Text Summarization using NLP

Shashank Mishra Tanishk Kumar Singh Shivansh Rai

2201921540152 2201921540175 2210921540159
Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science) Department of Computer Science
and Engineering(Data Science) and Engineering(Data Science) and Engineering(Data Science)
GL Bajaj Institute of Technology GL Bajaj Institute of Technology GL Bajaj Institute of Technology
and Management and Management and Management
Greater Noida, India Greater Noida, India Greater Noida, India
[email protected] tanishksingh442 [email protected]

Shivansh P Singh Mrs Priya Singh

2201921540158 Project Supervisor
Department of Computer Science Assistant Professor
and Engineering(Data Science) GL Department Of
Bajaj Institute of Technology and Csds&Aids
Management Greater Noida, India GLBITM

Abstract——The exponential growth of digital content has made content for clarity and coherence. Abstractive methods, which
manual text processing impractical. Automated text sum- are often seen as more advanced, aim to create summaries
marization is a crucial natural language processing (NLP) task that that are not only more concise but also more fluent and easier
helps generate concise summaries from large documents while
retaining essential information. Summarization methods can be
to understand. This paper explores the evolution, challenges,
categorized into extractive and abstractive approaches, each and advancements of these methodologies, with a focus on the
having distinct advantages and challenges. Recent advance- ments algorithms behind them. Machine learning plays a crucial role
in deep learning, particularly with transformer-based models like in improving summarization techniques, making them more
BERT and GPT, have significantly improved sum- marization accurate, efficient, and adaptable to diverse types of content.
quality. This paper explores various summarization techniques, The paper also discusses real-world applications of
their applications in domains like healthcare, legal research, and summarization in various fields, including document retrieval,
academic writing, and the latest advancements in neural
networkbased summarization models. —Text summa- rization, news aggregation, legal research, healthcare, and academic
extractive summarization, abstractive summarization, NLP, deep writing. In these areas, summarization techniques enhance
learning, transformers, document retrieval, content curation, pro- ductivity, streamline information retrieval, improve
coherence, information retrieval. decision- making, and help users quickly extract essential
Index Terms—Nlp,extractive abstractive, tf-idf,sequence to se- information from vast volumes of text, ultimately reducing
quence,rouge,bert,transformer cognitive load and improving efficiency.The exponential growth
of digital content has made manual text processing
impractical. With vast amounts of information being produced
I. INTRODUCTION
daily, it has become increasingly difficult for individuals and
The exponential growth of digital content has made manual organizations to efficiently manage and digest such data.
text processing increasingly impractical. With vast amounts Automated text summarization addresses this issue by
of information being produced daily, efficiently managing condensing lengthy texts into meaningful summaries, making
and digesting data has become a significant challenge. Au- information more digestible and accessible. This process not
tomated text summarization addresses this by condensing only saves time but also helps users focus on key insights
lengthy texts into concise summaries, making information without having to go through entire documents. Extractive
more accessible and easier to digest. This process saves Summarization: Select key sentences or phrases directly from
time and allows users to focus on key insights without the original text. Abstractive Summarization: Generates new
reading entire documents, which is especially valuable in sentences, often paraphrasing the original content, to ensure
today’s fastpaced, information-heavy environment. There are clarity and coherence. This paper explores these
two primary methods of text summarization: extractive and methodologies, their evolution, challenges, and
abstractive. Extractive summarization selects key sentences advancements, focusing on the underlying algorithms, and the
or phrases directly from the original text, while abstractive significant role of machine learning in improving
summarization generates new sentences that paraphrase the summarization techniques. Additionally,
it examines real-world applications in various fields, including Watson. The paper emphasizes the importance of refining ATS
document retrieval, news aggregation, legal research, health- models for domain-specific tasks, ethical considerations, and
care, and academic writing, where summarization techniques real-time summarization solutions. [3]The research paper, ”A
have proven essential in enhancing productivity and decision- Survey on NLP Based Text Summarization for Summa-
making. rizingProductReviews,”explorestheincreasingsignificance of
text summarization in managing online product reviews,
II. LITERATURE REVIEW given the rising prevalence of e-commerce. It categorizes
summarization techniques into extractive and abstractive ap-
The literature review in ”Natural Language Processing proaches, further classified by input type (single or multi-
(NLP) based Text Summarization A Survey” provides an document) and purpose (generic, domain-specific, or query
in-depth exploration of various methodologies employed for based). Extractive summarization selects key sentences from
automatic text summarization, focusing on both extractive and a text, while abstractive methods generate novel summaries
abstractive approaches. Extractive summarization involves se- conveying the same meaning. The paper reviews multiple
lecting important sentences or phrases directly from the source advancements, such as seq2seq models incorporating LSTM
text, whereas abstractive summarization generates new sen- and attention mechanisms for enhanced accuracy. The authors
tences, which can lead to more fluent and coherent summaries. emphasize the challenges in multi-document summarization
However, abstractive methods face significant challenges, such and the evolving role of domain knowledge in improving sum-
as natural language generation issues and the complexity of marization quality. The work highlights notable methodolo-
semantic representation, which can affect the accuracy and gies and tools, including genetic algorithms, neural networks,
fluency of generated summaries. The paper further reviews and embedding techniques, underscoring their application to
the three primary categories of techniques used in text summa- real-worlddatasets.Thesurveyconcludeswiththepotential
rization:unsupervised,supervised,andreinforcementlearning- of hybrid and advanced models in delivering concise and
based methods. Unsupervised methods, including K-Means meaningful summaries. [4]Literature Review for ”A Survey
clustering, latent variable models,and graph based approaches, on NLP Based Text Summarization for Summarizing Product
rely on extracting patterns from unlabeled data to produce Reviews” This survey explores advancements in text sum-
summaries. Supervised methods, on the other hand, leverage marization, addressing the challenge of condensing lengthy
labeled datasets and employ techniques like recurrent neural online product reviews into concise summaries using NLP. The
networks (RNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) paper categorizes summarization into extractive, abstractive,
to rank and select the most important sentences for the sum- and hybrid approaches, analyzing models such as sequence-
mary. Reinforcement learning is another promising approach to-sequence (Seq2Seq) with LSTMs and attention mecha-
that involves training models with reward mechanisms, where nisms for enhanced results. Multi-document summarization,
the model is incentivized to generate high-quality summaries. domain-specific methods, and query-based approaches are
Hybrid approaches, which combine multiple techniques, aim highlighted for their ability to manage diverse review datasets.
to address the individual limitations of each method. The The paper underscores the significance of genetic algorithms
review also highlights the use of evaluation metrics such and neural networks in achieving coherence and relevance
as ROUGE scores to assess the quality of generated sum- in summaries. The study notes the comparative simplicity
maries. Finally, the paper emphasizes the ongoing need for of extractive summarization against the complexity of ab-
more advanced models to overcome challenges, including data stractive methods, advocating hybrid techniques for improved
scarcity, issues related to anaphora and cataphora resolution, accuracy. While acknowledging advancements, it identifies
and the ultimate goal of achieving human-like summariza- opportunities for refining existing methodologies using larger
tion. The paper ”Exploring the Landscape of Automatic Text datasets and domain-specific insights. [5]The paper titled ”A
Summarization: A Comprehensive Survey” provides a detailed Survey of Automatic Text Summarization: Progress, Process,
examination of Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) meth- and Challenges” offers an exhaustive review of advancements
ods, addressing extractive, abstractive, and hybrid approaches. in automatic text summarization (ATS). It classifies ATS
[2]It traces the evolution of ATS from rule-based models methods into extractive and abstractive approaches, detailing
in the 1950s to deep learning techniques using transformer- their evolution from traditional statistical models to advanced
based architectures like GPT. Extractive techniques focus on deep learning frameworks. The paper explores various ATS
selecting key sentences, while abstractive methods generate methodologies, including fuzzy logic, neural networks, graph
new, coherent text, with hybrid approaches combining the based techniques, and pre-trained language models like BERT
strengths of both. Challenges discussed include handling large- and GPT-2. It highlights the significance of preprocessing
scale multi-document summarization, coherence issues, and techniques, feature extraction, dataset selection, showcas-
the risk of generating inaccurate summaries in abstractive ing their impact on performance metrics like ROUGE scores.
methods. The survey reviews preprocessing steps such as Challenges such as redundancy removal, semantic coherence,
text cleaning and linguistic analysis, and evaluates systems and domain-specific adaptations are addressed, with future
using metrics like ROUGE, BLEU, and F1-score. Applica- directions emphasizing hybrid models and enhanced linguistic
tions of ATS span search engines, news aggregation, and understanding. The study serves as a valuable resource for
document summarization tools like Google News and IBM
academics and professionals, synthesizing past research while volumes of textual data. It outlines text summarization as a
identifying opportunities for innovation in ATS technology. process of condensing information while preserving its mean-
[6]The paper titled ”A Survey of Automatic Text Summa- ing, emphasizing its relevance in natural language processing
rization: Progress, Process, and Challenges” offers an exhaus- (NLP). The study categorizes summarization into extractive and
tive review of advancements in automatic text summarization abstractive methods and reviews approaches such as
(ATS). It classifies ATS methods into extractive and abstractive statistical, lexical chain-based, graph-based, clustering, and
approaches, detailing their evolution from traditional statistical fuzzy logic techniques. It identifies key criteria for extracting
models to advanced deep learning frameworks. The paper sentences, including keyword significance, sentence location,
explores various ATS methodologies, including fuzzy logic, and similarity to title phrases. The paper also examines eval-
neural networks, graph based techniques, and pre-trained uation metrics, focusing on precision and recall measures.
language models like BERT and GPT-2. It highlights the Additionally, it discusses text mining applications related to
significance of preprocessing techniques, feature extraction, summarization, including spam filtering, classification, and
and dataset selection, showcasing their impact on performance clustering. Conclusively, it advocates for hybrid approaches to
metrics like ROUGE scores. Challenges such as redundancy enhance summarization performance by combining statistical
removal, semantic coherence, and domain-specific adaptations and linguistic methods, aiming for more coherent and readable
are addressed, with future directions emphasizing hybrid mod- summaries
els and enhanced linguistic understanding. The study serves as
avaluableresourceforacademicsandprofessionals,synthesiz- ing
past research while identifying opportunities for innovation in III.TEXTSUMMARIZATIONTECHNIQUES
ATS technology. [7]The reviewed paper provides a compre-
hensive study of text summarization techniques, focusing on Abstractive Summarization Abstractive methods create new
both extractive and abstractive approaches. It explores sentences to summarize content and rely on advanced NLP
machine learning methods, graph-based models, semantic techniques: Sequence-to-Sequence Models (Seq2Seq): En-
approaches, and optimization techniques to improve codes input text and decodes it into summaries using RNNs.
summarization perfor- mance. Extractive methods prioritize Transformers: Models like BERT and GPT generate coherent
sentence ranking based on features, while abstractive methods and contextually accurate summaries. Pointer-Generator Net-
leverage natural lan- guage generation for coherence. The works: Hybrid models that combine extractive and abstractive
paper emphasizes the use of ROUGE metrics to evaluate techniques for flexible summarization. Hybrid Summarization
summaries, highlighting the Hybrid summarization combines extractive and abstractive
dominanceofoptimizationmodelsinextractivesummarization methodstoleveragethestrengthsofeach,aimingformore
and semantic frameworks in abstractive summarization. It accurate, coherent summaries. By selecting key sentences
identifies challenges like redundancy, domain dependency, and through extractive techniques and rephrasing them with ab-
syntactic coherence, suggesting future advancements in stractive methods, hybrid models produce concise, contextu-
semantic understanding. This study serves as a foundational ally rich summaries. Recent advancements in neural networks,
resource for researchers aiming to enhance text summariza- particularly models like BERT and T5, have improved hy- brid
tion systems. [8]The paper titled ”Text Summarization Using summarization by integrating both techniques, ensuring
Natural Language Processing” explores text summarization relevance and fluency. Extractive Summarization Extractive
techniques leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods identify and select the most relevant parts of the
methods. It categorizes summarization into extractive and ab- input text. Common techniques include: TF-IDF: Measures the
stractive approaches. Extractive summarization identifies key importance of words relative to a document collection to
sentences, while abstractive techniques reformulate content identifykeysentences.Graph-BasedAlgorithms:Methodslike
into natural language. The study employs models like TF-IDF, TextRank rank sentences based on their relevance in a graph
K-means clustering, and Bi LSTM with attention mechanisms to structure. Clustering-Based Approaches: The task involves
extract features and generate summaries effectively. It eval- clustering similar sentences and selecting representative ones
uates various techniques, including Latent Semantic Analysis for summarization
(LSA) and Learning Free Integer Programming Summarizer ACKNOWLEDGMENT
(LFIP-SUM), highlighting their strengths in clustering and
dimensionalityreduction.ThepaperemphasizesROUGEmet- Iwouldliketoexpressmyheartfeltgratitudetoeveryone
rics for evaluating summarization quality, showing that LSA who supported me throughout the completion of this project.
and K-means clustering deliver higher performance. It also My sincere thanks to my supervisor, [M.S Priya Singh],
discusses preprocessing steps, such as tokenization and stop- for their continuous guidance, encouragement, and valuable
word removal, for improving summarization accuracy. The feedback. I also appreciate the assistance of my colleagues,
paper concludes by advocating hybrid methods combining whose insights and collaboration were invaluable, as well as
extractive and abstractive approaches to produce coherent and the resources and facilities that made this project successful.
informative summaries, addressing redundancy and enhancing Special thanks to my family and friends for their unwavering
readability. [10]The research paper explores text summariza- support and patience throughout this journey. Your encour-
tion techniques, highlighting its importance in managing large agement, belief in me, and understanding during challenging
 times have been crucial in helping me achieve this milestone.
I am truly grateful for your constant love and motivation.
REFERENCES
[1]. I. Awasthi et al., “Natural Language Processing (NLP) based
Text Summarization,” 2021.
[2]. S. Tanwar et al., “Machine Learning Adoption in Blockchain-
Based Smart Applications,” 2020.
[3]. R. Boorugu et al., “Survey on NLP-based Text Summariza-
tion for Summarizing Product Reviews,” 2020.
[4]. N. Patel et al., “Abstractive vs Extractive Text Summariza-
tion,” 2020
[5]. M. F. Mridha et al., “A Survey of Automatic Text Summa-
rization,” 2021
[6]. Prabhudas Janjanam ,d CH Pradeep Reddy,Text Summariza-
tion: An Essential Study. ”2019.
[7]. Kanithi Purna Chandu,Text Summarization Using Natural
Language Processing .”2022.
[8]. PBhagavan,VRajesh,PManoj3,NAshok,MultilingualTextSummarization
Using NLP Transformers .”2024.
[9]. b9Shohreh Rad Rahimi, Ali Toofanzaden
Mozhdehi(2017),An Overview On Extractive Text
Summarization. ”2017.
[10]. Raphal et al., ’Survey on Abstractive Text Summariza-
tion’.”2018.
[11].Tandel et al., ’Multi-document Text Summarization - A
Survey’ .”2016.Chatterjee et al., ’Single Document Extractive
Text Summarization Using Genetic Algorithms’ .”2012
[12].V.Gupta,G.S Lehal,”A survey of Text Mining Techniques in
Web Intelligence,Vol.1,no.1,2009.
[13]. G.O. Makbule,”Text Summerization using Latent Sementic
Analysis”,M.S thesis,Middle East Technical University.2018
Raphal et al., ’Survey on Abstractive Text Summariza-
tion’.”2018.