0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views6 pages

IBT Chapter 3 Summary

Chapter 3 discusses the reasons for trade, emphasizing comparative advantage and economies of scale. It explains the Ricardian model of international trade, highlighting how differences in labor productivity influence trade patterns and the benefits of specialization. The chapter also addresses misconceptions about comparative advantage and the effects of transport costs and nontraded goods on trade dynamics.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views6 pages

IBT Chapter 3 Summary

Chapter 3 discusses the reasons for trade, emphasizing comparative advantage and economies of scale. It explains the Ricardian model of international trade, highlighting how differences in labor productivity influence trade patterns and the benefits of specialization. The chapter also addresses misconceptions about comparative advantage and the effects of transport costs and nontraded goods on trade dynamics.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Chapter 3

• Reasons for Trade:

o Countries trade because they are different (comparative advantage).


o Countries trade to achieve economies of scale.

• Comparative Advantage:
o A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good if its opportunity
cost of producing that good is lower than in other countries.

o This concept is central to understanding why trade is beneficial.


o Trade between two countries can benefit both countries if each country exports
the goods in which it has a comparative advantage.

• Ricardian Model:
o A model of international trade where trade is solely due to international
differences in labor productivity.

o Developed by David Ricardo.


One-Factor Economy:

• Assumptions:

o One factor of production (labor).

o Two goods (wine and cheese).


o Unit labor requirement (aLC, aLW): the number of hours of labor required to
produce one unit of a good.

o Total labor supply (L).

• Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF):


o Shows the maximum amount of one good that can be produced given the
production of another good.

o In a one-factor economy, the PPF is a straight line.


o Equation: aLCQC + aLWQW ≤ L.
o The slope of the PPF represents the opportunity cost of one good in terms of the
other.

• Relative Prices and Supply:


o Supply decisions are based on maximizing earnings.

o Labor moves to the sector with the higher wage.


o The economy specializes in the production of the good with the higher relative
price compared to its opportunity cost.
o In the absence of trade, relative prices equal relative unit labor requirements
(labor theory of value).

Trade in a One-Factor World:

• Assumptions:

o Two countries (Home and Foreign).


o One factor of production (labor) in each country.

o Two goods (wine and cheese).

o Home has a comparative advantage in cheese: aLC/aLW < aLC*/aLW*.

• Absolute Advantage vs. Comparative Advantage:


o Absolute advantage: A country can produce a good with less labor than another
country.

o Comparative advantage determines trade patterns, not absolute advantage.

• Determining Relative Prices After Trade:

o Prices are determined by relative supply and demand.


o General equilibrium analysis is crucial (considering both markets).

o Relative supply curve (RS) is a "step" function.


o World relative price is determined by the intersection of relative supply and
demand curves.

• Gains from Trade:


o Trade allows countries to "produce" goods indirectly, which can be more
efficient.
o Trade expands consumption possibilities beyond production possibilities.

o Both countries are better off with trade.

• Relative Wages:

o Relative wage: the ratio of wages between two countries.


o Relative wage lies between the ratios of the two countries' productivities in the
two industries.
o Comparative advantage allows countries to have a cost advantage even with
different wage rates.

Misconceptions about Comparative Advantage:


• Productivity and Competitiveness (Myth 1):
o Free trade is beneficial even if a country does not have an absolute advantage in
any good.

o Gains from trade depend on comparative, not absolute, advantage.

o Competitive advantage depends on relative productivity and relative wages.


• The Pauper Labor Argument (Myth 2):
o Foreign competition is not inherently unfair or harmful when based on low
wages.

o Low wages in foreign countries are often due to lower overall productivity.
o The argument that industries shouldn't compete with those paying lower wages
is flawed.
o Example: Ross Perot's warning about the "giant sucking sound" of U.S. industry
moving to Mexico.
o The key point is that trade benefits a country if it's cheaper to produce goods
domestically and trade them than to produce everything.

o Foreign countries benefit from trade, even with low wages.

• Exploitation (Myth 3):


o The belief that trade exploits a country if its workers receive much lower wages is
a misconception.
o Focus should be on whether workers and their country are better off with trade
than without it.
o Example: Contrast between high CEO salaries and low wages of Central American
garment workers.
o Denying low-wage countries the opportunity to export can lead to even deeper
poverty.

o The alternative to "exploitation" might be worse.


o One must know the alternative situation before declaring that a low wage
represents exploitation.

Comparative Advantage with Many Goods:

• Model Setup:
o Two countries (Home and Foreign).

o One factor of production (labor).

o Many goods (N).

o Unit labor requirements: aLi (Home), aLi* (Foreign).


o Goods are ordered by increasing ratio of Home to Foreign unit labor
requirements (aLi/aLi*).

• Relative Wages and Specialization:

o The pattern of trade depends on the ratio of Home to Foreign wages (w/w*).

o Goods are produced where it is cheapest.


o Home produces goods where aLi*/aLi > w/w*.

o Foreign produces goods where aLi*/aLi < w/w*.

o There is a "cut" in the lineup of goods based on the wage ratio.

o Numerical example: Apples, bananas, caviar, dates, enchiladas.


• Benefits of Specialization:

o Both countries gain from specialization and trade.

o It is cheaper to "produce" goods indirectly through trade.


o Example: Home imports dates and enchiladas because it's cheaper than domestic
production.
• Determining Relative Wages:

o Relative wages are determined by the relative derived demand for labor.

o Relative demand for Home labor falls when Home wages rise.
o Two effects: Goods produced in Home become more expensive; fewer goods are
produced in Home.
o Relative demand curve (RD) is "stepped."
o Relative supply curve (RS) is vertical.

o Equilibrium relative wage is determined by the intersection of RD and RS.


Adding Transport Costs and Nontraded Goods:

• Effects of Transport Costs:


o Transport costs do not change the fundamental principles of comparative
advantage.

o They reduce the extent of specialization.

o Some goods become nontraded.


o Example: Caviar and dates become nontraded with 100% transport costs.
o Reasons for less than complete specialisation are: multiple factors of production,
protectionism, and transport costs.

• Nontraded Goods:

o Services (haircuts, auto repair) are generally nontraded.


o Goods with high weight-to-value ratios (cement) are often nontraded.

o Many goods are nontraded due to low cost advantages or high transport costs.

o Nations spend a large portion of their income on non-traded goods.

Empirical Evidence on the Ricardian Model:


• Model's Limitations:

o Predicts extreme specialization.

o Ignores income distribution effects.

o Neglects differences in resources.


o Does not account for economies of scale.

• Model's Strengths:

o Predicts that countries export goods with relatively high productivity.

o Confirmed by studies comparing British and American productivity and trade.


o Bela Balassa's 1963 study: Higher relative productivity leads to higher relative
exports.

o Trade depends on comparative, not absolute, advantage.


o Example: Bangladesh's clothing exports, despite low overall productivity.
o Evidence shows that differences in labour productivity play an important role in
determining world trade patterns.

Important Definitions:
• Comparative Advantage: The ability of a country to produce a good or service at a lower
opportunity cost than another country.
• Opportunity Cost: The value of the next best alternative that is given up when a choice
is made.
• Ricardian Model: A model of international trade that demonstrates how comparative
advantage leads to gains from trade.

• Unit Labor Requirement: The amount of labor required to produce one unit of a good.
• Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF): A graph that shows the maximum amount of one
good that can be produced for every possible level of production of the other good.
• Absolute Advantage: The ability of a country to produce more of a good or service
than another country using the same amount of resources.
• Relative Wage: The wage rate of one country relative to the wage rate of another
country.

• General Equilibrium Analysis: The simultaneous analysis of all markets in an economy.


• • Pauper Labor Argument: The misconception that foreign competition based on low
wages is unfair.

• • Derived Demand: Demand for a factor of production that results from the demand for
goods produced with that factor.

• • Nontraded Goods: Goods and services that are not traded internationally due to high
transport costs or other factors.

• • Relative Derived Demand for Labor: The demand for home labor relative to foreign
labor, derived from the demand for the goods those laborers produce.

You might also like