Chapter Three
Chapter Three
existing ones improved; manufacturing and marketing techniques may also improve. Some examples of the
technological environment include disruptive technologies, artificial intelligence, IoT, new production processes,
and machine learning.
5. Natural environment
Natural environment also affects strategies. Positive climatic conditions may favor some firms. To support this
we give the example. The chairman stated. “Monsoon has also been kind and the excellent rains will give a boost
to agricultural production and consequently to the sale of fertilizers. The company chairman further stated: our
company is also considering setting up a foundation for environmental research, education information and eco-
regeneration.” All this is being done with a view to prepare the company to face the future environmental laws
and the emerging needs.
Micro-Environment/Industry analysis
Analysis of the industry environment is focused on the factors & conditions influencing the firm’s profitability
in the industry. An industry is a group of firms producing products that are close substitutes Firms that influence
one another including a rich mix of competitive strategies that companies use in pursuing strategic
competitiveness & above-average returns. Compared to the general environment, the industry environment has a
more direct effect on the firm’s strategic competitiveness and above-average returns
3
3.3 Porter’s Five Forces’ Model of Industry Analysis
Michael E. Porter of the Harvard School of Business Administration has developed a framework that helps
managers for analyzing the nature and extent of competition within an industry. He says that there are five
competitive forces, which determine the degree of competition within an industry. And the framework is known
as the Porter’s five forces model. This model focuses on five forces that shape competition within an industry.
The Porter’s “Five-Force” competition Model: - A key Analytical Tool
On the other hand, if the risk of new entry is low, established organizations could take advantage of this
opportunity to raise prices and earn greater returns. The strength of the competitive forces of potential rivals is
largely a function of the height of barriers to entry. The concept of barriers to entry implies that there are
significant costs in joining an industry. The greater the costs that potential competitors must bear, the greater are
the barriers to entry. High entry barriers keep potential competitors out of an industry even when industry returns
are high.
External factors are extracted after deep internal analysis of external environment. Obviously there are some
good and some bad for the company in the external environment. That’s the reason external factors are divided
into two categories opportunities and threats. Opportunities are the chances exist in the external environment, it
depends firm whether the firm is willing to exploit the opportunities or may be they ignore the opportunities due
6
to lack of resources. Threats are always evil for the firm, minimum no of threats in the external environment
open many doors for the firm. Maximum number of threats for the firm reduce their power in the industry.
Developing an EFE matrix is an intuitive process which works conceptually very much the same way like
creating the IFE matrix. An External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix can be developed in five steps:
1. List key external factors as identified in the external audit process. Include a total of from ten to twenty
factors, including both opportunities and threats affecting the firm and its industry. List the opportunities
first and then the threats. Be as specific as possible, using percentages, ratios, and comparative numbers
whenever possible.
2. Assign to each factor a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to 1.0 (very important). The weight
indicates the relative importance of that factor to being successful in the firm’s industry. Opportunities
often receive higher weights than threats, but threats too can receive high weights if they are especially
severe or threatening. Appropriate weights can be determined by comparing successful with
unsuccessful competitors or by discussing the factor and reaching a group consensus. The sum of all
weights assigned to the factors must equal 1.0.
3. Assign a 1 to 4 rating to each key external factor to indicate how effectively the firm’s current strategies
respond to the factor, where 4 = the response is superior, 3 = the response is above average, 2 = the
response is average, and 1 = the response is poor: Ratings are based on effectiveness of the firm’s
strategies. Ratings are thus company €‘based, whereas the weights in Step 2 are industry €‘based. It is
important to note that both threats and opportunities can receive a 1, 2, 3, or 4.
4. Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to determine a weighted score.
5. The weighted scores for each variable to determine the total weighted score for the organization.
Regardless of the number of key opportunities and threats included in an External Factor Evaluation (EFE)
Matrix, the highest possible total weighted score for an organization is 4.0 and the lowest possible total
weighted score is 1.0. The average total weighted score is 2.5. A total weighted score of 4.0 indicates that an
organization is responding in an outstanding way to existing opportunities and threats in its industry. In other
words, the firm’s strategies effectively take advantage of existing opportunities and minimize the potential
adverse effect of external threats. A total score of 1.0 indicates that the firm’s strategies are not capitalizing on
opportunities or avoiding external threats.
Example: An External factor evaluation of a company that manufactures and installs solar energy systems for
residential and commercial clients.
Key External Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score
Opportunities:
1. Growing government subsidies for solar energy 0.15 4 0.60
2. Increasing public awareness of climate change 0.10 3 0.30
7
3. Technological advancements in solar panel 0.12 3 0.36
efficiency.
4. Expanding market for residential solar installations. 0.10 4 0.40
5. Potential for partnerships with smart home 0.08 3 0.24
technology companies.
Threats:
6. Fluctuations in raw material prices (silicon). 0.13 2 0.26
7. Increasing competition from established energy 0.12 2 0.24
companies.
8. Potential changes in government energy policies 0.10 2 0.20
(negative)
9. Economic downturn affecting consumer spending 0.08 1 0.08
10. Rising interest rates affecting financing costs for 0.02 2 0.04
consumers.
Total: 1.00 2.72
Consumers, Distributors,
Governments, Competitors.
Suppliers,
Distribution
Distribution includes warehousing, distribution channels, distribution coverage, retail site locations, sales
territories, inventory levels and location, transportation carriers, wholesaling, and retailing.
Marketing Research Marketing research is the systematic gathering, recording, and analyzing of data about
problems relating to the marketing of goods and services. Marketing research can uncover critical strengths and
weaknesses, and marketing researchers employ numerous scales, instruments, procedures, concepts, and
techniques to gather information. Marketing research activities support all of the major business functions of an
organization. Organizations that possess excellent marketing research skills have a definite strength in pursuing
generic strategies.
Opportunity Analysis
The seventh function of marketing is opportunity analysis, which involves assessing the costs, benefits, and risks
associated with marketing decisions. Three steps are required to perform a cost/benefit analysis:
Compute the total costs associated with a decision,
Estimate the total benefits from the decision, and
Compare the total costs with the total benefits. As expected benefits exceed total costs, an opportunity
becomes more attractive. Sometimes the variables included in a cost/benefit analysis cannot be
quantified or even measured, but usually reasonable estimates can be made to allow the analysis to be
10
performed. One key factor to be considered is risk. Cost/benefit analyses should also be performed when
a company is evaluating alternative ways to be socially responsible.
3) Accounting / Finance
Financial condition is often considered the single best measure of a firm's competitive position and overall
attractiveness to investors. Determining an organization's financial strengths and weaknesses is essential to
formulating strategies effectively. A firm's liquidity, leverage, working capital, profitability, asset utilization,
cash flow, and equity can eliminate some strategies as being feasible alternatives. Financial factors often alter
existing strategies and change implementation plans.
Finance/Accounting Functions
Determining financial strengths and weaknesses key to strategy formulation
Investment decision (Capital budgeting)
Financing decision
Dividend decision
4) Production/Operations
The production/operations function of a business consists of all those activities that transform inputs into goods
and services. Production/operations management deals with inputs, transformations, and outputs that vary across
industries and markets. A manufacturing operation transforms or converts inputs such as raw materials, labor,
capital, machines, and facilities into finished goods and services.
5) Research And Development
The fifth major area of internal operations that should be examined for specific strengths and weaknesses is
research and development (R&D). Many firms today conduct no R&D, and yet many other companies depend
on successful R&D activities for survival. Firms pursuing a product development strategy especially need to
have a strong R&D orientation. The purpose of research and development are as follows:
Development of new products before competition
Improving product quality
Improving manufacturing processes to reduce costs. Organizations invest in R&D because they believe
that such investment will lead to superior product or services and give them competitive advantages.
Research and development expenditures are directed at developing new products before competitors do,
improving product quality, or improving manufacturing processes to reduce costs.
6) Management Information Systems
MIS is a general name for the academic discipline covering the application of information technology to
business problems. As an area of study it is also referred to as information technology management. The study of
information systems is usually a commerce and business administration discipline, and frequently involves
11
software engineering, but also distinguishes itself by concentrating on the integration of computer systems with
the aims of the organization.
The area of study should not be confused with computer science which is more theoretical in nature and deals
mainly with software creation, or computer engineering, which focuses more on the design of computer
hardware. IT service management is a practitioner-focused discipline centering on the same general domain. In
business, information systems support business processes and operations, decision-making, and competitive
strategies.
Value Chain Analysis (VCA)
Value chain analysis (VCA) refers to the process whereby a firm determines the costs associated with
organizational activities from purchasing raw materials to manufacturing product(s) to marketing those products.
VCA aims to identify where low-cost advantages or disadvantages exist anywhere along the value chain from
raw material to customer service activities. VCA can enable a firm to better identify its own strengths and
weaknesses, especially as compared to competitors’ value chain analyses and their own data examined over
time.
In order to better understand the activities leading to a competitive advantage, one can begin with the generic
value chain and then identify the relevant firm-specific activities. A linkage exists if the performance or cost of
one activity affects that of another. Competitive advantage may be obtained by optimizing and coordinating
linked activities. The value chain also is useful in outsourcing decisions.
Michael Porter suggested that the activities of a business could be grouped under two headings
(1) Primary Activities- those that are directly concerned with creating and delivering a product (e.g.
component assembly); and
(2) Support Activities which whilst they are not directly involved in production, may increase effectiveness or
efficiency (e.g. HRM).
Value Chain Analysis is one way of identifying which activities are best undertaken by a business and which are
best provided by others ("out sourced"). The value chain shows how a product moves from the raw-material
stage to the final customer.
The goal of these activities is to create value that exceeds the cost of providing the product or service, thus
generating a profit margin.
• Inbound logistics include the receiving, warehousing, and inventory control of input materials.
• Operations are the value-creating activities that transform the inputs into the final product.
12
Outbound logistics are the activities required to get the finished product to the customer, including
warehousing, order fulfillment, etc.
• Marketing & Sales are those activities associated with getting buyers to purchase the product, including
channel selection, advertising, pricing, etc.
• Service activities are those that maintain and enhance the product's value including customer support,
repair services, etc.
Support Activities
The primary value chain activities described above are facilitated by support activities. Porter identified four
generic categories of support activities, the details of which are industry-specific
• Procurement the function of purchasing the raw materials and other inputs used in the value-creating
activities
• Technology Development includes research and development, process automation, and other
technology development used to support the value-chain activities
• Human Resource Management the activities associated with recruiting development, and
compensation of employees
• Firm Infrastructure includes activities such as finance, legal, quality management, etc
Benchmarking
Benchmarking is an analytical tool used to determine whether a firm’s value chain activities are competitive
compared to rivals and thus conducive to winning in the marketplace. Benchmarking entails measuring costs of
value chain activities across an industry to determine “best practices” among competing firms for the purpose of
duplicating or improving upon those best practices. Benchmarking enables a firm to take action to improve its
competitiveness by identifying (and improving upon) value chain activities where rival firms have comparative
advantages in cost, service, reputation, or operation.
3.6. Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
The Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix is a strategic tool used in the strategy formulation process. It
summarizes and evaluates the major strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of a business. The IFE
Matrix provides a foundation for identifying and assessing the internal factors that are critical to the success of
an organization.
Steps to Develop an IFE Matrix
The IFE Matrix can be developed in five key steps:
Step 1: List Key Internal Factors
Action: Identify and list key internal factors, including both strengths and weaknesses, as determined
during the internal audit process.
Details: Typically, a total of 10 to 20 internal factors are included. Strengths should be listed first, followed
by weaknesses. Be as specific as possible, using percentages, ratios, and comparative numbers to define
these factors.
13
Step 2: Assign Weights
Action: Assign a weight to each factor, ranging from 0.00 (not important) to 1.00 (all-important).
Details: The weight reflects the relative importance of the factor in the firm’s industry. Factors that have
the greatest effect on organizational performance should be given the highest weights. The sum of all
weights must equal 1.0.
Step 3: Assign Ratings
Action: Assign a rating to each factor to indicate its nature:
1 = Major Weakness 3 = Minor Strength
2 = Minor Weakness 4 = Major Strength
Details: Note that strengths should receive a rating of 3 or 4, while weaknesses should receive a rating of 1
or 2. Ratings are company-based, meaning they are specific to the organization, while weights are industry-
based.
Step 4: Calculate Weighted Scores
Action: Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to determine a weighted score for each variable.
Details: This step converts the subjective ratings into quantifiable scores that reflect the importance of
each factor to the organization.
Step 5: Determine the Total Weighted Score
Action: Sum the weighted scores for each factor to determine the total weighted score for the
organization.
Details: The total weighted score provides an overall measure of the organization’s internal strengths
and weaknesses.
14
Evaluating the IFE Matrix
Scoring: Regardless of the number of factors included, the total weighted score can range from a
low of 1.0 to a high of 4.0, with the average score being 2.5.
Scores below 2.5: Indicate that the organization is weak internally.
Scores above 2.5: Indicate that the organization has a strong internal position.
The IFE Matrix is an important tool for strategy formulation. In multidivisional firms, each division or
strategic business unit should construct its own IFE Matrix. These divisional matrices can then be
integrated to develop an overall corporate IFE Matrix.
Page 15