0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views6 pages

Automata Presentation

The document details the conversion of an Epsilon Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (ε-NFA) with states {q0, q1, q2, q3, q4} into an equivalent Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA). It outlines the steps including computing ε-closures, constructing the ε-NFA transition table, and using the subset construction method to derive the DFA, which results in three states: {q0, q1, q2}, {q3}, and {q4}. The final output includes transition tables for both the ε-NFA and DFA, ensuring the DFA accepts the same language as the original ε-NFA.

Uploaded by

shihab.touhid777
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views6 pages

Automata Presentation

The document details the conversion of an Epsilon Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (ε-NFA) with states {q0, q1, q2, q3, q4} into an equivalent Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA). It outlines the steps including computing ε-closures, constructing the ε-NFA transition table, and using the subset construction method to derive the DFA, which results in three states: {q0, q1, q2}, {q3}, and {q4}. The final output includes transition tables for both the ε-NFA and DFA, ensuring the DFA accepts the same language as the original ε-NFA.

Uploaded by

shihab.touhid777
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

### Problem Statement (Textual)

Given an Epsilon Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (ε-NFA) with a set of states {q0, q1,
q2, q3, q4}, where q0 is the start state and q4 is the accept state, the task is to convert
this ε-NFA into an equivalent Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA). The ε-NFA includes
ε-transitions, which allow transitions between states without consuming any input
symbols, as well as regular transitions on the input symbols 0 and 1. The alphabet for the
automaton is {0, 1}. The specific transitions for the ε-NFA are as follows:

- ε-transitions from q0 to q1 and from q0 to q2.


- Transition on input 0 from q1 to q3.
- Transition on input 1 from q2 to q3.
- Transition on input 1 from q3 to q4.

The conversion process requires computing the ε-closures for each state, constructing
the transition table for the ε-NFA, and deriving the transition table for the DFA using the
subset construction method. The final output must include the transition tables for both
the ε-NFA and the DFA, along with the ε-closure calculations for all states, ensuring the
resulting DFA accepts the same language as the given ε-NFA.

### Step-by-Step Process of Conversion from ε-NFA to DFA

#### Step 1: Compute ε-Closures


The ε-closure of a state is the set of all states reachable from that state via ε-transitions,
including the state itself. Let's compute the ε-closures for each state based on the given
transitions:

- **ε-closure(q0)**:
- Start with q0.
- From q0, there are ε-transitions to q1 and q2.
- No further ε-transitions exist from q1 or q2.
- Thus, ε-closure(q0) = {q0, q1, q2}.

- **ε-closure(q1)**:
- Start with q1.
- No ε-transitions from q1.
- Thus, ε-closure(q1) = {q1}.

- **ε-closure(q2)**:
- Start with q2.
- No ε-transitions from q2.
- Thus, ε-closure(q2) = {q2}.

- **ε-closure(q3)**:
- Start with q3.
- No ε-transitions from q3.
- Thus, ε-closure(q3) = {q3}.

- **ε-closure(q4)**:
- Start with q4.
- No ε-transitions from q4.
- Thus, ε-closure(q4) = {q4}.

#### Step 2: Transition Table for ε-NFA


The transition table for the ε-NFA represents the possible next states for each current
state under the inputs 0, 1, and ε-transitions. Based on the given transitions, the table is
as follows:

| State | ε |0 |1 |
|-------|-----------|------|------|
| q0 | {q1, q2} | ∅ |∅ |
| q1 |∅ | {q3} | ∅ |
| q2 |∅ |∅ | {q3} |
| q3 |∅ |∅ | {q4} |
| q4 |∅ |∅ |∅ |

- **Notes**:
- **q0**: Has ε-transitions to q1 and q2, no transitions on 0 or 1.
- **q1**: Transitions to q3 on 0, no transition on 1, no ε-transitions.
- **q2**: Transitions to q3 on 1, no transition on 0, no ε-transitions.
- **q3**: Transitions to q4 on 1, no transition on 0, no ε-transitions.
- **q4**: No transitions defined for any input or ε.
- ∅ represents the empty set, indicating no transition for that input.

#### Step 3: Subset Construction for DFA


To convert the ε-NFA to a DFA, we use the subset construction method. Each DFA state is
a set of ε-NFA states, and we start with the ε-closure of the start state, then compute
transitions for each input symbol (0 and 1).

- **Initial DFA State**:


- Start with the ε-closure of q0: {q0, q1, q2}.
- This is the start state of the DFA, denoted as A = {q0, q1, q2}.

- **Transitions from A = {q0, q1, q2}**:


- **On input 0**:
- From q0: No transition on 0.
- From q1: Transitions to q3 on 0.
- From q2: No transition on 0.
- Resulting states = {q3}.
- ε-closure({q3}) = {q3}.
- New DFA state B = {q3}.
- **On input 1**:
- From q0: No transition on 1.
- From q1: No transition on 1.
- From q2: Transitions to q3 on 1.
- Resulting states = {q3}.
- ε-closure({q3}) = {q3}.
- New DFA state B = {q3} (same as on 0).

- **Transitions from B = {q3}**:


- **On input 0**:
- From q3: No transition on 0.
- Resulting states = ∅.
- ε-closure(∅) = ∅ (no new state generated yet).
- **On input 1**:
- From q3: Transitions to q4 on 1.
- Resulting states = {q4}.
- ε-closure({q4}) = {q4}.
- New DFA state C = {q4}.

- **Transitions from C = {q4}**:


- **On input 0**:
- From q4: No transition on 0.
- Resulting states = ∅.
- **On input 1**:
- From q4: No transition on 1.
- Resulting states = ∅.

- **Handling ∅**:
- In a complete DFA, every state must have a transition for each input symbol.
Transitions to ∅ indicate no reachable states, typically leading to a dead state (e.g., D =
∅) where D transitions to itself on 0 and 1. However, for simplicity and following the
provided descriptions, we can list ∅ as "no transition" in the table without explicitly
including it as a state unless required.

- **DFA States Generated**:


- A = {q0, q1, q2} (start state).
- B = {q3}.
- C = {q4}.
- No new states arise from further transitions.

- **Accept States**:
- A DFA state is accepting if it contains an accept state from the ε-NFA (q4).
- {q0, q1, q2}: Does not contain q4, not accepting.
- {q3}: Does not contain q4, not accepting.
- {q4}: Contains q4, accepting.

#### Step 4: Transition Table for DFA


Based on the subset construction, the DFA transition table is:

| DFA State |0 |1 |
|--------------|------|------|
| {q0, q1, q2} | {q3} | {q3} |
| {q3} |∅ | {q4} |
| {q4} |∅ |∅ |

- **Notes**:
- **Start State**: {q0, q1, q2}.
- **Accept State**: {q4}.
- ∅ indicates no transition for that input symbol, implying rejection if the DFA reaches
this point (alternatively, a dead state could be added for completeness, but it’s not
required here per the problem context).

### Final Output

#### Transition Table for ε-NFA


| State | ε |0 |1 |
|-------|-----------|------|------|
| q0 | {q1, q2} | ∅ |∅ |
| q1 |∅ | {q3} | ∅ |
| q2 |∅ |∅ | {q3} |
| q3 |∅ |∅ | {q4} |
| q4 |∅ |∅ |∅ |

#### Epsilon Closures


- ε-closure(q0) = {q0, q1, q2}
- ε-closure(q1) = {q1}
- ε-closure(q2) = {q2}
- ε-closure(q3) = {q3}
- ε-closure(q4) = {q4}

#### Transition Table for DFA


| DFA State |0 |1 |
|--------------|------|------|
| {q0, q1, q2} | {q3} | {q3} |
| {q3} |∅ | {q4} |
| {q4} |∅ |∅ |

- **Start State**: {q0, q1, q2}


- **Accept State**: {q4}

### Summary
The ε-NFA with states {q0, q1, q2, q3, q4}, start state q0, and accept state q4 has been
successfully converted to an equivalent DFA. The process involved computing
ε-closures, constructing the ε-NFA transition table, and applying the subset construction
method to derive the DFA. The resulting DFA has three states: {q0, q1, q2}, {q3}, and {q4},
with {q0, q1, q2} as the start state and {q4} as the accept state. The transition tables and
ε-closures provided ensure that the DFA accepts the same language as the original
ε-NFA, effectively handling the elimination of ε-transitions.

You might also like