LEARNING EVIDENCE 1: INSTRUCTIONS

1. Create a short video (3 to 5 minutes) documenting an artwork of one of the eleven IP tribes of Davao City. It could be a native
delicacy, a mural, a famous sculpture or painting, an applied art (clothing or accessories), a musical instrument, a dance, a piece of
music, etc. Remember that art is something that is man-made. You may view the links provided in the UVE (under “Essential
Resources”) as reference.
2. Members of the group should be part of the documentation. This means I should be able to see you in the video and your name in
the credits.
3. While you may include footage taken from public domain sites, your documentary should be 80% your own footage. Do not just
capture footage. Make your documentation informative as well. You may highlight a particular aspect of your chosen art form. You
may also include interviews with a member of the IP tribe you are documenting.
4. You may work on this individually or you may work as a pair or as a trio. Please do not ask me, “Ma’am p’wede upat?” We all know
how to divide
5. Include a script or a rundown sheet in your video submission. Refer to the rubric below to know how you will be graded and to the
sample script format to know how to go about it.
6. Uploading your videos to a public site is your choice. It is not required. I will not be grading based on the number of “likes” or
“reactions” or “shares.”
7. There is no need for multiple submissions. If you worked with a partner or with a team, you only need to submit one file. Just make
sure that the names of the members are indicated in the script.
8. Deadline for the submission of your LE 1 is on April 28, 2025 for MW classes and April 29, 2025 for TTh classes. Place them all in
one folder in a flash drive (1 per class) so I can transfer them to my computer at work and then return the flash drive to you after.
9. Have fun, be creative, and be proud of your culture.
 Area to Assess Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Unacceptable

Concept 15-20 points 10-14 points 5-9 points 0-4 points

The concept describes a clear picture of what The concept describes a relatively clear picture The team has brainstormed their concept, but Little effort has been spent on brainstorming and
students are trying to achieve including an of what they are trying to achieve including what has no clear focus. Goals/final product are not refining a concept. The team appears unclear on
adequate description of what they are trying to the team is trying to do overall but without clearly defined. their goals and how the project objectives will be
do and generally how each team member’s work specifics on how each team member’s work will met
will contribute to the final project. contribute to the final project.

Script/Storyboard 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

The storyboard illustrates the video presentation The storyboard includes thumbnail sketches of The thumbnail sketches on the storyboard are There is no evidence of a storyboard or script.
structure with thumbnail sketches of each scene. each video scene and includes text for each not in logical sequence and/or do not provide
Notations of proposed transitions, special segment of the presentation, descriptions of complete descriptions of the video scenes, audio
effects, sound and title tracks are included: text, background audio for each scene, and notes background, or notes about the dialogue.
color, placement, graphics, are detailed. Notes about proposed shots and dialogue.
about proposed dialogue/ narration text are
included.

Content/Organization 15-20 points 10-14 points 5-9 points 0-4 points

The content includes a clear statement of Information presented is a connected theme The project does not present a clearly stated Content lacks a central theme, clear point of
purpose or theme and is creative, compelling with accurate and current supporting theme, is vague, and/or some of the supporting view and/or logical sequence of information.
and clearly written. A rich variety of supporting information contributing to understanding of the information does not seem to fit the main idea. Much of the supporting information is irrelevant
information in the video contributes to the project’s main idea. Details are logical and Citations and facts are minimal. to the overall message. The viewer is unsure
understanding of the project’s main idea. Events persuasive information is used effectively. The what the message is. Information is incorrect,
and messages are presented in a logical order. content includes a clear point of view with a out of date, or incomplete. No citations included.
Includes properly cited sources. progression of ideas and supporting
information. Includes properly cited sources.
Quality 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

The video project was completed and included Video was completed and contained many of the Video was produced, but had very little editing. There was no video, or video was unedited
most of the suggested elements. The video was suggested elements. Editing was incomplete or Many poor quality shots remain. Video was without transitions or audio support.
well edited and moves smoothly from scene to poorly done. Some poor shots remain. Video is fragmented and choppy with little to no audio
scene with proper use of transitions. Audio was still somewhat choppy. Audio and other reinforcement.
clear and understandable and other enhancements were utilized, but not for
enhancements were well used. maximum effect.

Teamwork 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

Students met and had discussions regularly. All Students met and had discussions regularly. Minimal team meetings were held. Most of the Meetings were not held and/or not all of the team
students on the team contributed to the Most of the students on the team contributed to students on the team contributed, but a majority members contributed to the project. Teamwork
discussion and were part of the final project. the discussion and were part of the final project. of the work was done by one or two. was not evident.
Team members showed respect to one another. Team members mostly showed respect toward
each other.

Timeliness 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

All project deadlines were met. Most project deadlines were met. Those that Many project deadlines were not met, negatively Deadlines were disregarded, having a significant
were late did not have a significant impact on the impacting the finished project. impact on the final project.
finished project.