lecture4
lecture4
random vectors
multiple r v
joint distributions
conditional distributions
conditional expectation
IE FiiIItiE
Pxy lx.ge P X
T xandY y
ZPxylx.TT
Px lxl
M EIP X
xi.xmx.kz Xn
Likewise the joint cmf 1 R 0,1 is defined
msn.net
random vectors
iiiii ei t
The expectation is taken over the joint pmf
1 glx.ME
Pxcx.y g x.g
g ZW aztbw
IE ax̅ bY ax x
by Pxy y
a x b ypxycx.ly
xp y y
EE
aIE x̅
É Effie
belR
bIE Y a
t.at
IIIIII
IEEI amans
and the
ou X2 X Var X2
Cov x̅ E
anti varix
all i.e M MT
By property 2 covariance matrices are
symmetric
m
ii iEEEI
msn.it i
t.FI
properties of variance
i i
i f
For simplicity of notation let x̅
m.am
x̅ E X
var E E x̅
E E x̅
E ÉE x̅
E E x̅ E E x̅ x̅ which is the
desired result
as probability PCBIA for two
events A BE F This notion can be extended more generally to v.v s
s.t IP x 0 is pyx
o x
IP Y 11
pyx.ly x y1X x
probability
IE YI x̅ y Pay y x̅
2
Pyaly IP Y y A I YA y Pya y A
Many of the usual expectation properties we've seen before also hold
for the conditional expectation For example
For function g IR IR I g Y A g y Pata y A
any
LawofTotalExpectation i.fr partition A of 1
this v.v
EE
EIE
sEnII
profo simply
IE IE YI x̅ IE Y Px x
x x
y pyyx.ly px
I y Pxe g Elt
IELY E Y1x̅ x P x̅ x
Def The conditionalvariance of given x̅ is
Var Y x̅ IE Y IELY x̅ x̅
conditioning on
knowing x̅ and using IE YI x̅ as the center
tii
for you
eaia
proof exercise
Independencer
With a
way to describe multiple v.v s we are now ready to talk
about their independence
This is similar to the concept of two events being independent of each other
the events and A must be independent events xeR
i l
É
Alternatively
É
ÉÉ
ÉÉÉÉ f
74 in
y
I
ii t.FI i
itti
independent
if the following holds
H
ifi.IT
e
ii t
Lemma If X Y are independent v.v s then E
ELXEfTT
T
proof IE XY xyPxy x
y
xypxCXPy.ly
XP x YPy.ly ELXTECY
independence of X Y implies
IE g X h Y IE g X E h Y
at tY varcx ar
proof exercise for y1
Mutal independence of multiple r.v s x̅ In follow similar formulas
Px Xi Xn Px Xi Pyn Xn s
Px Xii Xn x
Var X Xn n Var X
where x̅ has the same distribution as each x̅ and was defined
so that we can remove the subscript Sometimes it is conventional
to write x̅ X