Deployment Management - ITIL 4 Practice Guide
Deployment Management - ITIL 4 Practice Guide
This document provides practical guidance for the deployment management practice.
Table of Contents
1. About this document
2. General information
7. Important reminder
8. Acknowledgements
the practice’s processes and activities and their roles in the service value chain
2. General information
Key message
The practice is usually applied to digital and physical IT components, including software,
hardware, documentation, licences, and data, within the agreed scope of environments
controlled by the organization.
Definition: Environment
A service component’s lifecycle may vary depending on its type and the sourcing
approach. The number and purpose of controlled environments within the organization
may also vary. Table 2.1 provides a list of example environments for an organization that
develops software.
Environment Purpose
Development/Integration Developing and integrating software
Continuous integration Integrating, building, and testing code within the software
development environment.
Continuous delivery Continuous delivery means that built software can be released
to production at any time. Frequent deployments are possible, but deployment
decisions are taken case by case, usually because organizations prefer a slower rate
of deployment.
2.3 SCOPE
The scope of the deployment management practice includes:
the effective removal of products, services, and service components from designated
environments.
new features/releases
support/troubleshooting
service requests.
Several activities and areas of responsibility are not included in the deployment
management practice, although hey are still closely related to deployment. These are
listed in Table 2.2, along with references to the practices in which they can be found. It is
important to remember that ITIL practices are merely collections of tools to use in the
context of value streams; they should be combined as necessary, depending on the
situation.
Table 2.2 Deployment-related activities described in
other practice guides
Testing and validating services and service Service validation and testing
components
A PSF is more than a task or activity, as it includes components of all four dimensions of
service management. The nature of the activities and resources of PSFs within a practice
may differ, but together they ensure that the practice is effective.
Models can be defined for deploying services or service components of similar types.
Such deployment models could be defined based on several factors, including:
automation considerations
costs/resource limitations
Based on these and other relevant considerations, organizations define a set of models
for the deployment of different service components. These models may describe
different solutions in all four dimensions of service management. Table 2.3 outlines some
example models.
These models may be flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances, such as the
scale, urgency, or complexity of the deployment.
The effectiveness and efficiency of the deployment is significantly dependent on, and
can be considerably impacted by, the availability of the relevant resources, skills,
technology, tools and infrastructure. The effective use of technology and automation in
deployment can improve the consistency, agility, and efficiency of the practice.
The success of service moves depends on the effective and efficient management of
changes and releases, which in turn depends on timely deployments that align with
requirements and objectives. Alignment of the deployment to the change and release
requirements, as well as key aspects such as schedule and cost, must be managed
effectively.
Key metrics for deployment management practice are mapped to its PSFs. They can be
used as KPIs in the context of value streams to assess the contribution of deployment
management to the effectiveness and efficiency of those value streams. Some examples
of key metrics are given in Table 2.4.
Timeliness/adherence to deployments
schedule
The correct aggregation of metrics into complex indicators will make it easier to use the
data for the ongoing management of value streams, and for the periodic assessment and
continual improvement of the deployment management practice. There is no single best
solution. Metrics will be based on the overall service strategy and priorities of an
organization, as well as on the goals of the value streams to which the practice
contributes.
Definition: Process
deployment
Deployment After the item has been installed, a The version control system
verification series of tests is performed to confirm sends notifications to the
the equipment is functioning. change requestor, such as a
The staff performing the installation product owner, when the
notifies those who triggered the deployment is complete.
deployment of the deployment
results.
This process includes the activities listed in Table 3.4 and transforms the inputs into
outputs:
Policies and
regulatory
requirements
Release information
Activity Description
Deployment model The deployment manager arranges for appropriate pipeline tools
implementation to be configured to support the new model, such as access
settings, code support, or branching procedures. Alternatively, if
automated deployment tools are not applicable, the deployment
manager establishes and communicates
adequate guidelines to the teams and parties involved.
Deployment model The deployment manager tests the new deployment model to
testing ensure proper edge-case handling and workflow. Where testing
is impossible, the deployment manager oversees the first of the
model’s live runs.
Deployments The deployment manager, together with service owners and
review and other relevant stakeholders, performs a review of selected
deployment failure deployments or deployment failures. They identify opportunities
records analysis for the optimization of deployment
models and deployment procedures.
Roles are described in the context of processes and activities. Each role is characterized
with a competency profile based on the model shown in Table 4.1.
planning deployments
planning, coordinating, and ensuring the availability of the resources needed for the
effective completion of deployments
managing and/or ensuring effective interfaces between and coordination with other
practices and stakeholders
acquiring, maintaining, and continually improving the skills and capabilities required
for technical aspects of deployments
In some organizational contexts, the deployment practitioner role can be divided into
multiple categories and levels based on the types and requirements of the deployments
and platforms, the complexity of organization’s products and services, and so on.
Deployment
process
deployment communications
deployment plans
This information may take various forms. The key inputs and outputs of the practice are
listed in Section 3.
Where automation is possible and effective for deployment, it may involve the solutions
outlined in Table 5.1.
Deployment management and its PSFs can be enabled and enhanced through selective
and judicial sourcing in many forms, including those outlined in Table 6.1.
7. Important reminder
Most of the content of the practice guides should be taken as a suggestion of areas that
an organization might consider when establishing and nurturing their own practices.
The practice guides are catalogues of topics that organizations might think about, not a
list of answers. When using the content of the practice guides, organizations should
always follow the ITIL guiding principles:
focus on value
start where you are
More information on the guiding principles and their application can be found in section
4.3 of ITIL Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition.
8. Acknowledgements
AXELOS Ltd is grateful to everyone who has contributed to the development of this
guidance. These practice guides incorporate an unprecedented level of enthusiasm and
feedback from across the ITIL community. In particular, AXELOS would like to thank the
following:
8.1 AUTHORS
Vinod Kumar Agrasala, Roman Jouravlev, Konstantin Naryzhny.
8.2 REVIEWERS
Jon Hall, Anton Lykov, Samantha Robertson, Oleg Skrynnik.
Sign up