ZnO Humidity Sensor
ZnO Humidity Sensor
1
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, NIT Durgapur, Durgapur 713209, India
2
Carbon Nanotechnology Lab, Department of Physics, NIT Durgapur, Durgapur 713209, India
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-13090-6
Vol.:(0123456789)
1425 Page 2 of 8 J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2024) 35:1425
3 Results and discussions 70% are plotted in Fig. 4b, which confirms good
reproducibility at all RH values.
3.1 Characterization of ZnO Figure 4c plots a single cycle at 70% RH to demon-
strate the process of estimation of the response and
The analysis of synthesized ZnO by X-ray diffrac- recovery times. From Fig. 4a–c it is evident that the
tion pattern shows (Fig. 3a) several sharp peaks sensitivity of the ZnO sensor at 70% RH is as high
indicating its high degree of crystallinity. All the as 480% and its response and recovery times are 16 s
peaks were matched to hexagonal wurtzite phase of and 7 s, respectively.The variation of sensitivity of the
ZnO in accordance with JCPDS card No. 00-036-145. sensor as a function of RH value of the atmosphere
Using the Scherrer equation, the average crystal- is plotted in Fig. 4d in which the exact nature of the
lite size of 49.4 nm is obtained for the most intense dependence is shown by fitting the experimental data
peak at 36.7° corresponding to (101) planes of ZnO points with an exponential function given by the fol-
[14]. UV–vis absorbance spectrum shows a peak at lowing equation:
380 nm (Fig. 3b) corresponding to Π–Π* transition. −x
Assuming ZnO as a direct bandgap semiconduc- y = y0 + A1 e t (2)
tor, its bandgap was estimated to 3.32 eV as can be
where, y0 is the offset, A1 is the amplitude, and t is the
seen from the Tauc plot (inset of Fig. 3b) [20, 21].
time constant. The value of the R2 COD (R square coef-
The FESEM images recorded at two different mag-
ficient of determination) for the fitted graph is 96.7%
nifications, shown in Fig. 3c, d, where one can see a
indicating it as a good fit of the data.
homogenously distributed pyramid-like microstruc-
The inset in Fig. 4d plots the variation of response
tures with an edge length of 270 µm. Each pyramid
and recovery times with increasing RH where one
encompasses hundreds of multifaceted plates, each
can see that both response and recovery times shows
100 µm long and 50 µm wide.
an initial decrease between 40 and 50% RH above
which these remain almost constant showing no
significant rise/fall with increase in RH. The I–V
3.2 Gas sensing measurements
plots of the sensor (Fig. 4e) at different atmospheric
The dynamic sensitivity plot of the ZnO sensor at conditions, i.e., in vacuum, dry Nitrogen, and in air
different RH (Fig. 4a) shows that the sensitivity of varying RH shows straight lines confirming the
increases with increase in RH. The repeatability of ohmic contacts. Figure 4f displays the sensitivity of
the sensor response (expressed in current) for five the sensor at 50% RH recorded at different intervals
consecutive cycles at RH 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, and of days over a period of one month. It is evident
from the plot that the sensor is preety stable against
1425 Page 4 of 8 J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2024) 35:1425
Fig. 3 a XRD plot; b UV–vis absorbance spectra with the Tauc plot in the inset; c, d FESEM images of ZnO at different magnifications
Fig. 4 a Dynamic response of the ZnO sensor at various RH; b function (variation of response time and recovery times with RH
Repeatability plot at varying RH; c Dynamic response curve at in the Inset); e I–V characteristics; and f stability of the sensor
70% RH demonstrating the estimation of response and recovery against ageing at 50% RH
times; d Experimental data vs RH plot fitted with an exponential
1425 Page 6 of 8 J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2024) 35:1425
Fig. 5 a Selectivity test plot of the sensor against some VOCs and; b Schematic ofhumidity sensing mechanism
Table 1 Comparison of
S. No. Morphology of ZnO RH Sensitivity Response time References
performance parameters
of reported ZnO humidity 1 Nanosheet 96 R12%
= 220 600/3 [28]
R96%
sensors with the present 2 Nanowire 30 Rdry 60/3 [29]
= 88
pyramid-like ZnO sensor R30%
4 Film 90 Rdry
= 226 8/25 [31]
R90%
5 Pyramid-like 70 Rv −Ra
× 100 = 480% 16/7 This work
Rv
17. M.W. Ahn, K.S. Park, J.H. Heo, D.W. Kim, K.J. Choi, J.G. comprehensive review. Sensors 14(5), 7881–7939 (2014).
Park, On-chip fabrication of ZnO-nanowire gas sensor https://doi.org/10.3390/S140507881
with high gas sensitivity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 138, 26. P.R. Mark, Forces and interactions between nanoparticles
168–173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNB.2009.02. for controlled structures (Rutgers The state university of
008 New Jersy, School of graduate studies, 2013)
18. J. Xu, Q. Pan, Y. Shun, Z. Tian, Grain size control and gas 27. L. Yang, J. Hu, K. Bai, Capillary and van der Waals force
sensing properties of ZnO gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B between microparticles with different sizes in humid air.
Chem. 66, 277–279 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925- J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 30, 566–578 (2015). https://doi.
4005(00)00381-6 org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1111834
19. L. Zhu, W. Zeng, Room-temperature gas sensing of ZnO- 28. F.S. Tsai, S.J. Wang, Enhanced sensing performance of
based gas sensor: a review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 267, relative humidity sensors using laterally grown ZnO
242–261 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNA.2017.10. nanosheets. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 193, 280–287 (2014).
021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.069
20. T. Matsumoto, H. Kato, K. Miyamoto, M. Sano, E.A. Zhu- 29. N. MohseniKiasari, S. Soltanian, B. Gholamkhass, P.
kov, T. Yao, Correlation between grain size and optical Servati, Room temperature ultra-sensitive resistive humid-
properties in zinc oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, ity sensor based on single zinc oxide nanowire. Sens.
1231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1499991 Actuators A Phys. 182, 101–105 (2012). https://doi.org/
21 A. Becheri, M. Dürr, P. Lo Nostro, P. Baglioni, Synthesis 10.1016/J.SNA.2012.05.041
and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles: applica- 30. S.P. Yawale, S.S. Yawale, G.T. Lamdhade, Tin oxide and
tion to textiles as UV-absorbers. J. Nanopart. Res.Nano- zinc oxide based doped humidity sensors. Sens. Actuators
part. Res. 104(10), 679–689 (2007). https://d oi.o rg/1 0. A Phys. 135, 388–393 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.
1007/S11051-007-9318-3 2006.08.001
22. P. Ranjan, P. Tiwary, A.K. Chakraborty, R. Mahapatra, 31. G. Algün, Humidity sensing properties of f luorine
A.D. Thakur, Graphene oxide based free-standing films doped zinc oxide thin films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Elec-
for humidity and hydrogen peroxide sensing. J. Mater. Sci. tron. 29, 17039–17046 (2018). https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 007/
Mater. Electron. 29, 15946–15956 (2018). https://doi.org/ S10854-018-9800-Y
10.1007/s10854-018-9680-1
23. S. Gupta Chatterjee, S. Dey, D. Samanta, S. Santra, S. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with
Chatterjee, P.K. Guha, A.K. Chakraborty, Near room tem- regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
perature sensing of nitric oxide using SnO2/Ni-decorated institutional affiliations.
natural cellulosic graphene nanohybrid film. J. Mater. Sci.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner)
Mater. Electron. 29, 20162–20171 (2018). https://doi.org/
holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing
10.1007/s10854-018-0149-z
agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s);
24. M. Bowker, H. Houghton, K.C. Waugh, T. Giddings, M.
author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of
Green, Crystal plane dependence of adsorption and reac-
this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing
tion on zinc oxide. J. Catal.Catal. 84, 252–255 (1983).
agreement and applicable law.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(83)90105-7
25 H. Farahani, R. Wagiran, M.N. Hamidon, Humidity sen-
sors principle, mechanism, and fabrication technologies: a