Scribd
Upload
10 views3 pages

Mod-HW5 2020

The document outlines an assignment for EE Course 25367 focused on current programmed control of power electronics converters, specifically a Buck converter and Cuk converter. It includes tasks such as deriving equivalent circuit parameters, steady-state analysis, and modeling using averaged switch techniques. The assignment also requires stability analysis and transfer function derivation for various converter configurations.

Uploaded by

keshavarzimasoud93
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views3 pages

Mod-HW5 2020

The document outlines an assignment for EE Course 25367 focused on current programmed control of power electronics converters, specifically a Buck converter and Cuk converter. It includes tasks such as deriving equivalent circuit parameters, steady-state analysis, and modeling using averaged switch techniques. The assignment also requires stability analysis and transfer function derivation for various converter configurations.

Uploaded by

keshavarzimasoud93
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

In the name of Almighty

EE Course 25367
Modeling& Control of PE Converters

Assignment 5 – Current programmed Control (part1)


Due date: 1404/02/6

1: Find the two-port equivalent-circuit parameters of a CPM controlled Buck converter


operating in CCM. (as in table 1)

Table 1. Current programmed mode small-signal equivalent circuit parameters, simple


model

2: Derive the averaged model of CPM Buck-Boost converter via averaged switch
modeling operating in CCM. (as in Fig. 1)

Fig. 1. Average models of CPM boost (a) and CPM buck-boost (b) converters, derived
via average switch modeling
3: (18-1) A non-ideal buck converter operates in the continuous conduction mode, with
the values 𝑉𝑔 = 10 𝑉, 𝑓𝑠 = 100 𝑘𝐻𝑧, 𝐿 = 4 𝜇𝐻, 𝐶 = 75 𝜇𝐹, and 𝑅 = 0.25 Ω. The
desired full-load output is 5 V at 20 A. The power stage contains the following loss
elements: MOSFET on-resistance𝑅𝑜𝑛 = 0.1 Ω, Schottky diode forward voltage drop
𝑉𝐷 = 0.5 𝑉, inductor winding resistance 𝑅𝐿 = 0.03 Ω.
(a) Steady-state analysis: determine the converter steady-state duty cycle D, the
inductor current ripple slopes 𝑚1 and 𝑚2 , and the dimensionless parameter 𝐾 =
2𝐿/𝑅𝑇𝑠 .
(b) Determine the small-signal equations for this converter, for duty cycle control.

_____________________________________________________________________________________
25367: Modeling& Control of PE Converters p.1/3
A current-programmed controller is now implemented for this converter. An
artificial ramp is used, having a fixed slope 𝑀𝑎 = 0.5𝑀2 , where 𝑀2 is the steady-
state slope 𝑚2 obtained with an output of 5𝑉 at 20𝐴.
(c) Over what range of D is the current programmed controller stable? Is it stable at
rated output? Note that the non-idealities affect the stability boundary.
(d) Determine the control-to-output transfer function 𝐺𝑣𝑐 (𝑠) using the simple
approximation < 𝑖𝐿 (𝑡) > 𝑇𝑠 = 𝑖𝑐 (𝑡). Give analytical expressions for the corner
frequency and dc gain. Sketch the Bode plot of 𝐺𝑣𝑐 (𝑠).

4: (18-3) Use the averaged switch modeling approach to model the CCM Cuk converter
with current-programmed control. A Cuk converter is diagrammed in Fig. 2.
(a) It is desired to model the switch network with an 𝑖𝑐 current source and a dependent
power source or sink, using the approach of Section 18.1.2 of the book. How
should the switch network terminal voltages and currents be defined?
(b) Sketch the switch network terminal voltage and current waveforms. With the
assumption that < 𝑖1 (𝑡) > 𝑇𝑠 −< 𝑖2 (𝑡) > 𝑇𝑠 = 𝑖𝑐 (𝑡) (where 𝑖1 and 𝑖2 are the
inductor currents defined in Fig. 2), determine expressions tor the average values
of the switch network terminal waveforms, and hence derive an equivalent
circuit similar to the equivalent circuits of Fig. 1.
(c) Perturb and linearize your model of part (b), to obtain a small signal equivalent
circuit similar to the model of Fig. 3. It is not necessary to solve your model.

Fig. 2. Cuk converter (a) with ideal switch, (b) practical realization using MOSFET and
diode

Fig. 3. Small-signal model of CCM CPM buck converter, derived by perturbation and
linearization of the switch network

5: (18-5) In a CCM current-programmed buck convener, it is desired to minimize the line-


to-output transfer function 𝐺𝑣𝑔 (𝑠) via the choice 𝑚𝑎 = 0.5𝑚2. However, because of
component tolerances, the value of inductance L can vary by ±10% from its nominal
_____________________________________________________________________________________
25367: Modeling& Control of PE Converters p.2/3
value of 100µH. Hence, 𝑚𝑎 is fixed in value while 𝑚2 varies and 𝑚𝑎 = 0.5𝑚2 is
obtained only at the nominal value of 𝐿. The switching frequency is 100 𝑘𝐻𝑧, the out -
put voltage is 15 𝑉, the load current varies over the range 2 to 4 A, and the input voltage
varies over the range 22 to 32 V. You may neglect losses. Determine the worst-case
(maximum) value of the line-to-out- put dc gain 𝐺𝑣𝑔 (0).

6: (18-6) The non-ideal Flyback convener of Fig. 4 employs current-programmed control,


with artificial ramp having slope 𝑚𝑎 . MOSFET Q1 exhibits on-resistance 𝑅𝑜𝑛 .All current
programmed controller waveforms are referred to the transformer primary side.
(a) Derive a block diagram which models the current-programmed controller, of form
similar to Fig.5. Give analytical expressions for the gains in your block diagram.
(b) Combine your result of part (a) with the converter small-signal model. Derive a
new expression for the control-to-output transfer function 𝐺𝑣𝑐 (𝑠)

Fig. 4. Flyback converter example

Fig. 5. Functional block diagram of the current programmed controller

_____________________________________________________________________________________
25367: Modeling& Control of PE Converters p.3/3

You might also like