chapter4
chapter4
p̂2 1
Ĥ = + mω 2 x̂2 . (4.1)
2m 2
The eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are a set of energy levels labelled |ni,
where n is an integer, with equally spaced energies En = (n + 1/2)~ω. We can
think of the energy being quantised into equal packets of energy each of energy
~ω. It is convenient to study QHO using ladder operators
r
mω
â = (x̂ + ip̂) ↠= (â)† (4.2)
2~
These operators are called lowering and raising operators (or annihilation and
104 Chapter 4. Quantum Light, Atoms and the Interaction Picture
and satisfy the commutation relation [â, ↠] = 1. Combining these expressions
we find:
↠â|ni = n|ni (4.4)
The operator ↠â is called the number operator since its eigenvalue is n the number
of excitations in state |ni.
Since
r
~
x̂ = (↠+ â)
r 2mω (4.5)
~
p̂ = i(↠− â)
2mω
we can rewrite the Hamiltonian in the ladder operator picture as
1 ∂2
2
∇ − 2 2 E=0 (4.8)
c ∂t
where 1/c2 = µ0 0 .
We can solve this equation using the separation of variables technique, writing
E(r, t) = u(r)T (t) where r is the vector position and t is time,
ω2
∇2 u(r) = − u(r). (4.10)
c2
This is a vector equation, and has many solutions depending on ω and boundary
conditions (i.e. the presence of conducting surfaces such as mirrors).
The temporal equation takes the form of a simple Harmonic oscillator equation
∂ 2 T (t)
2
= −ω 2 T (t) (4.11)
∂t
the solutions of which will have the form exp[±iωt].
Labelling the solutions to these equations Tj (t) and uj (r), where ωj is the
associated frequency, to obtain a general solution we would compute all the solu-
tions to these equations for all values of ω and combine them linearly
X
E(r, t) = αj uj (r)Tj (t) (4.12)
j
where E0j is a unit vector representing the polarisation of the mode and the αj
coefficients depend on the initial conditions. We can think of this classical solution
as representing a sum of independent oscillators, each associated with a particular
106 Chapter 4. Quantum Light, Atoms and the Interaction Picture
where E0j has the units of electric field and other quantities are dimensionless.
Optical Cavities
In free space, light propagates at speed c, however, it is possible to trap light inside
a set of mirrors, called a cavity. The quantum properties of light are more easily
probed and, as we shall see below, interactions with atoms can be enhanced or
suppressed. In particular, it is possible to cause the atom to interact with a single
mode alone. This single mode can be studied as an ideal quantum oscillator,
and such interactions have been an important experimental testing ground for the
predictions of quantum mechanics.
Below we shall consider the interaction between an atom and a single cavity
mode. We shall write the eigenstates of the mode |ni and the mode operators a
and a† . The Hamiltonian for the mode is written
Although very simple, this model is a good approximation for an atom that is
interacting with a light mode at resonance, e.g. when the atomic transition energy
~ωa is equal to the energy of a photon in the mode ~ωj , i.e. when ωa = ωj , but all
transitions to other states are off resonance.
For a two-level atom it is straight-forward to derive a general form for the
dipole moment operator. The dipole operator D̂ for a two-level system can only
have 4 possible matrix elements and we analyse those in turn.
The dipole moment operator is proportional to the displacement operator r̂
for the displacement between electron and positive atomic core. The diagonal
elements of D̂ are thus proportional to expectations of r̂,
hg|D̂|gi = −ehg|r̂|gi
(4.19)
he|D̂|ei = −ehe|r̂|ei
For most atomic states these elements are zero since the electron wave-function is
symmetric about the nucleus (and thus the mean displacement is zero). We will
therefore assume that hg|D̂|gi = he|D̂|ei = 0.
This leaves the off-diagonal elements hg|D̂|ei = he|D̂|gi∗ . We shall leave
these general, except to assume that they are real (this assumption does not change
the physics and simplifies our analysis). The dipole moment is a 3-D vector in
space, and thus the matrix elements have three components. We thus have
where d~ is a real 3-D vector, which depends upon the atomic states in question.
Thus we obtain a simple form for D̂:
~
D̂ = d(|gihe| + |eihg|). (4.21)
~
where ~g(r) = (−d·u(r)E0 ) represents the strength of the coupling between light
and atom.
However, to save space, and since notationally atom states and operators look very
different to light states and operators, it is conventional not to write the tensor
products.
When we write operators â and ↠, we are abbreviating 1 ⊗ â and 1 ⊗ â†
respectively. Likewise we write |gihe| for |gihe| ⊗ 1 etc.
These operators thus act on the joint states as in the following examples:
√ √
â|g, ni = n|g, n − 1i ↠|g, ni = n + 1|g, n + 1i
(4.24)
|gihe||e, ni = |g, ni |gihe||g, ni = 0
We are now able to write down the full Hamiltonian for the atom and light
mode, including their interaction:
H = ~ωj (↠â + 1/2) + ~ωa |eihe| + ~g(r)(â + ↠)(|gihe| + |eihg|) (4.25)
H = H0 + V (4.27)
where H0 is a solved Hamiltonian (i.e. whose eigenstates and energies are known).
Typically H0 will represent the Hamiltonian for the system if it were not interact-
ing, and V will represent extra terms introduced due to the interaction. We can
see that equation (1.25) is of this form, with
This is sometimes called the free-evolution operator, and represents the dynamics
we would see if no interaction were present.
Let |ψiS (t) represent the time-evolving state in the Schrödinger picture. In
the interaction picture, we “remove” from this state the dynamics due to H0 , by
defining the interaction picture state |ψiI (t) as follows:
Since U0 (t)† is the inverse of U0 (t), this is equivalent to “unwinding” the evolution
in the state just due to H0 alone. It is usually easier to calculate |ψiI (t) (we shall
see below how to do this), and then apply U0 (t) to recover the Schrödinger picture.
Expectation values must be the same in all pictures, which mean that observ-
ables ÔI (t) in the interaction picture must evolve as follows
where ÔS is the Schrödinger picture observable. You can see that in the Interaction
picture, similar to the Heisenberg picture, observables evolve in time, however,
they evolve under U0 (t) rather than the full evolution operator U (t). The following
table summarises the similarities and differences between all three pictures.
Picture Observables States
Schrödinger ÔS |ψ(t)iS = U (t)|ψ(0)iS
Heisenberg ÔH = U † (t)ÔS U (t) |ψiH = |ψ(0)iS
Interaction ÔI = U0† (t)ÔS U0 (t) |ψ(t)iI = U0† (t)|ψ(t)iS
All three pictures coincide at t = 0.
As an indication of why the Interaction picture will simplify calculations, con-
sider the following example. Let |φk i represent an orthonormal basis. We can
therefore represent an Interaction picture state as
X
|ψ(t)iI = cj (t)|φk i (4.33)
j
From this we see that the interaction picture focuses on the evolution of co-
efficients cj (t), ignoring the phases exp[−iEj t/~] which are due to the non-
interaction part of the Hamiltonian.
∂
i~ |ψS (t)i = H|ψS (t)i (4.35)
∂t
112 Chapter 4. Quantum Light, Atoms and the Interaction Picture
and substitute in the defining identity |ψ(t)iS = U0 (t)|ψ(t)iI . We then use the
product rule to transform the left-hand-side of the above equation:
∂ ∂|ψ(t)iI ∂U0 (t)
i~ U0 (t)|ψ(t)iI = i~ U0 (t) + |ψ(t)iI
∂t ∂t ∂t
(4.36)
∂|ψ(t)iI −iH0
= i~ U0 (t) + U0 (t)|ψ(t)iI
∂t ~
Hence,
∂|ψ(t)iI
i~U0 (t) + H0 U0 (t)|ψ(t)iI = HU0 (t)|ψ(t)iI (4.37)
∂t
and multiplying from the left by U0† (t) and rearranging, we obtain
∂|ψ(t)iI
i~ = U0† (t)(H − H0 )U0 (t)|ψ(t)iI = U0† (t)V U0 (t)|ψ(t)iI (4.38)
∂t
This has a very similar form to the standard Schrödinger equation, and indeed
if we define an Interaction Picture Hamiltonian HI = U0† (t)V U0 (t), we have
derived the Interaction Picture Schrödinger equation,
∂|ψ(t)iI
i~ = HI |ψ(t)iI (4.39)
∂t
This has exactly the same form as the standard SE and we can use the same tech-
niques to solve it. The key difference is that the Interaction Picture Hamiltonian
has few terms in it, simplifying the calculations.
and
V = ~g(r)(â + ↠)(|gihe| + |eihg|) (4.41)
We will study this evolution in the interaction picture. To do so we need
to compute the Interaction Picture Hamiltonian HI = U0† (t)V U0 (t). This seems
daunting at first sight, but we can break the calculation down. The first observation
is that ↠â and |eihe| commute, so we can write
U0 (t) = exp[−iωj (↠â + 1/2)t] exp[−iωa |eihe|t] (4.42)
Since the mode operators â and ↠commute with the atomic operators |gihe|, etc.,
we can group the two different types of operator in HI together
HI = U0† (t)V U0 (t)
= ~g(r) exp[+iωj (↠â + 1/2)t](â + ↠) exp[−iωj (↠â + 1/2)t] (4.43)
exp[+iωa |eihe|t](|gihe| + |eihg|) exp[−iωa |eihe|t]
We then proceed term by term
exp[+iωj (↠â + 1/2)t]â exp[−iωj (↠â + 1/2)t]
(4.44)
= exp[+iωj ↠ât]â exp[−iωj ↠ât]
We can simplify this by using
exp[+iωj ↠ât]|ni = exp[+iωj nt]|ni (4.45)
which holds because |ni is an eigenstate of ↠â with eigenvalue n, and can be
verified using the power series for the exponential, and also
X√
â = n + 1|nihn + 1| (4.46)
n
to derive
exp[+iωj ↠ât]â exp[−iωj ↠ât]
X√
= n + 1 exp[+iωj nt]|nihn + 1| exp[−iωj (n + 1)t]
n (4.47)
X√
= exp[−iωj t] n + 1|nihn + 1| = exp[−iωj t]â
n
(4.51)
We mentioned above that an atom and cavity mode have a particularly strong
interaction when they are at resonance, i.e. when the transition energy ~ωa is close
to photon energy ~ωj . Here we shall assume exact resonance ωa = ωj = ω where
we shall use ω to stand for either quantity.
At resonance, the interaction picture Hamiltonian is
A good way to remember which terms are retained in the RWA is to note that
the terms we kept correspond to an energy conserving process (absorbtion of a
photon + excitation of atom, or emission of photon plus deexcitation of the atom),
whereas the terms we dropped describe a non-energy conserving process (photon
absorbed plus atom excited, etc.).
Rabi oscillation occurs when the cavity is prepared in any Fock state |ni, and
via similar methods to those used here one can show that a similar oscillation
occurs when the system is prepared in |g, ni. Indeed we find
√ √
|ψ(t)iI = cos( ngt)|g, ni − i sin( ngt)|e, n − 1i. (4.60)