Scribd
Upload
82 views7 pages

Zenqor Documentation

Uploaded by

deadbeef420
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
82 views7 pages

Zenqor Documentation

Uploaded by

deadbeef420
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Quantum AI with Zenqor

1. Overview
This document presents a comprehensive, industrial-grade implementation of Quantum AI models
for anomaly detection and classification tasks. It details the data architecture, preprocessing
pipeline, model architectures (both classical and quantum), deployment strategies, performance
evaluations, and industrial insights. This initiative targets use cases in cybersecurity and
semiconductor manufacturing, aligning with real-world applications.

2. Dataset Architecture and Preprocessing Pipeline


2.1 Datasets Utilized

Dataset Sources Industrial Application

KDD CUP ‘99 UCI Repository Network intrusion


detection in
cybersecurity
environments
SECOM UCI Repository Fault detection in
semiconductor
manufacturing

2.2 Preprocessing Workflow


 Missing Value Imputation:
Missing values in the SECOM dataset were handled using a mean imputation strategy.

 Normalization:
All numerical features were scaled to a 0,10, 10,1 range using MinMaxScaler for both
datasets.

 Categorical Encoding:
Protocol and service fields in the KDD dataset were encoded using one-hot encoding.

 Dimensionality Reduction:
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed when necessary to reduce dimensionality
and enhance model efficiency.
2.3 Dataset Splitting Strategy
 Train-Test Split: 70:30 ratio

 Class Balancing: Stratified sampling was used to maintain class proportions across splits.

 Unsupervised Learning Setup: Autoencoders were trained exclusively on “normal” class


data to detect anomalies during inference.

3. Model Architecture and Deployment

3.1 Quantum Autoencoder (QAE)


 Purpose: Quantum-based data compression and anomaly detection

 Design: Encoder → Variational Quantum Circuit → Measurement → Decoder

 Deployment: Tested on reduced-scale quantum datasets, constrained by current qubit


availability and noise levels.
3.2 Quantum Neural Network (QNN)
 Purpose: Classification leveraging quantum circuits

 Architecture: Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) integrated within a classical feedback loop

 Deployment: Prototype tested on IBM Qiskit simulators for proof-of-concept evaluation.

3.3 Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM)


 Purpose: Binary classification utilizing the quantum kernel trick

 Kernel: Fidelity-based quantum kernel

 Deployment: Implemented using IBM’s Quantum Kernel Estimator API; demonstrated


superior performance in high-dimensional decision boundaries.
4. Performance Evaluation
4.1 Quantitative Metrics
F1
Model Accuracy Training Environment Remarks
Score

Some confusion in boundary


AE 91.2% 0.87 Python + Keras
anomaly cases

QNN 88.5% 0.84 IBM Qiskit (simulator) Sensitive to circuit initialization

IBM Quantum Kernel Best performance, particularly on


QSVM 93.0% 0.89
Estimator KDD dataset

QAE 90.0% 0.85


Quantum noise affected
PennyLane
reconstruction quality
This bar chart showcasing Accuracy and F1 Score for each model
5. Industrial Insights and Challenges
5.1 Strengths
 Quantum models provide improved performance on non-linearly separable data due to their
superior feature space encoding capabilities.

 Hybrid architectures enable scalability of classical models while leveraging the


expressiveness of quantum circuits.

 QSVMs demonstrate highly accurate boundary decision-making, especially in high-


dimensional contexts.

5.2 Limitations
 QNNs and QAEs exhibit sensitivity to quantum noise and circuit initialization.

 Deployment is restricted by current quantum hardware limitations including decoherence,


gate errors, and limited qubit counts.

 Quantum training remains computationally intensive and not yet feasible for large-scale
industrial systems.

5.3 Strategic Recommendations


 Deploy Classical Autoencoders or Hybrid AE-QAE solutions on edge devices for efficient
anomaly detection.

 Prioritize QSVM as the most viable and performant hybrid model under current
technological constraints.

 Invest in research on quantum error correction and qubit stability to enhance industrial
readiness.
6. Future Roadmap
 Expand QAE designs by exploring advanced quantum compression techniques and
entanglement strategies.

 Investigate distributed quantum-classical training frameworks to scale QNN learning


capabilities.

 Integrate IBM Quantum Runtime environments for near-real-time inference in industrial


setup

You might also like