Module 107268
Module 107268
Module 1:
The science and management of air quality
Contents
3 Air pollutants 68
3.5 Odours 87
Changes in temperature or pressure cause the volumes of gases to change much more markedly
than the volumes of solids or liquids. So, when dealing with air pollution, it is necessary to have
agreed conditions of pressure and temperature when quoting data.
Two conditions commonly used are:
STP = ‘Standard Pressure & Temperature’: 00C and one atmosphere pressure.
NTP = ‘Normal Pressure & Temperature’: 250C and one atmosphere pressure.
The technology of measurement also needs to be taken into account in several other respects:
• the collecting efficiency and representativeness of the sampling devices and instruments being
used to make the measurements
• the sensitivity of the analytical methods being used, either online within the measuring
instrument itself or ‘back in the laboratory’
• how the uptake by humans of the pollution is related to the instrument measurement and
associated analysis.
For air quality management and regulatory purposes the plant conditions during emissions
measurement need to be known, and for ambient air quality measurements the meteorological
conditions need to be known.
The ideas associated with the dispersion of pollutants will be discussed in more detail in the next
section on meteorology. This section deals with the basic ideas associated with the amounts,
concentrations and rates of the discharges.
Pollutant emissions from activities and premises typically disperse to a greater or lesser extent
depending on:
• where and how they are released
• their temperature
• the rate of discharge
• the topography of the surrounding land
• the prevailing meteorological conditions
• and, to a much lesser extent, the exit velocity of discharge.
The potential impact of pollutant discharges from activities ranging from the smoke of stubble burning
in a rural area, through dust on a construction site, to unpleasant odours from a fast food shop begins
with how much is released, the rate at which it is released and the type of pollutant.
For example an acute event may occur in which an amount of a pollutant is discharged over a short
period of time, maybe only a few minutes. This may result in a serious impact in the immediate
vicinity—such as odours from a food shop giving rise to complaints, wind-blown dust emissions near
sensitive land use on neighbouring properties or the discharge of a toxic chemical in an accident.
The discharge of the same amount of such pollutants over a long period of time—that is, at a much
lower rate—may not have the same level of impact. However, if the pollutants have long-term health
effects, such as exposure to fine particles or cumulative toxic materials, the reverse may be true: short-
term higher-concentration exposures may have little effect while long-term lower-concentration
exposures may have a damaging effect.
When assessing or regulating the discharges from any activities it is important to address
management of both normal operations and the potential for acute events when the rate of
emission may be high.
Increasing amount
Increasing Increasing
emission rate concentration
The discharge to the air of a given amount of pollutant may take place over a short or long period of
time—at different rates. When dispersed this same quantity of pollutant will then be mixed into
another larger volume of air.
The concentration of a pollutant and the time over which this is averaged are the significant
parameters in terms of impact on the local environment or human health; and consequently on its
measurement and the regulatory standards in the atmosphere that are set for its management.
For example 100 g of emitted CO when confined within a closed space like an unventilated basement
car park of volume 10,000 m3 has a concentration of 10 mg/m3. When dispersed into the open air, say
into a volume that is one hundred thousand (105) times greater, the same amount has a concentration
of only 0.1 μg/m3.
Air pollutants like dust and solvent vapours are customarily taken out of work areas within premises
by means of extractor fans and ducting through filters or absorbers to stacks. It is important that the
volume rate of flow through these is large enough to remove enough air to keep the concentration of
pollutants inside at an acceptably low level. Removing the pollutants from the workplace into the
outside air may solve the occupational problem but leaves the pollution problem. The environmental
impact of these discharges must be managed.
Interior air quality is an issue of workplace health and safety rather than an environmental one.
Some local council officers have found it helpful to work in collaboration with WorkCover officers
when addressing the related air quality issues within and arising from premises and activities.
The filtration system being used must then be able to remove enough of the pollutants so their
concentrations in the flow from the stack into the outside air are also acceptable—an environmental
pollution issue. When any extracted air is discharged to the outside atmosphere from a stack, the
location and height of the stack must allow acceptable dispersion.
Rural monitoring sites are located in the following cities; most are operated by DECC in
collaboration with the local council:
Albury TEOM PM10
The current monitoring network for Sydney, the Lower Hunter and the Illawarra regions are shown
below. In each map the colours show the heights above sea level.
The methods and instruments used to monitor these pollutants are scientifically complex and do
not need to be understood in order to use the monitoring data. Further information is available on
the DECC website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au/air/nepm/index.htm
Variability
The observed variability for different pollutants arises from many different factors:
– the physical and chemical behaviour of the pollutants in the different seasonal weather
conditions
– changes in people’s travel and energy use patterns at different times of the year
– seasonal patterns in the use of wood heaters
– the occurrence of natural events like droughts, dust storms, rainfall and bushfires.
If the total amount of air pollution discharged by sources only changes slowly, as is the case for large
urban or industrial areas, then the main variability in air quality will depend on daily and weekly
patterns of discharge and daily and seasonal variations in meteorology and weather.
So the changes in traffic flow throughout the day, with morning and evening peak periods, will
markedly change the rates of emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). Likewise activity patterns on weekdays will be significantly different from those on
weekends.
Dispersion is affected by variation in synoptic conditions. During the day some synoptic patterns
favour conditions where dispersion is governed by synoptic winds or regional sea breezes, while at
night, dispersion can be influenced by regional topography and ‘stable drainage’ flows. More of these
aspects are considered in the following section on meteorology.
Measured ambient pollutant concentrations depend on many factors and a general trend may be
overlaid with the consequences of particular events.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
January . 2001 January . 2001
Fe b r u a r y . 2 0 0 1 February . 2001
pictures.
Ma r c h . 2 0 0 1 March . 2001
A p r il . 2 0 0 1 April . 2001
Ma y . 2 0 0 1 May . 2001
June . 2001 June . 2001
J u ly . 2 0 0 1
Monitoring Reports.
July . 2001
particulate pollution.
August . 2001 August . 2001
Se p t e m b e r . 2 0 0 1 September . 2001
Oc tober . 2001 October . 2001
No v e m b e r . 2 0 0 1 November . 2001
De c e m b e r . 2 0 0 1 December . 2001
January . 2002 January . 2002
Fe b r u a r y . 2 0 0 2 February . 2002
Ma r c h . 2 0 0 2 March . 2002
A p r il . 2 0 0 2 April . 2002
Ma y . 2 0 0 2 May . 2002
June . 2002 June . 2002
J u ly . 2 0 0 2 July . 2002
August . 2002 August . 2002
Se p t e m b e r . 2 0 0 2 September . 2002
Oc tober . 2002 October . 2002
No v e m b e r . 2 0 0 2 November . 2002
De c e m b e r . 2 0 0 2 December . 2002
January . 2003 January . 2003
Ma y . 2 0 0 3 May . 2003
June . 2003 June . 2003
J u ly . 2 0 0 3 July . 2003
August . 2003 August . 2003
hour concentrations in each month for the same monitoring station at Lindfield.
January . 2004 January . 2004
Fe b r u a r y . 2 0 0 4 February . 2004
Monthly all hour s aver ages of TEOM - PM10 in Lindfield (1-hour clock aver ages)
Ma r c h . 2 0 0 4 March . 2004
A p r il . 2 0 0 4 April . 2004
Ma y . 2 0 0 4 May . 2004
intended only to illustrate variability and how different averaging methods give very different
June . 2004 June . 2004
Bushfires of course occur principally in the hot summer months and contribute significantly to
It is evident that the monthly averages smooth out large spikes in concentrations that occur over
J u ly . 2 0 0 4 July . 2004
sun during summer makes this the principal season for photochemical smog and ozone formation.
The two graphs here are not meant to be representative of regional or even local trends. They are
matter at one Sydney metropolitan monitoring station, as reported in the DEC Quarterly Air Quality
Se p t e m b e r . 2 0 0 4 September . 2004
The graph below shows the variations in monthly all hours averages for concentrations of particulate
The Quarterly Air Quality Monitoring Reports published by DECC contain monitoring data for the
key pollutants and can be accessed at: www.environment.nsw.gov.au/air/datareports.htm
Intermittent sampling
Large unmeasured
peak in pollutant
In the case of some pollutants the sampling has been intermittent by choosing to take 24-hour
samples every sixth day. This protocol reveals trends in particulate pollution over longer periods of
months, seasons and years but may miss acute events that occur on days when sampling is not done. In
the diagram the sharp peak is not recorded simply because it did not occur on one of the sampling
days.
Averaging periods
It is important to consider the averaging period for air pollution monitoring data. Ambient monitoring
is usually carried out in accordance with NEPM monitoring protocols—that is, for the following
different time periods for different pollutants:
• 1 hour (clock hour average)
• 4 hours (rolling 4-hour average of 1-hour averages)
• 8 hours (rolling 8-hour average of 1-hour averages)
• 1 day (calendar day)
• 1 year (calendar year).
In general, existing pollution and meteorological patterns result in the maximum measured
concentrations becoming lower with longer averaging times; that is, a maximum daily average is
typically much lower than a maximum 8-hour or maximum 1-hour average.
Air quality data for the same pollutant can only be compared for similar averaging periods.
Different averaging periods are used in some aspects of air quality management such as impact
assessment. These include for example:
• 10 minutes (sulfur dioxide)
• 15 minutes (carbon monoxide)
• 7, 30 and 90-day (rolling) averages (hydrogen fluoride).
Longer averaging times tend to relate to pollutants which can have longer term cumulative effects on
health, vegetation or property—for example, the toxic metal lead which is described in more detail
below.
Shorter sampling times tend to relate to acute, immediately detected pollutant impacts, such as those
resulting from sulfur dioxide and ozone exposure.
This is a diagrammatic
representation only.
Always use the standard
charts for readings!
Note that the North American standards for the Ringelmann method specify a different method of
reading with respect to illumination. Be sure to use the Australian/British method.
The proper location of the chart, the observer, the stack top and the sun (or sky illumination in
overcast conditions) are precisely defined in the Standard and must be followed if the readings are
to be accepted in any enforcement or legal action.
In practice, reading the full size chart is difficult in most urban settings and requires a holder
which is able to be both independently secured and elevated about 4 m above the ground surface,
usually at a distance of 10 to 15 m from the observer.
The miniature chart, if marginally more difficult to read consistently, will be found easier to
manipulate. However, even this requires a small holder of about 1 m in length to read properly.
The diagrams below show configurations that could be used by local government officers.
full-sized chart
Chart stand
Chart holder
Any officer intending to use the Ringelmann chart should refer to the instructions and the Standard
and follow them carefully in preparing for and making the observations.
Testing location
An important factor is to position the testing location in a section of the duct or stack which has
relatively even flow distribution. Ideally this is 10 stack diameters downstream from a bend or fan
outlet, but this ideal sometimes has to be compromised.
The key factor to appreciate is that if local government officers specify particulate testing, the
inherent methodology of in-stack measurement of particles is relatively difficult and requires
considerable time and effort to organise and carry out.
Thus stack tests for particulate emissions or requiring isokinetic sampling should only be specified
when there is a clear justification.
Typically a one-off test can cost from $5,000 to $30,000 depending on the set-up costs involved
(e.g. stack openings, platforms, access ladders, etc.).
Further discussion about the nature, trends and impacts of gaseous pollutants is contained in Module 1
section 3.
More detailed technical information about the principles and operations of the instruments now
available for these measurements is easily found using an internet search engine.
The main causes of changes in atmospheric stability are heating of land surfaces by the sun
during the day and cooling of the surfaces by the radiation of heat at night.
Neutral stability
With a moderate to strong wind in moderate sunshine or
Atmospheric stability
an overcast sky the atmosphere will be in a state of
‘neutral stability’. This condition depends on the The idea of atmospheric stability is
physical properties of the air and water in the complex and can sometimes be
atmosphere. In neutral stability the temperature of the air confusing.
decreases uniformly as we go upwards, at about 10C per The atmosphere is said to be
100 m. This uniform temperature gradient continues up ‘stable’ when conditions inhibit the
to about 10 km above the earth’s surface. However, the vertical motion of air and the
region of most interest for pollution is the lowest two resulting turbulence that causes
kilometres. mixing and dilution of pollutants.
During conditions of neutral stability a parcel of air In an ‘unstable’ atmosphere
moved to a different height will have the same density turbulence is enhanced by the
after moving as the surrounding air at that height. So conditions and so there is an
there is no density difference, or buoyancy, tending to increase in mixing and dilution.
move it back again.
A ‘neutral’ atmosphere neither
This explains the term ‘neutral’. Also pollutants are inhibits nor enhances air
mixed readily and predictably in the wind in neutral turbulence.
conditions. So they disperse and dilute as they are blown
downwind from the release point. It is an interesting fact that the
atmosphere can be very unstable
By applying meteorological science to the conditions we under some low wind conditions
can predict fairly accurately what the concentration of but at other times neutral, even
pollutants will be at different locations away from the with high wind speeds.
source.
1
This discussion of meteorology is not intended to provide a general introduction to meteorological
science, but rather to introduce in practical terms those aspects of the atmosphere which are likely to
be of immediate interest to local government officers.
Altitude →
0
1 C / 100 m Inversions
When the air temperature increases (rather than decreases)
with height this is called a temperature inversion.
During the day the ground is heated by incoming solar
Temperature → radiation. After sunset, when there is no incoming solar
Neutral stability – mild day radiation, the ground loses energy and cools. The air
immediately above the ground is also cooled and becomes
0 denser. The thickness of the cold layer of air extends upwards
Altitude →
1 C / 100 m
as the night draws on. The air below is now cooler than the air
above.
Inversion
So, somewhere above the ground there is now warmer air than
Cooling from
ground at the ground. This is called a ‘radiation or nocturnal
inversion’. If the term ‘temperature inversion’ is used
Temperature →
without any qualification it usually refers to this type of
Stable, inversion – night
inversion. The lower atmosphere is now said to be ‘stable’
because the higher warm layer restricts vertical mixing of air
and any pollutants in it.
0
1 C / 100 m
There are other types of inversion but the radiation inversion is
Altitude →
the ground than during the day when its heat would carry it
higher into the air, so with reduced height the downwind
concentration is again less diluted.
Temperature → • In some circumstances a temperature inversion can stop
Neutral stability restored – day elevated pollution from reaching the ground.
Instability
Altitude →
0 During a hot, still day, when the sun beats down strongly, the
1 C / 100 m
ground can become very hot and heats the air at the surface.
Strong heating
The hot less dense air rises rapidly and results in large eddies
from ground (convection) causing an unstable atmosphere. The turbulence
created generally results in better mixing of pollutants in the air
Temperature → but can also bring pollutants discharged at height to the
Unstable – still, hot, sunny day ground.
Contrary to popular belief, very windy weather—the sort that
blows our umbrellas inside out—is not meteorologically
unstable. It is entirely ‘neutral’, just very turbulent.
Sea breezes
The dynamics of air movement are such that this difference
results in a sea breeze in the mid morning as the air over the
land heats up, rises and is displaced by cooler air from the
ocean. If it is not removed by more widespread ‘synoptic
flows’ associated with high or low pressure regions, the hot
air goes out to sea aloft, is cooled above the water, then
settles and flows back over the land again. That is, a
circulating cell may be set up and a sea breeze is created
from the ocean to the land.
There are two effects on pollution in places like Sydney.
The first is beneficial in that the sea breeze can bring in
clean air from out to sea. The second is a detrimental effect,
the accumulated pollution of overnight and early morning
emissions caught in the drainage flow is blown back over
the land by the sea breeze from mid morning to mid
afternoon—Sydney then gets a double dose of its own
pollution!
Smog in Sydney
As we will see in section 3 of this Module, the sea breeze Of course there are also emissions from
plays an important role in the formation of photochemical the Sydney CBD that contribute to the
pollution in the Sydney Basin, which usually needs about mixture. Sometimes the emissions from
three to four hours for the ingredient pollutants to ‘cook’ the previous day are also re-circulated by
and form photochemical ‘smog’. By the time they reach the combination of the sea breeze and
south-western parts of the basin in mid to late afternoon, drainage flows.
emissions from the whole city, including from the western
and north-western suburbs in the morning, are well cooked
and can deliver a peak dose of ‘smog’.
The concentration of pollution in the atmosphere downwind from a source depends on:
– rate of pollutant discharge
– wind speed
– distance downwind from the source
– effective height of the discharge
– stability of the atmosphere, and
– ground surface features (e.g. vegetation, trees and hills).
Nearby hills
If there are medium to large hills or mountains near sources
the plumes can impinge on this higher ground causing
higher levels of pollution than would be the case in the
‘ideal’ situation. This effect is likely to be more important
under stable atmospheric conditions.
Nearby buildings
Most stacks that release pollutants are near or on buildings.
These buildings affect the normal air flow around them. We
become aware of this in windy weather when we can be hit by a
blast of air on coming around the corner of a building. The
effect on pollutant plumes in all wind conditions is to cause
some ‘downwash’ of the plume and higher concentrations
closer to the source than would occur for ‘ideal’ dispersion.
On still nights the emissions from higher houses will be caught in the katabatic flow and tend to
accumulate in the gullies below.
Understanding these sorts of situations and achieving satisfactory solutions can be achieved by
applying the qualitative meteorological principles described above, without the need for expensive
quantitative modelling.
The left hand photograph shows three fast- Rather than three small stacks, each the
food shops in front of a multi-storey block of ‘regulation height’ above the shops’ roofline,
flats and over the road from the seafront at the local council has required all three to be
Bondi Beach. serviced by a single large stack that is behind
the flats and ‘the regulation height’ above the
roof line of the block, as shown in the
photograph on the right.
Isopleths
The resultant predicted concentrations are then added together by
the computer and analysed as frequencies of concentrations
experienced at various locations. The results are usually plotted as
concentration isopleths on a map around the source. An isopleth
is a line joining points of equal predicted concentration.
It is possible to produce concentration isopleths for time
periods corresponding to the averaging periods in different air
quality goals. For example, for sulfur dioxide, figures could be
drawn separately to show isopleths for any or all of the predicted
10-minute, 1-hour and annual average concentrations.
AusPlume
The Australian version of the Gaussian model is the AusPlume model. It has been developed and
maintained by the Victorian Environment Protection Authority over a period of more than three
decades. (See www.epa.vic.gov.au/Air/EPA/pub391.asp)
It is generally adopted in most Australian jurisdictions and has a good record of reliable prediction, if
applied with sound judgment and experience. However, there are many models derived from this basic
Gaussian dispersion assumption. The US EPA’s ISC model, also a Gaussian model, is widely used,
giving similar results to AusPlume.
Puff models
In some situations, due to complex terrain or the need to accurately predict short-term concentrations,
a more complicated type of model can be used. This assumes the dispersing pollutant behaves like a
set of discrete ‘puffs’ or expanding clouds of pollutant in the atmosphere, rather than a continuous
plume as in the Gaussian model.
These so-called ‘puff models’ require more complex meteorological inputs and are more difficult and
expensive to run. One commonly used in Australia is CALPUFF, a model approved by the US EPA
for assessments involving complex meteorological situations.
TAPM
CSIRO’s Air Pollution Model (TAPM) eliminates the need to have site-specific meteorological
observations. Instead, the model predicts the three dimensional flows important to local-scale air
pollution, such as sea breezes and terrain induced flows, against a background of synoptic-scale
meteorological analyses.
The model is also able to account for differences in vegetation and soil properties across the region.
The air pollution component of TAPM uses the predicted meteorology and turbulence from the
meteorological component, while the Plume Rise Module is used to account for plume momentum
and buoyancy effects for point sources.
TAPM is also able to model chemical processes, such as the formation of photochemical smog.
More information can be found at www.dar.csiro.au/tapm/.
TAPM modelling uses a significantly different approach from the Gaussian plume models.
In Gaussian modelling the rate of dispersion of the plume is expressed as a mathematical function
of atmospheric stability and distance from the source. Thus it requires site-specific wind data as
well as a methodology for determining atmospheric stability.
TAPM on the other hand solves the fundamental equations of atmospheric motion and plume
dispersion. It calculates the wind-fields and the motion and dispersion of plumes directly.
Features such as sea breezes and thermal internal boundary layers, which require specific
methods for Gaussian models, are calculated naturally as part of TAPM.
Local government officers need to be able to make sensible judgements as to when modelling is
called for in the context of air quality issue and the comparative cost of mitigation measures.
Guidelines for both specifying and interpreting the reports from this type of specialist consulting
service are set out in the introduction to Module 3 of the Toolkit.
3 Air pollutants
carbon
3.1 The normal atmosphere dioxide
0.03%
The atmosphere is made up mostly of gases with other
microscopic liquid and solid particles (aerosols) dispersed in
oxygen
them. In ‘normal’ air the most abundant of the gases is 21%
inert
nitrogen (N2) making up about 78% of the volume. It is gases
chemically unreactive at normal temperatures. The next 1%
Ozone (O3)
Sulfur dioxide
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colourless gas with a sharp, nasty smell, but it is usually noticed as a salty
chemical taste in the mouth before being smelled. It is one of the six key air pollutants for which
national goals have been set.
Sources of SO2
Globally, human activities contribute over 100 million tonnes of SO2 each year, mainly from the
combustion of coal and fuel oil, with some contribution from the processing of mineral ores.
Significant amounts of SO2 are also emitted in volcanic eruptions. For example, it is estimated that the
1991 explosion of Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines blasted from 15 to 30 million tonnes of sulfur
dioxide into the air, as well as huge quantities of particulate matter.
Indicative Top Sour ces of SO2 emissions Top Sources of SO2 emissions in
over all of NSW in 2003 / 2004 Sydney in 2003 / 2004
Sydney, New castle, Wollongong Regional NSW
Thousand tonnes
0 100 200 300
Motor
Vehicles
Electr icity Supply
4200
tonnes Petroleum
Basic Non-Fer r ous Metal Refining
Manufactur ing
6400
tonnes
Ir on and Steel Manufactur ing
Motor Vehicles
Sulfur dioxide data from
the National Pollutant Inventory
In NSW by far the largest contribution is from coal-fired power stations located outside of Sydney.
In Sydney itself SO2 is also present in motor vehicle emissions but this is now a less important source
because national standards have already significantly reduced sulfur levels in fuels and will do so
more in the future.
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Monitor ing r ec ommenc ed in Sydney and lower Hunter in 1992
There are three main ways that data are obtained for the NPI database:
– medium to large industrial facilities measure and/or estimate and report their emissions to the
government
– State and Territory governments estimate generically the emissions from smaller facilities
– State and Territory governments estimate emissions from mobile and non-industrial sources
(such as emissions from activities like driving to work and mowing the lawn), and other sources
of pollutants.
NPI data can be useful for an overall view of the types of sources responsible for pollutant
emissions in a particular area, and the differences between the large urban centres and regional
areas. However, caution is required in using NPI data for air quality assessments. In
assessing potential impacts, consideration must be given to the location and manner in which
pollutants are emitted as well as the actual quantity of pollutant emitted. Also, the quality of the
data recorded in the NPI is unavoidably variable.
Carbon monoxide
The overall levels of carbon monoxide
Carbon monoxide (CO) is another of the key air pollutants for
are now below the NEPM standard,
which national goals have been set. It is a colourless and
with most of the emissions being from
odourless gas.
motor transport.
Sources of CO
CO is a product of the incomplete combustion of organic
material and its main natural sources are volcanoes and
bushfires. Sources associated with human activities are motor Top Sour ces of CO emissions in Sydney, New castle
vehicle emissions, some industrial activities such as steel and Wollongong in 2003 / 2004 (tonnes / year )
Trends in ambient CO
In most Australian cities and towns the levels of CO in air are
now below those that are hazardous to human health. The
NEPM goal of less than 9 ppm set for 2008 was achieved by
2000 through implementing catalytic vehicle emission
standards. The highest levels of CO are likely to be experienced
in the ‘canyons’ of city streets and nearby busy roads.
25
NEPM
20 standard
9 ppm
15
10
0
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Nitrogen oxides
The two nitrogen oxides that are important air pollutants are nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide
(NO2), collectively called NOx. NO is a colourless, odourless gas and NO2 is a brownish, highly
reactive gas with a nasty acrid smell when in very high concentrations. However, it is normally neither
smelled nor visible in the atmosphere.
NO is the primary form in which NOx is emitted, but it is usually converted relatively rapidly in the
atmosphere to the more reactive NO2 which is one of the six key pollutants included in the Air NEPM.
Nitrogen oxides are important pollutants because they contribute to the formation of photochemical
smog which can have significant impacts on human health. This is treated in more detail in the next
section.
The reaction of NOx with volatile organic compounds to form photochemical smog is considered in
the next section.
Impacts of NOx
Acute exposure to NO2 is harmful to human health. Fatalities have been reported due to gases
containing NO2 being inhaled when celluloid is burning. Also, in the case of ‘silo fillers disease’, NO2
poisoning has occurred because fodder containing nitrate has fermented and produced NO2.
Sydney *
0.25 Illawarra
NEPM
Hunter
0.20 Standar d
0.12 ppm
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
* The Sydney data does not include data from Sydney CBD site (a peak site which
d it i NO2 i 2000 & d t t th NEPM it i f NO2)
1 µm = 1 micron = 10 – 6 m
Category Description
PM10 (particulate matter All particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 µm
less than 10 µm) (sometimes called ‘inhalable’ particles).
PM2.5 (particulate matter All particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 µm
less than 2.5 µm) (sometimes called ‘respirable’ particles).
These can be clusters of as few as 20 to 50 individual molecules but
Particles less than 0.1 µm
tend to agglomerate rapidly to larger particles.
Condensable Formed by chemical reactions and physical condensation within a few
particulate matter seconds of emission from a stack.
TSP
PM1
PM2.5
The larger PM10 particles stay in the air for minutes or hours and travel as little as 100 metres or
as much as 50 kilometres.
The smaller PM2.5 particles persist in the air for days or weeks and can travel for hundreds of
kilometres.
PM10 PM2.5
Droplet evaporation may occur if water containing solids is used to cool gas streams. The cooling
water is ‘atomised’ and as the small droplets evaporate, the suspended and dissolved solids are
released as small particles, typically with sizes between 0.1 and 20 μm.
The diagram below (adapted from the US EPA) summarises the ranges of particle sizes arising from
the four different processes.
Particle attrition
(10 – 1000 μm)
Combustion burnout
(1.0 – 10 μm)
Droplet evaporation
(0.1 – 20 μm)
Nucleation
(0.1 – 1.0 μm)
Health effects
The human respiratory system in a healthy person normally is able to deal with most inhaled particles
without long-term effects or undue stress. However, in cases of extreme exposure and more generally
for sensitive individuals, the presence of airborne particles is associated with increased rates of
respiratory illnesses and symptoms.
When particulate matter is breathed in it then travels into the respiratory system. Generally the smaller
the particles the further they penetrate into the lungs and the worse their effect.
If the smaller PM2.5 particles contain more toxic substances like trace metals and carcinogenic
organic compounds, then these may be carried deeper into the lungs than the normal bronchio-
pulmonary defences would allow—with adverse effects.
Epidemiological studies have shown that exposure to particulate matter leads to increased use of
medication, more visits to doctors or hospital outpatient services and more deaths of medically-at-risk
individuals.
The known health effects of exposure to particulate matter include:
• coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath
• aggravated asthma
• damage to the lungs that results in decreased function
• lifelong respiratory disease such as chronic bronchitis and emphysema
• premature death in people with existing heart or lung conditions.
Asthma: this is caused by the periodic constriction of the bronchi and bronchioles making
breathing more difficult. It is triggered by airborne irritants and chemicals.
Chronic bronchitis: any small particle reaching the bronchi and bronchioles in the lungs
stimulates increased secretion of mucus to try and remove the irritation. In chronic bronchitis these
air passages become clogged with mucus leading to a persistent cough.
Emphysema: when very small PM2.5 particles penetrate deep into the lungs they are trapped and
cause the delicate walls of the alveoli to break down. This progressively reduces the gas exchange
area of the lungs which in turn forces the heart to pump ever larger volumes of blood to the lungs
in order to satisfy the body's needs. The added strain can lead to heart failure. Emphysema is now
mainly a result of cigarette smoke.
Other effects
Particulate matter in the air can cause a range of damage to surfaces and materials, as well as being a
significant nuisance problem. The simple requirement for more frequent cleaning and the associated
abrasion of surfaces by dust particles can speed up deterioration. Over the years many car yards
adjacent to dust-generating premises have been badly impacted leading to costly reparation.
Additionally, if the particles are themselves corrosive or have other pollutants, such as SO2/sulphate,
attached to them, they may corrode sensitive surfaces (paint work, duco, etc.) to which they adhere,
especially if there is overnight condensation on the particles lying on the sensitive surfaces.
In coastal areas wind-blown suspended sea salt particles are corrosive. They usually require particular
attention to exposed metal surfaces such as external plumbing in roof gutters and other structures.
250
PM10 c onc entr ation ( μ g/m3 )
200
150
NEPM
St andar d
100 50μg/m 3
50
0
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Events where concentrations of PM10 exceed the NEPM standard can occur in the Sydney region as
can be seen in the figure below.
Concentrations of PM10 near to or exceeding the NEPM standard are widespread in the Sydney region.
The more moderate of these generally occur during the cooler months of the year with the highest
concentrations observed during the early evening and early morning. They tend to be associated with
stable atmospheric conditions that are conducive to clear cold nights and the development of
inversions and drainage flows which can result in the trapping of pollutants close to the surface and
their transport within the Sydney region.
Extreme episodes of particle pollution are generally associated with large-scale hazard reduction
burning or wildfires. These sorts of events account for most of the exceedences of the PM10 standard
in the Sydney region.
The distribution of elevated concentrations of PM10 during these events is governed by the location of
the fire and the prevailing winds on that day. The combination of these two factors has meant that on
different occasions, all of the monitoring stations in the Sydney region have recorded elevated
concentrations of PM10.
Severe dust storms can also contribute to particulate pollution.
100
80
NEPM
Advisor y
60 Repor ting
Standar d
25 μg/m
3
40
20
0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Ozone
Ozone is important at two levels in the atmosphere: in the
troposphere (the air layer next to the earth’s surface) and in the
stratosphere (a higher air layer, above the troposphere).
In the troposphere high concentrations of ozone are
detrimental to health, vegetation and materials. It is the main
constituent of photochemical air pollution and is a very
reactive gas causing deterioration of all types of organic
materials it contacts. Gaseous ozone is the measured indicator
of photochemical air pollution and is used to set the ambient
standard for this type of pollution in the Air NEPM goal.
In the stratosphere high concentrations of ozone are
beneficial for health, biota and materials. It shields the earth’s
surface from damagingly high levels of ultraviolet radiation
from the sun. Ozone is also a greenhouse gas.
Upper-level (stratospheric) ozone is destroyed by the release of ozone-depleting substances such as
chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. The release of these materials is internationally controlled under the
Montreal Protocol and locally controlled in NSW under the Ozone Protection Act 1989.
Ozone is an ephemeral gas at both the tropospheric and stratospheric levels, being continually formed
and destroyed by dynamic, photocatalysed reactions. The concentration at any time depends on the
competing rates of destruction and formation. It is more difficult to measure accurately than most
other gaseous pollutants, since standard calibration gases cannot be stored.
The Air NEPM set the goal for ozone exposure at 0.1 ppm for Consideration is being given
a 1-hour exposure and 0.08 ppm for a 4-hour exposure, to the introduction of an 8-
neither to be exceeded more than once per year. hour standard for ozone.
Oxides of nitrogen
Oxides of nitrogen are released from motor vehicles
and industry. The largest proportion comes from motor
vehicles.
As discussed earlier in section 3.2 ‘Gaseous
impurities’, the two forms occurring in the atmosphere
are nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Fresh
emissions are mostly in the form of nitric oxide. This is
oxidised to nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere as part
of the photochemical process. The photochemical
reactions between the two oxides of nitrogen occurs
naturally in sunlight, but does not result in levels of
ozone being formed above concentrations of concern
if no significant concentrations of VOCs are
present.
Monitoring ozone
Care is needed in monitoring ozone. If the monitors are located too close
to concentrated sources of nitrogen oxide emissions, such as heavy
traffic lanes or near large industrial combustion sources or in CBDs, then
NO + O3 → NO2 + O2
low values are likely to be measured. This is because the dominant form
of nitrogen oxides from combustion is nitric oxide (NO), as discussed
above. This reacts very rapidly with ozone already formed to convert it
to oxygen. In the longer time needed for full development of oxidants
this effect passes and a realistic concentration of ozone will be measured
relating to the emissions.
This was the main cause of an unfortunate prediction about
photochemical air pollution made in the late 1960s, namely, that even
without any control of vehicle air pollution in Sydney, Los-Angeles-type
smog was not likely to be a problem until 1997. When measurements
were taken well away from the Sydney CBD in the early 1970s, high
ozone values quickly made it apparent that there was an urgent need for
control.
Traffic management
To the extent that local government has an influence on traffic congestion and generation, it can have a
significant impact on the potential for ozone and oxidant pollution within the air basin in which it is
located. But the pollution effect may not be a local one for the particular local government area in
which the control is undertaken.
Traffic generation and congestion can be influenced by planning for walking and cycling facilities;
and by planning to reduce local trips—e.g. for shopping or schools. These can all contribute to the
reduction of vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) in the air basin.
Emissions of the ingredients of photochemical smog in one local government area have regional
impacts and will impact on the air quality in other local government areas.
0.15
0.10
NEPM
st andar d:
0.05
0.10 ppm
0.00
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
3.5 Odours
The community complains about odours more frequently than any other type of air pollution. The
majority of the air quality problems associated with local-government-controlled industries and
businesses relate to odours. There is great subjectivity associated with odour assessment. These facts
make odours a significant problem for local government.
The olfactory
epithelium (Yale
University Medical
School website)
Odours are transported from source to nose by air movement, the wind. Many odours are not toxic at
readily detectable concentrations. Each citizen is equipped with a sensitive detector. So the primary
issue is amenity.
Most odours, both pleasant and unpleasant, result from mixtures of many compounds.
That odours come from mixtures of many compounds is especially true of the food and waste
treatment industries where biological processes characteristically generate families of odorous
compounds rather than one or two such compounds. Most rotting material contains hydrogen sulfide,
although it is not recognisable as such in the mixture. Surprisingly, hydrogen sulfide is also found in
small quantities in pleasant odours, such as coffee.
Odours:
– are pure compounds or mixtures of compounds which stimulate the olfactory nerve causing a
sensation of smell
– are often not toxic at the strength they are detectable (even if a ‘nasty smell’).
Measurement of odour
Odour strength is usually measured by quantitatively diluting a sample
of odorous air with non-odorous air and presenting it according to set
protocols to a panel of representative subjects, or ‘sniffers’.
The mean or average dilution value at which the panel just detects
the presence of the odour is called the threshold value.
Panel response may be either to the detection threshold or the
recognition threshold.
Measured odour concentrations can vary by an order of magnitude
depending on how the test is conducted. Some of the variations in the
results from odour testing include:
• Forced choice versus yes/no response—the panellist is asked to
choose the strongest of multiple odour dilutions presented to them
versus the panellist’s ability to smell anything in the dilution
presented.
• Dynamic versus static exposure—the panellist is exposed to a
continuous flow of odour dilutions versus being exposed to discrete
parcels of odour dilutions.
• Recognition versus detection threshold—the panellist can detect
a recognisable smell versus any smell sensation.
There can also be variations in the method of panel selection. Most panels are selected to be
representative of the ‘typical community’ and to be reliable in their response to varying odour
dilutions. They should not be dominated by panellists on the extremes of the range of sensitivity or
insensitivity.
The number of odour units in a sample is the number of dilutions required for the sample to reach
the chosen threshold of detection.
No reliable means of scientifically measuring O or defining C has been developed. Thus many odour
assessment techniques involve a compromise of specifying FID, which can be assessed scientifically,
and either not assessing OC or assuming it is loosely related to FID. This tends to be a ‘safe’
approach, in that it assumes no odour is preferable to any odour, even a normally pleasant one, in most
circumstances.
Despite these shortcomings, considerable progress has been made in odour assessment and control.
The DEC draft policy, Assessment and management of odour from stationary sources in NSW (2001),
provides extensive guidance for odour assessment and control.
Assessment of odour
In essence the assessment technique relies on three
things:
• measurement (sampling and testing) of odour
strength by dynamic olfactometry
• prediction of ambient concentrations at sensitive
receptors using dispersion formulae or air quality
models
• assessment of the predicted strength against
odour exposure criteria.
Council officers should also be aware that measuring emission rates from diffuse sources such
as smelly solid or liquid surfaces is problematic.
This is a serious qualification to general application of the methodology, since diffuse sources are
fairly common in many industries with an odour problem.
Even at the initial assessment level this technique is difficult and demanding to apply, and it is
unlikely that council officers would attempt it directly.
Much progress has been made on odour assessment over the last 50 years. However, there is still
not the same degree of consensus on managing this frustrating aspect of air quality as that which
exists for most other forms of air pollution.
Two general types of impact are addressed under the category of ‘air toxics’:
– directly toxic air pollutants
The Commonwealth Government has published several documents under its Air Toxics Program
including the State of knowledge report on air toxics and indoor air quality. NEPC released an
Information bulletin and an Impact statement for the National Environment Protection (Air Toxics)
Measure (2003).
While the NEPM sets monitoring investigation levels for these toxic compounds, it has not set
goals. In anticipation of setting goals it has prescribed a monitoring regime with a view to setting
goals by 2012.
The Environment Protection and Heritage Council (EPHC) has also identified other air toxics which
it has prioritized for further investigation at a later stage:
• 1,3 butadiene • nickel and compounds
• acetaldehyde • styrene
• arsenic and compounds • tetrachloroethylene
• cadmium and compounds • trichloroethylene
• methyl ethyl ketone • polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
• methyl isobutyl ketone • polychlorinated dioxins and furans.
It would be wise for local councils to consider obtaining expert advice if they need to consider an
emission involving toxic pollutants.
Management framework
The ideal air quality management objective is to avoid all air pollution and maintain pristine air
quality. Such a goal is not feasible in the presence of human activities relying on energy from fuels
and involving biological and manufacturing processes.
Our practical objective becomes to manage air quality to the best level
possible and to ensure that pollutants are kept at or below acceptable Management
Controlling emissions
Except for the unique case of motor vehicles—which is the preserve of
the Commonwealth Government—agreed national policy leaves
controlling emissions to achieve the national ambient air quality goals to
the States and Territories.
Control of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane is
also guided at a national level by the Commonwealth Government.
However, in varying degrees, State and Territory governments, and in
some cases local councils, have taken significant initiatives in this area.
Responsibilities for managing greenhouse gases are not yet well
defined.
In contrast, the stratospheric ozone depleting gases are regulated in an
agreed manner by the Commonwealth, States and local government in
pursuance of Australia’s national responsibility under the Montreal
Protocol for Ozone Protection.
State level
Each State continues to carry the responsibility for managing the release State environmental
of air pollutants in its jurisdictional territory. planning legislation
governs the location of
This is achieved through planning legislation in terms of new industry and business.
developments. The Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979
(EP&A Act) is the relevant planning law in NSW. The recently updated Location, in turn, affects
EP&A Act and Regulations provide tools for managing the location of the impacts of air
polluting sources. pollutants.
Level of
Direct responsibility Influence
government
Five-step cycle
The five key steps are:
• defining the problem
• exploring options for its solution
• deciding on a solution by analysis—including costs and benefits
• implementing the chosen solution
• checking and, if necessary, reviewing the outcome.
What is the
issue or
problem?
Global? Local?
What is the
issue or
problem?
Regional?
If the issue is to manage air quality comprehensively in the local government area to meet the NEPM
standard or goal, then this may be beyond the capacity of many councils acting alone. For example,
few local councils in large metropolitan areas can possibly manage all the factors which contribute to
air quality in their local government area. There are two reasons for this:
• air pollutants cross council boundaries, and
• not all pollution sources in a local government area (LGA) are under the council’s regulatory
control.
Conversely, councils in rural areas may be in a position to effectively achieve this outcome because
their areas are larger and most sources tend to be council-controlled.
Air pollution comes from many sources, and the multitude of small sources make a major
contribution to the regional air quality problem in cities like Sydney. Therefore councils almost
always have some part to play with the State and Commonwealth governments in the
management of regional air quality.
See Module 2 for information on Cities for Climate Protection and other initiatives.
Some regional air quality issues, such as photochemical smog, can be significantly influenced by
sources which are located throughout the region and are regulated by individual local councils.
Another example would be domestic wood fires in the north west of the Sydney air basin or parts of
the Southern Highlands or Northern Tablelands. Fine particles and aerosols from wood fires are
trapped in the early-morning winter drainage flow in Sydney, Armidale and the Southern Highlands.
They accumulate in the stable air moving slowly eastwards, exposing the suburbs it crosses to high
levels of particulate air pollution.
Exploring options
There are usually many ways of reducing air pollution. Module 3 of the
Toolkit outlines some of the important techniques for the types of
industries commonly controlled by local government.
In general the management options fall into three categories:
• changes to practices
• changes to materials used
• changes to equipment.
Often a combination of two or even three of these categories can be used together.
Changes to practices
Changes to practices might be, for example, ensuring paper or carbon filters are changed regularly in
food preparation establishments. This will mean their containment capacity does not become
overwhelmed, rendering the removal of fatty and smelly aerosols ineffective. Another change to
practice might be applying adequate water to dusty surfaces on a construction site or within industrial
premises.
Changes to materials
Changes to materials might be, for example, substituting an effective but less odorous or low solvent-
content surface coating for a more odorous high solvent-content one in a smash repair shop, or on a
white goods finishing line. This would reduce both odours and VOC contribution to photochemical
smog. Another example would be ensuring wood used for domestic combustion is well seasoned and
dry.
Changes to equipment
Changes to equipment might involve, for example, using high-pressure
low-volume applicators in the car repair trade to minimise overspray, or
installing a catalytic oxidiser on the exhaust of a coffee bean roaster.
Another common equipment change is to raise the height of the exhaust
point of the pollutant in the interests of better dispersion. While this can
give real relief locally, it is ineffective for regional impacts.
However, even to achieve the local benefits, the change in height has to
be enough to overcome building and topographic effects. It is not
uncommon for these factors to defeat the purpose of raising stacks at
small to medium sources that are surrounded by other high buildings and
hills.
Practice? Materials?
Equipment?
Deciding on a solution
Once a range of options has been developed to address the issue, the
options are analysed, quantitatively if possible, to determine the
optimum solution. The analysis should look at:
• costs
• effectiveness
• acceptability.
Options may not be easy to assess in situations where there has been
extensive or prolonged public disquiet and solutions have been difficult
to find.
The guidance notes in Module 3 provide a range of detailed solutions to specific types of industries
which present problems for local government.
develop this expertise. An additional option, always available to councils, is to require the businesses
in question to provide expert reports addressing the issues of uncertainty.
Acceptability of a solution
Council must determine which of the possible solutions to the problem is the most acceptable, based
on the consideration of the costs, the effectiveness and the benefits associated with each option.
Some exercise of practical judgment is usually warranted, especially for dealing with amenity
impacts which may be a significant proportion of complaints to council. The amenity of the people
affected by the pollution may need to be weighed against the capacity of the neighbouring source of
air pollution to pay for the mitigation measures.
Acceptability will be more difficult to assess, especially for amenity pollutants such as dust and
odour.
For example, it is not uncommon for complainants against odour sources to become so sensitised to
the odour over a period that a significant improvement, even to the level of industry best practice, will
not satisfy them. Putting up with a smell for a considerable time can leave an emotional scar which is
not easily healed. Added to this, political factors can sometimes become entwined in the problem.
Effectiveness? Cost?
What is the
solution?
Acceptability?
Implementation
The tools and resources needed for implementation of the chosen solution
need to be carefully assembled and applied. Depending on the nature of the
problem or issue different tools will be required.
Essentially there are three tools used in implementation:
• legal instruments
• technical resources
• education.
In many cases problems can be avoided in the development assessment process by anticipating
impacts and using siting or the incorporation of appropriate controls at that stage.
To manage an emission source that is presenting problems (external to council’s own operations), the
solution will generally require the management of the polluting source to undertake the work.
The legal instruments available for imposing these requirements are outlined in Module 2. They are
generally Prevention or Clean Up Notices under the POEO Act. Occasionally variations to or
enforcement of planning consent provisions or measures under the LG Act may be used.
The technical information needed can be generated by or elicited from the source factory or business,
either voluntarily in response to council recommendations, or in response to a Prevention or Clean Up
Notice.
Persuasion
The preferable way to implement change is by persuading
Even when a solution is developed
the factory or business management that they need to solve
voluntarily by a business, it is
the problem, since development undertaken willingly is
advisable for a council to issue a
always more likely to succeed than development undertaken
notice to formalise any agreement
by constraint. There can also be problems for council
with the occupier of the premises
officers in drafting technical notices in terms which avoid
or business.
the risk of the recipient of the notice evading its purpose.
An issued notice should clearly set out any requirements
relating to the investigation of a problem, monitoring or
operational changes and the timeframe for completion of
each step, so that all parties know where they stand. A
realistic time is needed for compliance with equipment
design and installation. A notice which is unrealistically
short, i.e. a standard ‘30 days to comply’ typically used with
domestic premises and shops, may render the notice
ineffective if the actions required involve designing
equipment, specialised installation or raising capital. For
longer processes it might be appropriate to set milestones.
Education
Education may be the principal means of addressing some problems, either as a broad issue-specific
campaign or on an individual premises level. Planning would need to take account of the need for
sustained advice and follow-up for effective implementation.
Legal? Education?
How is it
implemented?
Technical?
Mere disappearance of the complaints may seem an adequate outcome from an officer’s
perspective. But if this results in an ineffective solution being applied in another situation, the
outcome will not have been satisfactory.
Secondly, reviewing programs leads to continual improvement and is the path to sustainability in
environment protection.
This approach can be adopted for all programs, from the smallest action to a council’s overall
environmental performance.
Monitoring
Monitoring can span a full range of actions from checking for odours on a
‘sniff patrol’, through emission testing of a source on completion of its
installation, to ambient scientific monitoring to ensure that air quality
goals have been achieved. The expense increases across this range.
Ambient scientific monitoring, the most expensive, is rarely
warranted in local government situations involving small to medium
Simple air pollution monitors
industries and businesses, even for limited periods.
on a large construction site
Consistent pre- and post- monitoring (scientific or by simple observation) is essential for the
adequate assessment and management of new developments and changes to premises.
‘Monitoring’ may be anything from intelligent observation to specialised, scientific measurement.
Wherever it lies on the spectrum it should be:
– systematic
– documented
– subject to careful analysis.
Auditing
Auditing is a systematic and thorough checking of operations and equipment to make sure they are
performing as intended. There are various techniques for auditing which are described on the DECC
and related web sites and in various standards produced by organisations such as Standards Australia
and the ISO standards.
Audits may take many forms. The purpose of an audit might be to address:
• compliance
• program effectiveness
• due diligence.
Audits are most successful when their objectives have been carefully and precisely defined before
any measurements or checks are undertaken.
Audits may be carried out by accredited or general auditors, or may be independent or internal
to the organisation involved.
The acceptability of these variations will depend on the objectives. For example, for auditing
contaminated land only DECC accredited auditors may be used, whereas there are fewer situations in
which accredited auditors are likely to be required in air pollution situations.
Finally, the term ‘monitoring’ is also applied in a management sense to the overall process of checking
that a program or policy is being implemented satisfactorily.
Reporting of monitored and audited results should take account of who needs to know and who
might be interested in knowing.
The feedback process should also be open, and ideally there should be a willingness to consider
critical comment in order to improve management.
Does it work or
Monitoring? need changing? Auditing?
Overview
This management cycle, widely used for managing many activities in business and government, is
appropriate for local government management of air quality.
The full cycle is shown combined in the following diagram.
What is
the issue or
problem?
Monitoring by industries
Some industries are required to undertake specific ambient monitoring around their operations and to
make the information publicly available. This can be usefully accessed and reviewed by local
government for general air quality trends, although these large industries are not regulated by local
government.
GIS databases
Often a council’s own GIS database of its industries and businesses can be a useful starting point in
developing a priority program for air quality management. For example, the location of poultry
operations, small piggeries or mushroom growers in relation to residential areas and likely prevalent
wind directions might provide useful inputs to land use planning and the formulation of Local
Environment Plans (LEPs) and Development Control Plans (DCPs).
Council-generated information
Complaints usually represent a substantial database in councils, and careful analysis of the complaints
can provide useful pointers for practical management as discussed further below. Skilled observations
by council officers in the course of normal field duties can also provide valuable data inputs.
4.4 Planning
Although regional planning for air quality is primarily the province of DECC and the Department of
Planning, local government planning for local facilities can have significant impacts on air quality. For
example, the development of a new shopping complex has obvious implications for traffic flow and
vehicle emissions and certain types of commercial emissions. Similarly, the development of a new
industrial area can have significant impacts on air quality—both locally and regionally. For example,
the development of marina-based businesses could result in increased emissions of VOCs as a result of
boat maintenance activities.
The best management of the regional and amenity impacts of air pollution is achieved at the
planning stage, in which local government is an active partner with State government.
Enforcement
Enforcement will be needed from time to time, when industries, businesses or householders are tardy
and recalcitrant in complying with Council’s requirements to control or eliminate air pollution.
Penalty Notices under the EP&A Act and the POEO Act are useful tools for achieving compliance.
Prosecution is a more demanding measure, but one which may be warranted in difficult cases. The
approach taken will depend on circumstances and council policies and attitudes to enforcement.
Clean-Up Notices under the POEO Act where there has been an incident or persistent damage to the
environment can serve both the dual purpose of remediating damage to the environment and being a
costly deterrent to repeat offences.
Warning letters following inspections are used by some councils as the first formal action against
offending premises, before applying the law formally. While this can be effective, it needs to be
publicly demonstrated that more formal legal action will indeed follow if warnings are not heeded.
Long-term experience has shown that public descriptions of smells and fallout are not generally
reliable. What is reliable is that complaints are more often than not an indication that a real
problem of some sort does exist.
Most local government councils have a system for recording and following up on complaints. It is
wise to review this periodically to see if there are patterns of complaints which could be dealt with in
other ways—for example by providing information via council’s website or brochures, and so on.
Persistent complaint patterns may point to a need to make concerted efforts to achieve efficient
solutions for particular premises or industries.
4.7 Resources
Many council environmental officers have received training at university or college level, and are
generally equipped to understand the basic principles of air quality science without being experts in
the area. However, the air quality issues which arise, even with medium to small installations, can be
quite complex. For example, crematoria, a local council responsibility, emit mercury and dioxins and
complex risk assessment may be needed in their assessment and management.
From time to time, when complex issues arise, councils will need access to more skills than available
through their staff. Consultants can be used to supplement council skills, either employed by council
or by the businesses posing the problems.
Use of consultants
Some councils retain consultants to advise them on specific matters of planning or development
consent assessments. However, this can strain council budgets if the costs cannot be passed on to the
developers.