Module 1
Module 1
1. Mental processes exist: Cognitive psychologists believe that mental processes like
perception, memory, and decision-making are real and can be studied scientifically.
2. The mind processes information: The mind is seen as an information processor,
similar to a computer, where sensory input is transformed, stored, and retrieved.
3. Cognitive processes can be studied scientifically: Unlike behaviorism, which focuses
on observable behavior, cognitive psychology accepts that mental processes, though not
directly observable, can be studied through experimental methods and inference.
4. Cognitive processes are influenced by both nature and nurture: Genetics and the
environment both shape cognitive development and functioning.
Cognitive processes are active and dynamic: Mental processes are continuously
interpreting and interacting with the environment, not passive or static.
Humans have limited cognitive resources: Cognitive abilities like attention and
memory are constrained, affecting information processing.
Cognitive processes are subject to error and bias: Cognitive biases and
heuristics influence decision-making and memory, leading to errors.
Structuralism
Functionalism
Behaviorism
Genetic Epistemology
● Occurred in the 1950s-1960s, marking a shift from behaviorism to the study of internal
mental processes
● Critique of behaviorism by figures like Noam Chomsky and Herbert Simon
● Chomsky’s critique of Skinner's behaviorist theories of language acquisition was pivotal
● Development of computer models of the mind as information-processing systems
● Established cognitive psychology as a distinct field focused on mental processes like
perception, memory, and problem-solving
● Miller, G.A. (1956): “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two” – Identified
limitations in short-term memory
● Chomsky, N. (1959): Critique of Skinner’s behaviorist account of language acquisition in
"Review of Verbal Behavior"
● Broadbent, D.E. (1958): Developed the filter model of attention, foundational for
information processing theories
● Neisser, U. (1967): Published Cognitive Psychology, marking the formal establishment
of the field
1. Naturalistic Observation:
○ Definition: Observing behavior as it naturally occurs in real-world settings,
without any manipulation or interference from the researcher.
○ Cognitive Psychology Connection: This method helps researchers understand
how cognitive processes manifest in everyday environments, without artificial
constraints. It is particularly valuable in studying cognitive processes that are
difficult to replicate in a lab, such as language acquisition in children or
problem-solving in social contexts.
○ Example: Observing how individuals navigate decision-making while shopping in
a store, revealing insights into cognitive biases and choices. This allows
researchers to see how people make choices based on preferences, heuristics,
and the influence of external stimuli in real-life situations.
○ Limitations: The main drawback is the lack of control over variables, making it
difficult to establish causal relationships. Factors like environmental distractions
or individual differences may influence results.
2. Introspection:
○ Definition: Participants are asked to reflect on and describe their own mental
experiences, providing insights into their conscious cognitive processes.
○ Cognitive Psychology Connection: Introspection was crucial in the early
development of cognitive psychology, especially in understanding conscious
thought. It is used less today, but is still relevant in phenomenological
approaches to understanding subjective experience and in exploring emotional
and cognitive states.
○ Example: A participant may be asked to describe their thought process while
solving a complex math problem. The researcher can then analyze these reports
to understand how the individual approaches the problem cognitively, even
though the process is subjective and cannot be directly verified.
○ Limitations: Introspection is inherently subjective and unreliable, as people's
reflections may not be consistent or accurate. It also cannot be used for studying
unconscious processes.
3. Controlled Observation:
○ Definition: Observing behavior in a structured, controlled environment where the
researcher manipulates specific variables to isolate the effects of those variables.
○ Cognitive Psychology Connection: This method allows cognitive psychologists
to study specific cognitive processes (e.g., attention, memory, perception) while
controlling for extraneous factors. It helps establish cause-and-effect
relationships by isolating variables.
○ Example: A researcher may observe how participants perform on a memory task
under different conditions, such as varying levels of distraction. By controlling
environmental variables, they can isolate how distractions specifically affect
memory performance.
○ Limitations: The artificial nature of controlled environments can reduce
ecological validity, meaning results may not fully generalize to real-world settings.
4. Clinical Interviews:
○ Definition: A direct questioning technique used to explore an individual’s
cognitive and emotional state. Can be structured (standardized questions) or
unstructured (flexible, open-ended questions).
○ Cognitive Psychology Connection: Clinical interviews are often used in clinical
cognitive psychology to understand the thought patterns, memory functions, or
emotional responses of individuals, especially in the context of mental health or
cognitive disorders.
○ Example: A clinical interview with a patient who is experiencing memory
problems might help researchers or clinicians assess how cognitive processes,
such as attention or encoding, are impaired. It also helps in exploring issues like
the effect of emotional states on cognitive performance.
○ Limitations: The unstructured nature can introduce interviewer bias, and the
results may be subjective, making it harder to draw clear, generalizable
conclusions.
5. Experiments:
○ Definition: A method where the researcher manipulates one or more
independent variables (IVs) to observe their effects on dependent variables
(DVs), conducted in a controlled environment.
○ Cognitive Psychology Connection: Experiments are the primary method for
investigating causal relationships between cognitive processes. Researchers can
test specific cognitive theories and hypotheses by controlling variables and
isolating specific cognitive functions.
○ Example: A common experiment might involve manipulating the level of
cognitive load (IV) in a working memory task (DV) to see how different loads
affect performance. This can be done by changing the number of items to be
remembered or the complexity of the task.
○ Limitations: While experiments provide strong evidence of cause and effect,
they often take place in artificial settings, which can limit the ecological validity of
the results.
6. Quasi-Experiments:
○ Definition: Similar to experiments, but lacking random assignment to conditions.
Participants are not randomly assigned to different experimental conditions, often
due to practical or ethical constraints.
○ Cognitive Psychology Connection: Quasi-experiments are used when random
assignment is not possible, such as studying cognitive differences between
groups (e.g., patients with brain damage vs. healthy controls). These studies are
important when studying real-world groups that cannot be randomly assigned,
like age groups, clinical populations, or educational settings.
○ Example: A researcher studying how elderly individuals (without random
assignment) perform on cognitive tasks compared to younger adults. Since
random assignment isn’t feasible, researchers use existing groups, but the study
design lacks full experimental control over confounding variables.
○ Limitations: The inability to randomly assign participants makes it harder to rule
out confounding variables, which can make causal conclusions more difficult to
establish.
7. Investigations of Neural Underpinnings:
○ fMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging):
■ Definition: fMRI measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood
flow, which corresponds to neural activity.
■ Cognitive Psychology Connection: fMRI allows researchers to directly
link cognitive processes (e.g., memory, attention, language) with brain
activity, enabling the study of neural mechanisms involved in cognition.
■ Example: fMRI is used to study brain activity during tasks like reading
comprehension, showing how different brain regions (e.g., language
areas in the left hemisphere) are activated when participants read
different types of texts.
■ Limitations: fMRI has high spatial resolution but low temporal resolution,
meaning it can show where activity occurs in the brain but not when it
occurs with precision.
○ EEG (Electroencephalography):
■ Definition: EEG records electrical activity in the brain through electrodes
placed on the scalp, providing real-time measures of brain waves.
■ Cognitive Psychology Connection: EEG is used to study the timing of
cognitive processes, such as the speed of memory retrieval or the brain's
response to stimuli.
■ Example: Researchers might use EEG to measure brain responses
(event-related potentials, or ERPs) when participants are presented with a
word list and later asked to recall the words.
■ Limitations: While EEG has excellent temporal resolution (measuring
millisecond-level changes in brain activity), its spatial resolution is low,
making it difficult to pinpoint exact locations of activity in the brain.
○ PET (Positron Emission Tomography):
■ Definition: PET scans measure brain activity by detecting radioactive
tracers injected into the bloodstream, which accumulate in areas of high
brain activity.
■ Cognitive Psychology Connection: PET allows for mapping both neural
activity and metabolic processes in the brain, providing a comprehensive
view of brain function during cognitive tasks.
■ Example: PET scans have been used to study how the brain functions
when engaging in complex tasks like problem-solving or multitasking,
revealing which brain areas are activated during these activities.
■ Limitations: PET is invasive due to the use of radioactive substances,
and it has lower temporal resolution than EEG, though it provides more
precise spatial data than EEG.
1. Information-Processing Approach:
○ Overview: Models cognition as a sequence of stages: input → processing →
output, similar to a computer.
○ Applications: Useful for tasks like language comprehension, memory recall, and
problem-solving.
○ Limitations: Oversimplifies human cognition by ignoring emotional and social
influences, and doesn't account for the dynamic nature of cognition.
2. Connectionist Approach (Parallel Distributed Processing):
○ Overview: Suggests cognition arises from interactions among simple processing
units (similar to neurons), with knowledge distributed across a network.
○ Applications: Helps explain complex processes like memory retrieval and
language processing.
○ Limitations: Difficult to test due to the complexity of simulating large networks,
and hard to pinpoint mechanisms for higher-order functions.
3. Evolutionary Approach:
○ Overview: Examines cognitive functions in terms of evolutionary advantages for
survival and reproduction.
○ Applications: Used to explore decision-making, memory, social behavior, and
biases shaped by natural selection.
○ Limitations: Can be speculative and hard to test the exact evolutionary history of
cognitive traits.
4. Ecological Approach:
○ Overview: Focuses on studying cognition in real-world settings, emphasizing
context and environment.
○ Applications: Useful for understanding cognition in everyday tasks, such as
navigation, driving, and social interactions.
○ Limitations: Lacks control over variables, making it harder to establish causality
and replicate findings.