesis of neurotransmitters and neurotrophies that trigger the
processes of neurogenesis, angiogenesis and neuroplasticity.
Although studies conducted on the human brain are still limited compared to those
carried out on animal test subjects, there is now ample evidence that, contrary to past belief
that the adult brain remains static after prenatal and neonatal development, new neurons
can be generated through a process known as neurogenesis [13]. In recent decades, in fact,
numerous experimental trials have shown that neurogenesis can also occur in the adult
brain, particularly at the level of the olfactory bulb and in the hippocampus, where new
undifferentiated neuronal stem cells give rise to neural progenitor cells. It is precisely the
hippocampus, located in the temporal lobe and embedded in the limbic system, that plays
a key role in learning, spatial orientation and memory, as well as being a fundamental area
in the cognitive processes related to the construction of our identity and in the adaptive
capacities of human beings. In fact, as people age, there are several changes in the brain,
to a slight degree, that affect cognitive, behavioral and emotional functions. According
to the definition provided by the American Association of Psychologists (APA) in 1987,
“chronic-progressive cognitive impairment is a brain disease that involves the impairment
of cognitive functions such as to impair the possibility of living independently. Cognitive
symptoms are almost always associated with alterations in personality and behavior that
vary in entity from individual to individual. In addition, there is a progressive alteration
of the functional status.” Cognitive symptoms are different [14]. They vary depending on
the diagnosis and the portion of brain tissue and nerve cells affected. The most common
cognitive symptoms may be memory impairment, language difficulties, reduced attention,
slowed logical reasoning, a progressive reduction in perceptual skills and a reduction in
movement skills.
The improvement of physical performance has a protective effect against cognitive
decline in the course of aging [15]. Physical activity is considered a determining factor
in the health of adults and especially in those over 60 years of age. It helps slow down
the decline in cognitive performance. An adequate program of physical activity in the
elderly improves brain function by modifying the passage across the blood–brain barrier
of chemicals important for mood and nerve transmission [16]. The favorable effects of
physical exercise are then amplified if there is a simultaneous involvement of the elderly in
social and productive activities. This happens independently of the improvement in cardio-
pulmonary performance, suggesting that physical activity can bring benefits in terms of
survival and quality of life. It should be emphasized that the positive effect, although
widespread, is not generic, but mainly oriented towards executive functions and the speed
of information processing [17]. The protective effect of physical activity on the cognitive
function of the elderly has several explanations. First of all, it has a well-established effect
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 3 of 16

on reducing cardio- and cerebrovascular risk, arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus,
all relevant factors in the pathogenesis of several forms of cognitive decline, including
Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Furthermore, physical activity seems to have
a direct effect at the biochemical and structural level (increased production of neuronal
growth factors, such as BNDF, serotonin and IGF-1; increased neuroplasticity in animal
studies; increased hippocampal volume and dentate gyrus in studies on human subjects;
and a reduction in the accumulation of neurodegenerative products such as beta-amyloid
and tau protein) [18].
Therefore, this contribution intends to explore, through a review of the scientific
research in the literature, the link between motor and sport activity and learning processes,
based on the assumption that motor activity can be an important mediating factor capable of
making brain functions more efficient, plastic and adaptable, due to positive modifications
that trigger changes in neurogenesis, synaptic plastic capacity and neuronal proliferation.

2. Search Strategy, Identification of the Studies and Study Characteristics


This literature review presents an overview of studies focused on how an adequate
practice of motor activity offers possibilities for everyone in relation to learning, from the
perspective of an integral development of the person.
In order to identify the studies four databases were used: Google Scholar, Pubmed,
Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The following Boolean search syntax was applied
to identify the studies: “((Physical activity” or “physical exercise”) and (“cognitive func-
tion” or “cognition”)”/“(“learning”) and (“academic achievement” or “academic perfor-
mance”))”. Then, different filters were applied: text availability, full text; species, humans
and animals; languages, English; period, last thirty years. Lastly, further selection has been
provided due to the use of inclusion and exclusion criteria, such as:
(i) English-language publications;
(ii) A time interval of studies, between 1990 and 2023;
(iii) Physical activity or exercise as a tool for the improvement of cognitive function;
(iv) Study design: randomized controlled trials.
Studies were excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria, or due to their lack
of focus on physical activity or exercise interventions.

3. The Effects of Motor and Sport Activity on Neuroplasticity


What has been discussed so far allows us to understand how motor activity is able to
influence and modify neuronal processes. Indeed, there is a great deal of scientific evidence
demonstrating that motor activity leads to an increase in cerebral plasticity, especially in
the hippocampus [19]. In years past, the scientific community believed that the Central
Nervous System (CNS) was structurally stable immediately after birth and that only a few
changes could take place within it during the course of a person’s life. The different brain
areas were thus represented as predefined and immutable structures. This belief made
the brain an organism that, once it had reached its full development, became static and
destined to a gradual, yet irreversible, decline [20,21]. However, over the past few decades,
with the advancement of imaging techniques, this dogma began to s to the belief that the
human brain can manifest plasticity phenomena at all stages of life. The human brain is not,
in fact, made up of fixed and immutable neural circuits, but the brain’s synaptic network
and the structures connected to it are capable of actively reorganizing themselves through
practice and experience, reprogramming their neural networks [22]. Neuroplasticity is the
brain’s ability to change its structure and functioning based on lived experiences [23], and
thus also change in relation to motor activity.
Neuroplasticity is a kind of structural and functional disposition of our nervous
system to change as a result of stresses from the environment [24]; the richer and more
diversified the stresses are, the more our brain will be able to adapt and modulate itself
in response to them. Several studies have shown how motor activity conducted in an
enriched environment causes structural modifications of the nervous system and behav-
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 4 of 16

ioral changes through an increase in locomotor and exploratory activity, learning ability
and especially spatial and problem-solving abilities. This condition is also capable of
leading to a long-term enhancement of the hippocampus due to an activity-dependent
increase in synaptic transmission [25,26]. This enrichment condition can also influence the
expression of neurotrophins [27], especially BDNF (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor),
known as one of the main modulators of brain plasticity. The modulation of the release
of neurotransmitters such as BNDF and their utilization by nerve structures is, in fact,
related to the neuroplasticity induced by motor activity [28]. Neuroplasticity should also be
considered a fundamental property from the perspective of normal neuronal and cognitive
functioning, and not only a response to a pathological condition that results in a lesion;
motor activity, experience, and learning situations are all factors that allow the synaptic
connections of our CNS to be shaped [29,30]. Synaptic neuroplasticity is based on three
fundamental principles that bring about changes in the functioning of neuronal circuits and
modifications in brain reorganization. These principles are represented by the modifiability
of functional and morphological synaptic transmission, by sprouting, i.e., a proliferation of
axon collaterals with an associated formation of synapses, and by neurogenesis, i.e., the
proliferation of certain populations of neurons that take on the characteristics of pluripotent
stem cells.
Human studies have made it possible to describe four forms of brain plasticity. The
first is Cortical Map Expansion, which is expressed in the ability of the primary cortices
to expand their representation areas following the acquisition of skills or the repetition
of an exercise [31]. In 1995, Elbert et al., studying a group of violinists, showed that
in response to exercise, their left-hand finger representation area was larger than in the
control group, as they represent a professional category that makes differentiated, as well
as intensive, use of the left hand [32]. Cross-modal reassignment represents the second
form of plasticity and implies the transfer of certain functions specific to a sensory modality
to brain areas other than those originally assigned to them. The third form is Homologous
Area Adaptation, which consists of the possibility of transferring the cognitive operations
of an area in which a lesion has occurred to the contralateral homologous area of the
cerebral hemisphere. The last form of neuroplasticity is expressed through the concept
of masked compensation or vicariousness, and this represents the possibility of using
alternative strategies and modalities to counteract and, indeed, partially vicariate the
functions no longer performed by a damaged area, due to the recruitment of an intact
cognitive system. From this point of view, motor activity would favor learning as it is
able to trigger the release of a cascade of neurochemical factors capable of generating
neurogenesis, especially at the level of the hippocampus [33], a region that, by its very
nature, is the gateway to new memories essential for learning [34]. Neurogenesis is,
in fact, a differentiation process that allows for the generation of new neurons, which
takes place throughout life, in which neuronal stem cells evolve into mature neurons that
will go on to form the brain’s network of interconnections [35]. This differentiation is
facilitated by factors such as past experience, learning, physical and mental exercise. This
is exactly what happens with exercise-mediated learning, which results in new stimuli
that promote the creation of synaptic connections and, consequently, improved intellectual
performance [36]. It seems, therefore, clear how the constant practice of motor and sporting
activity nourishes and supports cognitive functions while at the same time fostering the
development of a positive sense of self-efficacy, thus offering a positive feedback loop
that supports learning. Neuroplasticity is, moreover, the basis of the concept of cognitive
modifiability, of which it is the prerequisite and neurobiological counterpart, as well as its
complex mediating phenomenon. Cognitive modifiability is the possibility of enhancing
cognitive processes and internal brain resources that are not always exploited, but also
the possibility of developing abilities that are absent or present to a reduced extent in an
individual’s behavioral repertoire [37]. It describes the human organism’s tendency to
allow itself to be shaped by its environment. Numerous studies underline how motor
activity performed in adulthood allows for the activation of less-developed brain areas
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 5 of 16

and the modification of neuronal maps [38]. It is precisely through movement, practice
and experience that neuronal networks and related structures can actively reorganize
themselves. When a new motor skill is acquired, the brain potential for neuroplasticity
is set in motion. During the first exercise, the connections between the brain and the
specific muscle group used to learn that skill are not optimized. With the repetition of the
gesture, the neural pathway becomes more established and refined, so that more neurons
and muscle fibers are recruited and coordinated within the correct motor pattern. The
plastic changes that occur in the brain result in physical improvements related to the
acquired ability. Motor activity allows the brain to function to its full potential, supporting
neuronal multiplication and strengthening connections, thus leading to improved cognitive
abilities [39]. Motor and sports activity programs are important as they prepare the brain
for learning by placing it in the optimal conditions for learning [40]. Studies by Kleim
and Jones [41] first, and Feuerstein et al. [42] later, show that there are essential criteria
that underlie neuroplasticity and, thus, cognitive modifiability. The first criterion is the
Activation effect, according to which, for there to be plasticity, learning interventions must
be carried out in such a way as to stimulate specific brain functions. This is the essential
criterion that cannot be disregarded, as it represents the potential of cognitive modifiability.
Several studies have demonstrated the loss of certain neural connections and, consequently,
of acquired abilities, when these brain functions are not exercised [43]. The second criterion
is called the Specificity effect and is based on the principle that highly specific interventions
are required to increase neuroplasticity and cognitive modifiability. The Repetition effect
constitutes the third principle, whereby the repetition of the motor task is a prerequisite
for changes to manifest themselves behaviorally. However, mere passive repetition is not
sufficient to promote plasticity; there must be variability in the tasks proposed. The fourth
condition is the Intensity effect, according to which the greater the frequency and time over
which the function is stimulated, the more noticeable the change will also be behaviorally.
The Persistence effect is based on the need for a certain level of constancy in relation to the
exercise schedule, and is the fifth condition. The sixth criterion relates to the motivational
dimension and is the Salience Effect; understanding the value of the intervention is the key
to successful cognitive modifiability. The Optimal timing potential effect is the seventh
criterion. According to this principle, change is correlated with age. Nevertheless, if the
adult brain is subjected to appropriate stimulation, this does not constitute a barrier to
learning. According to the eighth criterion, termed the Novelty effect, in order for any
change to take place, the exercise of skills must incorporate new and increasingly complex
elements. The Spread off effect is the ninth criterion and represents the possibility that
the changes, and thus the new learning, may also extend to other functions not originally
targeted by the intervention. The tenth criterion is the Selection effect and reflects the
possibility that there may be interference caused by the new changes in other areas of
operation. The eleventh is the Consciousness/awareness effect and concerns the need
for the subject to be aware of the changes he or she undergoes as a result of the stimuli
and experiences. The last criterion is the multi-sensory effect, which concerns the way
in which stimuli are presented; the variety of stimuli and experiences proposed favors
the learning experience. In a 2006 study, Feuerstein described the concept of cognitive
modifiability as the individual’s ability to modify his or her responses through motor
practice and experience. This capacity constitutes a condition of plasticity in an organism,
which, as a result of motor and sporting activity, becomes capable of improving, changing
and developing new learning strategies.

4. The Role of BDNF in Improving Learning and Memory


Underlying the relationship between motor activity and hippocampal neurogenesis
is a molecule recognized as a key element in mediating this process, BDNF or the Brain-
Derived Neutrophic Factor. BDNF, a polypeptide belonging to the neurotrophin family,
regulates many of the processes within neurogenesis in the adult brain and is implicated
in the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity, which are fundamental for the learning, survival
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 6 of 16

and differentiation of neurons. By promoting synaptogenesis, BDNF regulates the number


of synapses and makes neurons capable of developing stable variations in response to
the synaptic stimuli they are subjected to [44]. This phenomenon underlies the plastic
capacity of the brain and is responsible for complex phenomena such as learning and
memory. The fact that BDNF plays a major role in the functionality of neurons implies
that an increase in its expression through activity-dependent stimulation is necessarily and
significantly correlated with an increased functionality of cognitive processes, determined
by a higher degree and speed of learning [45]. By increasing BDNF synthesis, motor activity
would induce the creation of an ideal neurobiological environment such that it becomes a
significantly predisposed terrain for the changes and adaptations induced by the learning
processes [46]. Constantly practiced motor activity improves hippocampal function and,
consequently, performance in tasks requiring the use of spatial memory [47]. In 1996,
Neeper et al. [48] demonstrated how motor activity in rodents was able to produce the
increased expression of a gene regulating the production of the neurotrophin BDNF, which
is responsible for the growth of the nervous system, the proper functioning of neurons and
their defense against free radical damage. It can, therefore, be deduced that the more a
mouse had run during its life, the greater its production of neurotrophin [49]. The cognitive
aspects that would most seem to benefit from this increase in BDNF protein are memory
and executive functions [50], as well as an improved performance related to attention,
inhibitory control, work speed and visual learning [51–53]. A large area of study devoted
to research on the possible links between motor activity and increased BDNF expression
shows how both are associated with increased neurogenesis, especially at the level of the
dentate gyrus of the hippocampus [54,55]. In laboratory tests on test subjects, it has been
shown that increased BDNF can be observed after only a few days of exercise, and that such
levels of increased Neurotrophic Factor can be maintained for several weeks [56–59]. The
generation of new neurons and the increased plastic capacity of the hippocampal region
make it possible to explain the improvement in cognitive abilities, as this area of the brain
is responsible for memory consolidation and learning [54]. Consistent with these findings,
higher levels of BDNF stimulated through motor activity, and consequently associated with
increased synaptic plasticity and long-term neuronal potentiation, result in better memory
and spatial recognition abilities that can also counteract the effects of senile cognitive
decline [60–66]. However, in order to be able to achieve a significant improvement in
learning abilities, a decisive factor would appear to be the administration of motor practice
in terms of duration, frequency and intensity [67,68]. Nevertheless, it has been possible to
observe that the best results can be achieved through moderate motor activity, especially
when conducted over a prolonged period of time [69].

5. Aerobic Motor Activity


Research conducted over the past decade in both animal models and humans suggests
that aerobic motor activity is the ideal delivery mode, as it is capable of elevating basal
BDNF levels in the hippocampus above a statistically significant threshold [70–75] through
the positive regulation of learning-related brain processes and the induction of functional
and structural changes in the CNS. Following aerobic motor activity, the brain becomes
more efficient and adaptable, and is able to positively modify its plasticity through the
mechanisms of neurogenesis, neuroadaptation and neuroprotective processes. All this
inevitably translates into improved memory and executive function through mechanisms
that promote synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis and the generation of new brain cells capable
of integrating into pre-existing neuronal networks [76,77].
Recent studies conducted on elderly populations have shown that aerobic motor
activity is not only instrumental in improving various cognitive areas, but that it is also
protective against cognitive decline, favoring the maintenance of memory, processing speed
and executive function, traits that are relatively widespread in the ageing process [78–82].
This effect is due to the positive influence that motor activity exerts on various brain regions
capable of generating increased serum levels of neurotrophins. Aerobic motor activity
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 7 of 16

would create the most suitable conditions for making the CNS easily predisposed to the
changes and adaptations necessary for learning new functions [83–85]. In this sense, it can
be used both as enhancement training and as maintenance training for brain functions [86].
Aerobic physical activity would appear to induce improvements in the frontal brain areas
especially [87]. The greatest positive effects have been observed on improvements in capac-
ities related to executive functions, memory, attention, working memory, concentration,
planning and processing speed; functions that are managed precisely by the prefrontal
cortex. This selectivity of action of the training is confirmed by magnetic resonance images
that allow the presence of increased grey matter in the frontal regions to be observed. These
results can be interpreted as evidence in favor of increased neuronal efficiency during
executive and memory tasks [88]. There are, therefore, some experimental data supporting
the role of BDNF as a mediating factor for cognitive improvements; as the hippocampus
is crucial for memory consolidation and learning, so is the generation of new neurons
and the increased plasticity in this region [89,90]. The most current studies in the field of
neuroscience applied to motor activity suggest that BDNF has numerous beneficial effects
on the mind, as it is capable of inducing significant performance improvements on aspects
such as attention and cognitive control, the emotional and social sphere, and short- and
long-term memory [91,92]. In light of the numerous scientific evidence provided by the
most current neuroscientific research, it is possible to state that BDNF could therefore be a
potential modulator of the effects of aerobic motor activity on the cognitive performance of
young adults.

6. Relationship between Anaerobic Exercise and Cognitive Function


At present, the greater part of the studies exploring the impact of physical exercise
on cognitive function has focused on aerobic exercise. A significant number of meta-
analyses that involve both aerobic and anaerobic exercise have found mild to moderate
training-induced enhancements in different domains including processing speed, attention,
executive function and memory [93–102].
Earlier in the development of the field, a number of investigations undertook a compar-
ison of the impact of aerobic and resistance exercise on cognitive function, thereby revealing
a potential dissimilarity in the effects yielded by these two exercise modalities [103]. Pen-
nix et al. [104] aimed to conduct a more comprehensive investigation into the impact of
physical activity on emotional states and overall physical health, with a specific focus on
distinguishing potential disparities between aerobic and resistance exercises, if discernible.
Participants in the aerobic group exhibited a pronounced decrease in depression symptom
scores over time, in contrast to those in the control group. On the other hand, individuals in
the resistance exercise group experienced a shift in symptoms. However, this alteration did
not demonstrate any significant divergence from the shift observed in the control group.
The presence of evidence indicating that aerobic exercise had a pronounced impact on
working memory, in contrast to the absence of any discernible outcome in the resistance
exercise group, signifies that aerobic and resistance exercise may diverge in their influence
on cognitive function.
Recent studies [105–107] have also focused on investigating the potential influence of
resistance exercise due to the observed favorable outcomes. Compared to the practice of
endurance training, commonly characterized by the repetitive performance of a singular
movement pattern such as running or cycling, resistance training frequently encompasses
a sequence of diverse exercises targeting both the upper and lower extremities. Therefore,
it is possible to hypothesize that strength training, due to its greater variability, could
potentially elicit a comparable level of brain stimulation as aerobic exercise. The systematic
reviews that are currently available have reported a range of results, with predominantly
modest benefits, in relation to resistance exercise and its impact on various cognitive
measures [108]. The results of this study align with the data presented in two meta-
analyses that examined trials involving the recruitment of healthy older individuals for
long-term training interventions. Kelly et al. [109] were unable to identify any impact of
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 8 of 16

resistance exercise on working memory or attention, although they did observe a substantial
enhancement in reasoning. Nevertheless, the size of their sample was relatively limited,
as they only identified a maximum of three studies for each cognitive dimension. In 2018,
Northey et al. [98] successfully aggregated the findings from thirteen trials. The researchers
documented notable impacts of resistance exercise on cognitive processes such as executive
function, memory and working memory. In comparison to the data accessible for long-term
regimens, there is a paucity of evidence pertaining to the immediate consequences of a
single training session.
Recently, Wilke et al. [110] provided a comprehensive overview of the existing body of
evidence pertaining to the immediate impacts of resistance exercise on cognitive capabilities
among the adult population. The findings of their study illustrate that a single session of
training has the capability to elicit modest enhancements in performance. The postulated
mechanisms through which physical activity might impact cognitive functioning could
account for this discrepancy. It has been demonstrated that acute aerobic exercise has the
potential to augment cerebral blood flow [111]. A comparable phenomenon might arise
following resistance exercise. Nevertheless, while the primary factors influencing cerebral
perfusion subsequent to aerobic exercise are neuronal exigency, cardiac output and the
partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, it is plausible to surmise that resistance exercise
could instead instigate fluctuations and/or surges in blood pressure, leading to alterations
in blood flow [112]. An alternative aspect pertains to changes in the concentration of
cortisol in the bloodstream.
To the best of our knowledge, the study by Sibley and Etnier [113] remains the only
review that aims to evaluate the effects of anaerobic exercise on children. Nonetheless, it is
considerably antiquated and has yet to present a comprehensive statistical summation of
the gathered information.

7. Motor Activity and Cognitive Involvement


Without motor activity conducted with a positive relationship with the surrounding
environment, an individual’s cognitive and social development would be severely compro-
mised. If the experiences of the individual during movement are rich and different, more
neuronal connections can be created and, consequently, more new skills can be learned by
the individual [114]. Numerous studies suggest that cognitively engaging motor activity,
i.e., those activities that adhere to a qualitative approach, can improve cognitive function.
According to Tomporowsky and Pesce [115], this happens, plausibly, because qualitative
physical activities that intentionally include problem-solving demands and lead to the
acquisition of declarative and procedural knowledge, as well as immediate response strate-
gies, could lead to the long-term development of abilities to exercise control over thinking
and actions.
According to Vazou et al. [116], motor activity is able to have a positive influence on
intellectual performance because many motor tasks are cognitively engaging. In particular,
activities performed in a group encompass a great variety of cognitive demands that the
individual must put in place in order to perform the required motor task. Specifically,
open-skills sports, characterized by specific situations of contextual interference, allow
the learning of new skills to occur more quickly and in a more lasting and reinforced
manner [117]. Presumably, this occurs because the subject’s processing of information
becomes more complex and demanding, leading to a higher degree of cognitive learn-
ing [118–120]. In high-performance motor and sporting activities, cognitive qualities are
required that include speed of response to stimuli, high memorization and a rapid change
of action in relation to situational changes, as well as temporal and motor anticipation
skills. This complex of cognitive activities required by motor and sporting activity allows
for a restructuring of brain maps and an improvement in mental functionality such that the
learning experience is strengthened and enriched [121,122]. Motor and sports activity is,
therefore, capable of stimulating the creation of new neuronal connections and reorganizing
cortical maps to such an extent that learning processes become an effective and rewarding
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 9 of 16

experience. In this sense, motor activity, with cognitively engaging tasks, is capable of
inducing and emphasizing cognitive processes and is an effective tool for achieving a
person’s full cognitive potential [123,124].

8. Discussion
Motor and sports activity can make brain functions more efficient, plastic and adapt-
able, which translates into a significant improvement in memory and executive function
due to positive modifications that trigger changes in neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity and
neuronal proliferation. The data discussed in this review show that motor activity can be
used to improve cognitive abilities both in healthy individuals and in those with cognitive
decline, as it would be a predisposing terrain on which to accommodate the changes and
adaptations induced by learning new and more evolved functions and skills. Research
in the field of neuroscience points to a profound interdependence between movement
and cognitive processes. According to a conceptualization model proposed by many au-
thors [125–128], this interdependence is mainly related to the changes that occur in brain
function and structure as a consequence of motor activity. In recent years, research in this
field has evolved considerably, through studies born out of the need to better understand
the multifaceted relationship between motor activity and cognitive health. Advances in
neuroscience and neuroimaging techniques have allowed researchers to better understand
the effects of motor activity on cognitive function by investigating its physiological and
molecular mechanisms [129–131]. Research conducted in the different areas of interest
regarding motor activity has helped to define this line of investigation and to identify
some preliminary underlying mechanisms. This has resulted in a deeper understanding
of the components that are linked to cognitive function and that may be amenable to
intervention [132,133]. Investigations into the influence of motor activity on cognitive func-
tioning have proposed several mechanisms that could explain this relationship [134,135].
Numerous studies published in recent years on this topic have mainly concluded that
motor activity is able to bring about a series of biological and structural modifications and
adaptations that allow brain cells to create new connections in different cortical areas. In
fact, motor activity is able to trigger a cascade of neurochemical growth factors capable of
changing the entire brain’s structure. This reflects the brain’s ability to adapt to the various
cognitive challenges it faces [136,137]. However, until recently, the relationship between
intensive exercise and cognitive function was not entirely established, in light of the fact
that the literature on the subject seemed to provide somewhat contradictory results. Indeed,
while a number of studies indicated that short sessions of motor activity could induce
benefits in terms of cognitive functioning, others found no such beneficial effect [138,139].
In more recent times, it has been shown that the effect of motor activity on cognitive
performance depends on both the intensity and duration of the exercise, as well as the
intrinsic aspects that characterize the proposed activity, i.e., the cognitive engagement
required by the exercise [140]. Although it would appear that the most fruitful mode
of motor activity delivery may be that of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, and that
the first hour after the end of exercise itself may be the most likely window of time
within which motor learning processes are most facilitated, research in recent years has
focused on understanding how motor activity with cognitive involvement is most likely to
influence cognitive development and learning processes [141]. The most recent scientific
evidence shows, therefore, how the effects of motor activity on cognitive abilities can lead
to favorable results in terms of improving both low-level cognitive functions related to
simple reactions and higher-level functions such as memory, processing speed, attention
and executive function [90,117]. Overall, the results of these studies suggest that motor
activity is positively correlated with children’s cognitive functioning and learning abilities,
but these relationships are not universal and vary depending on the outcome studied and
the different variables taken into account Figure 1.
shows, therefore, how the effects of motor activity on cognitive abilities can lead to favor‐
able results in terms of improving both low‐level cognitive functions related to simple
reactions and higher‐level functions such as memory, processing speed, attention and ex‐
ecutive function [90,117]. Overall, the results of these studies suggest that motor activity
is positively correlated with children’s cognitive functioning and learning abilities, but
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 10 of 16
these relationships are not universal and vary depending on the outcome studied and the
different variables taken into account Figure 1.

Figure Effectsofofphysical
1. Effects
Figure 1. physicalactivity
activity
onon cognitive
cognitive function.
function.

9. Conclusions
The modern neuroscientific approach toward the relationships between motor activ-
ities and cognitive functions suggests that hypokinesia tends to inhibit learning. In this
context, neuroscience applied to motor and sporting activity forces us to pay particular
attention to the growing number of children and adolescents with learning disorders.
Therefore, it now seems more topical than ever to draw attention to the need to introduce
working proposals that integrate brain-based motor activity programs into the school
curriculum. Future research collaborating with educational institutions should, therefore,
allow us to work together in order to maximize the use of adapted physical activity within
the regular curriculum.
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 11 of 16

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, F.L.; methodology, F.L. and F.T.; software, F.T.; validation,
F.L.; formal analysis, F.L.; investigation, F.L.; resources, F.T.; data curation, F.L.; writing—original draft
preparation, F.L.; writing—review and editing, F.L.; supervision, F.L.; project administration, F.T.;
funding acquisition, F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study was obtained from the included
studies and was openly available.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
1. Erickson, K.I.; Voss, M.W.; Prakash, R.S.; Basak, C.; Szabo, A.; Chaddock, L.; Kim, J.S.; Heo, S.; Alves, H.; White, S.M.; et al.
Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3017–3022.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Spalding, K.L.; Bergmann, O.; Alkass, K.; Bernard, S.; Salehpour, M.; Huttner, H.B.; Bostrom, E.; Westerlund, I.; Vial, C.; Buchholz,
B.A.; et al. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell 2013, 153, 1219–1227. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Phillips, C.; Baktir, M.A.; Srivatsan, M.; Salehi, A. Neuroprotective effects of physical activity on the brain: A closer look at trophic
factor signaling. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Cabeza, R.; Albert, M.; Belleville, S.; Craik, F.; Duarte, A.; Grady, C.L.; Lindenberger, U.; Nyberg, L.; Park, D.C.; Reuter-Lorenz,
P.A.; et al. Maintenance, reserve and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 19,
701–710. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Hillman, C.H.; McAuley, E.; Erickson, K.I.; Liu-Ambrose, T.; Kramer, A.F. On mindful and mindless physical activity and
executive function: A response to Diamond and Ling (2016). Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2019, 37, 100529. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Vazou, S.; Pesce, C.; Lakes, K.; Smiley-Oyen, A. More than one road leads to Rome: A narrative review and meta-analysis of
physical activity intervention effects on cognition in youth. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2019, 17, 153–178. [CrossRef]
7. Donnelly, J.E.; Hillman, C.H.; Castelli, D.; Etnier, J.L.; Lee, S.; Tomporowski, P.; Lambourne, K.; Szabo-Reed, A.N. Physical
Activity, Fitness, Cognitive Function, and Academic Achievement in Children: A Systematic Review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016,
48, 1197–1222. [CrossRef]
8. Khan, N.A.; Hillman, C.H. The relation of childhood physical activity and aerobic fitness to brain function and cognition: A
review. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2014, 26, 138–146. [CrossRef]
9. Dishman, R.K.; Berthoud, H.R.; Booth, F.W.; Cotman, C.W.; Edgerton, V.R.; Fleshner, M.R.; Gandevia, S.C.; Gomez-Pinilla, F.;
Greenwood, B.N.; Hillman, C.H.; et al. Neurobiology of exercise. Obesity 2006, 14, 345–356. [CrossRef]
10. Wassenaar, T.M.; Williamson, W.; Johansen-Berg, H.; Dawes, H.; Roberts, N.; Foster, C.; Sexton, C.E. A critical evaluation of
systematic reviews assessing the effect of chronic physical activity on academic achievement, cognition and the brain in children
and adolescents: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 79. [CrossRef]
11. Voss, M.W.; Heo, S.; Prakash, R.S.; Erickson, K.I.; Alves, H.; Chaddock, L.; Szabo, A.N.; Mailey, E.L.; Wójcicki, T.R.; White, S.M.;
et al. The influence of aerobic fitness on cerebral white matter integrity and cognitive function in older adults: Results of a
one-year exercise intervention. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34, 2972–2985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Steichele, K.; Keefer, A.; Dietzel, N.; Graessel, E.; Prokosch, H.-U.; Kolominsky-Rabas, P.L. The effects of exercise programs on
cognition, activities of daily living, and neuropsychiatric symptoms in community-dwelling people with dementia—A systematic
review. Alz. Res. Ther. 2022, 14, 97. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. van Praag, H.; Shubert, T.; Zhao, C.; Gage, F.H. Exercise enhances learning and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice. J.
Neurosci. 2005, 25, 8680–8685. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Varghese, A.P.; Prasad, J.; Jacob, K.S. Mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older patients attending a general hospital in
south India: DSM-5 standards and correlates. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2019, 31, 133–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Blondell, S.J.; Hammersley-Mather, R.; Veerman, J.L. Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia?: A systematic
review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 510. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Yamasaki, T. Preventive Strategies for Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Benefits of Aerobic Physical Activity, Especially Open-Skill
Exercise. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Veronese, N.; Soysal, P.; Demurtas, J.; Solmi, M.; Bruyère, O.; Christodoulou, N.; Ramalho, R.; Fusar-Poli, P.; Lappas, A.S.; Pinto,
D.; et al. Physical activity and exercise for the prevention and management of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A
collaborative international guideline. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2023, 14, 925–952. [CrossRef]
18. Chen, C.; Nakagawa, S. Physical activity for cognitive health promotion: An overview of the underlying neurobiological
mechanisms. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023, 86, 101868. [CrossRef]
19. Leuner, B.; Gould, E. Structural plasticity and hippocampal function. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2010, 61, 111–140. [CrossRef]
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 12 of 16

20. Doidge, N. The Brain Changed Itself, UK ed.; Penguin Books: London, UK, 2007.
21. Mahncke, H.W.; Bronstone, A.; Merzenich, M.M. Brain Plasticity and Functional Losses in the Aged: Scientific Bases for a Novel
Intervention. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 157, 81–109.
22. Bartels, S.; Roubíček, T. Thermoviscoplasticity at small strains. ZAMM J. Appl. Math. Mech. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 2008, 88,
735–754. [CrossRef]
23. Knaepen, K.; Goekint, M.; Heyman, E.M.; Meeusen, R. Neuroplasticity exercise-induced response of peripheral brain-derived
neurotrophic factor: A systematic review of experimental studies in human subjects. Sports Med. 2010, 40, 765–801. [CrossRef]
24. Siegel, D.J. The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are; Guilford Press: New York, NY,
USA, 2012.
25. Fagherazzi, C.; Zucchero, A.; Brugiolo, R. The concept of brain plasticity and its potential clinical applications in the elderly with
dementia: Focus. G Gerontol. 2014, 62, 464–482.
26. Shapiro, M. Plasticity, hippocampal place cells, and cognitive maps. Arch Neurol. 2001, 58, 874–881. [CrossRef]
27. Ickes, B.R.; Pham, T.M.; Sanders, L.A.; Albeck, D.S.; Mohammed, A.H.; Granholm, A.C. Long-term environmental enrichment
leads to regional increases in neurotrophin levels in rat brain. Exp. Neurol. 2000, 164, 45–52. [CrossRef]
28. Schinder, A.F.; Berninger, B.; Poo, M. Postsynaptic target specificity of neurotrophin-induced presynaptic potentiation. Neuron
2000, 25, 151–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Blundo, C. Conoscere e Potenziare il Cervello; Giunti Editore: Firenze, Italy, 2007.
30. Malabou, C. An Eye at the Edge of Discourse. Commun. Theory 2007, 17, 16–25. [CrossRef]
31. Elbert, T.; Pantev, C.; Wienbruch, C.; Rockstroh, B.; Taub, E. Increased cortical representation of the finger of the left hand in string
players. Science 1995, 270, 305–307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Pascual-Leone, A. The brain that plays music and is changed by it. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 930, 321–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. van Praag, H. Exercise and the brain: Something to chew on. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 283–290. [CrossRef]
34. Fotuhi, O.; Cohen, G.L. Self-affirmation intervention and the reduction of addictive behaviours. In Addictions: A Social Psychological
Perspective; Kopetz, C.A., Lejuez, C.W., Eds.; Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 286–300.
35. Fuchs, E.; Flügge, G. Adult Neuroplasticity: More than 40 Years of Research. Neural Plast. 2014, 5, 1687–5443. [CrossRef]
36. Zhao, C.; Deng, W.; Gage, F.H. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell 2008, 132, 645–660. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
37. Fabio, R.; Pellegatta, B. Attività di Potenziamento Cognitivo; Erikson: Trento, Italy, 2005; Volume 1.
38. Hywood, H.C.; Tzuriel, D. Interactive Assessment in Practice; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
39. Chaddock, L.; Pontifex, M.B.; Hillman, C.H.; Kramer, A.F. A review of the relation of aerobic fitness and physical activity to brain
structure and function in children. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2011, 17, 975–985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Federici, A.; Toscani, A. Motor and cognitive effect caused by motor increased activity in primary school. Form. E Insegn. XVI
2018, 1, 1973–4778.
41. Kleim, J.A.; Jones, T. Principles of Experience-Dependent Neural Plasticity: Implications for Rehabilitation after Brain Damage. J.
Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2008, 51, S225–S239. [CrossRef]
42. Feuerstein, R.; Lewin-Benham, A. What Learning Looks Like—Mediated Learning in Theory and Practice K-6; Teachers College Press:
New York, NY, USA, 2012.
43. Hultsch, D.F.; Hertzog, C.; Small, B.J.; Dixon, R.A. Use it or lose it: Engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging?
Psychol. Aging 1999, 14, 245–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Patterson, S.L.; Abel, T.; Deuel, T.A.; Martin, K.C.; Rose, J.C.; Kandel, E.R. Recombinant BDNF rescues deficits in basal synaptic
trans- mission and hippocampal LTP in BDNF knockout mice. Neuron 1996, 16, 1137–1145. [CrossRef]
45. Vaynman, S.; Ying, Z.; Yin, D.; Gomez-Pinilla, F. Exercise differentially regulates synaptic proteins associated to the function of
BDNF. Brain Res. 2006, 1070, 124–130. [CrossRef]
46. Churchill, J.D.; Galvez, R.; Colcombe, S.; Swain, R.A.; Kramer, A.F.; Greenough, W.T. Exercise, experience and the aging brain.
Neurobiol. Aging 2002, 23, 941–955. [CrossRef]
47. Fordyce, D.E.; Farrar, R.P. Physical activity effects on hippocampal and parietal cortical cholinergic function and spatial learning
in F344 rats. Behav. Brain Res. 1991, 43, 115–123. [CrossRef]
48. Neeper, S.A.; Gómez-Pinilla, F.; Chol, J.; Cotman, C. Exercise and brain neurotrophins. Nature 1995, 373, 109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Isackson, P.J.; Huntsman, M.M.; Murray, K.D.; Gall, C.M. BDNF mRNA expression is increased in adult rat forebrain after limbic
seizures: Temporal patterns of induction distinct from NGF. Neuron 1991, 6, 937–948. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Vaynman, S.; Ying, Z.; Gomez-Pinilla, F. Hippocampal BDNF mediates the efficacy of exercise on synaptic plasticity and cognition.
Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20, 2580–2590. [CrossRef]
51. Oertel-Knochel, V.; Mehler, P.; Thiel, C.; Steinbrecher, K.; Malchow, B.; Tesky, V.; Ademmer, K.; Prvulovic, D.; Banzer, W.; Zopf,
Y.; et al. Effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive performance and individual psychopathology in depressive and schizophrenia
patients. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 264, 589–604. [CrossRef]
52. Greer, D.J.; Romberg, C.; Saksida, L.M.; van Praag, H.; Bussey, T.J. Running enhances spatial pattern separation in mice. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2367–2372.
53. Cotman, C.W.; Berchtold, N.C.; Christie, L.A. Exercise builds brain health: Key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation.
Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 464–472. [CrossRef]
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 13 of 16

54. Cotman, C.W.; Berchtold, N.C. Exercise: A behavioural intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002,
25, 295–301. [CrossRef]
55. Kim, K.; Sung, Y.; Seo, J.; Lee, S.; Lim, B.; Lee, C.; Chung, Y.R. Effects of treadmill exercise-intensity on short-term memory in the
rats born of the lipopolysaccharide-exposed maternal rats. J. Exerc. Rehabil. 2015, 11, 296–302. [CrossRef]
56. Huang, T.; Larsen, K.T.; Ried-Larsen, M.; Møller, N.C.; Andersen, L.B. The effects of physical activity and exercise on brain-derived
neurotrophic factor in healthy humans: A review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2014, 24, 1–10. [CrossRef]
57. Johnson, R.A.; Rhodes, J.S.; Jeffrey, S.L.; Garland, T., Jr.; Mitchell, G.S. Hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor but not
neurotrophin-3 increases more in mice selected for increased voluntary wheel running. Neuroscience 2003, 121, 1–7. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
58. Rasmussen, P.; Brassard, P.; Adser, H.; Pedersen, M.V.; Leick, L.; Hart, E.; Secher, N.H.; Pedersen, B.K.; Pilegaard, H. Evidence for
a release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor from the brain during exercise. Exp. Physiol. 2009, 94, 1062–1069. [CrossRef]
59. Russo-Neustadt, A.; Beard, R.C.; Cotman, C.W. Exercise, antidepressant medications, and enhanced brain derived neurotrophic
factor expression. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999, 21, 679–682. [CrossRef]
60. Trenchers, M.F.; Buttner, K.A.; Sulkes Cuevas, J.N.; Temprana, S.G.; Fontanet, P.A.; Monzón-Salinas, M.C.; Ledda, F.; Paratcha, G.;
Schinder, A.F. High plasticity of new granule cells in the aging hippocampus. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1129–1139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Korte, M.; Carroll, P.; Wolf, E.; Brem, G.; Thoenen, H.; Bonhoeffer, T. Hippocampal long-term potentiation is impaired in mice
lacking brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 8856–8860. [CrossRef]
62. Voss, M.W.; Erickson, K.I.; Prakash, R.S.; Chaddock, L.; Kim, J.S.; Alves, H.; Szabo, A.; Phillips, S.M.; Wójcicki, T.R.; Mailey, E.L.;
et al. Neurobiological markers of exercise-related brain plasticity in older adults. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013, 28, 90–99. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
63. Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, C.; Cui, Y.; Feng, W.; Wang, G.F. BDNF and COX-2 participate in anti-depressive mechanisms
of catalpol in rats undergoing chronic unpredictable mild stress. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 151, 360–368. [CrossRef]
64. Liu, P.Z.; Nusslock, R. How stress gets under the skin: Early life adversity and glucocorticoid receptor epigenetic regulation. Curr.
Genom. 2018, 8, 653–664. [CrossRef]
65. Lu, B.; Nagappan, G.; Guan, X.; Nathan, P.J.; Wren, P. BDNF-based synaptic repair as a disease-modifying strategy for neurode-
generative diseases. Nat. Rev. 2013, 14, 401–416. [CrossRef]
66. Karpova, N.N. Role of BDNF epigenetics in activity-dependent neuronal plasticity. Neuropharmacology 2014, 76, 709–718.
[CrossRef]
67. Leal, G.; Alfonso, P.M.; Salazar, I.L.; Duarte, C.B. Regulation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity by BDNF. Brain Res. 2015, 1621,
82–101. [CrossRef]
68. Larson, E.B.; Wang, L.; Bowen, J.D.; McCormick, W.C.; Teri, L.; Crane, P.; Kukul, W. Exercise is associated with reduced risk factor
for incident dementia among persons 65 years of age and older. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144, 73–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. Saskia, H.; Bernhard, H.; Armin, K.; Colzato, L. Neuromodulation of Aerobic Exercise—A review. Front. Psychol. 2016, 6, 1890.
70. Szuhany, K.L.; Bugatti, M.; Otto, M.W. A meta-analytic review of the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotropic factor. J.
Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 60, 56–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71. Ding, Q.; Vaynman, S.; Souda, P.; Whitelegge, J.P.; Gomez-Pinilla, F. Exercise affects energy metabolism and neural plasticity-
related proteins in the hippocampus as revealed by proteomic analysis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24, 1265–1276. [CrossRef]
72. Oliff, H.S.; Berchtold, N.C.; Isackson, P.; Cotman, C.W. Exercise-induced regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
transcripts in the rat hippocampus. Mol. Brain Res. 1998, 61, 147–153. [CrossRef]
73. Widenfalk, J.; Olson, L.; Thorén, P. Deprived of habitual running, rats down regulate BDNF and TrkB messages in the brain.
Neurosci. Res. 1999, 34, 125–132. [CrossRef]
74. Suijo, K.; Inoue, S.; Ohya, Y.; Odagiri, Y.; Takamiya, T.; Ishibashi, H.; Itoh, M.; Fujieda, Y.; Shimomitsu, T. Resistance exercise
enhances cognitive function in mouse. Int. J. Sports Med. 2013, 34, 368–375. [CrossRef]
75. Zoladz, J.A.; Pilc, A.; Majerczak, J.; Grandys, M.; Zapart-Bukowska, J.; Duda, K. Endurance training increases plasma brain-
derived neurotrophic factor concentration in young healthy men. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2008, 59, 119–132.
76. Seifert, T.; Brassard, P.; Wissenberg, M.; Rasmussen, P.; Nordby, P.; Stallknecht, B.; Adser, H.; Jakobsen, A.H.; Pilegaard, H.;
Nielsen, H.B.; et al. Endurance training enhances BDNF release from the human brain. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. 2010,
298, 372–377. [CrossRef]
77. Cassilhas, R.C.; Tufik, S.; de Mello, M.T. Physical exercise, neuroplasticity, spatial learning and memory. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016,
73, 975–983. [CrossRef]
78. Eadie, B.D.; Redila, V.A.; Christie, B.R. Voluntary exercise alters the cytoarchitecture of the adult dentate gyrus by increasing
cellular proliferation, dendritic complexity, and spine density. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 486, 39–47. [CrossRef]
79. Bishop, N.A.; Lu, T.; Yankner, B.A. Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature 2010, 464, 529–535. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
80. El Haj, M.; Allain, P. Relationship between source monitoring in episodic memory and executive function in normal aging. Geriatr.
Psychol. Neuropsychiatr. Vieil. 2012, 10, 197–205. [CrossRef]
81. Silver, H.; Goodman, C.; Gur, R.C.; Gur, R.E.; Bilker, W.B. Executive functions and normal aging: Selective impairment in
conditional exclusion compared to abstraction and inhibition. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2011, 31, 53–62. [CrossRef]
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 14 of 16

82. Singh-Manoux, A.; Kivimaki, M.; Glymour, M.M.; Elbaz, A.; Berr, C.; Ebmeier, K.P.; Ferrie, J.E.; Dugravot, A. Timing of onset of
cognitive decline: Results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012, 344, d7622. [CrossRef]
83. Woodard, J.L.; Nielson, K.A.; Sugarman, M.A.; Smith, J.C.; Seidenberg, M.; Durgerian, S.; Butts, A.; Hantke, N.; Lancaster, M.;
Matthews, M.A.; et al. Lifestyle and genetic contributions to cognitive decline and hippocampal structure and function in healthy
aging. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2012, 9, 436–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
84. Mahmudul Hasan, S.M.; Rancourt, S.N.; Austin, M.W.; Ploughman, M. Defining Optimal Aerobic Exercise Parameters to Affect
Complex Motor and Cognitive Outcomes after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Synthesis. Neural Plast. 2016, 2016, 2961573.
85. Dieckelmann, M.; González-González, A.I.; Banzer, W.; Berghold, A.; Jeitler, K.; Pantel, J.; Pregartner, G.; Schall, A.; Tesky, V.A.;
Siebenhofer, A. Effectiveness of exercise interventions to improve long-term outcomes in people living with mild cognitive
impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
86. Nie, X.; Wang, N.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Han, B.; Zhu, C.; Chen, Y.; Xia, F.; Cang, Z.; Lu, M.; et al. Blood cadmium in Chinese adults
and its relationships with diabetes and obesity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res Int. 2016, 18, 18714–18723. [CrossRef]
87. Firth, J.; Stubbs, B.; Vancampfort, D.; Schuch, F.; Lagopoulos, J.; Rosenbaum, S.; Ward, P.B. Effect of aerobic exercise on
hippocampal volume in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage 2017, 166, 230–238. [CrossRef]
88. Voelcker-Rehage, C.; Niemann, C. Structural and functional brain changes related to different types of physical activity across the
life span. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013, 37 Pt B, 2268–2295. [CrossRef]
89. Colcombe, S.J.; Erickson, K.I.; Scalf, P.E.; Kim, J.S.; Prakash, R.; McAuley, E. Aerobic exercise training increases brain volume in
aging humans. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2006, 61, 1166–1170. [CrossRef]
90. Mazzeo, F.; Santamaria, S.; Monda, V.; Tafuri, D.; Dalia, C.; Varriale, L.; De Blasio, S.; Esposito, V.; Messina, G.; Monda, M. Dietary
supplements use in competitive and non-competitive boxer: An exploratory study. Biol. Med. 2016, 8, 1.
91. Monda, M.; Viggiano, A.; Vicidomini, C.; Viggiano, A.; Iannaccone, T.; Tafuri, D.; De Luca, B. Expresso coffee increases
parasympathetic activity in young, healthy people. Nutr. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 43–48. [CrossRef]
92. Huan, B.; Chen, K.; Li, Y. Aerobic exercise, an effective prevention and treatment for mild cognitive impairment. Front. Aging
Neurosci. 2023, 15, 119455. [CrossRef]
93. Erickson, K.I.; Banducci, S.E.; Weinstein, A.M.; MacDonald, A.W.I.I.I.; Ferrell, R.E.; Halder, I.; Flory, J.D.; Manuck, S.B. The brain-
derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism moderates an effect of physical activity on working memory performance.
Psychol. Sci. 2013, 24, 1770–1779. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
94. Colcombe, S.; Kramer, A.F. Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14,
125–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
95. Ludyga, S.; Gerber, M.; Brand, S.; Holsboer-Trachsler, E.; Pühse, U. Acute effects of moderate aerobic exercise on specific aspects
of executive function in different age and fitness groups: A meta-analysis. Psychophysiology 2016, 53, 1611–1626. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
96. Groot, C.; Hooghiemstra, A.; Raijmakers, P.; van Berckel, B.; Scheltens, P.; Scherder, E.; van der Flier, W.; Ossenkoppele, R. The
effect of physical activity on cognitive function in patients with dementia: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Ageing
Res. Rev. 2016, 25, 13–23. [CrossRef]
97. Firth, J.; Stubbs, B.; Rosenbaum, S.; Vancampfort, D.; Malchow, B.; Schuch, F.; Elliott, R.; Nuechterlein, K.H.; Yung, A.R. Aerobic
exercise improves cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull
2016, 43, 546–556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
98. Northey, J.M.; Cherbuin, N.; Pumpa, K.L.; Smee, D.J.; Rattray, B. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than
50: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 154–160. [CrossRef]
99. De Greeff, J.W.; Bosker, R.J.; Oosterlaan, J.; Visscher, C.; Hartman, E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention
and academic performance in preadolescent children: A meta-analysis. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2018, 21, 501–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
100. Song, D.; Yu, D.S.; Li, P.W.; Lei, Y. The effectiveness of physical exercise on cognitive and psychological outcomes in individuals
with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2018, 79, 155–164. [CrossRef]
101. Landrigan, J.F.; Bell, T.; Crowe, M.; Clay, O.J.; Mirman, D. Lifting cognition: A meta-analysis of effects of resistance exercise on
cognition. Psychol. Res. 2020, 84, 1167–1183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
102. Zhang, L.; Li, B.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Tang, Q.; Wang, S. Meta-analysis: Resistance training improves cognition in mild cognitive
impairment. Int. J. Sports Med. 2020, 41, 815–823. [CrossRef]
103. Coelho-Junior, H.; Marzetti, E.; Calvani, R.; Picca, A.; Arai, H.; Uchida, M. Resistance training improves cognitive function
in older adults with different cognitive status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment. Health 2022, 26, 213–224.
[CrossRef]
104. Penninx, B.W.J.H.; Rejeski, W.J.; Pandya, J.; Miller, M.E.; Di Bari, M.; Applegate, W.B.; Pahor, M. Exercise and Depressive
Symptoms: A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Effects on Emotional and Physical Function in Older Persons with
High and Low Depressive Symptomatology. J. Geront. Psychl. Sci. 2002, 57B, 124–132. [CrossRef]
105. Pontifex, M.; Hillman, C.; Fernhall, B.; Thompson, K.; Valentini, T. The Effect of Acute Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on
Working Memory. Med. Sc. Sport Ex. 2009, 9, 927–934. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
106. Snowden, M.; Steinman, L.; Mochan, K.; Grodstein, F.; Prohaska, T.R.; Thurman, D.J.; Brown, D.R.; Laditka, J.N.; Soares, J.;
Zweiback, D.J.; et al. Effect of exercise on cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults: Review of intervention
trials and recommendations for public health practice and research. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011, 59, 704–716. [CrossRef]
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 15 of 16

107. Loprinzi, P.D.; Frith, E.; Edwards, M.K. Resistance exercise and episodic memory function: A systematic review. Clin. Physiol.
Funct. Imaging 2018, 8, e76301. [CrossRef]
108. Sáez de Asteasu, M.L.; Martínez-Velilla, N.; Zambom-Ferraresi, F.; Casas-Herrero, A.; Izquierdo, M. Role of physical exercise on
cognitive function in healthy older adults: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 37, 117–134.
[CrossRef]
109. Kelly, M.E.; Loughrey, D.; Lawlor, B.A.; Robertson, I.H.; Walsh, C.; Brennan, S. The impact of exercise on the cognitive functioning
of healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014, 16, 12–31. [CrossRef]
110. Wilke, J.; Giesche, F.; Klier, K.; Vogt, L.; Herrmann, E.; Banzer, W. Acute effects of resistance exercise on cognitive function in
healthy adults: A systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019, 49, 905–916. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
111. Querido, J.S.; Sheel, A.W. Regulation of cerebral blood flow during exercise. Sports Med. 2007, 37, 765–782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
112. Ogoh, S.; Ainslie, P.N. Cerebral blood flow during exercise: Mechanisms of regulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 1370–1380.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
113. Sibley, B.A.; Etnier, J.L. The relationship between physical activity and cognition in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci.
2003, 15, 243–256. [CrossRef]
114. Latino, F.; Fischetti, F.; Cataldi, S.; Monacis, D.; Colella, D. The Impact of an 8-Weeks At-Home Physical Activity Plan on Academic
Achievement at the Time of COVID-19 Lock-Down in Italian School. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5812. [CrossRef]
115. Tomporowski, P.D.; Pesce, C. Exercise, sports, and performance arts benefit cognition via a common process. Psychol. Bull. 2019,
145, 929. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
116. Stodden, D.; Lakes, K.D.; Côté, J.; Aadland, E.; Brian, A.; Draper, C.E.; Ekkekakis, P.; Fumagalli, G.; Laukkanen, A.; Mavilidi, M.F.;
et al. Exploration: An overarching focus for holistic development. Braz. J. Mot. Behav. 2021, 15. [CrossRef]
117. Greco, G.; Fischetti, F.; Cataldi, S.; Latino, F. Effects of Shotokan Karate on resilience to bullying in adolescents. J. Hum. Sport
Exerc. 2019, 14, 890–899. [CrossRef]
118. Brady, F. The contextual interference effect and sport skills. Sage J. 2008, 106, 461–472. [CrossRef]
119. Carey, J.R.; Bhatt, E.; Nagpal, A. Neuroplasticity promoted by task complexity. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2005, 33, 24–31.
120. Gaetano, R.; Domenico, T.; Gaetano, A. Physical activity and its relation to body and ludic expression in childhood. Mediterr. J.
Soc. Sci. 2015, 6 (Suppl. S2), 293. [CrossRef]
121. Matura, S.; Fleckenstein, J.; Deichmann, R.; Engeroff, T.; Füzéki, E.; Hattingen, E.; Hellweg, R.; Lienerth, B.; Pilatus, U.; Schwarz,
S.; et al. Effects of aerobic exercise on brain metabolism and grey matter volume in older adults: Results of the randomised
controlled SMART trial. Transl. Psychiatry 2017, 7, e1172. [CrossRef]
122. Bonavolontà, V.; Cataldi, S.; Latino, F.; Carvutto, R.; De Candia, M.; Mastrorilli, G.; Messina, G.; Patti, A.; Fischetti, F. The role
of parental involvement in youth sport experience: Perceived and desired behavior by male soccer players. Int. J. Environ. Res.
Public Health 2021, 18, 8698. [CrossRef]
123. Voss, M.W.; Prakash, R.S.; Erickson, K.I.; Basak, C.; Chaddock, L.; Kim, J.S.; Alves, H.; Heo, S.; Szabo, A.N.; White, S.M.; et al.
Plasticity of brain networks in a randomized intervention trial of exercise training in older adults. Front. Ag. Neurosci. 2010, 2.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
124. Latino, F.; Cataldi, S.; Fischetti, F. Effects of a coordinative ability training program on adolescents’ cognitive functioning. Front.
Psychol. 2021, 28, 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
125. Farì, G.; Latino, F.; Tafuri, F.; Dell’Anna, L.; Raele, M.V.; Fai, A.; De Serio, C.; Intonti, G.; De Salvo, A.L.; Ricci, V. Shoulder Pain
Biomechanics, Rehabilitation and Prevention in Wheelchair Basketball Players: A Narrative Review. Biomechanics 2023, 3, 362–376.
[CrossRef]
126. Morsanuto, S.; Peluso Cassese, F.; Tafuri, F.; Tafuri, D. Outdoor Education, Integrated Soccer Activities, and Learning in Children
with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Project Aimed at Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda.
Sustainability 2023, 15, 13456. [CrossRef]
127. Latino, F.; Saraiello, E.; Tafuri, F. Outdoor Physical Activity: A Training Method for Learning in an Experiential and Innovative
Way. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2023, 23, 1852–1860.
128. Kamijo, K.; Nishihira, Y.; Higashiura, T.; Kuroiwa, K. The interactive effect of exercise intensity and task difficulty on human
cognitive processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. Off. J. Int. Organ. Psychophysiol. 2007, 65, 114–121. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
129. Pagliara, V.; De Rosa, M.; Di Donato, P.; Nasso, R.; D’Errico, A.; Cammarota, C.; Poli, A.; Masullo, M.; Arcone, R. Inhibition of
Interleukin-6 induced Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 expression and invasive ability by Lemon Peel Polyphenol Extract in human
primary colon cancer cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 7076. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
130. Alcaro, S.; Arcone, R.; Costa, G.; De Vita, D.; Iannone, M.; Ortuso, F.; Procopio, A.; Pasceri, R.; Rotiroti, D.; Scipione, L. Simple
Choline Esters as Potential Anti-Alzheimer Agents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 692–697. [CrossRef]
131. Da Silva, S.G.; Doná, F.; Da Silva-Fernandes, M.J.; Scorza, F.A.; Cavalheiro, E.A.; Arida, R.M. Physical exercise during the
adolescent period of life increases hippocampal parvalbumin expression. Brain Dev. 2010, 32, 137–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
132. Palma, D.D.; Tafuri, D. Special needs and inclusion in sport management: A specific literature review. Sport Sci. 2016, 9 (Suppl. S2),
24–31.
133. Harvey, S.B.; Øverland, S.; Hatch, S.L.; Wessely, S.; Mykletun, A.; Hotopf, M. Exercise and the Prevention of Depression: Results
of the HUNT Cohort Study. Am. J. Psychiatry 2017, 75, 28–36. [CrossRef]
Medicina 2024, 60, 216 16 of 16

134. La Torre, M.E.; Monda, A.; Messina, A.; de Stefano, M.I.; Monda, V.; Moscatelli, F.; Tafuri, F.; Saraiello, E.; Latino, F.; Monda, M.;
et al. The Potential Role of Nutrition in Overtraining Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4916. [CrossRef]
135. Whiteman, A.S.; Young, D.E.; He, X.; Chen, T.C.; Wagenaar, R.C.; Stern, C.E.; Schon, K. Interaction between serum BDNF and
aerobic fitness predicts recognition memory in healthy young adults. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 259, 302–312. [CrossRef]
136. Latino, F.; Tafuri, F.; Saraiello, E.; Tafuri, D. Classroom-Based Physical Activity as a Means to Improve Self-Efficacy and Academic
Achievement among Normal-Weight and Overweight Youth. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2061. [CrossRef]
137. Latino, F.; Tafuri, F. Physical Activity and Academic Performance in School-Age Children: A Systematic Review. Sustainability
2023, 15, 6616. [CrossRef]
138. Nakagawa, T.; Koan, I.; Chen, C.; Matsubara, T.; Hagiwara, K.; Lei, H.; Hirotsu, M.; Yamagata, H.; Nakagawa, S. Regular
moderate-to vigorous-intensity physical activity rather than walking is associated with enhanced cognitive functions and mental
health in young adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 614. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
139. Pesce, C. Shifting the focus from quantitative to qualitative exercise characteristics in exercise and cognition research. J. Sport
Exerc. Psychol. 2012, 34, 766–786. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
140. Chacón-Cuberos, R.; Zurita-Ortega, F.; Ramírez-Granizo, I.; Castro-Sánchez, M. Physical activity and academic performance in
children and preadolescents: A systematic review. Apunts. Educ. Física Deportes 2020, 139, 1–9. [CrossRef]
141. Masini, A.; Sanmarchi, F.; Kawalec, A.; Esposito, F.; Scrimaglia, S.; Tessari, A.; Scheier, L.M.; Sacchetti, R.; Dallolio, L. Mediter-
ranean diet, physical activity, and family characteristics associated with cognitive performance in Italian primary school children:
Analysis of the I-MOVE project. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2023, 182, 917–927. [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

You might also like