0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

PQM1

The document contains a series of problems related to quantum mechanics, focusing on topics such as eigenstates, commutation relations, time evolution of operators, coherent states, and Hamiltonians. Each problem presents specific tasks, including proving mathematical relations, finding wavefunctions, and interpreting physical results. Optional problems are marked with an asterisk and may involve more complex concepts.

Uploaded by

derekdereklch
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

PQM1

The document contains a series of problems related to quantum mechanics, focusing on topics such as eigenstates, commutation relations, time evolution of operators, coherent states, and Hamiltonians. Each problem presents specific tasks, including proving mathematical relations, finding wavefunctions, and interpreting physical results. Optional problems are marked with an asterisk and may involve more complex concepts.

Uploaded by

derekdereklch
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Prof. E.

Pajer PQM 1 Michaelmas 2024

Principles of Quantum Mechanics - Problems 1


Please email me with any comments about these problems, particularly if you spot an error. Problems with an
asterisk (∗) are optional and may be more difficult.

1. Let |xi and |pi be eigenstates of the three-dimensional position and momentum operators, respectively.

i) Given that hx|pi = eix·p/~ /(2π~)3/2 , show that


   
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
hx|Lz |ψi = −i~ x −y ψ(x) and hp|Lz |ψi = −i~ px − py ψ̃(p) ,
∂y ∂x ∂py ∂px

where Lz = XPy − Y Px , |ψi is a generic state with position- and momentum-space wavefunctions
ψ(x) = hx|ψi and ψ̃(p) = hp|ψi.
ii) Find the position space wavefunction of e−ia·P/~ |ψi and the momentum space wavefunction of
eik·X |ψi, where a and k are constants.

2. Let A and B be any operators which each commute with [A, B], and let λ ∈ C.

i) Prove that [A, B n ] = nB n−1 [A, B] for all n ∈ N0 , and that [A, eB ] = eB [A, B].
ii) Define the operator-valued function F (λ) = eλA eλB e−λ(A+B) . Show that F 0 (λ) = λ [A, B] F (λ).
Hence deduce that
1
eA eB = eA+B+ 2 [A,B] = eB eA e[A,B] .

Now let A and B be any operators (not necessarily commuting with [A, B]).

iii) Prove that d eλA Be−λA /dλ = eλA [A, B] e−λA . Hence deduce that


1
eA B e−A = B + [A, B] + [A, [A, B]] + · · · .
2

3. Let X(t) = eiHt/~ Xe−iHt/~ and P (t) = eiHt/~ P e−iHt/~ where X and P are the usual position and
momentum operators, and H is the Hamiltonian of the d = 1 harmonic oscillator. Show that
1
X(t) = X cos(ωt) + P sin(ωt)

P (t) = P cos(ωt) − mωX sin(ωt) .

and interpret this result. Evaluate [X(t), P (t)].

4. A Fermi oscillator has Hilbert space H = C2 and Hamiltonian H = B † B, where B 2 = 0 and

B † B + BB † = 1 (the anti commutator) .

Find the eigenvalues of H. If |0i is a state obeying H|0i = 0 and h0|0i = 1, find B|0i and B † |0i. Obtain
a matrix representation of the operators B, B † and H.
Prof. E. Pajer PQM 1 Michaelmas 2024

5. Consider a d = 1 quantum harmonic oscillator with classical frequency ω. Define the coherent state |αi
by

|αi = eαA − ᾱA |0i ,
where A† and A are the usual raising & lowering operators, |0i is the ground state of the oscillator and
α ∈ C is a constant.

i) Show that |αi is an eigenstate of A and find its eigenvalue. Compute the inner product between
two different coherent states |αi and |βi. [You may find it helpful to use the results of question 2.]
Does the set {|αi}α∈C of all coherent states form a basis of the Hilbert space?
ii) A quantum oscillator is prepared to be in state |αi at t = 0. Show that subsequently it evolves to
become the new coherent state e−iωt/2 |e−iωt αi.
iii) Suppose α ∈ R. By expressing A and A† in terms of X and P , sketch the position space wavefunction
of |αi in this case.
iv*) Now let α ∈ C and compute hα|P |αi. Hence give a physical interpretation of the coherent state for
general complex α. Without further calculation, describe the shape and motion of both the position
space and momentum space wavefunctions of a general coherent state as time passes.

6*. In certain units where ~ = 2m = 1, the relative motion of the atoms in a diatomic molecule can be
modelled by the Hamiltonian
 2
2 1 −X
Hν = P + ν + − e ,
2
where ν is a real parameter.

i) Sketch the potential. Suggest a reason why it gives a better description of the molecule’s vibrations
than the harmonic oscillator does.
ii) Find a non-Hermitian operator Aν that depends on ν, such that
1
Hν = A†ν Aν + ν +
4
What is the ground state energy of Hν ? Calculate the position space wavefunction of the ground
state. For what range of ν is this state normalizable?
iii) Let |0, νi be the ground state appropriate for parameter ν. Show that

Aν A†ν = A†ν−1 Aν−1 + 2ν − 1

and hence that A†ν |0, ν − 1i is also an (unnormalized) eigenstate of Hν .


iv) Iterating this procedure, deduce an expression for the unnormalized nth eigenstate in terms of a
sequence of raising operators acting on a ground state, for appropriate choices of the parameter.
Hence find the bound state spectrum of Hν . Show that the number of bound states is bν + 1c. Do
these states form a basis of the Hilbert space?

7. Let P/~ and J/~ be the generators of translations and rotations, respectively. By considering the effect
of a rotation and translation on an arbitrary vector v ∈ R3 , show that [Ji , Pj ] = i~ ijk Pk .
Prof. E. Pajer PQM 1 Michaelmas 2024

8*. A quantum particle is described by the Hilbert space H = L2 (R3 , d3 x) and has Hamiltonian H = P2 /2m.
Galilean boosts with fixed velocity v act on H through a time-independent unitary operator U (v) such
that
U † (v) X(t) U (v) = X(t) + vt ,
where X(t) is the position operator in the Heisenberg picture.

i) Show that U (v1 ) U (v2 ) = U (v1 + v2 ) and that U † (v) P U (v) = P + mv. Hence express U (v) in
terms of X, P and v.
ii) Let T (a) = e−ia·P/~ be the translation operator. Evaluate the composition of operators

T † (a) U † (v) T (a) U (v)

Is this compatible with what you’d expect classically for the corresponding sequence of boosts and
translations?

You might also like