0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views4 pages

MIL Performance Task Video Project Short Film 4

The project proposal outlines a performance task for students to produce a short film that educates viewers on legal, ethical, and societal issues in media and information literacy. Students will work in groups to create a video presentation, adhering to specific guidelines and using various tools, while also organizing a symposium to present their work. The proposal includes evaluation rubrics for both the short film and movie poster, as well as a peer evaluation component.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views4 pages

MIL Performance Task Video Project Short Film 4

The project proposal outlines a performance task for students to produce a short film that educates viewers on legal, ethical, and societal issues in media and information literacy. Students will work in groups to create a video presentation, adhering to specific guidelines and using various tools, while also organizing a symposium to present their work. The proposal includes evaluation rubrics for both the short film and movie poster, as well as a peer evaluation component.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Project Proposal for Media and Information Literacy (MIL)

Performance Tasks: Video Project – Short Film


I- Standard
A. Content Standard
1. The learner demonstrates understanding of media and information literacy (MIL) and MIL related concepts.
B. Performance Standard
1. The learner organizes a creative and interactive symposium for the community focusing on being a media and information literate individual.
II- Content
A. Media and Information Languages
B. Legal, Ethical, and Societal Issues in Media and Information
III- Learning Competencies
Students will be able to…
A. produce a short film that will educate the viewers about a specific issue related to legal, ethical, and societal issues in media and information (SSHS);
B. produce and assess the codes, convention, and messages of a group presentation (MILI11/12MILA-IIIf-16); and
C. organize a creative and interactive symposium where students will present their short film and discuss its subject and message to junior high school students (SSHS).
IV- Tools
A. Computer
B. Smartphone, Digital Camera, or DLSR Camera (Video Recording)
C. Microsoft Word
D. Video Editing Software, Web Tool, or Mobile Application (e.g. Windows Movie Maker, iMovie, Animoto, MiniMovie, VideoShow etc.)
V- Guidelines
A. The class will be divided into groups with 6- 7 members. Each group is considered a film production and members will be assigned to a specific position role. Students will be
allowed to play dual positions.
B. Each group will create a 3- 6 minutes video presentation in MP4 format. Video presentation may be instructional, persuasive, historical, or reflective.
C. Each group will choose a topic from the next lesson which is “Legal, Ethical, and Societal Issues in Media and Information”. No duplication of topics in each class.
- Digital Piracy - Internet Addiction - Digital Footprints - Plagiarism
- Netiquette - Flame Wars - Cyberbullying - Internet Safety
- Cybercrime
D. Each group will create a movie poster for their video.
E. Digital video poster size is 8 inches x 12. 5 inches while a storyboard sheet will be provide.
F. Shooting location is strictly within the premises of the School and if they need to be outside the school, the School will not be accountable if there are anything happen to the
students (a Parent’s Consent should be given to the students/group who will shoot their film outside the school).
G. Students can use any video editing software, web tools, or mobile application that they are familiar with in making their video presentation.
H. The video must be in line with the vision- mission of the school thus cursing, vulgar words, profanity, obscenity are not allowed.
I. Communication or language should be in English, nevertheless they can still communicate in Filipino Language IF they create a subtitle in English of that Filipino word/s.
J. Deadline is on March 7, 2025 via Google Form from your subject teacher.

VII- Rubric
A. Short Film (Group Grade)
Criteria Very Good Good Fair Needs Improvement
Content The content includes a clear statement of Information is presented as a connected The content does not present a clearly Content lacks a central theme, clear point
purpose or theme and is creative, theme with accurate, current supporting stated theme, is vague, and some of the of view and logical sequence of
compelling and clearly written. A rich information that contributes to supporting information does not seem to information. Much of the supporting
variety of supporting information in the understanding the project’s main idea. fit the main idea or appears as a information is irrelevant to the overall
video contributes to the understanding of Details are logical and persuasive disconnected series of scenes with no message. The viewer is unsure what the
the project’s main idea. Events and information is effectively used. The unifying main idea. Includes few citations message is because there is little
messages are presented in a logical order. content includes a clear point of view with and few facts. persuasive information and only one or
Includes properly cited sources. a progression of ideas and supporting two facts about the topic are articulated.
information. Includes properly cited Information is incorrect, out of date, or
(15 Points) sources. incomplete. No citations included.
(12 Points) ( 8 Points) (5 Points)
Quality Movie was completed and had all required Movie was completed and contained all Movie was made, but had very little if any The video was totally unedited with no
elements. The video was well edited and required elements. Editing was not done editing. Many poor shots remain. Video transitions or audio support of any kind.
moves smoothly from scene to scene with as well as it should have been. Some poor was very fragmented and choppy with
proper use of transitions. Audio and other shots remain. Movie is still somewhat little to no audio reinforcement.
enhancements were well used. choppy. Audio and other enhancements
were utilized, but not for maximum effect.
(15 Points) (12 Points) (8 Points) (5 Points)
Citations All sources (information, graphics, music, 1-2 sources (information, graphics, music 3-4 sources (information, graphics, music, More than 5 sources (information,
etc.) are properly cited using APA etc.) are not identified and credited using etc.) are not identified and credited using graphics, music, etc.) are not identified
citations. APA citations. APA citations. and credited using APA citations or No
citations are included.
(12 Points) (8 points) (5 Points)
(15 Points)
Work Every individual in the group contributed 1 member is not involved in the group 2-3 members are not involved in the group More than 3 members are not involved in
Ethics to the creation of the video project. Team project. Team members mostly showed project. Team members fairly showed the group project or group members are
members showed respect with each other. respect with each other. respect with each other. not working during the designated time or
low levels of respect were evident within
the team.
(15 Points) (12 Points) (8 Points) (5 Points)
TOTAL 60 Points

References
• https://lambenglishmontana.wikispaces.com/file/view/RubricVideo.doc
• https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/videorubric.html
B. Movie Poster (Group Grade)
Criteria Very Good Good Fair Needs Improvement
Includes all of the following: Includes most of the following: Includes some of the following: Missing most of the required
Movie title, author, rating, cast of Movie title, author, rating, cast of Movie title, author, rating, cast of information.
Written Information main actors, director, and movie main actors, director, and movie main actors, director, and movie
tagline line. tagline line. tagline line.
(4 Points) (3 Points) (2 Points) (1 Point)
All graphics are appropriate Most graphics are appropriate Some graphics are appropriate Graphics are not
Picture or Graphic of
to topic to topic to topic appropriate to topic
Movie Poster
(4 Points) (3 Points) (2 Points) (1 Point)
The poster is presented creatively For the most part the poster is The poster is somewhat The poster is not presented
and organized neatly. presented in a creative manner presented in a creative manner creatively and is not organized
Overall Appearance of
and is organized neatly. and organized neatly to some neatly.
Movie Poster
degree.
(4 Points) (3 Points) (2 Points) (1 Point)
Spelling, punctuation, and Spelling, punctuation, and There were problems with There were numerous spelling,
Spelling, Grammar, and
grammar were all correct. grammar were mostly correct. 1- spelling, punctuation, and punctuation, and grammar
Punctuation of Movie
3 mistakes. grammar. 4-7 mistakes. mistakes. More than 7 mistakes.
Poster
(4 Points) (3 Points) (2 Points) (1 Point)
Readability Background and text make all Background and text make most Background and text make some Background and text make it
parts easy to see and read. parts easy to see and read. parts easy to see and read. difficult to see and read parts.
(4 Points) (3 Points) (2 Points) (1 Point)
TOTAL 20 Points

Reference: http://www.starofbethlehem.org/home/140007275/140007276/files/Movie%20Poster%20Scoing%20Rubric.pdf
C. Peer Evaluation
Write the name of each of your group members in the first column. For each person, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4
(1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=agree; 4=strongly agree). Total the scores in each column.
CRITERIA
Demonstrates a Contributes
Contributes Completes group

Points
Score
Total
Prepares work in cooperative and significantly to
NAMES meaningfully to assignments on
a quality manner. supportive the success of the
group discussions. time.
attitude. project.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Peer Evaluation Summary


Average
NAMES Score Given by Members Points
Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Equivalent Points for Peer Evaluation


Average Score: 16 –20 Average Score: 11 – 15 Average Score: 6 – 10 Average Score: 0 – 5
Peer Evaluation
(10 Points) (8 Points) (5 Points) (3 Points)

C. Computation of Grades
Group Grade + Peer Evaluation Average Score = Individual Grade
80 Points + 10 Points = 90 Points

You might also like