wc-Module_2
wc-Module_2
2.2 Shadowing
Shadowing is a type of large-scale fading that occurs due to the presence
of obstacles or obstructions in the path of the signal.This causes the signal
power to vary as the receiver moves in the environment. It is generally
modeled as a log-normal distribution, with a mean and standard deviation
that depend on the characteristics of the environment.
Shadowing is a slow-varying phenomenon and affects the overall received
signal power. It can be mitigated by using techniques such as diversity,
where multiple antennas are used to combine multiple signal paths, or by
using signal processing techniques to estimate the shadowing effects and
compensate for them.
To battle the impacts of blurring, remote correspondence frameworks
utilize different strategies, including:
• Variety strategies: This includes the utilization of different radio
wires or channels to give numerous variants of a similar
transmission, which can be joined at the recipient to diminish the
impacts of blurring.
• Balance procedures: This includes the utilization of computerized
signal handling calculations to make up for the bending brought
about by blurring.
• Power control strategies: This includes changing the sending
ability to keep a specific degree of sign quality, even within the
sight of blurring.
• Tweak procedures: This includes the utilization of more strong
balance plans, for example, QPSK or 16-QAM, that can endure a
more elevated level of clamor and twisting.
Implementation of Fading Models Or Fading
Distributions
• Rayleigh Fading
o Description: Rayleigh fading assumes that the
magnitude of the received signal follows a
Rayleigh distribution.
o Scenario: Commonly used for modeling non-line-
of-sight (NLOS) wireless channels.
o Application: Rayleigh fading is prevalent in urban
environments with multipath propagation1.
• Rician Fading
o Description: Rician fading accounts for both a
dominant line-of-sight (LOS) component and
scattered multipath components.
o Scenario: Suitable for environments where there
is a strong LOS path alongside weaker multipath
components.
o Application: Often used in scenarios like indoor
wireless communication with reflective surfaces1.
• Nakagami Fading
o Description: Nakagami fading models the
envelope of the received signal using the
Nakagami distribution.
o Scenario: Applicable to channels with moderate
to severe multipath fading.
o Application: Used in cases like mobile
communication and satellite links1.
• Weibull Fading
o Description: Weibull fading considers the shape
parameter of the Weibull distribution to
characterize fading.
o Scenario: Useful for modeling channels with
varying fading conditions.
o Application: Applied in cases where the fading
environment changes over time
• Scattering: This takes place when waves interact with particles or irregularities
in a medium, causing them to spread in different directions. Scattering explains
why the sky appears blue (Rayleigh scattering of sunlight) and is key in wireless
communication as it enables signals to navigate through complex environments.
Concept of Diversity
Superposition of multiple signals at the receiver causes random
amplitude variation which is known as Fading. A mechanism that is used
to decrease the effect of fading is called Diversity. It is used to
compensate for fading channel impairments. In Diversity mechanism,
multiple copies of the same data are transmitted to the receiver through
multiple paths or channels and the decision is made by the receiver
without knowing the transmitter.
. Diversity techniques are used in wireless communications systems to primarily
to improve performance over a fading radio channel.
Types of Diversity
1. Space Diversity(or Antenna Diversity): Replica of same signal is
transmitted through different antenna. Space should be between
adjacent antenna so that channel gain will be independent of signal
path. Space diversity may give a path that avoid shadowing and also
decrease the large scale fading. Space diversity offer different path
without an increase in transmitter power or bandwidth.
Space Diversity Reception Methods
1. Selection diversity : The highest instantaneous SNR(Signal-
Noise Ratio) branch is connected to the demodulator. Antenna
signal themselves could be sampled and the best one sent to a
single demodulation.
2. Feedback diversity : N-signals are scanned on the receiver side
until one is found to be above a predetermined threshold.
Signal is received until it falls below threshold scanning
process is again initiated.
3. Maximal Ratio Combining Technique: Signal from all of the N-
branches are weighted according to the SNR’s and then
summed. Signal must be co-phased. Output SNR = Sum of the
individual SNR’s.
4. Equal gain combining technique: Branch weight are all set to
unity. Signal from each antenna is co-phased. Make use of
energy in all branches. Performance is marginally inferior to
MRC and superior to selection diversity.
2. Time Diversity: Time diversity is obtained by re-transmitting the
same signal at separate interval of time. The re-transmission interval
should be less than the coherence time. Time Diversity also does not
require any increase in the transmission power.
Time Diversity can be realized in different ways:
• Repetition coding
• Automatic Repeat Request
• Combination of interleaving and coding
3. Frequency Diversity: Frequency diversity is obtained by transmitting
the same information on more than one carrier frequency or transmitting
the same signal over different carrier frequency. In Frequency Diversity
only one antenna is needed. It requires large bandwidth and more
number of receivers hence high cost.
4. Polarization Diversity: Polarization Diversity require two transmitter
and two receiving antennas with different polarization. The
transmission wave with two different polarization constitute two
different paths. This provide only two different diversity branches.
Polarization Diversity uses half power by dividing the power between
two different polarized antennas.
5. Angular Diversity: It is also known as pattern diversity. This diversity
allows the identical antennas to be located at same location but with a
different pattern. These two co-located antennas with different
patterns will provide a diverse path for multipath signal. It enhances the
decorrelation of signal at closely spaced antennas.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Single Path:
Selection Diversity:
Selecting the best signal among all the signals received from different braches
at the receiving end. Consider M independent Rayleigh fading channels available
at receiver
Assumptions:
• Each branch has the same average SNR
• Instantaneous SNR for each branch = γ
Selection diversity offers an average improvement in the link margin without
requiring additional transmitter power or sophisticated receiver circuitry.
• Selection diversity is easy to implement because all that is needed is a side
monitoring station and an antenna switch at the receiver.
• However it is not an optimal diversity technique because it does not use all of
the possible branches simultaneously.
• In practice the SNR is measured as (S+N)/N, since it is difficult to measure SNR.
• This method is very simple to implement, requiring only one receiver.
• The resulting fading statistics are somewhat inferior to those obtained by the
other methods.
Maximal Ratio Combining: Combining all the signals in a co‐phased and
weighted manner so as to have the highest achievable SNR at the receiver at all
times. Consider M branches which are maximal ratio combined in a co‐phased
and weighted manner in order to achieve high SNR
The voltage signal γi from each of the M diversity branches are co‐phased to
provide coherent voltage addition and are individually weighted to provide
optimal SNR.
• Each branch has gain Gi
• Each branch has same average noise power N
Equal Gain Combining: Combining all the signals in a co‐phased manner with
unity weights for all signal levels so as to have the highest achievable SNR at the
receiver at all times.
In certain cases it is not convenient to provide for the variable weighting
capability.
This allows the receiver to exploit signals that are simultaneously received on
each branch.
The probability of producing an acceptable signal from a number of
unacceptable inputs is still retained.
The performance is marginally inferior to maximal ratio combining and superior
to selection Diversity