1 FA July 2024 MS
1 FA July 2024 MS
Economics
Higher & Standard Level
Day: Monday
Date: July 29, 2024
Duration: 35
minutes
Instructions to candidates
Q1 Using real world examples, evaluate the argument that economic growth is always good?
Page 1 of 3
A relevant diagram illustrating the costs and benefits of economic growth, such as the private and social
costs of increased consumption of demerit goods, as well as the size of the welfare loss and the
externalities associated with unregulated markets. Examples of this might be a sharp rise in pollution or
traffic congestion within fast-growing cities or the fact that some LEDCs, have experienced high rates of
economic growth but have also seen sharp rises in economic degradation or significant gaps in wealth and
income inequality. For example, the diagram above and to the right, illustrates one of the effects of
economic growth, a rise in traffic congestion, pollution or another demerit good. The result is an increase in
welfare loss, resulting from the increase in consumption of some demerit goods, represented on the diagram
by Q1 rather than the socially optimum level of Q2.
A short conclusion weighing up the relative merits of both arguments and the impact upon different
stakeholders, as well as the short-term as well as long-term consequences upon sustainability. For
example, a conclusion might recognise that while the net welfare effect of economic growth is likely to be
positive, some stakeholders, typically the young and skilled will benefit more than others. The conclusion
might also recognise that in some cases the positive effects of sustained economic growth, might not lead to
higher living standards for a period of time.
Page 2 of 3
Q2 Using a real-world example, evaluate the view that the most significant impact of income inequality
is the way it limits growth in the long-run aggregate supply. [15]
An explanation that income inequality limits the growth in LRAS because low-income
households do not have enough access to education, training and healthcare which makes them
unproductive workers. Low-income people also lack the capital to start their own businesses
to contribute to the LRAS. These two factors mean the LRAS cannot increase in the way
shown in the diagram.
An example to illustrate the limits on the growth of LRAS. In this case, India could be used.
Evaluation might include discussion of the other implications of income inequality such as the
demand side implications of a country having a high proportion of people on low incomes who
cannot add as much to AD as people on higher incomes. Also discussion of the implication of
low incomes on the political and social stability of a country.
Page 3 of 3