Course Title: Introduction to Business

Course Code: (BUS101)

Section: 22 Group No: 06

First Draft of Term Paper

Term Paper on “Evaluating the Effectiveness of CSR
programs’’
Submitted By:
Name ID participation Marks
JUNAYED IBNE 2024-3-10-227 Discussion,Conclusion
ABEDIN
AL-amin 2024-3-10-225 Methodology,Result/findings

ABU SALEH 2024-3-10-360 Introduction,Literature

KHAN review,References
Submitted to: Razib Hossain

Date of submission:09.01.2025

1|Page
 ABSTRACT
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a crucial aspect of modern
business practices. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of CSR programs by
examining their impacts on both businesses and society. A combination of
literature review and case study analysis was conducted to understand the
methodologies, outcomes, and challenges of CSR initiatives. Findings suggest
that effective CSR programs benefit businesses through enhanced reputation,
customer loyalty, and employee satisfaction, while addressing critical social
and environmental issues. The paper also highlights areas for improvement to
enhance the long-term impact of CSR efforts.

2|Page
Table of contents
Introduction……………………………………………………………………… 4
Literature review……………………………………………………………... 5
Methodology……………………………………………………………………. 8
Results/Findings……………………………………………………………….. 10
Discussion…………………………………………………………………………. 11
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………... 12
Refereces………………………………………………………………………….. 13

3|Page
1.Introduction
In the contemporary business environment, the concept of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) has assumed a pivotal role, significantly influencing
sustainable development and social welfare. Recognized as a cornerstone in
modern business operations, CSR represents a paradigm shift from being a
discretionary practice to a strategic imperative, reflecting businesses’
acknowledgment of their substantial impact on society and the
environment.This study endeavors to critically evaluate the role of CSR in
promoting sustainable development and enhancing the social welfare of
communities, employing advanced bibliometric analysis techniques for a
comprehensive understanding.This evaluation delves into various
interpretations and models of CSR,highlighting its multidimensional scope that
encapsulates economic, environmental, and social responsibilities. The
exploration of these facets aims to shed light on the complex nature of CSR.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has undergone a signifcant evolution,
as it has been reflecting the changing perceptions of the role of business in
society and its impact on the environment and stakeholders. This
introduction traces the historical development of CSR, highlighting its
transformation from a philanthropic concept to a strategic imperative for
sustainable development. Historically, CSR emerged from a basic
understanding of philanthropy and community support, gradually
expanding to include ethical business practices, environmental stewardship,
and social welfare. Initially, CSR efforts were largely seen as voluntary or
additional activities of businesses, not integral to their core operations.
However, over time, CSR has evolved to be recognized as a company’s
commitment to conduct its business in an ethically responsible way that
considers its impact on society and the environment. The link between
CSR and sustainable development has become increasingly significant.The
effectiveness of CSR in achieving sustainable development and social welfare
is crucial not only for academicians and business leaders but also for
policymakers and stakeholders in shaping a more equitable and
sustainable future. In conclusion, this academic inquiry, enhanced by
bibliometric analysis, presents a nuanced examination of CSR’s role in
harmonizing business objectives with societal needs, charting a course for
a sustainable and socially responsible future.

4|Page
2. literature review
2.1 Historical Development of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR)

The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved significantly

over the decades, becoming a pivotal aspect of contemporary business ethics
and corporate governance. This evolution reflects a complex interplay of
socioeconomic factors, ethical theories, and global trends. Historically, the
roots of CSR can be traced back to the early 20th century, when initial
discussions were primarily centered around the philanthropic efforts of
corporations. However, the scope of CSR has expanded profoundly since then,
encompassing not just philanthropy but also environmental stewardship,
ethical labor practices, and sustainable development. The genesis of CSR can
be observed in the early industrial age, marked by the burgeoning of corporate
influence and the subsequent societal expectations for ethical business
conduct. This period witnessed the first instances of corporate philanthropy, a
precursor to modern CSR. The post-World War II era marked a significant shift,
with the emergence of social movements emphasizing civil rights,
environmental concerns, and labor rights, which substantially influenced
corporate accountability and responsibility narratives. In the latter half of the
20th century, academic discourse began to rigorously explore CSR, leading to
various theories and models that framed CSR within the context of corporate
profitability, stakeholder theory, and ethical obligations. The seminal works of
scholars such as Archie Carroll, who proposed the Pyramid of Corporate Social
Responsibility, have been instrumental in shaping contemporary
understandings of CSR.

2.2 Corporate social responsibility and social welfare

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved from a mere business

catchphrase to a significant component of corporate strategy, impacting social
welfare globally. This literature review critically examines the development,
implementation, and impact of CSR on social welfare, drawing upon a range of
scholarly sources. In this regard, the historical context and theoretical
frameworks of CSR’s genesis are rooted in the moral and ethical obligations of
corporations, a concept that has significantly evolved. Carroll (1991) presents
the seminal ‘Pyramid of CSR’, advocating for a multi-faceted approach to CSR

5|Page
that balances economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities.
However, Friedman (1970) famously contended that a corporation’s primary
responsibility is to its shareholders. These opposing viewpoints highlight the
ongoing debate on the extent of corporate responsibilities.
On the other hand, CSR’s impact on Social Welfare often directly targets social
welfare enhancement. Bhattacharya (2008) illustrate how strategic CSR
initiatives align corporate and societal interests, yielding mutual benefits.
However, the effectiveness of these initiatives in genuinely contributing to
social welfare is debated. Matten and Moon (2008), provide insights into the
contribution of CSR to sustainable development, yet this relationship is
complex and multi-dimensional, often varying across different socio-economic
contexts. Furthermore, regarding CSR strategies and implementation, the
integration of CSR into corporate strategy is nuanced and varies widely. Porter
and Kramer (2006) argue for creating shared value, suggesting that the
intersection of business and social needs can lead to more sustainable and
impactful CSR. However, the implementation of CSR strategies is troubled with
challenges, including aligning them with core business operations and
measuring their impact effectively (McWilliams, Siegel, & Wright, 2006).
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Social Welfare represent integral
facets within the contemporary business and societal landscape. CSR, as
conceptualized by Carroll (1999), extends beyond mere economic
considerations to encompass legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations,
marking a paradigm shift toward stakeholder inclusivity and societal well-
being. Porter and Kramer (2006) further enrich this narrative by introducing
the notion of shared value, positing that businesses can simultaneously
generate economic value and address societal challenges. The interplay
between CSR and Social Welfare is underscored by a generally positive
correlation with corporate financial performance as identified by Margolis and
Walsh (2003), suggesting that responsible business practices can yield mutually
beneficial outcomes. Yet, the complexity of this relationship is highlighted by
Brammer and Millington (2008), who notes the influence of external factors
such as market conditions and the nature of CSR investments. Moreover, the
future directions and emerging trends of the future of CSR lie in addressing
global challenges such as climate change and inequality. The rise of social
entrepreneurship and sustainability as components of CSR points towards a
more integrated approach. However, there remains a need for more rigorous
research in this field to ascertain the true impact of CSR on social welfare. The
research literature reveals a complex and multifaceted picture of CSR’s role in
enhancing social welfare. While there are instances of successful CSR
implementations, the field is loaded with challenges, including measuring
impact, ensuring authenticity, and adapting to diverse global contexts. Future

6|Page
research should focus on these areas to better understand and maximize the
potential of CSR in contributing to social welfare.

2.3 Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable

Development

The intertwining of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable

Development has become increasingly relevant in contemporary academic
discussion. This review critically examines the evolving role of CSR in promoting
sustainable development, analyzing theoretical frameworks, implementation
strategies, and the broader implications for society and the environment.
Theoretical foundations and evolution of CSR’s role in sustainable development
are rooted in its evolution from a purely philanthropic practice to a strategic
business imperative. Carroll’s CSR Pyramid (1991) and Friedman’s (1970)
economy-centric view provide foundational perspectives.This evolution reflects
the growing recognition of the environmental and social impacts of corporate
activities.A critical issue in linking CSR with sustainable development is the
measurement of impact. Bhattacharya et al. (2008) discuss methodologies for
assessing CSR initiatives, yet these often lack standardization and may not fully
capture long-term sustainability impacts. This gap highlights the need for more
robust and comprehensive metrics that align with global sustainability
benchmarks. Corporate Motivations and Ethical Considerations of the
motivations behind CSR initiatives are diverse, ranging from ethical
commitments to strategic business objectives. Critiques of CSR, such as
accusations of greenwashing, question the authenticity of corporate
sustainability efforts. These critiques suggest a need for greater transparency
and accountability in CSR practices to ensure they contribute meaningfully to
sustainable development.
Moreover, according to Fasoli, (2017), the future Directions, and emerging
trends in the future of CSR in sustainable development are likely to be shaped
by global challenges like climate change, resource scarcity, and social
inequality. Emerging trends, including social entrepreneurship and impact
investing, point towards innovative approaches to aligning business operations
with sustainability goals. However, the need for empirical research to validate
these approaches and assess their impact remains crucial. This review
highlights the evolving nature of CSR within the context of sustainable
development. The existing literature provides insights into how CSR has
transitioned from a secondary concern to a central strategy for achieving
sustainable development goals.
Therefore, researchers underscore the complex relationship between CSR and
sustainable development. While there is evidence of CSR initiatives
7|Page
contributing positively to sustainable development, significant challenges and
criticisms remain.Future research should focus on developing more robust
methodologies for measuring the impact of CSR on sustainable development,
understanding the motivations behind CSR initiatives, and exploring innovative
strategies for aligning business practices with sustainability goals.

3. Methodology
The methodology of a CSR program typically involves the following steps:

3.1 Assessment and Planning:

Needs Assessment: Identify the specific social and environmental issues
that the company can address effectively. This may involve community
surveys, stakeholder engagement, and data analysis.

Goal Setting: Define clear, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-

bound (SMART) goals for the CSR program.

Strategy Development: Determine the specific initiatives and activities that

will be undertaken to achieve the goals. This may include community
development projects, environmental conservation efforts, employee
volunteer programs, or ethical business practices.

3.2 Implementation:

Resource Allocation: Allocate necessary resources, including budget,

personnel, and materials, to support the CSR initiatives.

Project Management: Implement the planned activities effectively,

ensuring proper coordination and communication among stakeholders.

Monitoring and Evaluation: Track progress towards the goals, collect data
on the impact of the initiatives, and make necessary adjustments to the
plan.

3.3 Communication and Reporting:

8|Page
 Transparency: Communicate the CSR activities and their impact to
stakeholders, including employees, customers, investors, and the
community.

Reporting: Prepare regular reports on the progress and outcomes of the

CSR program, ensuring accountability and transparency.

3.4 Continuous Improvement:

Evaluation: Regularly evaluate the effectiveness of the CSR program and

identify areas for improvement.

Adaptation: Adjust the program based on the evaluation findings and

changing needs of stakeholders and the community. Here are some
additional considerations for developing a successful CSR methodology.

Stakeholder Engagement: Involve stakeholders, including employees,

customers, suppliers, and community members, in the planning,
implementation, and evaluation of the CSR program.

Integration with Business Strategy: Align CSR initiatives with the company's
overall business strategy to ensure sustainability and long-term impact.

Measurement and Reporting: Use appropriate metrics to measure the

social and environmental impact of the CSR program and report on the
results transparently.

Innovation: Continuously explore innovative approaches to CSR that

address emerging social and environmental challenges.

By following a well-defined methodology and continuously improving the

program, companies can create meaningful and sustainable CSR initiatives
that benefit both the business and society.

4.Results/Findings
The results of the CSR program can be divided into two parts.
9|Page
1: Impact on the business
2 : Impact on society

1. Impact on the Business: A company can benefit from CSR programs in

various ways, such as: Improved brand image: Social and environmental
responsibility enhances the company’s reputation. Increased customer trust:
Fulfilling social responsibilities makes customers more inclined to use the
company’s products or services. Boosted employee morale: Employees
participating in CSR activities experience higher satisfaction and productivity.
Attracting investors: Responsible business practices make the company more
appealing to investors.

2. Impact on Society CSR programs can play a significant role in societal

development, such as: Social improvement: Addressing education, healthcare,
poverty alleviation, or creating employment opportunities. Environmental
impact: Conserving the environment, reducing carbon emissions, or adopting
recyclable technologies. Development of local communities: Supporting the
improvement of the living standards of local people. Long-term sustainable
development: Preserving sustainable infrastructure and natural resources for
future generations.

10 | P a g e
5.Discussion
Discussion about Evaluating the Effectiveness of CSR Programs

When evaluating the effectiveness of CSR programs, it's important to consider

both the business benefits and the social/environmental impact

Balancing Business and Social Goals: It's crucial to find a balance between the
company's financial goals and its social or environmental responsibilities. A
successful CSR program should benefit both the company and society.

Short-Term vs. Long-Term Impact: Some CSR results may take time to
show.
It’s important to think about both short-term achievements and the long-term
effects of the program.

Transparency and Accountability: Companies need to be open about their

CSR efforts, including goals, actions, and results. This builds trust with
stakeholders and holds the company accountable for its impact.

Stakeholder Involvement: Getting feedback from employees, customers, and

communities can help evaluate the success of CSR initiatives. However,
managing different opinions can be challenging.

External Benchmarks and Standards: Comparing your CSR program to

industry standards (like GRI or UN SDGs) helps measure how well it’s doing
and ensures you are following best practices.

Impact on Company Culture: CSR can improve company culture by boosting

employee satisfaction and loyalty. However, measuring these cultural changes
can be tricky.

New Tools for Measuring CSR: As technology advances, new tools like
sustainability software or blockchain are helping companies track CSR
performance more easily and accurately.

11 | P a g e
6.Conclusion
In conclusion, evaluating the effectiveness of CSR programs is an important
process that helps companies understand how well their efforts are making a
difference. It’s not enough to just launch a CSR initiative; businesses need to
regularly assess whether their programs are achieving the goals they set for both
social good and business success. This involves measuring both the immediate
results and the long-term impact, as many CSR outcomes take time to become
visible.

Another key aspect of evaluating CSR is gathering feedback from different

stakeholders, such as employees, customers, and communities. This feedback is
crucial because it shows whether the program is truly benefiting those it aims to
help. Companies also need to compare their CSR performance with industry
standards or best practices to make sure they are staying on track and meeting
global expectations.

Finally, while the tangible results of CSR—like reduced carbon emissions or

increased donations—are important, it’s also essential to recognize the
intangible benefits, such as improved employee morale, stronger community
relationships, and enhanced brand reputation. These benefits, although harder
to measure, play a huge role in the long-term success of the program.
By regularly evaluating their CSR programs, companies can make sure they are
achieving their goals, creating real value for society, and improving their
business performance. A strong and effective CSR program not only helps build
a positive image but also contributes to a better world.

12 | P a g e
References
Abdullah, N., & Lim, A. (2023). The Incorporating Sustainable and Green IT
Practices in Modern IT Service Operations for an Environmentally Conscious
Future. Journal of Sustainable Technologies and Infrastructure Planning, 7(3),
17-47.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On Corporate Social Responsibility,
Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work. Journal of
Management, 45(3), 1057-1086 https:// doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691575
Allen, C., & Clouth, S. (2012). Green Economy, Green Growth, and Low-Carbon
Development - history, definitions and a guide to recent publications. Division
for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
United Nations, New York.
Anupam S., & Kiran, R. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives of
Major Companies of India with Focus on Health, Education and Environment.
African Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 4 (3): 95-105.
https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ajbas.2012.4.3.1593
Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Understanding
the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate
social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 12(3), 760.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030760
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and
the Ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51-79.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623
Benckendorff, P., Zehrer, A. (2013). A network analysis of tourism research.
Annals of tourism research, 43, 121e149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005
Bergkamp, L. (2002). Corporate governance and social responsibility: a new
sustainability paradigm? European Energy and Environmental Law Review,
11(5), 136 – 152. https://doi. org/10.54648/5092567
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why,
and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California
Management Review, 47(1), 9-24. https://doi. org/10.2307/41166284
Bhattacharya, C., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social
responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2),
37-44.

13 | P a g e