Scribd
Upload
33 views1 page

Static Vs Dynamic Routing

The document compares static and dynamic routing, highlighting that static routing is manually configured and suitable for small networks, while dynamic routing automatically adjusts to changes and is better for larger networks. Static routing offers control and security but lacks scalability and automatic failover, whereas dynamic routing provides scalability and redundancy but requires more resources and is more complex. The choice between the two depends on the network size and requirements, with static routing being efficient for small, stable networks and dynamic routing for larger, dynamic environments.

Uploaded by

prismeiko.ph
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
33 views1 page

Static Vs Dynamic Routing

The document compares static and dynamic routing, highlighting that static routing is manually configured and suitable for small networks, while dynamic routing automatically adjusts to changes and is better for larger networks. Static routing offers control and security but lacks scalability and automatic failover, whereas dynamic routing provides scalability and redundancy but requires more resources and is more complex. The choice between the two depends on the network size and requirements, with static routing being efficient for small, stable networks and dynamic routing for larger, dynamic environments.

Uploaded by

prismeiko.ph
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Static vs.

Dynamic Routing

Static Routing
Static routing is a manual process where routes are added to the routing table by an
administrator. It involves configuring routes directly on the router to guide data packets to
their destination.

Advantages of Static Routing


- Easy to configure and maintain in small networks.
- No overhead or additional processing needed for route updates.
- Provides more control over routing paths.
- More secure as it doesn’t broadcast routing information.

Disadvantages of Static Routing


- Not scalable for larger networks.
- Requires manual reconfiguration for topology changes.
- Prone to human errors during configuration.
- No automatic failover in case of a link failure.

Dynamic Routing
Dynamic routing uses routing protocols to automatically update and manage routing tables
based on network topology changes. Common protocols include RIP, OSPF, and EIGRP.

Advantages of Dynamic Routing


- Automatically adjusts to network topology changes.
- Scalable for large and complex networks.
- Reduces the risk of human error.
- Provides redundancy and failover capabilities.

Disadvantages of Dynamic Routing


- Higher resource consumption (CPU, memory, bandwidth).
- More complex to configure and maintain.
- Initial convergence time can cause delays.
- May be less secure as it involves broadcasting routing information.

Which Routing is More Efficient?


The efficiency of a routing type depends on the network size and requirements:
- **Static Routing**: Best for small networks where routes are predictable and rarely
change. It minimizes resource consumption and ensures control.
- **Dynamic Routing**: Best for medium to large networks with frequent topology changes.
Its scalability and adaptability make it more efficient in complex environments.

You might also like