Controlling is the process of monitoring and correcting work performance to ensure that organizational goals are met. It involves measuring actual performance, comparing it against standards, and taking managerial action based on the results. Effective control systems empower employees and protect organizational assets from various threats.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages
Control
Controlling is the process of monitoring and correcting work performance to ensure that organizational goals are met. It involves measuring actual performance, comparing it against standards, and taking managerial action based on the results. Effective control systems empower employees and protect organizational assets from various threats.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
controlling
What is controlling? It’s the process of monitoring, comparing,
and correcting work performance. All managers should control even if their units are performing as planned because they can’t really know that unless they’ve evaluated what activities have been done and compared actual performance against the desired standard.3 Effective controls ensure that activities are completed in ways that lead to the attainment of goals. Whether controls are effective, then, is determined by how well they help employees and managers achieve their goals.4 Why is control so important? Planning can be done, an organizational structure created to facilitate efficient achievement of goals, and employees motivated through effective leadership. But there’s no assurance that activities are going as planned and that the goals employees and managers are working toward are, in fact, being attained. Control is important, therefore, because it’s the only way that managers know whether organizational goals are being met and if not, the reasons why. The value of the control function can be seen in three specific areas: planning, empowering employees, and pro tecting the workplace. The second reason controlling is important is because of employee empowerment. Many managers are reluctant to empower their employees because they fear something will go wrong for which they would be held responsible. But an effective control system can provide information and feedback on employee performance and minimize the chance of potential problems. The final reason that managers control is to protect the organization and its assets.6 Today’s environment brings heightened threats from natural disasters, financial scandals, workplace violence, supply chain disruptions, security breaches, and even possible terror ist attacks. Managers must protect organizational assets in the event that any of these things should happen. Comprehensive controls and backup plans will help assure minimal work disruptions. The control process consists of the following basic elements and steps:
Step 1. Measuring Actual Performance
To determine what actual performance is, a manager must first get information about it. Thus, the first step in control is measuring. HOW WE MEASURE. Four approaches used by managers to measure and report actual performance are personal observations, statistical reports, oral reports, and written reports. Exhibit 18-3 summarizes the advantages and drawbacks of each approach. Most managers use a combination of these approaches. WHAT WE MEASURE. What is measured is probably more critical to the control process than how it’s measured. Why? Because selecting the wrong criteria can create serious problems. Besides, what is measured often determines what employees will do.8 What control criteria might managers use? ep 2. Comparing Actual Performance Against the Standard The comparing step determines the variation between actual performance and the standard. Although some variation in performance can be expected in all activities, it’s critical to de termine an acceptable range of variation (see Exhibit 18-4). Deviations outside this range need attention. Let’s work through an example. Chris Tanner is a sales manager for Green Earth Gardening Supply, a distributor of specialty plants and seeds in the Pacific Northwest. Chris prepares a report during the first week of each month that describes sales for the previous month, classified by product line. Step 3. Taking Managerial Action Managers can choose among three possible courses of action: do nothing, correct the ac tual performance, or revise the standards. Because “do nothing” is self-explanatory, let’s look at the other two. CORRECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE. Sports coaches understand the importance of correcting actual performance. During a game, they’ll often correct a player’s actions. But if the problem is recurring or encompasses more than one player, they’ll devote time during practice before the next game to correcting the actions.9 That’s what managers need to do as well. Depending on what the problem is, a manager could take different corrective actions. For instance, if unsatisfactory work is the reason for performance variations, the manager could correct it by things such as training programs, disciplinary action, changes in com pensation practices, and so forth. One decision that a manager must make is whether to take immediate corrective action, which corrects problems at once to get performance back on track, or to use basic corrective action, which looks at how and why performance deviated before correcting the source of deviation. It’s not unusual for managers to rational ize that they don’t have time to find the source of a problem (basic corrective action) and continue to perpetually “put out fires” with immediate corrective action. Effective managers analyze deviations and if the benefits justify it, take the time to pinpoint and correct the causes of variance.