GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves
The document presents GhostStack, a headless VM layer architecture designed for ephemeral task execution within Qubes OS, focusing on secure virtual machines with self-purging capabilities. It incorporates features like real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and Tor-based telemetry, emphasizing hardware distrust and attack surface reduction. The approach aims to enhance psychological resilience for users facing persistent digital threats.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views1 page
GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves
The document presents GhostStack, a headless VM layer architecture designed for ephemeral task execution within Qubes OS, focusing on secure virtual machines with self-purging capabilities. It incorporates features like real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and Tor-based telemetry, emphasizing hardware distrust and attack surface reduction. The approach aims to enhance psychological resilience for users facing persistent digital threats.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
2.
“GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves”
A design approach for secure VMs with temporal self-purging capabilities Rooted in the experiences of users facing persistent compromise, this document introduces GhostStack — a headless VM layer architecture for ephemeral task execution. Designed for Qubes OS, it includes real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and trickled Tor-based telemetry. Emphasis is placed on hardware distrust, attack surface reduction, and psychological resilience under digital siege. 2. “GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves” A design approach for secure VMs with temporal self-purging capabilities Rooted in the experiences of users facing persistent compromise, this document introduces GhostStack — a headless VM layer architecture for ephemeral task execution. Designed for Qubes OS, it includes real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and trickled Tor-based telemetry. Emphasis is placed on hardware distrust, attack surface reduction, and psychological resilience under digital siege. 2. “GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves” A design approach for secure VMs with temporal self-purging capabilities Rooted in the experiences of users facing persistent compromise, this document introduces GhostStack — a headless VM layer architecture for ephemeral task execution. Designed for Qubes OS, it includes real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and trickled Tor-based telemetry. Emphasis is placed on hardware distrust, attack surface reduction, and psychological resilience under digital siege. 2. “GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves” A design approach for secure VMs with temporal self-purging capabilities Rooted in the experiences of users facing persistent compromise, this document introduces GhostStack — a headless VM layer architecture for ephemeral task execution. Designed for Qubes OS, it includes real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and trickled Tor-based telemetry. Emphasis is placed on hardware distrust, attack surface reduction, and psychological resilience under digital siege. 2. “GhostStack Architectures: Building Digital Environments That Erase Themselves” A design approach for secure VMs with temporal self-purging capabilities Rooted in the experiences of users facing persistent compromise, this document introduces GhostStack — a headless VM layer architecture for ephemeral task execution. Designed for Qubes OS, it includes real-time stack rotation, automated NVRAM sweeps, and trickled Tor-based telemetry. Emphasis is placed on hardware distrust, attack surface reduction, and psychological resilience under digital siege.