The document discusses the nature of knowledge and truth, emphasizing the distinction between truth and opinion. It outlines the process of acquiring knowledge through perception and rational thought, referencing key philosophical concepts such as empiricism and rationalism. Additionally, it defines truth as knowledge validated by facts of reality, contrasting it with opinion, which is subjective and influenced by personal biases.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views25 pages
Week 3 - Methods of Philosophizing
The document discusses the nature of knowledge and truth, emphasizing the distinction between truth and opinion. It outlines the process of acquiring knowledge through perception and rational thought, referencing key philosophical concepts such as empiricism and rationalism. Additionally, it defines truth as knowledge validated by facts of reality, contrasting it with opinion, which is subjective and influenced by personal biases.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25
PHIL2121
Knowledge and Truth Patricia Mae T. Gavilan,LPT OBJECTIVES To understand the nature of knowledge and truth
To differentiate the truth
and opinion. "Epistemology is a science devoted to the discovery of the proper method of acquiring and validating knowledge" (Rand 1990). The NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE According to Rand knowledge is a "mental grasp of reality reached either by perceptual observation or by a process of reason based on perceptual observation" (Rand 1990).
When you know something (be it the behavior of your friend,
the movement of the planets, or the origin of civilizations) you understand its nature. You identify what it is. And it stays with you. Knowledge is a retained form of awareness (Binswanger 2014) So how do you acquire knowledge? Miss Rand's definition gives us two ways: First, we can acquire knowledge using our senses: seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling, smelling. How do you know that the table is brown? Because you see it. How do you know that fire is hot? Because you feel it. This method of acquiring knowledge is called empiricism and it has many adherents in the history of philosophy such as John Locke. George Berkley, David Hume. Second, we can acquire knowledge by thinking with the use of our minds (what philosophers call the rational faculty). This is what rationalism advocates. (Some well- known rationalists in history are Rene Descartes, Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz). Let us now explore the first part of epistemology the process of acquiring knowledge 1 Reality To know is to know something. This "something" is what philosophers call reality, existence, being. Let us employ the term existence. Existence is everything there is (another name for it is the Universe [Peikoff 1990]). It includes everything we perceive (animals, plants, human beings, inanimate objects) and everything inside our heads (e.g., our thoughts and emotions) which represents our inner world. Existence is really all there is to know if nothing exists knowledge is impossible. 2. Perception Our first and only contact with reality is through our senses. Knowledge begins with perceptual knowledge. At first the senses give us knowledge of things or entities (what Aristotle calls primary substance) dog, cat, chair, table, man. Later we became aware not only of things but certain aspects of things like qualities (blue, hard, smoothi, quantities (seven inches or six pounds), relationship of, son of) even actions jumping, running. flying). These so called Aristotelian categories cannot be separated from the entities that have it. Red for example cannot be separated from red objects, walking cannot be separated from the person that walks, etc. 3. Concept After we perceive things we began to notice that some of the things we perceive are similar to other things. For example we see three individuals let's call them Juan, Pablo and Pedro who may have nothing in common at first glance. But when we compare them with another entity, a dog for example, suddenly their differences become insignificant. Their big difference to a dog highlights their similarity to one another (Binswanger 2014) We therefore grouped them into one class or group, named the group ["man" or "human being") and define what that group is to give it identity [Peikoff 1990). We now have a concept which according to one dictionary means "an abstract or generic idea generalized from particular instances" (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) 4. Proposition When we use concepts in order to classify or describe an "existent" (a particular that exist be it an object, a person, an action or event, etc) (Rand 1990) we use what philosophers call a proposition (Binswanger 2014). A proposition is a statement that expresses either an assertion or a denial (Copi, 2002) that an existent belongs to a class or possess certain attribute. Proposition is usually expressed in a declarative sentence. When I say, for example, that "Men are mortals. I am making an assertion of men which are affirmative in nature (thus the statement is an affirmative proposition). When I make an opposite claim however, "Men are not mortals" I am denying something about men and thus my statement is negative in nature (thus the proposition is called a negative proposition). 5. Inference How do we demonstrate that the statement is true? By providing an argument. According to Hurley an argument "is a group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reason to believe one of the others (the conclusion) (Hurley 2011). To clarify this definition let's give an example using the famous Socratic argument. Premise 1: All men are mortals Premise 2: Socrates is a man Conclusion: Therefore Socrates is mortal Here we have three related statements for propositions). The last statement beginning with the word "therefore is what we call a conclusion. A conclusion is a statement that we want to prove The first two statements are what we call premises (singular form: premise. A premise provide evidences, and proof to the conclusion. Activity #2 TRUTH OPINION Truth is knowledge validated and when we say validated we mean they are based on the facts of reality. Facts of reality are independent of your thoughts, feelings or preferences (Ayn Rand calls this the primacy of existence [Rand 1982]). That is the characteristic of truth. For example the statement "Jose Rizal died in 1896" is true. You may not like that statement or deny it strongly. That does not change the fact that the statement is true because it is based on what really happened in the past. There are many sources that can validate the truth of that statement if one cared to look. However when you say that "Jose Rizal is the greatest man who ever lived" you are stating your preference and not facts. This is an opinion. Now it is true that there are many facts about Rizal but that statement is asserting something that is beyond what the facts state. That statement represents not facts but your interpretation of facts which may reveal your biases. opinion truth Based on Based on the facts of emotions reality Open to Can be confirmed interpretation with other sources Independent of Cannot be one's interpretation, confirmed preferences and Inherently biased biases