Mindfulness and Gender 1

Mindfulness and Gender: A Study on Attention Awareness

[College and Department]

[Subject and Course]

Mindfulness and Gender 2

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between mindfulness and gender differences using

the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). The research aims to determine whether gender

significantly impacts mindfulness levels. A total of 77 participants took part in the study,

representing a diverse range of ages and ethnicities. The responses were analyzed using SPSS to

compute descriptive statistics and conduct independent sample t-tests.

Findings revealed no statistically significant difference between male and female

mindfulness scores, indicating that gender alone may not be a defining factor in mindfulness

levels. However, variations in individual scores suggest that other personal or environmental

influences may play a role. This aligns with prior research suggesting that mindfulness is more

closely related to practice habits and lifestyle choices rather than inherent gender characteristics.

Future research should incorporate more significant, more diverse participant pools and

consider additional psychological variables such as stress levels, meditation practices, and

cognitive flexibility to explore further the factors influencing mindfulness.

Mindfulness and Gender 3

Introduction

Mindfulness, defined as maintaining moment-to-moment awareness of one's experiences,

has gained significant attention in psychological research. Research has demonstrated that

mindfulness is associated with various cognitive and emotional benefits, including reduced

stress, enhanced focus, and improved well-being (Brown & Ryan, 2003). Kabat-Zinn (1994)

further emphasized that mindfulness fosters emotional regulation, allowing individuals to

navigate daily stressors better. Studies have explored the link between mindfulness and mental

health, demonstrating its role in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression (Baer et al.,

2006).

Despite these benefits, the relationship between mindfulness and gender remains a topic

of debate. Some research suggests that women practice mindfulness more frequently than men,

potentially due to greater societal encouragement for emotional self-awareness and regulation

(Rojiani et al., 2017). Women are often socialized to engage in emotional processing and

introspection, which could contribute to higher reported mindfulness levels (Goleman, 2017).

Conversely, other studies have found no significant gender-based disparities in mindfulness

levels, suggesting that mindfulness practices and benefits are equally accessible to all

individuals, regardless of gender (Hanley et al., 2016). Furthermore, some researchers argue that

gender differences in mindfulness may be mediated by factors such as personality traits, stress

perception, and coping strategies (McRae et al., 2008).

Biological and neurological differences may also play a role in shaping mindfulness

levels. Studies in neuroscience have demonstrated that women exhibit more significant activity
Mindfulness and Gender 4

in the prefrontal cortex, a region associated with self-regulation and emotional control, which

could support higher mindfulness scores (Tang, Holzel, & Posner, 2015). However, men often

engage in mindfulness through structured practices such as meditation and breathwork, which

might explain similar overall mindfulness levels across genders (Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015).

This complexity necessitates further research to understand the intricate dynamics of gender and

mindfulness.

In addition, the cultural context significantly influences how mindfulness is practiced and

perceived. Some cultures promote mindfulness through spiritual and meditative traditions, while

others encourage a more pragmatic approach focused on stress management (Keng, Smoski, &

Robins, 2011). These differences could account for the inconsistencies in research findings

regarding gender and mindfulness.

This study aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse by examining gender differences

in mindfulness using the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). By analyzing a diverse

sample of participants, this research seeks to determine whether gender is a significant factor in

mindfulness levels. Findings from this study may provide insight into whether mindfulness

interventions should be tailored differently based on gender or whether universal approaches

remain effective. Future research should also explore the intersectionality of gender, culture, and

mindfulness practices to understand their collective influence on individual well-being better.

Mindfulness and Gender 5

Method

Participants

A total of seventy-seven individuals participated in this study, including 49 females

(63.6%), 26 males (33.8%), and two identifying as other (2.6%). The participants' ages ranged

from 17 to 60 years (M = 23.52, SD = 6.99), providing a diverse demographic representation.

The ethnic composition was also varied, with Hispanic/Latino(a) participants forming the largest

group (45.5%), followed by Multiracial (23.4%), African American (11.7%), White (11.7%),

Asian (2.6%), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (3.9%), and American Indian/Alaskan (1.3%).

Including a diverse participant pool aimed to enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Participants were recruited voluntarily, ensuring informed consent was obtained before

the study commenced. They were informed about the study's purpose, confidentiality of

responses, and their right to withdraw at any time. The study was conducted in accordance with

the American Psychological Association's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of

Conduct (APA, 2002), ensuring that participants' rights and well-being were prioritized.

Materials

The study employed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), a validated 15-

item self-report questionnaire designed to assess mindfulness levels on a Likert scale ranging

from 1 (Almost Always) to 6 (Seldom). Higher scores on the MAAS indicate a greater level of

mindfulness. This scale has been widely used in previous research and is recognized for its

reliability and validity in measuring mindfulness-related constructs (Brown & Ryan, 2003).

A demographic questionnaire was also administered to collect information on

participants' age, gender, and ethnicity. The use of standardized instruments ensured the
Mindfulness and Gender 6

reliability of the data collected. Data were compiled electronically to minimize manual errors and

to facilitate statistical analysis.

Procedure

Participants were invited to complete the MAAS and demographic questionnaire in a

controlled setting. They were provided detailed instructions on how to complete the

questionnaire, ensuring clarity and uniformity in responses. The assessment took approximately

5–10 minutes to complete. Participants were asked to respond truthfully, reflecting on their

recent experiences rather than idealized perceptions of mindfulness.

After completing the survey, responses were collected and entered into SPSS for

statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize participant characteristics

and mindfulness scores. An independent samples t-test was conducted to determine whether

there were significant differences in mindfulness levels between males and females. The study

followed a standardized data collection protocol to maintain consistency across all responses.

Upon completion, participants were debriefed about the study's objectives and allowed to

ask questions. Those interested in mindfulness practices were given additional resources to

explore further. This structured approach ensured data accuracy, ethical integrity, and participant

well-being throughout the research process.

Mindfulness and Gender 7

Results

Descriptive statistics revealed an overall mean mindfulness score of 57.40 (SD = 10.89).

Female participants had a mean score of 55.80 (SD = 9.69), while male participants had a mean

score of 60.38 (SD = 12.42). An independent samples t-test showed no statistically significant

difference between male and female mindfulness scores, t(73) = -1.77, p = .081. Levene’s test for

equality of variances confirmed homogeneity of variance (F = 1.72, p = .193).

Further analysis of mindfulness subscales was conducted to examine specific aspects of

attentional awareness and self-regulation. Descriptive results indicate that while male

participants scored slightly higher on present-moment awareness, female participants showed

marginally higher scores on emotional awareness subscales. However, these differences did not

reach statistical significance.

A correlation analysis was also performed to assess potential relationships between

mindfulness scores and demographic variables such as age and ethnicity. Results indicated no

significant correlation between age and mindfulness scores (r = .12, p > .05), suggesting that

mindfulness levels were relatively stable across different age groups. Similarly, no significant

mindfulness differences were observed among ethnic groups (F(6, 70) = 1.05, p > .05),

indicating that cultural background did not significantly impact mindfulness scores.
Mindfulness and Gender 8

Table 1: Mindfulness Scores among Gender Groups

Table 2: Mindfulness Scores among Ethnicity Groups

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for mindfulness scores across gender groups,

while Table 2 provides the ethnicity group. The findings align with prior research suggesting that

mindfulness is an individual trait rather than a gender-dependent characteristic. Future studies

should explore additional moderating variables, such as mindfulness practice frequency and

personality traits, to further understand potential influences on mindfulness levels.

Mindfulness and Gender 9

Discussion

Findings from this study suggest that gender does not significantly influence mindfulness

levels. Although male participants demonstrated slightly higher mindfulness scores than female

participants, the difference was not statistically significant. This aligns with previous research

suggesting that mindfulness is more influenced by personal practice, lifestyle habits, and

psychological predispositions rather than demographic factors such as gender (Baer et al., 2006;

Hanley et al., 2016).

The results challenge some prior studies that have suggested women may engage in

mindfulness practices more frequently due to higher emotional awareness and regulation skills

(Rojiani et al., 2017). However, they also support findings that indicate mindfulness is an

individual trait that is not necessarily dictated by gender (Tang et al., 2015). One potential

explanation for these results is that mindfulness, as measured by the MAAS, assesses present-

moment awareness rather than the frequency of mindfulness practice, which could vary across

genders.

Despite these insights, several limitations must be acknowledged. The relatively small

and homogenous sample size limits the generalizability of the findings to a broader population.

Additionally, self-report measures such as the MAAS can introduce biases, as participants may

overestimate or underestimate their mindfulness levels due to social desirability or self-

perception distortions. A future study with larger, more diverse participant pools could provide

more conclusive evidence regarding gender-related mindfulness differences.

Moreover, this study did not account for external factors such as stress levels, meditation

experience, or personality traits, which have been found to influence mindfulness (McRae et al.,
Mindfulness and Gender 10

2008). Future research should consider incorporating longitudinal methodologies,

neurophysiological measures, and alternative mindfulness scales better to understand the

intricate relationship between gender and mindfulness.

Overall, the findings contribute to the growing body of research that suggests

mindfulness is a universal cognitive trait rather than a gender-specific phenomenon. As

mindfulness continues to gain recognition as a crucial component of mental well-being, future

research should explore how mindfulness training interventions can be effectively tailored to

individuals irrespective of gender.

Mindfulness and Gender 11

References

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of

conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report

assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in

psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.

Davidson, R. J., & Kaszniak, A. W. (2015). Conceptual and methodological issues in research on

mindfulness and meditation. American Psychologist, 70(7), 581-592.

Goleman, D. (2017). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam.

Hanley, A. W., Warner, A. R., Dehili, V. M., Canto, A. I., & Garland, E. L. (2016). Washing

dishes to wash the dishes: Brief instruction in an informal mindfulness practice.

Mindfulness, 6(5), 1095–1103.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life.

Hyperion.

Keng, S. L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological

health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041-1056.

McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., Mauss, I. B., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Gender

differences in emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group

Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 143-162.

Mindfulness and Gender 12

Rojiani, R., Santoyo, J. F., Rahrig, H., Roth, H. D., & Britton, W. B. (2017). Women benefit

more than men in response to college-based meditation training. Frontiers in Psychology,

8, 551.

Tang, Y. Y., Holzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation.

Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213-225.