Computational Algorithms
Computational Algorithms
Computational Problem:
discovering optimized travel paths through systems where trip expenditure including duration
and fares and journey comfort levels change throughout the hours. Scalability becomes a
Urbans areas experience continuous rise in traffic congestion that causes mobility
performance to decline. The solution complexity arises because the system requires
integrating various transportation methods including trains, buses and private cars while
taking into consideration time-based variations of travel duration and waiting periods and
experience performance degradation under these circumstances because they cannot manage
real-time data effectively and parallel computing synchronization efficiently. The paper
computational networks into multimodal subgraph segments by region and transport type
which enables efficient shortest path computations (Zhao, 2010). The algorithm performs
The research addresses three main objectives: efficient transport management through
Research Questions:
i. What is the most efficient method to split a transport network into smaller
computational units?
ii. Which methods enable maximum efficiency when parallelizing the TDMTP solution
process?
iv. What impact does the number of different transportation systems have on algorithm
execution speed together with how networks get divided between parallel processors?
# Initialization
cost_best_solution = float('inf')
g = get_graph_containing_node(s)
# If arrival time is valid, update node cost and add new task to stack
elif arrival_time <= cost_of_node(last_node) and arrival_time <=
cost_best_solution:
update_node_cost(last_node, arrival_time)
graph = get_graph_containing_node(last_node)
Inputs:
d – Destination node
Outputs:
Cost of Path – The time or cost associated with the computed shortest path
4. Explain the proposed algorithm using simple language (approx. 250 words) [Marks
20]
The PMTDSP algorithm executes its intended function to discover efficient shortest routes
across intricate time-dependent transport network environments. The algorithm splits the
complete network into separate smaller graphs using both transportation type and
geographical zones as its organizational structure (Ayed et al., 2011). A given subgraph
corresponds to a specific transport method including buses or trains and private vehicles and
From its starting point at the source node with initial departure time the algorithm locates
appropriate transport subgraphs. The algorithm utilizes a parallel version of the Dijkstra
algorithm (Galvez-Fernandez et al., 2009) to identify the minimum paths for all destination
nodes which includes transfer nodes. The system distributes each computational
new computation task to find the minimum path within the next subgraph. The system
extends itself dynamically which leads to the complete investigation of available pathways. A
shared memory model functions with computation synchronization that maintains the best
solution outputs (Zhao, 2010). Short path computations in extensive networks become more
efficient through the use of parallel computing operations in the PMTDSP algorithm. The
algorithm proves high suitability for real-time transportation route optimization because it
provides swift and precise results essential for urban mobility and congestion mitigation.
5. Analyze the time complexity of the proposed algorithm (word count depends on the
The modified Dijkstra’s approach serves as the foundation of the algorithm to run shortest
boosts efficiency levels substantially. The algorithm achieves its optimal speedup of O((V +
E) log V / p) with p processors during execution. The efficiency gain depends on network
partitioning intensity together with the amount of transport methods since additional
[Marks 20]
Strengths:
i. A parallel computing framework enables this algorithm to handle big transport
systems fast and a real-world setting will utilize its high scalability through efficient
ii. The simultaneous execution of multiple shortest path calculations brought through
iii. Shared memory optimization cuts down computational redundancy which allows
iv. The flexible design allows the algorithm to operate over all types of real-life
transportation systems and enables its use in various urban mobility situations.
Weaknesses:
parallel computing hardware needs technical expertise for setup and routine
maintenance.
obstacles.
iii. Real-time flexibility suffers because frequent transport schedule changes force the
Discussion:
since it optimizes the processing speed especially when dealing with extensive problem sizes.
The algorithm benefits from parallel computing because it improves both processing speed
and efficiency when handling extensive datasets which proves useful for urban traffic
management and planning. The algorithm confronts two main limitations from both hardware
limitations and synchronization expenses in the execution process. The system faces two
main issues which include excessive computational costs because of real-time updates as well
evaluation of the available infrastructure limitations. The researchers should add flexibility to
the algorithm by implementing dynamic task scheduling methods in conjunction with AI-
Note: Please report the word count for sections 1, 4, and 6 [word count: 832] after
completing your assignment.
References
Ayed, H., Habbas, Z., Khadraoui, D., & Galvez-Fernandez, C. (2011). A parallel algorithm
for solving time dependent multimodal transport problem. 2011 14th International
https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2011.6082973
Galvez-Fernandez, C., Khadraoui, D., Ayed, H., Habbas, Z., & Alba, E. (2009). Distributed
Consequences of urban sprawl for mobility on the urban fringe of Beijing. Habitat