Law Test 1
Law Test 1
DYoutube https://t.melcafoundationlawbypreetiaggarwal
Q1) A shop-keeper displayed a pair of dress in the show room and a price tag of 2,000 was attached
to the dress. Ms. Lovely looked at the tag and rushed to the cash counter. Then she asked the shop
keeper to receive the payment and pack up the dress. The shopkeeper refused to hand over the dress
to Ms. Lovely in consideration of the price stated in the price tag attached to the dress. Ms. Lovely
seeks your advice whether she can sue the shopkeeper for the above cause under the Indian Contract
Act, 1872. (5 Marks)
Q2) Miss Shakuntala puts an application to be a teacher in the school. She was appointed by the trust
of the school. Her fiend who works in the same school informs her about her appointment informally.
But later due to some internal reasons her appoint1ment was cancelled. Can Miss Shakuntala claim for
damages? (4 Marks)
Q3) What do you understand by the term 'Consideration'? Are there any circumstances under which a
contract, under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, without consideration is valid?
Explain (6 Marks)
Q4) (i) X's brother runs away from the house. Y who is an employee of X offers to search for the
brother and goes out for the purpose. In the absence of Y, X offers a reward of 500 to anyone who
can either find out the brother or give clues enabling X to find him out. Y gets the brother back to X in
ignorance of the offer for reward. Can Y now claim the reward? (3 marks)
(iü) M promised to pay N for his services at his (M) sole discretion found to be fair and reasonable.
However, N dissatisfied with the payment made by M and wanted to sue him. Decide whether N can
sue Munder the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872? (2 Marks)
EST -Ol
urSTION
PRovisionN
Alccoxdirg
to a piovision) of Irdian Cabect
i812 nder Sectio2la, aohenone posore sgnihes
t otfRrto do orabatain fom doing same hing
poon is said to hawemade proposal
An olor is disinguishedbam
initatignt
invi ion to la i only a cioeula hon kae
la panly euitou eprusing hin fnal allingnsi ptbposes
colain tems hich he ailling nagohaa, he anot
makesan
dla Suol.itabon toloninot an in fronlof
yilao and it chnot tesnoiath agtamant
upn aceplance tn ondex to ascertain weathaa stalrent
inwtaiont
Walatonen is mode odared.
KEFERENCE CASE LAw
Phaama cauical Saciels d Goret Brilain sla
Boot Cash Cheriaa
ANALYSIS
an
CoNCLU SION:
Ma. Lovely cannot
twas only
damage. ony oclain cannat8hakuntla
acoptance,
Mis yabd q t tRus Sinca
CoNCLUSAON
accaptanca. not
Shakuntala'
Tha glo
on
acceptauthosidy has
wko poien not ik§and kiuntala Sha Mi
ANALY'SI8:
accptanc. amYuntto docsnat
aul cuithout pesGn otax Aeceptancgfho
ans Fro OAON.
porson
ized
can tanca ocopcomnanicakon
o The ach¡n. by a
da byConnmunLcole
eit eommsdtien lel aLcoptanca
Can
compleh.
The acceplance
is hTaen only
comnunitatogl
the to amupactoplanca
d occepted
n
is
said paoposal
beto therato,
tha ont
popasglià
made tRhom peson
o a
ack, bact Con Sndian (6) Secton
2 YROVISIOperN: Aa
-02 UESTON
Page.
Date
classmate
classmute
Data
Page
UESTON -03
UndorSee hon ald) ndian Gontroch Aet. 1812
dalines conidnahon as
pomisor, the promibea angyothar pouon hasdon or
dong does abslains pom doing
o
A conbact ecome
panlies d the conanct qoh sone thing as considnalien
io snesiluaion Fallasng
eonbartÀ yalid any 'considhahon.
1) Aqneman made cOBunt
accaunt natal loe and
No coraideraon is ogyuad al e kllauing
Cendiigs ae
a) Muat epode al
out nalial oe and oeho
A) 4 must enpse
o). Mteriged undari ioaut la.
d) the agreomantis dselineonso
Alanding in nao nalalion (lad elahan' mariage
Agoarun made hn qomponsakan for past
ompensahon. can de modertfR pakas ka
has ondexed seavieds to a tke leo voluntaiy
) Agtsnant made
Emitaton, a dalt beaonual
a
iv) Bailont :
Nocosiderakon is
bailmen. gallas.
V) Contact o aganet
uginad.