Internal Audit Benchmarking Part One
Internal Audit Benchmarking Part One
Benchmarking
Health of the Internal Audit Profession – Part One
Contents
Purpose of this presentation
Survey participants
Professional designations/certifications
Appendix 1 – Methodology
Size of organisations
Appendix 2 – Sectors
Size of internal audit functions
Organisational governance Appendix 3 - Industries
The purpose is to provide some benchmarking information and discussion points for internal
audit functions to use and consider. We are also aiming to highlighting the kind of output that is
available from this survey, with the hope of pursuing this survey on a larger, more regular basis.
The presentations will not provide analysis or commentary on the statistics themselves, and
users should understand they are based on a relatively small sample (ie the responses of 216
member participants from across the UK & Ireland, as well as role levels, sectors and industries).
Based on feedback to these presentations, our longer-term aim will be to ask members to respond in
greater numbers to this survey again in Autumn 2025 - so that we can then share an updated set of data,
analyses, commentary and conclusions that are statistically more representative of the IA profession as a
whole.
2.3%
from a range of internal audit roles. 2.3% 0.5%
Audit committee
member
6.0%
• The largest being Chief Audit Executives Chief Audit
Executive (Head of
Internal Audit)
representing 37% of participants. 17.6%
Senior Internal Audit
Manager
37.0%
• The smallest proportion being Audit Internal Audit
Manager
7.4%
13.4% Level 2 – Infrastructure, e.g. has structures in
40.3% described their
place, but not much beyond the mechanics of a
process governance as level 3 =
13.9%
Level 3 – Integrated, e.g. co-ordinated across the
organisation with good interaction integrated.
Level 4 – Managed, e.g. Very good reporting and
use of dashboards for risk-based decision making 13.9% described it as
Level 5 – Optimised, e.g. Fully embedded and
level 5 – optimised.
transparent with excellent professionally
challenging discussions and variety of views fully
22.7% explored before decisions are made for the benefit
40.3% of the organisation.
Not applicable – I provide internal audit for multiple
client organisations
Don’t know
Partial Conformance
12.1% (conforms with over 75%
and has an action plan to
address the gaps) • 12.1% partially conformed with the
framework and
Low level of conformance
(conforms with less than
75% of the Standards)
level of conformance.
Green indicates higher performance Public sector 78.1% 8.57% 6.67% 6.67%
1.4%
16.7%
Already conforming (very early adopter)
23.3%
2.3% On track to conform prior to 9th of January 2025 (early
adopter)
On track to conform by 9th of January 2025
Don’t know
35.3%
Wales 12.5%
20.8 in the South-East of England
South West England 20.8%
Scotland 13.0%
they performed their internal audit work in
Republic of Ireland 5.1%
London North West England 17.1%