Lecture 2 Types of Research Projects
Lecture 2 Types of Research Projects
2.1 Objectives
To qualify for a patent an invention must pass a test of originality--that is, be sufficiently
different from previous inventions. Most inventions are minor improvements on existing
inventions which do not qualify for patents. Only a small percent of patented inventions have
any economic value.
Many current innovations are the result of applying new technology in (1)
manufacturing and (2) processing of business and government paperwork.
Empirically, better performance is not achieved by the new technology to
improve the performance of the old process. Rather, the manufacturing or
paperwork process is redesigned from ground up to make optimal use of the
new combination of technology and people. A portion of the performance gain
is from carefully analyzing the process to be replaced and asking what really
needs to be done to maximize profits. In the business media, this is the origin of
the word "reorganization".
In its purest sense, “invention” can be defined as the creation of a product or introduction of a
process for the first time. “Innovation,” on the other hand, occurs if someone improves on or makes a
significant contribution to an existing product, process or service.
Example one: Consider the microprocessor. Someone invented the microprocessor. But by itself, the
microprocessor was nothing more than another piece on the circuit board. It’s what was done with
that piece — the hundreds of thousands of products, processes and services that evolved from the
invention of the microprocessor — that required innovation.
Example two: Consider the Mpesa money transfer system in Kenya. Someone invented the Mpesa
system. Initially the Mpesa system was to transfer money from person to person using mobile phones.
But over time many other services have been added17
such as: Lipan a Mpesa for bill payment and
purchase of goods via Mpesa etc, — the additional services on Mpesa required innovation
2.2.3 Interactions between Discovery, Invention and Innovation
It is important to note several features concerning the interaction between
discovery, invention and innovation.
a) Invention is promoted by discoveries in the natural sciences and more recently
the biological sciences; whereas, innovation is promoted by discoveries in the
industrial engineering, the social sciences and the business disciplines.
Examples:
Discovery of the properties of iron led to invention of iron tools such as
hammer etc
Discovery of electrons in cathode ray tube led to invention of television
Discovery in industrial
Leads to Innovation
engineering, social
sciences and business
disciplines
Figure 2: From discovery in industrial engineering, social sciences and Business disciplines
to technological invention
Examples:
Discovering that the reason why people do not adopt mobile banking is
poor security can lead to innovative ways of designing a more secure
mobile banking system
18
Discovering that the reason why customers avoid a business is slow
service can lead to the business adopting an innovative service delivery
system e.g. an online system.
b) The interaction between discovery and invention is a two-way street.
Obviously, as science advances, it produces opportunities to create new
inventions. However, the development of the full economic value of an
invention requires massive discoveries for many inventions. For example, the
modern airplane required the scientific development of aerodynamics. The
economic development of superconductivity will require the physicists to
develop a theory of superconductivity. The interaction between scientific
discovery and Innovation is such that scientific knowledge allows us to build
new technologies, which often allow us to make new observations about the
world, which, in turn, allow us to build even more scientific knowledge,
which then inspires another technology … and so on. This interaction is
summarized in Figure 3
Invention Leads to
Discovery
Figure 3: Interaction between scientific discovery and technological invention
19
Case example of how scientific discovery and technological innovations propel
each other forward
In 1897, physicists discovered that the cathode rays in the cathode ray tube were
actually streams of electrons. The discovery of the electron lead to the discovery of
the atomic nucleus in 1910. On the technological front, the cathode ray tube slowly
evolved into the television (which is constructed from a cathode ray tube with the
electron beam deflected in ways that produce an image on a screen) and, eventually,
into many sorts of image monitors.
In 1895, the German physicist Wilhem Roentgen noticed that his cathode ray tube
seemed to be producing some other sort of ray in addition to the lights inside the
tube. These new rays were invisible but caused a screen in his laboratory to light up.
He tried to block the rays, but they passed right through paper, copper, and
aluminum, but not lead. And not bone. Roentgen noticed that the rays revealed the
faint shadow of the bones in his hand! Roentgen had discovered X-rays, a form of
electromagnetic radiation. This discovery shortly lead to the invention of the X-ray
machine, which would evolved into the CT scan machine which would became
essential to non-invasive medical diagnoses. Additionally, the discovery of X-rays
would eventually lead to the development of X-ray telescopes to detect radiation
emitted by objects in deep space. The discovery of X-rays also pointed William and
William Bragg (a father-son team) in 1913 and 1914 to the idea that X-rays could
be used to figure out the arrangements of atoms in a crystal. This works a bit like
trying to figure out the size and shape of a building based on the shadow it casts:
you can work backwards from the shape of the shadow to make a guess at the
building's dimensions.
20
Case example Continued
When X-rays are passed through a crystal, some of the X-rays are bent or spread out
(i.e., diffracted) by the atoms in the crystal. You can then extrapolate backwards
from the locations of the deflected X-rays to figure out the relative locations of the
crystal atoms. This technique is known as X-ray crystallography, and it has
profoundly influenced the course of science by providing snapshots of molecular
structures.
Perhaps most notably, Rosalind Franklin used X-ray crystallography to help
uncover the structure of the key molecule of life: DNA. In 1952, Franklin, like
James Watson and Francis Crick, was working on the structure of DNA but from a
different angle. Franklin was painstakingly producing diffracted images of DNA,
while Watson and Crick were trying out different structures using tinker-toy models
of the component molecules. In fact, Franklin had already proposed a double helical
form for the molecule when, in 1953, a colleague showed Franklin's most telling
image to Watson. That picture convinced Watson and Crick that the molecule was a
double helix and pointed to the arrangement of atoms within that helix. Over the
next few weeks, the famous pair would use their models to correctly work out the
chemical details of DNA.
The impact of the discovery of DNA's structure on scientific research, medicine,
agriculture, conservation, and other social issues has been wide-ranging — so much
so, that it is difficult to pick out which threads of influence to follow. To choose just
one, understanding the structure of DNA (along with many other inputs) eventually
allowed biologists to develop a quick and easy method for copying very small
amounts of DNA, known as PCR — the polymerase chain reaction. This technique
(developed in the 1980s), in turn, allowed the development of DNA fingerprinting
technologies, which have become an21 important part of modern criminal
investigations.
c) Similarly the interaction between discovery and innovation and between
invention and innovation is two-way. This is summarized in Figure 4 and 5
Innovation Leads to
Discovery
Innovation Leads to
Invention
24