New Study
New Study
Immediate Memory
Immediate memory is the briefest form of memory that retains information for a
fraction of a second to a few seconds. It acts as a temporary buffer for sensory
input before further processing occurs. This type of memory allows individuals to
perceive the world as continuous rather than fragmented.
1
o Example: When someone asks, "What did you say?" and instantly
recalls the last words, it is due to echoic memory.
3. Haptic Memory (Tactile Memory)
o This type of memory retains tactile sensations for about 1 to 2
seconds.
o It allows for quick reaction to touch stimuli.
o Example: The lingering feeling of an object after it is removed from
the skin.
● High capacity but brief duration: It can store a large amount of sensory
information but decays rapidly.
● Automatic processing: It does not require conscious effort.
● Precedes attention and perception: Only some sensory inputs move into
short-term memory.
Short-term memory (STM) refers to the temporary storage of information that lasts
for about 15 to 30 seconds unless rehearsed. It allows for active manipulation of
information before it is either discarded or encoded into long-term memory.
The Miller’s Law (1956) states that short-term memory can hold 7 ± 2 chunks of
information. However, more recent research suggests that it may be closer to 4±1
chunks (Cowan, 2001).
2
3. Semantic Encoding – Processing the meaning of information.
o Example: Understanding the meaning of a word rather than just its
letters.
Baddeley and Hitch (1974) introduced the concept of working memory, which is
an extension of STM. Working memory consists of:
3
LTM is categorized into two broad types: Explicit (Declarative) Memory and
Implicit (Non-Declarative) Memory.
This type of memory requires conscious recall and is further divided into:
1. Encoding – The process of converting information into a form that can be
stored.
o Example: Associating a new fact with prior knowledge.
2. Retrieval – Accessing stored information when needed.
o Example: Recalling the name of a childhood friend.
4
1. Decay Theory – Information fades over time if not used.
2. Interference Theory – New or old information disrupts recall.
o Proactive Interference – Old memories hinder new learning.
o Retroactive Interference – New learning disrupts old memories.
3. Retrieval Failure – Inability to access stored information.
5
Hypothesis: Meaningful Words Are Easier to Remember Than
Nonsensical Syllables
Memory helps us store and recall information, but not everything is remembered
equally. Words that have meaning are easier to remember compared to random
syllables that do not make sense. This is because meaningful words connect to
what we already know, while nonsensical syllables have no familiar connections.
Hypothesis Statement
"People will remember meaningful words better than nonsensical syllables because
meaningful words are easier to understand and relate to past knowledge."
3. Research Findings
6
Types of Psychological Testing
Psychological testing is used to measure different aspects of human behavior,
emotions, and cognitive abilities. There are many types of psychological testing,
but two major ones are psychometric testing and psychological experiment
testing.
Psychometric Testing
7
2. The individual responds to a series of structured questions or tasks.
3. The results are compared to standardized scoring systems to assess mental
abilities or personality traits.
8
2. Field Experiments – Conducted in real-world settings to observe natural
behaviors.
Methodology
Study Design
9
The study was designed to test whether meaningful words are easier to remember
compared to nonsensical syllables. A simple memory recall test was conducted in
which the subject was shown a list of both meaningful words and nonsensical
syllables. After a short period, she was asked to recall as many items from the list
as possible. The number of remembered words and syllables was recorded to
compare memory retention.
Selection of Subject
The subject for this study was a fellow undergraduate student. The details of the
participant are as follows:
Before starting the experiment, the subject was informed about the following:
1. Informed Consent: She was given the right to decide whether or not to
participate in the study.
2. Privacy and Confidentiality: She was reassured that her identity and data
would be kept confidential.
3. Right to Withdraw: She was informed that she could leave the study at any
time if she felt uncomfortable or unwilling to continue.
4. How the rest is to be performed: Subject was thoroughly instructed on
how the test will be conducted and what she must do.
Materials Used
10
● Paper – For writing the word lists and taking notes.
● Tablet Computer – For displaying the list of words and syllables.
● Printer – For printing the word lists if needed.
● Precautions Taken
Actual Performance
1. The subject was shown a list of 8 meaningful words and 8 nonsensical
syllables.
2. She was given 5 minutes to memorize them.
3. After a 30 second gap, she was asked to dictate down as many words and
syllables as she could remember.
4. The number of correctly recalled words and syllables was recorded.
The results from this experiment will help determine whether meaningful words
are easier to remember than nonsensical syllables.
Aft BET
Bohr NOG
Torpedo DIT
Starboard LOB
Sigmund TUG
11
Horrendous DOD
Lucubrate GOT
Results
After conducting the experiment, the subject’s recall ability was measured based on
how many meaningful words and nonsensical syllables she was able to remember.
The findings are as follows:
Discussion
The experiment aimed to test whether meaningful words are easier to remember
than nonsensical syllables. Based on the subject's performance in both memory
recall tests, the results indicate a clear difference in retention between the two types
of stimuli.
12
● 3 out of 8 meaningful words correctly.
● 1 out of 8 nonsensical syllables correctly.
● 5 errors in recalling meaningful words.
● 7 errors in recalling nonsensical syllables.
These results suggest that the subject initially struggled to retain both types of
information, but the difficulty was more pronounced for nonsensical syllables. The
higher number of errors in recalling nonsensical syllables indicates that words
lacking meaning are harder to remember.
This improvement suggests that repetition and practice played a role in enhancing
recall. However, despite the improvement, meaningful words were still
remembered at a much higher rate than nonsensical syllables.
This confirms that meaningful words are easier to encode and retrieve from
memory compared to nonsensical syllables. The larger improvement in
meaningful word recall suggests that prior knowledge and associations help in
memory retention.
13
nonsensical syllables lack meaningful connections, making recall more
difficult.
2. Repetition and Familiarity: The second recall test showed improved
performance, suggesting that exposure and practice strengthen memory.
However, the improvement was greater for meaningful words, reinforcing
the role of prior knowledge in retention.
3. Cognitive Load: Nonsensical syllables require more mental effort to
memorize since they have no pre-existing associations in memory. This
could explain why the subject made more errors with them.
Conclusion
The findings from this experiment support the hypothesis that meaningful words
are easier to remember than nonsensical syllables. The subject consistently
recalled more meaningful words, with a significant improvement in the second
recall test, while nonsensical syllables remained difficult to retain. This suggests
that semantic connections and prior knowledge play a crucial role in memory
retention, making words with meaning easier to encode and retrieve. Additionally,
the results indicate that repetition can enhance memory recall, but meaningful
words benefit more from this effect than nonsensical syllables. Overall, this study
highlights the importance of meaning in memory processing and reinforces the
idea that information with context is easier to remember.
Introspective Report
This experiment provided valuable insights into how memory works and the role of
meaning in recall. As expected, the subject remembered more meaningful words
than nonsensical syllables, confirming that familiar concepts are easier to retain.
The second recall test showed improvement, but meaningful words had a greater
advantage, highlighting the importance of semantic connections in memory.
Conducting the experiment required careful planning, ensuring the subject felt
comfortable and minimizing distractions. It reinforced that memory is not just
about repetition but also about understanding and association. This experience
deepened my appreciation for cognitive psychology and the challenges of studying
memory. If repeated with more participants, the study could provide even stronger
evidence for these findings.
14
References APA
15