Scribd
Upload
6 views4 pages

Lab 5 Control

The experiment utilized MATLAB to analyze the frequency response of open-loop control systems, focusing on Bode and Nyquist plots for stability assessment. Key findings indicated that systems with proper phase and gain margins were stable, while challenges in plot analysis and MATLAB syntax were encountered. Overall, the exercise enhanced understanding of stability analysis and the importance of accurate modeling in control system design.

Uploaded by

Nazrin Syah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views4 pages

Lab 5 Control

The experiment utilized MATLAB to analyze the frequency response of open-loop control systems, focusing on Bode and Nyquist plots for stability assessment. Key findings indicated that systems with proper phase and gain margins were stable, while challenges in plot analysis and MATLAB syntax were encountered. Overall, the exercise enhanced understanding of stability analysis and the importance of accurate modeling in control system design.

Uploaded by

Nazrin Syah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

RESULT DATA

Part A (1)

Part A (2)
Part B (1)

Part B (2)
DISCUSSION
The experiment analyzed the frequency response of open-loop control systems using
MATLAB, focusing on Bode and Nyquist plots to assess stability. Theoretically, the Bode plot
provides magnitude and phase responses, while the Nyquist plot evaluates stability by checking
encirclements around the critical point (-1,0). According to the Nyquist criterion, a stable closed-
loop system requires the number of encirclements to match the right-half-plane poles of the
open-loop transfer function. This theoretical foundation guided the interpretation of simulation
results, ensuring accurate stability analysis.
Three transfer functions were analyzed by the MATLAB simulations, which also showed
important stability measures including phase margins and gain. Systems that had proper margins
(phase margin > 45°, gain margin > 6 dB) were viewed as stable, and the lack of encirclements
around (-1,0) in Hertz plots verified stability. Small differences between anticipated and actual
outcomes may be caused by high-frequency noise, numbers constraints, or input errors. With
these difficulties, the simulations successfully illustrated how frequency-domain analysis
forecasts system behavior, highlighting the significance of accurate parameter input and
modeling.
This lab presented a number of difficulties, such as computing limits influencing high-
frequency accuracy, trouble comprehending Bode and Hertz plots (especially phase margins and
encirclements), and MATLAB syntax problems in transfer function inputs that produced
inaccurate results. Analysis and documentation were under additional pressure due to time
restrictions. Overcoming these challenges, we improved our comprehension of stability analysis
and problem-solving abilities. Future enhancements might include better instructions on intricate
Hertz interpretations and pre-lab simulation practice.

CONCLUSION
To sum up, this experiment effectively illustrated how to use frequency response analysis to
assess control system stability using MATLAB's Bode and Nyquist plots. With difficulties with
plot analysis, transfer function delivery, and processing constraints, these obstacles offered
valuable educational experiences that improved our comprehension of stability requirements and
system behavior. The findings supported theoretical assumptions about phase margins and gain,
highlighting the significance of accurate modeling in control system research. In addition to
developing useful MATLAB abilities, this exercise highlighted the crucial connection between
frequency-domain properties and system stability, which is essential for effective control system
design and analysis.
REFERENCES
1) Ogata, K. (2010). Modern Control Engineering (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
2) MathWorks. (2023). Control System Toolbox User's Guide.
3) Nise, N. S. (2019). Control Systems Engineering (8th ed.). Wiley.
4) Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., & Emami-Naeini, A. (2019). Feedback Control of
Dynamic Systems(8th ed.). Pearson.
5) Dorf, R. C., & Bishop, R. H. (2016). Modern Control Systems (13th ed.). Pearson.
6) IEEE. (2021). IEEE Standard for System and Software Verification and
Validation*(IEEE Std 1012-2016).

You might also like