Scribd
Upload
9 views6 pages

Tutorial - 9 Q1 - Mohd Izzuddin Syahmi

The document contains a detailed stability analysis for a wall structure, including calculations for active soil pressure, overturning moments, sliding forces, and settlement checks. It also outlines the required reinforcement specifications and shear calculations to ensure structural integrity. Overall, the analysis confirms that the wall design meets safety requirements against overturning, sliding, and cracking.

Uploaded by

Najib Rosdi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views6 pages

Tutorial - 9 Q1 - Mohd Izzuddin Syahmi

The document contains a detailed stability analysis for a wall structure, including calculations for active soil pressure, overturning moments, sliding forces, and settlement checks. It also outlines the required reinforcement specifications and shear calculations to ensure structural integrity. Overall, the analysis confirms that the wall design meets safety requirements against overturning, sliding, and cracking.

Uploaded by

Najib Rosdi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Usafe

Usoil ①

Cnom

a)

kN/M
95

·
· >34.65
·

137.45 ②
· >

okN/m,
<
&

- >
44.22kN/m" ③ A
·

Active Soil Pressure, P:(UH + W/kc

0.33
=
KC:1.sinx:1-sin30:

I+sin 0 1+sin 30

"

= p. 17H 15)0.33:5.61H 4.95


+ +

At H Om=
< 4.95kN/m>

AtH =
6.4m <
40.85kN/m'
AtH:7m > 44.22kN/m"
Stability Analysis
Lupusense) pushb
Moment Point
ACkNm)
at
Element Load (kN) Lever Arm (m)

Wall

1. (0.5 x 0.35 x 6.4x1m width) x25:28 1,53 42.84


2
I
2. 10.25 x 6.4x/mwidth) x25 :40 1.78 71.2

(4) 3. (0.5X5xIm width) 25


x :75 2.50 187.5
3

Soil (1) (6.4x3.) x/mwidth) 17 x


-337.28 3.45 1163.62

Surcharge (1) (3.1x/mwidth) 15


x :46.5 3.45 160.43

Active Pressure
·

Surcharge (t) 4.95x(7 Im width)


x
34.65 3.5 121.28
·

Soil (t) 0.5x (44.22- 4.95/x(7X1mwidth):137.45 2.33 320.26

Permanent -
320.26 1465. 16

Moment, M Variable
-
121.28 160.43

Permanent:480.28
Total Vertical Load, Va Variable 46.5
:
3 favourable

Permanent:137.45 unfavourable
Horizontal Load, Hi Variable 34.65
3

1. StabilityAgainst Overtuning (at point Al :

Restrain
& Overturning
Check 0.9(1V,x) > Of Hiy

i)
Overturning Moment:(1.10 x 320.6) + (1.50 x 121.28):534.21kNm

ii) Restraining Moment:(0.90 x1465.16) 10 x


+

160.43) >1318.64kNm

Overturning
:
Moment <
Restraining Moment > OK!

2. Sliding

Check a (1.08Vk) = Uf Hp

i)
Sliding Force:(1.35 x 137.45) (1.5 +
x 34.65):237.53kN

ii) Friction Force:0.5 (1.0x480.28) (0 x 46.5) +


:240. 14kN

:Sliding Force Friction Force => OK!


3. Settlement

&
EVk:480.28 46.5:526.78kN +

M 320.26 121.28
= + -

(1465.16 +160.43): 1184.05kNm ("

vi
↑ a

in ↑
-
x:

2Vk
M = 1180.05:2.25m
526.78

y)
<

Eccentricity, 5.2.25 =0.25m B16:0.83


B
B(2 -n
=

e.
=

No negative pressure

A:BX1.0mwidth:5x 1.0:5m//m width

B/2 :5/2:2.5m
y:
1 1.8x
=
B3 :1.0x(5"/2):10.42 mm4
12

Bearing Pressure, q: SN IS.


My
:526.78 + 52678x0.25x2.5:105.36131.6
5 10,42

3 soilbearing
ga-min: fs kN/mc
200 feet
capacity, at

Element Design

1.
kN/M
95

· >34.65

·
&
> 137.45

40.85kN/m)
< -

↓
44.22kN/m" ·
- >

HEE L TOE

5 Xx +1 X

136.95
Soil,seeingare
-

x x
= -

73.76 73.76
L

5 3.1 3.1
-
0
t
=

112.94 136.95
120.51

x 112.94
=

(0.6x25):75

:11+ 1 t <
Base ofwall

16.4x17) 15:/23.8
+ Soil &
Surcharge

an
↓
-
V 25.86
105.52
65.04
121.95
b) MainReinforcement

n 600mm,
=

b 1000mm
=

Effective depth, d:h -c-0.50bar =600 -

50 -

0.5(12) 54'mn
=

i) Wall Stem

Mab
1.5, 4.95x
6.47] 1.35[(40.85 4.957x64 64 1
=
+ -

:
482.92kNm/m

k MEd
=

:482.92410 0.058
=

knd=0.157

fckb() 30x1000X SNY

:Compression reinforcement isNOT


required

i) z
d(0.5 k/1.54)] (0.25-
=

d(0.5 (0.25-005/1.Bu)]
-
+

:0.95d < 0.95d

As
req:
MEA 513.98 *100:2286.31mmYm
0.87fukz 0.87(780) (0.95 x544)

Broxicle H12-15(As=4520 mm/m)

iii Toe

Mac 1.35
105.52 (57] 1.35[(121.95. 10552!X1.3 7 1.3)
x
=
x +

:132.87kNm/m

k =

MEd :13287 110 0.014


=

knd= 0.157

fckb() 30x1000X SNY

:Compression reinforcement isNOT


required

i) z
d(0.5 (0.25-
k/1.By)]
=

d(0.5 10.25
004/1.Bu)]
-
-
+

0.99d> 0.95d = 7:use8.95d

As MEA :132.87 +100:591.04 mmYm


req:
0.87fukz 0.87(780) (0.95 x544)

Broxicle H12-175 (As 646 mm/m)


=
iii) Heel

Mbd 1.35
/25.8 317] 1.35[(65.04 25.8!x3") 7x3.1]
= -
x +

=337.18 kNm/m

k= MEd :337.18 10 x =
0.038 knd=0.157

fckb() 30x1000X SNY

:Compression reinforcement isNOT


required

i) z
d(0.5 (0.25-
k/1.By)]
=

d(0.5 (0.25-0.038/
1.Bu)]
-
+

0.95d > 0.95d = 7:use8.95d

As MEA S37.18 *100:1494.80


mmYm
reg:
0.87fukz 0.87(780) (0.95 x544)

Broxicle H12-75(As 1508mm/m) =

Asmin
fin) 0.2029)d=0.001560
0.26
=

bd =
<
0.003bd

:
Asmin:0.0015 (1000) (544):816mm / m

Asmax 0.04A):0.0464 0.04x1000 x 600


=
=

:24800mm"

Provide seconding Bar H12-12.5:905mmlm)

Shear
i) Wall

1.50[4.95x6.4] 1.357144.22 1.95)x 6.4/] 217.17kN/M


=

Vab
+
-
=

Vas=1.35/111.95 185.52) 1.312 + x


:199.6 EN/M

Vid: 1.35/65.04 + 25.86) x


3.1/2 :190.2/kN/m

:VEd 117. 17kN/M


=

x 1
=
1
100:1.81(2.0)
=
+
+

p. Acl :
:1508 0.0028(<0.02)
bd 1000 x 544
Vmdc:[0.12k(100p. f(k)"3]bd
:[0.12 (1.61) (100 0.0028x30)"3] (1000 504)
3
x
x x x 10
=

113.65kN

Umin [0.035k" f(k]bd


=

[0.035 (1.61)"12 50] (1000 x544)


x
10
+

:
213.04 kN

VEd (217. 17kN) > Vmin (113.04)

Not OK. Need Use


redesign. bigger diameter bar
=>
to

Cracking 600mms comm

(M1))Asireq Nquaset
f=

(500) 2286.3 O

:
131.95N/mm"

For
design crackwidth
0.3mm:

Maximum allowable bar


spacing:300mm

Wall:25mm <300mm

Toe:75mm <300mm

Heel:75mm <300mm

:Cracking OK

You might also like