Scribd
Upload
13 views1 page

Criteria For Grading

The document outlines the grading criteria for a miniature project with mathematical applications in the Senior High School Department at the University of Saint Anthony. It details the weight of different components: workmanship (30%), mathematical application (35%), oral defense (25%), and creativity (10%). Each category includes specific criteria for evaluation, emphasizing artistic quality, accuracy, understanding, and innovation.

Uploaded by

elrodjosh350
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
13 views1 page

Criteria For Grading

The document outlines the grading criteria for a miniature project with mathematical applications in the Senior High School Department at the University of Saint Anthony. It details the weight of different components: workmanship (30%), mathematical application (35%), oral defense (25%), and creativity (10%). Each category includes specific criteria for evaluation, emphasizing artistic quality, accuracy, understanding, and innovation.

Uploaded by

elrodjosh350
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY

(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)


City of Iriga

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT


__________________________________________________________________

MINIATURE WITH MATHEMATICAL APPLICATION


Criteria for Grading

Workmanship – 30%

 with artistic quality and careful planning(10 Points)

 with accurate measurements (10 points)

 worth the time, effort and expenses incurred in constructing (10


points)

Mathematical Application – 35%

 conic sections are complete: circle, parabola, ellipse, hyperbola


(10 points)

 mathematical computations/equations are accurate (10 points)

 properties and parts of the conic sections are reflected in the


output (10 points)

 level of mathematical application exceeds expectations (5


points)

Oral Defense – 25%

 presenters provide logical and substantial response to questions


given (10 points)

 presenters demonstrate excellent understanding of the concept


(10 points)

 presentation is smooth and organized (5 points)

Creativity – 10%

 shows innovativeness in concept development (5 points)

 shows uniqueness (5 points)

Total

You might also like